Slashdot Mirror


Wealthy 'Cryonauts' Put Assets on Ice

Carl Bialik writes "'You can't take it with you. So Arizona resort operator David Pizer has a plan to come back and get it,' the Wall Street Journal reports. Pizer is one of about about 1,000 members of the "cryonics" movement who plan to put their bodies on ice soon after death so that in the future, medical advances can save them. A small, wealthy subset of these cryonauts is exploring ways to leave their money to themselves. 'With the help of an estate planner, Mr. Pizer has created legal arrangements for a financial trust that will manage his roughly $10 million in land and stock holdings until he is re-animated,' the Journal reports. 'Mr. Pizer says that with his money earning interest while he is frozen, he could wake up in 100 years the richest man in the world.'"

72 of 538 comments (clear)

  1. Or.... by suso · · Score: 5, Funny

    he could wake up in 100 years the richest man in the world

    Or he could wake up in 300 years in sick bay with no money at all.

    1. Re:Or.... by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 3, Funny

      I was wondering if anyone would even want to waste the time to revive him at all. The world could be too overpopulated, or they could be fed up with cryonauts. Or the economy could have shifted so much he has no current currency.

      Or he could wake up in 30 years, travel back in time, start a company to rival his first one, get frozen again, wake up 30 years later (again), marry someone who was a kid when he knew her before, and live happily ever after on the royalties from both his competing companies.

    2. Re:Or.... by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...or he could wake up in 300 million years, only to discover that Cockroaches do not USE currency.

      --

      help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

    3. Re:Or.... by Bald+Wookie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "First one to revive me gets half my fortune."

      The upside is that your remaining money must be worth something, since it was a large enough bounty to bring about your revival.

    4. Re:Or.... by KDR_11k · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think H.G. Wells's The Sleeper Awakes came out a BIt earlier than that Futurama episode...

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    5. Re:Or.... by yo_tuco · · Score: 3, Funny

      "He could never wake up, and $10M will sit for eternity accruing interest"

      Nah, not too soon in the future, people will start getting e-mails that say something to the effect:


      Dear Mr Foobar

      I represent the financial estate of a Mr David Pizer. I manage approximately $10M USD of a frozen Mr Pizer and his account. I'm giving you, of all people, an exclusive opportunity to share a 70/30 cut of this large sum of wasted, frozen money. But you must act fast! 419 other people were given this same offer to become rich over night without having to do ANYTHING!

      All you have to do...

      Please, Mr. Foobar, you must maintain absolute confidentiality to ensure success...

      Sincerely,
      Mr. Scamee Nigerianez

    6. Re:Or.... by Jim+Hall · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or he could wake up in 300 years in sick bay with no money at all.

      Wasn't there a Niven short story on this topic? I don't have the reference handy, but a guy with some terminal disease had his body frozen, expecting that a future generation would thaw him out when a cure had been discovered.

      Thing was, he was revived thousands of years later, and while they had long since found a cure for his disease, he suddenly found himself with no money or rights. Hundreds of years before, the courts had established it was unfair to the economy (I think) to let a clinically dead person retain a bank account (which was still accumulating compound interest) and so had those accounts turned over to the State. Similarly, it was decided a dead person has no rights, as he has not participated in government.

      So this guy wakes up to discover he's being tested/trained to be a space pilot, by way of paying back his debt to society. Or something.

      Kind of puts a new perspective on things: What makes you so darn sure that future generations will want to thaw you out, and why should you expect to just pick up where you left off?

  2. You read it here first by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Three words for you my friends: tax evasion scam.
    Good night.

    1. Re:You read it here first by Cutriss · · Score: 4, Funny

      Like Hotblack Desiato?

      --
      "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
    2. Re:You read it here first by Al+Mutasim · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It does seem to be a way to avoid estate taxes. However, I doubt most people are doing it for this reason. The article suggests that the "so-called dynasty trusts" are typically used to "pay out funds to a person's children, grandchildren and future generations" and do not need to have anything to do with cryogenics. You can get the tax scam without the cryo.

      These people are doing it to avoid the dread of death. I don't think it should be legal. What if everyone who died just tied up their assets this way? We would have a "Trustee Economy" (you read it here first). This would not be good. Trustees are not motivated to optimize the use of assets the way owners are.

  3. What will actually happen is..... by EGSonikku · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Duh, he'll just wake up in a few hundred years after his consciousness is transferred into the memrouy wiped body of a convict, and recieve RNA memory injections and learn to pilot interstellar world seeding ships.

    --
    - "Scientia non habet inimicum nisp ignorantem"
  4. Old joke... by SiliconEntity · · Score: 5, Funny

    David Pizer wakes up in the future and calls his accountant to find out how his account is doing. "Good news!" the man says. "Your ten million dollars has grown to almost one billion dollars!" David is ecstatic and they talk a minute more. Suddenly the phone chimes. "Please deposit one hundred million dollars for the next three minutes..."

  5. Before any says... by Eightyford · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Before anyone says that this guy is greedy and should give the money to charity, I'd like to point out that there's little chance that he will come back to life unthawed, and if he doesn't spend the money it makes us all just a tiny bit richer.

    1. Re:Before any says... by c_forq · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The banks yes, but also everyone that uses the same currency as him. Taking that much money out of circulation should help increase the value of the bills in your wallet right now.

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    2. Re:Before any says... by Eightyford · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The banks yes, but also everyone that uses the same currency as him. Taking that much money out of circulation should help increase the value of the bills in your wallet right now.

      Bingo! I had a friend once who saw the movie Dead Presidents and he could not understand that printing money and giving it away would be a bad thing. On a side note, I was shocked recently when I found out that the US government or Alan Greenspan or whatever does this very thing.

    3. Re:Before any says... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The banks yes, but also everyone that uses the same currency as him. Taking that much money out of circulation should help increase the value of the bills in your wallet right now.

      Pfff! 10 million is infinitessimal in relation to even the minted and coined (M0) money supply (AKA "cash"), which is itself already fairly small in comparison to the full (M3) money supply as a whole. On top of that the value of the money supply is additionally at the mercy of a myriad of external forces. In the larger scheme of things, this guy's "fortune" is actually as meaningless as his plans to keep it forever.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  6. STTNG by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Reminds me of the Star Trek Next Generation episode where they wake up people who were frozen. The doc cured them, and one guy wanted to check on his stocks. They thought he was nuts, because why would you need stocks when you could just ask the replicator for anything you wanted?

    --
    Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    1. Re:STTNG by MBGMorden · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Unfortuneatly for our "real" situation makers of everything from candy bars to bath soap would cry foul if replicators were ever invented. "Pirates" would be trading templates for items all over the place, but the technology would be villified beyond belief.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    2. Re:STTNG by MagicDude · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The food replicators actually make sense, even if they are more energy intensive than cooking your own food. The replicators mean you don't have to keep large food stores on the ship which can rot. I don't know for certain what the stock material for the food replication is, but I'd imagine it's easily stored in small areas, and with the same material can be used to make steaks or self-sealing-stembolts, so it's very utilitarian. You also get a large variety of meals that can be prepared, which can help keep morale up on long missions, compared to how the crew would feel about having their selection of 6 flavors of rehyrdated gruel 3 times a day. There's also the part of not needing kitchen facilities or cooking personel on the ship. We've all seen how the Enterprise is a ship full of officers and no enlisted personel. Consider that most of the menial tasks on the Enterprise are automated; cooking, cleaning (The enterprise has been called a "self cleaning ship" in a few episodes), probably other things like laundry and stuff too. I'm don't have any experience with naval operations, but I think that modern ships have mainly enlisted men doing all the drugdery necessary for ship operations like cooking cleaning, and the like. With the enterprise having those things automated, they need fewer enlisted and thus have room for more officers for things like the dozen or so science departments on the enterprise.

  7. Comical ethics of advance technology... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There was a horror comic in the early 80's that has a story that I still remember.

    A rich man who was dying had enough money to develop the technology to put himself on ice until medical technology was advance enough to cure his disease. He wakes up about 50 years later to find out that medical technology did indeed advance greatly over the years. But there was no cure for his disease. Instead, he was revived so the doctors could harvest his limbs for the veterans of the last World War who lost their arms and legs. Since he was beyond cure, the doctors figured his limbs were still useful to humanity. Advance technology rendered the rich man a basketcase.

    1. Re:Comical ethics of advance technology... by RickPartin · · Score: 4, Funny

      Thanks for spoiling an obscure movie from the 80's that I've never of and will never watch. Jerk.

    2. Re:Comical ethics of advance technology... by morcheeba · · Score: 2

      Oh, he didn't mention the most shocking part of the move. Those limbs? THEY'RE MADE FROM PEOPLE!!!

  8. Rule against perpetuities by Peyna · · Score: 5, Informative

    The rule against perpetuities should probably stop this in most states. The point of it is to keep property from being tied up and being useless for long periods of time. I think it's probably a moot point until they actually manage to unthaw someone and then keep them alive for more than a second or two.

    --
    What?
    1. Re:Rule against perpetuities by Elminst · · Score: 2, Funny

      Rule against perpetuities??

      Then how do you explain the f'ed up Copyright system??

      --
      No unauthorized use. Trespassers will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
    2. Re:Rule against perpetuities by CmdrPorno · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Do you have any idea what you are talking about? The rule against perpetuities applies to future interests in any property--land, objects, or money. Upon your death, you can not set up a trust to devise all of your estate to your descendants 200 years down the line, none of whom have been born yet.

      link

      --
      Sent from my iPhone
    3. Re:Rule against perpetuities by agibbs · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The rule against perpetuities, in most states, has an exemption for reversions to the original grantor. Furthermore, the original grantor fills in all the gaps created by grants that violate the rule against perpetuities. This means that it would present no bar to a person's estate retaining money even hundreds of years in the future. That said it would likely raise some very interesting legal issues.

      Furthermore, many states have recently effectively eviserated the old common law rule against perpetuities so, while it is an interesting and mind bending exercise for first-year law students, there is little real applicability of it today (or so my Property professor told me...)

  9. Doubtful legality by Raindance · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd suspect that the legal status of someone that's, well, legally dead would be rather iffy. And for good reason- why should we set aside economic power for inactive (and potentially never-to-be active) members of our society? I think the burden of proof that this should be possible lies on them.

    There's also things such as Adverse Possession that could throw a wrench into things. I'd recommend that any 'cryonauts' conceive of any post-death, pre-revival arrangements to be tentative at best.

    1. Re:Doubtful legality by timeOday · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I'd suspect that the legal status of someone that's, well, legally dead would be rather iffy.
      I'm reminded of the Pharoahs of Egypt, who wanted so badly to "take it with them" that they were buried with great riches and even their own (living) servants. Fast forward a few thousand years to the explorers/theives who plundered the remains. There nobody around to protect whatever ownership rights the mummies thought they had over their loot.

      All I can say is, let it go. You don't own anything in perpetuity, not even the water and dirt your body is made of.

  10. Family members by RedWizzard · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This scheme was mentioned in at least one of Niven's books. It didn't work - surviving family members took the estate to court to get at their rightful inheritance. I think that's a pretty likely outcome. Another likely outcome is that the estate management will embezzle it (it's not like you can watch them closely when you're dead). It's also possible the government might decide to seize it, if it's a tempting enough target.

    1. Re:Family members by pmancini · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The estate could claim that his state of inanimation does not constitute death and that the freezing process is part of a long medical procedure.

      Of course his greedier heirs would then have themselves frozen with orders to be revived when he wakes or is declared dead!

  11. H.G. Wells did it by 246o1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    In "When the Sleeper Wakes," a guy is in a coma for a thousand years, wakes up and his money has taken over the world. Highly recommend it, but that's because I like Wells a lot.

    --
    Although the moon is smaller than the earth, it is farther away.
  12. Meanwhile in Applied Cyrogenics ... by slashbob22 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Terry: Welcome to the world of tomorrow!
    Lou: Why do you always have to say it that way?
    Terry: Haven't you ever heard of a little thing called showmanship? Come, your destiny awaits!"

    Futurama Pilot

    --
    Proof by very large bribes. QED.
  13. Don't forget to turn off the light! (Red Dwarf) by Artega+VH · · Score: 5, Funny

    Reminds me of this little sequence from Red Dwarf:

    Holly: They're from the NorWEB Federation.
    Lister: What's that?
    Holly: NorthWestern Electricity Board. They want you, Dave.
    Lister: Me? Why? What for?
    Holly: For your crimes against humanity.
    Lister: You what?!
    Holly: Seems when you left Earth, three million years ago, you left two half-eaten German sausages on a plate in your kitchen.
    Lister: Did I?
    Holly: You know what happens to sausages left unattended for three million years?
    Lister: Yeh, they go mouldy.
    Holly: Your sausages, Dave, now cover seven-eighths of the Earth's surface. Also, you left seventeen pounds, fifty pence in your bank account. Thanks to compound interest you now own 98% of all the world's wealth. And because you hoarded it for three million years, nobody's got any money except for you and NorWEB.
    Lister: Why NorWEB?
    Holly: You left a light on in the bathroom. I've got a final demand here for one hundred and eighty billion pounds.
    Lister: A hundred and eighty billion pounds!! You're kidding!
    Holly, wearing glasses, nose and moustache: April Fool.
    Lister: But it's not April!
    Holly: Yeah, I know. But I can't be waiting six months with a red-hot jape like that underneath me hat.

    --
    groklaw, wired and slashdot. The holy trinity of work based time wasting.
  14. Scary by tmandry · · Score: 5, Funny

    You can't take it with you. So Arizona resort operator David Pizer has a plan to come back and get it.

    Does anyone else think this sounds like a bad horror movie?

  15. You don't have to be rich. by f1r3br4nd · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Perhaps rich people are the ones worrying about preserving their assets for the future, but I don't want people to get the impression that you have to be rich to be a cryonicist.

    That mistaken assumption is what caused me to take so long to take the plunge.

    I'm a grad student, I make 20k/year, and I have a cryo contract. As a full-time student I pay $199 annually and my life insurance policy ($90k coverage) premiums cost about $1k per annually. If I wanted to, I could have taken out a term life insurance policy and I'd be paying in the low hundreds, but since by definition this is an arrangement you'd want to make for the duration of your life, I thought it would be better to lock in a good whole life insurance rate while I'm still young and healthy. Plus my policy has a safety margin of $10k over the $80k neurosuspension fee.

    And that's me, a starving PhD student. Some of you people with real jobs can fund your cryo policy, and toss some money into a trust fund for yourself, and have some left over for charity and heirs.

    Cryonics is a long-shot, but unlike many other beliefs about life after death, it doesn't contradict the observed laws of physics. I don't ridicule those beliefs or take any action to restrict them, no matter how alien to my way of thinking they may seem. I therefore expect a free and pluralistic society to reciprocate this courtesy toward my own beliefs.

    1. Re:You don't have to be rich. by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Perhaps rich people are the ones worrying about preserving their assets for the future, but I don't want people to get the impression that you have to be rich to be a cryonicist.

      Maybe not, but the OP has a point: if and when you wake up, will it do you much good to wake up a) broke, and b) without a marketable skill? You'll be about as useful to the new society as a buggy driver is to ours. Worse, you'll probably have a huge medical bill--while you've paid for the suspension (although how can they guarantee the rate?) you couldn't have possibly paid for the cure that will bring you back, as they can't at this point know how expensive it'll be to give you the cure, since it doesn't exist.

      Really, that sounds great. You might wake up someday, but you'll be broke, jobless, a relative idiot, nowhere to live, no friends or family, and maybe will have a crushing medical bill. Thanks, but I think I might prefer to stay dead.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    2. Re:You don't have to be rich. by RFC959 · · Score: 5, Funny

      will it do you much good to wake up a) broke, and b) without a marketable skill?


      So coming out of cryosleep is like graduating with a liberal arts degree, then?
    3. Re:You don't have to be rich. by f1r3br4nd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It never ceases to astound me how many things there are out there that people think are worse than death. To me, death is the one definite way to lose whatever game we're playing. Maybe people have a more literal belief in heaven than I do. Maybe people are in deep denial about the implacable finality of death. It's none of my business, though. Some people would rather be dead than stupid and broke, and I respect their beliefs.

      Call me a throwback then, because I'd rather be alive and keep on struggling to stay that way as long as possible. And the further in the future, the better. To put this into perspective, I'd rather be a homeless guy today than a medieval noble. Again, to each their own.

    4. Re:You don't have to be rich. by zcat_NZ · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No job skills? I dispute that. He'd be the ultimate authority on our current period of 'history', and considering the amount of information being stored in DRM-locked formats on short-term digital media, he might wake up in a future that knows almost nothing about this time.

      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
    5. Re:You don't have to be rich. by f1r3br4nd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It depends on when you're thawed. There's a theory in cryonics circles, though, that the reviving will proceed in a LIFO manner because the later someone gets frozen, the better the available technology will be, and the easier they will be to revive. The "early adopters" might get revived last, after the medicine of the time has had plenty of practice with the easy cases.

      If this is correct, it would mean that the handfull of people frozen now will be the authoritative source of information about the late 20th century... but they'll get revived after you do, so you'll get your time in the sun with your knowledge of the early -to-mid 21st century with the still relatively small number of people who will be frozen at the same time you are.

    6. Re:You don't have to be rich. by pontifier · · Score: 2, Interesting

      After I signed up with alcor I felt a kind of future-historical perspective shape the way I look at issues and events in our time. sometimes I'll think about a person from the future obsessed with the past, and think "They would realy like to be where I am right now", and it makes me feel good to be here in our primitive times, still arguing about this or that when it probably doesn't matter that much to the far future how things go, just that they do.

      by the way.. I've found price to be the biggest limiting factor among people I know as to why they havn't signed up. most people I've talked to about cryonics can see that any chance to be revived is better than none.

      --
      -John Fenley
    7. Re:You don't have to be rich. by springbox · · Score: 2, Funny
      Maybe not, but the OP has a point: if and when you wake up, will it do you much good to wake up a) broke, and b) without a marketable skill? You'll be about as useful to the new society as a buggy driver is to ours.

      Or maybe, if you wake up you'll be assigned to a position in society based on your capabilities. Haven't you watched Futurama?

    8. Re:You don't have to be rich. by Rakishi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It depends on how advanced society is and how it advances. Intelligence is influenced by genetics/womb, childhood experiences and learning.

      An advanced society may have altered the first so much that they are now super-humans compared to us and the changes go so deep they cannot "upgrade" a present-day person without destroying who they are. Assuming they have immortality this one must have a solution already present.

      The second would probably cause less drastic changes, although again you'd be at a disadvantage compared to those people who grow up in that time period (more so if they use some advanced child rearing practices designed to maximize intelligence). Also I believe with time intelligence becomes more dependent on genetics/womb than childhood experiences, although differences may still exist. In reality the greatest problem in this case may be that their society is so alien to us we are unable to cope with it. Assuming they have immortality this one must have a solution already present.

      The last one, learning, is probably the easiest to fix. Combined with some advanced drugs you can probably get up to pace in terms of sheer knowledge rather quickly, may even be able to change things which currently are in many ways hard wired.

    9. Re:You don't have to be rich. by typical · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think if such a person were plopped into our modern day they would, after a degree of struggle, they'd be able to make sense of it.

      The problem is that you're ignoring a lot of learning (and *unlearning* that will have to be done).

      One of the largest tasks I can think of that a linguist could face is to be confronted with a totally unknown language with no Rosetta Stone and have to work it out from scratch. I think that it would be a staggering achievement for most linguists to be able to write "Created the first dictionary to translate to and from this language".

      And yet nearly every person in the world has done this *as a child*. They started out with no common ground -- they can't think "Okay, what's 'rock' in this language?". They figured out not only the language but all the concepts that it attempts to express. Even the guy that pumps gas at the gas station did that. That's an amazing intellectual accomplishment.

      How long does it take to learn to use a computer effectively? I mean, ground zero, a computer newbie to the level that an power user on Slashdot has? Three years? Four years? Surely at least that.

      You've spent a lot of time learning all this. If you get frozen at age sixty, that is *sixty years* of learning and training that you've expended on building yourself. Sure, some things stay the same -- the laws of physics are probably going to remain the same, and throwing a ball in the future is probably going to be similar to doing so in the present. But language shifts quickly -- English from a few hundred years ago is totally incomprehensible to an English speaker today. All the locations and things that you've learned -- how to drive a car, etc -- are useless. And there's knowledge to be *unlearned*, as well -- maybe there are no toilets in the future. Maybe cooking knowledge is obsolete in the future because we have automated food production devices that everyone uses.

      Maybe for a young child, this wouldn't be so drastic, but I think that it would be quite a shift for a senior citizen.

      I mean, honestly, suppose Benjamin Franklin was around today. In his time, he was a learned man in many fields and a scientist, as well as a diplomat. But today, we've shot so far by him in the fields he student that he wouldn't have much more applicable knowledge than a teen would. Mathematics is still the same, but the ability to rapidly do arithmetic is no longer a crucial skill. You don't ride horses, you don't use an outhouse, we have childproof caps on medicine bottles. Our aesthetics have changed -- the comfortable styles that he grew up with will be gone, replaced by smooth, simple, artificial structures. His political knowledge would be out of date and useless. Social norms are quite different from his day. Heck, he didn't have *railroads* in his time. I'm sure that based on who he is and the fact that he was exceptional for his time, he'd find a way to get along...but I don't think that it would be all that easy. And the question really is -- would society be better off with an aging man with a good knowledge from 250 years ago, or someone who has learned from the start to live in current societyy.

      I also wouldn't trust the cryo-storage companies. They plan to keep you frozen for, what, a hundred years? No company worries about anything one hundred years in the future. Four is usually pushing it. Nobody except for maybe your great-great-grandkids will have an interest in ensuring that you are safely revived.

      --
      Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
  16. Instant by RickPartin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The one cool thing about freezing yourself that no one seems to mention is the process, if successful, will seem instant to you regardless of how many hundreds of years you're out for. Thinking of it that way makes it seem way more appealing. It's like a crude form of time travel.

    1. Re:Instant by thesandtiger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Who's to say one wouldn't have dreams? Or just some kind of low-level pseudo-consciousness? Or something else entirely?

      I'm not saying that any of those are possible, but I am saying that, since no human being has ever been frozen, suspended for a "long" period of time, and then thawed and revived, saying anything about the subjective experience is an iffy proposition.

      I suspect that you're right - likely there'll be no notice of the lapsed time - but I wouldn't rule anything else out.

      Me, I'll probably get frozen. After all, if it fails, well, I was dead anyway, and if it succeeds, go me - any world that would revive me would have to be stable/desirable enough for me to want to live in it (the Niven story, while amusing, was pretty absurd). One extra life insurance policy to cover the expense of it, it seems like a cheap enough way to slightly hedge one's bets.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    2. Re:Instant by Dun+Malg · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The one cool thing about freezing yourself that no one seems to mention is the process, if successful, will seem instant to you regardless of how many hundreds of years you're out for.

      Heh. You hope it seems instantateous, at least. Until we thaw one of those suckers out and reanimate 'em, we won't know if they wake up saying "what was that?" or "OH MY GOD WHAT TOOK YOU SO LONG, THE ETERNAL FREEZING LIMBO!!!!!!!!!"

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    3. Re:Instant by malsdavis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you were having thoughts of anykind, "low-level pseudo-consciousness" or whatever, you would NOT be cryogenically frozen. Thoughts require large amounts of chemical reactions to occur in the brain and the whole point of cryogenics is to stop chemical reactions from happening as they are also what causes ageing.

      So by the very definition of cryogenics you would be thoughtless and completely unconscious for the entire time. Apart maybe from any wake-up period which possibly might be required during reanimation (not sure if its called reanimation?, I just remeber that word from Austin Powers).

  17. Mr Pizer, please wake up now... by rmpotter · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... You've been frozen for 150 years, but your Cryo company went under about 80 years ago. Actually that company has been bought and sold a number of times. You actually spent a few weeks in a meat locker in Chicago until a new facility could be found. Unfortunately we were legally obligated to dip into your "inheritance" to pay for emergency cooling and relocation. You still have a few dollars left, but after converting them into American Yen, it looks like you will have to go back to work. Mr Pizer? Are you listening to me? Ah... yes, where is the rest of your body? Well, you see after the last market crash the Cryo industry was forced to make a few, um, cutbacks. What now? Well, Mr. Pizer, you've lucked into a wonderful Brave New World, you know. You've been assigned to the circus with all the others. You'll be pulled by trained monkeys round the ring on a special cart along with the other heads. It doesn't pay all that well, but it will keep the feeding tube flowing and cover any back taxes owing. And it does make the children laugh! Mr. Pizer? Now don't be angry with me Mr. Pizer...

    --
    Is this sig nificant?
  18. Who would want you? by bhhenry · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Funny to see this article so soon after viewing Final, a movie about a man who wakes up in a mental ward after being cryogenically frozen and then finds himself a ward of the state in more than one way. Or the Philip K. Dick story I just read about a man who travels into the future, but isn't worried about making his way, because he is a doctor, and society can always use a doctor, right?

    Seriously, if the technology worked as planned, what would you do after being thawed? Go back to grade school to catch up on the basics? Would any of your skills be useful to anyone? Unless you were a popular historical icon, who would want to bother with you? An archeologist or historian?

    Add to all of this the fact that the population of Earth is already expanding at an alarming rate.

    --
    signature not found
  19. So... Even if we do get enough advances medically by timothyf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So... Even if we do get enough advances medically to do this, tell me why on earth would we /want/ to revive someone so selfish and materialistic as to want to do this? Sorry, couldn't help myself.

  20. decisions by wall0159 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The difficult part would have to be deciding when to cut one's losses with life and be frozen. Persumably, if he waits until he's actually dead, it might be too late...

    "I figure I have a better than even chance of coming back," he says. *laughing* based on WHAT?? Just goes to show - wealth doesn't corrolate with intelligence.

    (personally, I reckon his chances are more like 42%... ;-)

  21. Reality cheque by HermanAB · · Score: 2, Funny

    As Robert Heinlein put it: "If you invest a substantial sum of money at a good interest rate, compounded monthly, it will eventually be worth nothing."

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
  22. Re:Or..... by Ucklak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I would imagine that in a hundred years time or more that the normal abundant viruses and other microorganisms that are bent on destroying the human body would probably take out his immune system immediately upon reanimation or drying out or whatever you want to call it. Of course you could put him a 'bubble' or quarrantine but if you don't have an evolution of antibiotics, his system would most likely shut down upon an infection.

    The cold and flu that you and I shrug off today would kill our great grandparents (at an age of young adulthood) in an instant because of sex and diversification. Just a natural evolution process.
    Viruses evolve and his immune system won't, that's the point of having kids. Hell, the next batch of kids may be immune to this current avian flu and we ourselves may be immmune to some ancient avian flu.

    --
    if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
  23. I see your quote and raise a Red Dwarf reference: by slashbob22 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Teller: OK, you had a balance of 93 cents...
    Fry: Alright!
    Teller: And at an average of two-and-a-quarter percent interest over a period of 1000 years, that comes to ... $4.3 billion.

    --
    Proof by very large bribes. QED.
  24. Re:New joke by magefile · · Score: 2, Funny

    Them: What's a nigger, pale boy?

  25. you talk about something you know nothing about by Cryofan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    as a signed up Alcor member, please allow me to disabuse you of some of your mistaken ideas:

    1. "all that money": Alcor is the best cryonics organization in the world. And there are only two...
    But Alcor is a nonprofit, and no one working there makes much money at all. In fact, almost everyone working there is either poor or independently wealthy.

    Also Alcor does not take in enough money to even cover its expenses. Most members are middle class, but some can afford to donate large sums, which is how Alcor stays solvent.

    2. Cryonics, for cryonicists, ties into the hardwired religious-epiphany-ectascy circuitry in our brains. You know that many people (most?) get a rush from religion? Well, that same religious feeling is what makes cryonics tick. It gives us an "out" just as does religion. Except of course our "out" is something that depends on real world physics and human nature.

    So, cryonicists who work at cryonics organizations are sort of like monks.They do it for the love of cryoncis, and in the hope that if they can build up cryonics enough so that society accepts it and we get a lot more members, we can make it a self sufficient enterprise.

    So if cryonicists working at Alcor do something bad, they screw up their own chances to be revived in the future.

    Do you now understand one of the major strengths of cryonics?

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
    1. Re:you talk about something you know nothing about by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not. I had very deep faith and gave it up for Lent one year. I spent years as an athiest, then felt called in another direction. I've seen both sides of the fence. I've also learned that those who don't believe have never really felt that extra connection that is true faith -- if a person has felt it, they know. If not, well, then, they just might drop faith and turn 100% scientific.

      That's something someone who thinks they believe, or has learned to act like the believe, or who takes a religious text literally and doesn't question it -- then one day learns something they never expected, can do, but someone who has had a true faith connection is not someone who can drop it and say that only the logical exists. And that is also one of those things that those who don't have it just don't get -- again, like trying to explain the bond you get having sex with someone you love to a virgin who hasn't even dated someone regularly.

  26. Clone of My Own by uberdave · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh, give me a clone
    Of my own flesh and bone
    With its Y-chromosome changed to X
    And when it is grown
    Then my own little clone
    Will be of the opposite sex.

    (Chorus)
    Clone, clone of my own,
    With your Y-Chromosome changed to X
    And when I'm alone
    With my own little clone
    We will both think of nothing but sex.

    Asimov and Garrett

  27. Re:Or..... by Servants · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The cold and flu that you and I shrug off today would kill our great grandparents (at an age of young adulthood) in an instant because of sex and diversification.

    That's completely not true. You don't think that people's immune systems in any given generation just luckily happen to be attuned to exactly the germs which will be around during their lifetimes? The immune system is extremely adaptable and will effectively attack nearly any foreign menace. We don't have to rely on it evolving to match specific germs that go through a million times as many evolutionary generations as we do.

    (As a side note, it's typically not advantageous for infectious agents to evolve to kill their hosts anyway, except under crowded and unsanitary conditions where they can spread very quickly. Many germs could well evolve to be less deadly as world sanitation improves.)

    You're probably thinking of the (extremely plausible) argument that the main evolutionary purpose of sex is to "change the locks" against such parasites. But the point of this is more that a genetically uniform population would be vulnerable, so lineages that could vary their genetic makeup would gain an advantage; not that genetic change is the primary line of defense against parasites. Luckily for all of us, it isn't.

  28. Re:New joke by networkBoy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Not so sure this is flamebait (I mean it is but...)
    Heinlein explored this basic concept (with a timewarp from a nuke) in Farhams Freehold.
    -nB

    --
    whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  29. Tax Em by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 3, Funny

    You heard me... Tax the icicles.

  30. Re:History repeats itself by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's different because it might really work.

  31. Re:Or..... by xiphoris · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes! Mod parent up!

    IANAD, but I am a med student. People are always worried about "viruses from space" coming to destroy us because our immune systems "won't be able to handle it". This is a crock of bullshit. Our immune systems are extremely effective at handling any foreign substances. The dangerous ones are those that have specifically evolved to trick our immune systems. The body (through an extremely complex & inefficient process) can generate antibodies to practically any pathogen.

    Though, the grandparent may have a point that diseases of the future may have evolved (like HIV family viruses have) to trick our immune systems. Observe, however, that the most effective parasites do not kill their hosts. All the viruses that kill us are viruses *we* wipe out. There are thousands of bacteria living in our stomachs and viruses elsewhere in our bodies with which we have established harmony (most of the time).

  32. There are two things certain... by xenocide2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I guess if you plan on skipping out on one of life's certainty's, you may as well plan on skipping the other!

    --
    I Browse at +4 Flamebait

    Open Source Sysadmin

  33. This is Nothing New by Greyfox · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When the Pharohs were placed in their reincarnation devices (The pyramids) they tried to take it all with them, too. I expect the results will be similar for the modern day people who are trying to cheat death. I don't believe that our current level of technology can preserve a body well enough to fix it at some future date and I don't believe that the current infrastructure is reliable enough to keep a body frozen for 100 years much less several. In fact, I doubt the current bunch of frozen dead guys will hold up as long as the Egyptians who were mummified thousands of years ago. My money's on them all quietly ending up in some medical waste bin somewhere within 40-50 years time.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  34. GET OVER YOURSELF! by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nobody lives forever... nobody SHOULD live forever... and if thats wrong and there is some rare person who actually deserves to live forever, it's certainly not YOU. Having accumulated weath doesn't make you deserving - if anything, it probably rules you out.

    --
    This space available.
  35. Re:You forget the nano/biotech revolution comming. by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    in the comming years it will be natural for future slashdotters to be able to handle the complexities of nano and biotech programming of nanotech assemblers and nanosensors and be able to do a lot of "matter" hacking even though there will

    No it won't. Replicating nanobots are pure sci-fi, and nano assembly is going to stay industrial for at least the next 100 years. Slashdotters are not going to be able to create a woman out of sand anytime soon.

    we should be able to advance nano/bio in the next 10 years to be able to demonstrate age halting/reversal in mice (the M-prize), and then, soon in people.

    Halting age is not the problem. Fatuige is. People could easily live until 150 if their body did not slowly succum to acumulated wear and tear. Free radicals will turn your brain to putty long before you ever had a hope of reaching 200.

    It may be hard to do, but, remember, they went to the moon in 9 years using slide rules and mainframe 32 bit computers with core memory

    That's because it was possible to go to the moon. Most of the stuff you mention is about as feasable as a perpetual motion machine.

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
  36. Don't forget the RIAA by bobamu · · Score: 3, Funny

    The Replicator Industry Association Off America will sue them all

  37. asset trusts limited to living beneficeries by peter303 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Generally states limit the lifetime monies held by nonliving entities (trusts) to living beneficies or one generation thereafter. Family/dynasty trusts like the Rockefellers or Kennedies have to renewed each generation.
    To be blunt, the even the dead cant avoid taxes forever. The concept of the dead and unborn owning assets is alien to current law.

  38. Useless bit of Red Dwarf trivia... by Gildersleeve · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The joke was originaly from a radio sketch comedy show from the early 80s called 'Son of Cliche', with the Red Dwarf writers and Chris Barrie among the cast. Barrie was the original Dave Lister.

  39. Synaptic degeneration by TheSync · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think the big problem in cryonics is that after 5 minutes of hypoxia, synapses start to degenerate. I really think this is a significant information loss, not something repairable. Even if you could put some of the neurons back together, you will have a hard time figuring out which neuron is connected to which and with what strength.

    Perhaps your body could come back, but unless you are frozen pretty much immediately upon onset of lethal hypoxia, the brain you come back with will not be much like your own.