Slashdot Mirror


New RIAA/MPAA "Customary Historic Use" Plan

Random_Transit writes "Ars Technica is reporting that the EFF has dug up plans by the RIAA/MPAA to stifle the consumer electronics market by replacing it's "fair use" policy with something called "Customary Historic Use". This new policy would effectively keep anyone from inventing any new type of media device without the RIAA/MPAA's say-so."

10 of 444 comments (clear)

  1. Is anyone here an Oregon voter? by MaelstromX · · Score: 5, Informative

    Please contact your lamebrained Senator to let him know what you think of the bill he's introducing.

  2. Fair Use isn't an RIAA policy. by jcr · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's a doctrine of copyright law, which the RIAA and its predecessors have always fought against.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  3. Lovely. by Jaazaniah · · Score: 5, Informative

    When technology first came along and swept music into our lives, it did so en mass. Further broadening the broadcasts will cost someone, that's for sure, but locking codecs into laws, linking ridiculous software patents to laws that won't expire without being smited by a judge with common sense? Here's a funny story. When Phillips and Sony finalized Red Book in 1979, it was done based off another technology source, Laserdiscs. If someone tried that today, they would be swamped by roughly 30 letters of patent infringment warnings, and if this law passes a startup that builds it's own machine (and for arguement's sake avoids stepping on toes) based on HD broadcasts would get slapped with a violation of this new ridiculous bill. (by way of bypassing the Customary Historic Use hardware regulations) Not only is this a blatant slap in the face for creativity in business, but it is also a "Pay to use our patented broadcast flag technology in your hardware or get sued for not doing so anyways!"

    And just so I don't fire people up without giving them an outlet, here's some useful links. We need to hound the government EN MASS to get this proposal squashed.

    Contact List
    U.S. Chamber of Commerce - This law is anti-competitive for the above reasons (and likely more). Let them know.

    State-sorted contact list of state senators - Can you write effectively, and do you want to make a difference? Go here and DO it. There's no reason to sit idle if you, as a citizen here, have an objection. Get others to do it too. Send them the link. Mass email it, mail in an old fashioned petition. Senators don't read Slashdot, and don't consult geeks unless it involves upgrading computers. Go here.

  4. Re:20 years or bust by stud9920 · · Score: 5, Informative
    and you want to buy "A Clockwork Orange" only to find out it's blocked by your country for being subversive or obscene (like England did)
    like england did not. Some copycat crimes happened in the UK, Stanley Kubrick, in no way linked to her majesty's government, retired the film in the UKuntil he died.
  5. Downloading in Holland by tsa · · Score: 2, Informative

    In my country (The Netherlands) downloading for your own use is legal (sorry - the links you get are mostly in Dutch). I hope it stays this way for a long time; this prevents moronic laws as the one described in the article to enter Europe for a long time to come. Hopefully.

    --

    -- Cheers!

  6. Re:Oy by Metasquares · · Score: 3, Informative

    4b. Bill gets tacked on to other unrelated bill and is passed because everyone thinks they're improving hopitals or something by passing that second bill.

  7. Controlling ADC by tepples · · Score: 2, Informative

    ADCs are used amost anywhere any sensor would get used to convert voltages to numbers.

    But it might be a violation to sell a bare ADC circuit with a bandwidth of 32 kHz or greater and an SNR of 60 dB or greater without a business license.

    1. Re: Controlling ADC by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 2, Informative
      But it might be a violation to sell a bare ADC circuit with a bandwidth of 32 kHz or greater and an SNR of 60 dB or greater without a business license.


      Two words: black market.


      Alternatively, sell measuring instruments that are very easy to convert to audio input devices. With high enough demand, digital oscilloscopes with USB interface will become dirt cheap.

  8. Re:Obligatory Anti-copyright rant by typicallyterrific · · Score: 2, Informative

    3. You can get a job with a larger company and be a salaried artist.

    Do I really even need to dissect this idea? A salaried artist? I can imagine the societal and artistic value of the creations produced by such a system.


    I don't know whether you're being sarcastic or not, but it seems Bach fared alright (they were called court musicians back in the day). Same deal with Mozart's earlier career working for the archbishop of Salzburg and pretty much every single Rennaisance artist.

    Art has *never* been untainted by some form of commercial venue.

  9. Re:post-mp3 by Mal-2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    MP3s *can* sound bad, but that is almost always due to over-compression, bad settings (such as mismatched sample rates), encoders that can't handle certain conversions well, etc. I'm quite certain you can make an AAC or WMA suck just as bad. Any lossy format (audio or otherwise) can turn an input file to mush if it's set up to do that. The problem is that computers aren't smart enough to say "These settings will sound like shit. Continue? Y/N". Then the person hosting the file either has a tin ear, or has never listened to it, or perhaps just can't find any better rip, and it propagates.

    Mal-2

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.