The New Boom
DarkClown writes "Wired is running a piece discussing the recovery from the burst Bubble in Silicon Valley. This time, though, it's no Bubble: it's a Boom. They suggest that this latest boom, fueled by Google's ascent, is under steadier footing than last time. Technology and the market seems to be catching up to the hype." From the article: "A boom perhaps, but not (phew!) a bubble. There's a difference. Bubbles are inflated with hot air and speculation. They end with a wet pop, leaving behind messy splatters. Booms, on the other hand, tend to have strong foundations and gentle conclusions. Bubbles can be good: They spark a huge amount of investment that can make things easier for the next generation, even as they bankrupt the current one. But booms - with their more rational allocation of capital - are better. The problem is that exuberance can make it hard to tell one from the other."
Google shares are possibly over-hyped, but they reflect a very interesting perception: that the Internet is now good for something, but that we don't know where it is going. We had the mass transit revolution (railways), the personal transit revolution (bicycles, then cars), the communications revolution (telephony.) Now we have the information revolution, and anyone who looks like they are reading meaningful signposts is likely to be highly valued.
Pining for the fjords
You know it's a bubble when people are calling it a "boom".
PS- has anyone ever clicked on a google ad? I haven't.
Oh, even if you don't click on them, they're still worth something to the advertiser.
For example, if I search for "poop" on google, then perhaps an ad will show up saying "Search for poop on eBay!"
Even if I don't click on the ad, I may happen to read it. This will improve eBay's brand recognition, since it will cause me to think of eBay whenever I see poop.