No Anti-Virus in Vista
truthsearch writes "Microsoft will omit anti-virus protection in Vista, the next version of Windows. Redmond is promoting Vista as a landmark improvement in Windows security. Yet Jim Allchin also told CRN in a recent interview that there will be no anti-virus software. For unspecified business (not technical) reasons, Microsoft will sell anti-virus protection to consumers through its OneCare online backup and security service."
Now M$ is making money so the small guys like realplayer can't cry.
No worries, there's already free antivirus out there.
It's called OS X, Linux Distro (insert distro name such as Ubuntu, Fedora, Mepis, Gentoo, etcetera), *BSD, Plan 9/Inferno, did I miss something?
Actually, isn't Clam AV, for Linux, used to scan incoming traffic before it reaches Windows boxes? Not for linux protection itself, per se.
Depressing how all the free solutions are better built than the one dominant pay-for solution. Actually, it's more depressing that it's able to be sold....
does kubuntu 64bit support broadcom wireless? how is it working in general? i gave ubuntu 64bit a whack and had a plethora of problems. the biggest of which being no wireless. with all of the stuff i am hearing about vista, i am seriously considering open source. but i dont want to hassle with an os and my wife needs it to be as seemless as possible.
always mosh clockwise
Haven't MSFT's shareholders lynched him by now?
-jcr
The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
Overrated I can live with. I think 90% of everything I say is overrated.
Flamebait though?
I hope you get metamoderated to hell for that you Microsoft fanboy prick. It wasn't even inflamatory, much less designed to be inflamatory.
(Now that is flamebait!)
or Linux, waiting to be downloaded. Is there a reason to care anymore?