Slashdot Mirror
Wasp Larvae Feed on Zombie Roaches
TheUploader writes "The story leaves nothing to embellish: The wasp, Ampulex compressa, has evolved to inject a toxin into a specific part of a roach's brain, turning it into a zombie. The wasp then leads the zombie roach into the wasp's nest, lays eggs inside it, and waits for its young to hatch, who will then go on to do the same to more roaches."
What wonderful breakfast conversation.
Anyway, I think I detect an IgNobile prize winner here.
I don't get it.
No they don't control the roaches mind. They inject a drug that pacifies the roach, then they control it with its antennae kinda like reins. Not direct mind control of any sort.
Randomly. That's kinda the idea behind evolution. The one's that didn't develop the right chemical trigger didn't get the distinct advantage of the climbing-slave-bug spore dispersal.
Conclusion: the Empire squashes the Federation like a bug. Accept it.
I'm all for comedy on Slashdot, but these evolution "debates" make us all look stupid.
May the Maths Be with you!
i.e. Americans
Yeah, hence why the headline read "Wasp Larvae Feed on Zombie Roaches" instead of simply "Wasp Larvae Feed on Roaches". This particular mechanism is the interesting aspect of this article.
"Unless Slashdot has a very high percentage of entymologists, I don't think it is that newsworthy for slashdot readers."
We may not have a large percentage of entymologists here, but it does have a large percentage of science nerds who enjoy reading about novel discoveries in the world of science (of course until the site recovers from being /.ed, its hard to determine whether or not this is indeed a novel discovery or just a reprint of something that was discovered some time ago).
Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
But logically speaking, you can't argue:
If
God is all powerful
God is all knowing
God is all Loving
then
Why Suffering?
because Loving and Suffering are two subjective statements, and is strictly relative those who subscribe to those two ideas. This makes that argument illogical, because in the end, everyones love and suffering is different.
This tends to be my ultimate point in arguments with religious nuts. Even if you can convince me that faith is better than proof, etc., I still don't like God very much. I mean, we tend to put people who behave like that in prisons or asylums, and I'm supposed to worship the guy?
Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
That doesn't stop Slashdot from turning into a diatribe on Bush and God anytime a bug post, political post...okay ANY post is posted these days. That and an ID vs. Evolution battle. So much for technology. First of all if evolution is the final word there's nothing "technological" about it. Same with ID. It just seems that so many evolutionists on Slashdot are so the same way they're liberal: basically they a) want to be with the crowd and b) they afraid someone somewhere is wiretapping their phones or videotaping their every move to find out if they masterbate.
I don't think we were really created in God's image unless God was little more than a subservient monkey, which is what Adam and Eve were before the serpent made them eat the apple. The apple is what turned them into humans. Yet we are told to yearn for the days when we were still monkeys and be ashamed for being what we are (inherited sin and all that nonsense)? Did the Greek demonize Prometheus? Then why do we demonize the serpent and ourselves?
Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
proof of inteligent design indeed. The Flying spaghetti monster is an amazing being indeed.