Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Changes Blog Censoring Policies

Lam1969 writes "Microsoft attorney Brad Smith says that the company has a new policy to deal with a foreign government's request that alleges posted material violates its laws. The policy was apparently developed after Microsoft's own employees complained after a Chinese blogger hosted by Microsoft was censored. From the article 'Smith said Microsoft will only remove blogs when given proper legal notice, and even then, will only block access to that material within the country where it is deemed unlawful. The site will still be viewable from outside the country, he said.'"

17 of 153 comments (clear)

  1. Ha! by lilmouse · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They've actually done as close to the Right Thing(tm) as they can (yeah, so I can be radical) - even tho it costs them more work (=money). I'd have to have to administer this one, tho ;-)

    Way to go MS!

    --LWM

  2. "Information wants to be free" by Douglas+Simmons · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You know that statement is true when even Microsoft goes out of their way to keep speech protected and free. Way to be, Microsoft.

  3. Excellent Step by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm happy to see Microsoft take this step. People need to be reminded that the Chinese citizens supposedly have their free speech protected by their constitution. If China wants to violate their own constitution, make sure that the blame falls sqaurely on their shoulders for all the world to see, rather than allowing companies to step in front and absorb the blame for them.

  4. The mods here have NO sense of humor. by mmell · · Score: 2, Insightful
    For the record, the TLP is not off-topic.

    Don't you recognize irony when you see it? Hellfire, not only was this irony, but it was explicitely declared as such (and a beautiful example of subtle irony it is).

    What do you need, <IRONY> and </IRONY> tags?

    1. Re:The mods here have NO sense of humor. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Maybe those moderating today are merely sick of seeing the SAME DAMN RESPONSE posted in the comments for every story! IT IS NOT FUNNY!

    2. Re:The mods here have NO sense of humor. by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Insightful
      a beautiful example of subtle irony it is).

      Be happy, now it's +5 funny. Personally, I'd have modded it "redundant", as this exact post is made every time somethng related to censorship is posted. Maybe a couple of years ago it was "subtle and beautiful", now it's on the same level as "Hot grits", "Imagine a Beowulf cluster", etc. Humour requires at least a touch of novelty.

  5. Re:Oh yeah? Well...... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Every once in awhile there are situations where you and your enemy find each other on the same side. This would be one of them.

  6. Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just give Google 10 more years...

    Do no evil. The concept of evil changes with time, sometimes quite rapidly.

  7. Say what you will about MS... by IAAP · · Score: 4, Insightful
    but the fact that their employees feel safe enough to criticise them says something.

    FTFB: But, the behavior of my company in this instance is not right.

    Either Scoble is very important to MS, or MS tolerates that from their employees. Beleive it or not, I've been at companies that would NOT have tolerated that kind of outspokeness from one of their employees. Or, Scoble, is now looking for a job.

  8. /nudges Google by everphilski · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Supposedly Bill Gates poked some fun at Google over their China ethics dilemma ... maybe this will be the start of something good.

  9. "sexual" content by superwiz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How's that going to effect all pedophilia blogs comming from the US? Does that mean that MS will now host blogs that promote pedophilia in the contries where it has not been outlawed?

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  10. Let the governments censor their own crap! by erroneus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm pretty tired of China (who else wants to be censored so badly?) making the price of commercial admission "do our censoring for us." They have the data pipes coming into their country's borders. They should take it upon themselves to filter their own damned data. Filter everything going out and coming in. Then they will know it's contained and controlled just the way they want it.

    Sounds like they want to have their noodles and eat'm too.

  11. Can someone explain... by argent · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...exactly what the difference is.

    Microsoft took a blog down. They got flamed about it. They changed their policies so they'd only "take blogs down" for the country that requested it. The blog in question would still have been censored if the current policy was in effect. Result: Microsoft is applying special filters for China.

    Which is exactly what Google is doing.

    How is this good when Microsoft does it, and evil when Google does it?

    I mean, people aren't going "well, Microsoft's expected to be evil, so this is par for the course", people are actually arguing that this is "not evil". It's less evil than blocking sites/searches that the Chinese government requested everywhere, perhaps, but Google wasn't doing that and nobody ever suggested that they might... and Microsoft was.

    1. Re:Can someone explain... by Asmor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's a pretty damn big difference, actually.

      It's the difference between a "utopian" society that's only that way because all dissidents are silenced, and a "utopian" society that is recognized by others to be the oppressive regime it is, even if the people there don't.

  12. Minor but important correction by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "China won't see it, ..."

    "China won't officially see it,..."

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  13. Re:Google/Russian Culture Version of Evil by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Please remember that one of the founders of Google is Russian, and in Russian culture censorship is just not evil. Censorship is what you do if you have the power to do it. Nothing more.
    As a Russian, I would like to officially state here that you, sir, are an idiot. At best what you describe could be called "Soviet culture", or, even more precisely, "totalitarian culture" - except there's no such thing. Censorship and tolalitarianism by the very nature of the latter always go hand in hand, be it in the USSR, China, North Korea, or Iraq.
  14. Re:Oh yeah? Well...... by plague3106 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Personally I think its a bit short sighted to just say 'I hate MS.' Its like saying that the US gov't is evil. Yes, there are parts of it that are, but do you really think that the Dept. of Parks (or whatever the official name is) is evil? Probably not.

    MS is just too big to paint the entire company one color; .net is a great platform to build applications in, but VB6 really sucks. Their licensing policy is crappy (although most commercial software is in the same boat), but they don't seem to be smashing people with patents.

    MS has its good aspects as well as its bad; lean on the bad ones to see if you can't get them to turn around, but its not necessary to try and bash them at every turn.