Botnet Brain Pleads Guilty
spge writes "Now that Jeanson James Ancheta has plead guilty to spamming, computer misuse and fraud, it might be worth scanning through the original indictment document, which includes a step-by-step account of how someone goes about setting up an adware business, manages botnets and (thankfully) gets caught." From the BBC article: "'Mr Ancheta was responsible for a particularly insidious string of crimes,' said a spokesman for the US attorney's office in Los Angeles, Thom Mrozek. 'He hijacked somewhere in the area of half a million computer systems. This not only affected computers like the one in your home, but it allowed him and others to orchestrate large-scale attacks.'" We discussed Ancheta's arrest back in October of last year.
From the link:
"Under a plea agreement, Mr Ancheta is expected to receive from four years to six years in prison when he is sentenced on 1 May, though the deal has to be approved by a judge.
He also agreed to pay $15,000 (£8,800) in restitution to the military facilities affected and forfeit the proceeds of his illicit activities, including more than $60,000 (£35,000) in cash and a 1993 BMW. "
Anyone believe he had only 60 thousand in the bank?
4-6 years, will probably get out in 2.
Just a slap on the hand.
This has been another valuable and informative opinion from:
Catahoula!
1. The correct word is cracking not hacking. Hacking was originally a word representing something good and useful, but has been taken over by the news media to bean somethine vile and disguisting. Cracking means breaking into something, in order to do vile and dispicable things. What you were doing was cracking, not hacking.
2. However, the main problem is that the code is not secure, not that I was messing around during a free period and found a way to bypass the "security."
So, if I threw a brick through a window of your home, would you thank me for showing that it was not "secure"? Especially after I backed up a sewage truck to the broken window and unloaded it into your house? Why shouldn't IT people be upset when you dump your shit into their systems?
3. I do not see hobbyist computer hacking as a REAL threat, because if they can hack into a system, that system is definitely NOT secure from true hackers with illegal, immoral fraud schemes, etc in mind.
I don't think you should get upset when I dump a tanker full of shit into your house, because it's possible that someone who was a REAL threat might someday come around, they could do something worse. Your house isn't completely secure, so you should thank me for that tanker full of shit.
4. Oh, and every time you fix your house, I'll just try to find another way to fill it full of shit.
You can thank me in advance.
Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
The correct word is cracking not hacking
Language evolves over time, and sometimes out of the control of the group that originally coined the phrase(s). Of course the real problem is that the word 'hacking' (or hacker or any other variation) is a piss poor choice of a word if you want it to be associated with something good. His use of the word hacking is just fine, even if it doesn't mean now what it used to.
Second, while I agree that he has no right to bypass security and enter other people's systems, he's also not dumping shit all over. He's not doing any permanent damage or anything that takes time/effort/money to fix. It's much closer to noticing that someone's front door is unlocked, and then letting yourself in and looking around a bit. He might see some things that no one wanted him to see, and they might have to take some steps to convince themselves that he really didn't steal or damage anything. That's about it. No dumptrucks full of sewage.
Again, that doesn't make it okay, it just means that the real damage isn't quite what you described.
William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.