Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

The Future of Speech Technologies

Posted by Zonk on from the you-want-some-toast? dept.

prostoalex writes "PC Magazine is running an interview with two of the research leaders in IBM's speech recognition group, Dr. David Nahamoo, manager of Human Language Technologies, and Dr. Roberto Sicconi, manager of Multimodal Conversational Solutions. They mainly discuss the status quo of speech technologies, which prototypes exist in IBM Labs today, and where the industry is headed." From the article: "There has to be a good reason to use speech, maybe you're hands are full [like in the case of driving a car]. ... Speech has to be important enough to justify the adoption. I'd like to go back to one of your original questions. You were saying, 'What's wrong with speech recognition today?' One of the things I see missing is feedback. In most cases, conversations are one-way. When you talk to a device, it's like talking to a 1 or 2 year old child. He can't tell you what's wrong, and you just wait for the time when he can tell you what he wants or what he needs."

3 of 101 comments (clear)

  1. Oh no! by Ardeocalidus · · Score: 5, Funny
    "Car, brake"

    "I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that"

    1. Re:Oh no! by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's because the car thought you said "break." You should speak more clearly.

  2. What's wrong with speech? by Nuclear+Elephant · · Score: 5, Funny

    What's wrong with speech recognition today?

    I took a brief poll, and nobody seems to have a problem:

    Bruce: I sure like being inside this fancy computer.
    Vicki: Isn't it nice to have a computer that will talk to you?
    Agnes: Isn't it nice to have a computer that will talk to you?
    Kathy: Isn't it nice to have a computer that will talk to you?

    Except the trinoids, who complained:
    We can not communicate with these carbon units.

    I wasn't sure which Carbon they were talking about.