Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

PayPal vs Google (Buy)

Posted by Hemos on from the everyone-knew-it-was-coming-eric dept.

pc-facile.com writes "While Google Chief Executive Eric Schmidt confirmed in press accounts that the company was building a payment service, Mr. Schmidt also denied it would directly compete with PayPal. Mr. Schmidt said Google didn't intend to offer a "person-to-person, stored-value payments system," which many people consider a description of PayPal's service. Mr. Jordan (PayPal chief) says he and his team immediately "dissected the wording" of Google's statements. He says he doesn't believe Mr. Schmidt..." There's also a more in depth WSJ article about the service.

5 of 242 comments (clear)

  1. Why Bite the Hand that Feeds? by mfh · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How can Google create an online payment system without competing with PayPal? Google doesn't want to piss off eBay, because eBay is one of Google's largest advertisers -- so I completely understand why Google would say that they won't compete directly against PayPal -- I get it. Never bite the hand that feeds. (great NiN tune!)

    But what I don't understand is the resulting system... what could it possibly consist of if it can't compete against PayPal? Perhaps they will use PayPal's services within the scope of the new system and defer customers to PayPal for the actual transactions? Partnerships happen when companies fear retaliation or when companies see greater profits by working together, and I think it's possible that is what's going on, in this case. Either that or we'll be seeing a very crippled new system from Google.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Why Bite the Hand that Feeds? by stinerman · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Google mighn't want to piss of eBay, but someone has to provide an alternative to PayPal sooner or later, and it might as well be them. I can recall quite a few times that sellers lost a sale to me because they only accepted PayPal. If there was a viable alternative with a sane TOS, perhaps I'd use it. Until then, I'm stuck ordering from merchants who take credit/debit card orders.

    2. Re:Why Bite the Hand that Feeds? by HugePedlar · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I got quite excited about the concept of micropayments a few years back. If I could sell stuff (software, music, videos, etc.) for £0.10 per download I might get rich. Maybe not, but the idea is cool.

      Unfortunately, even if Paypal weren't the evil beast people proclaim it to be, it has still stifled the online payment market through its outragous fees for transactions. Payments of less than £1.00 are worthless.

      If Google can provide a viable model for micropayments it could take over a different sector of the market by catering to the smaller purchasers.

      Of course, I'd be just as happy if Google pounded Paypal into the dirt.

      --
      Argh.
    3. Re:Why Bite the Hand that Feeds? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I remember when paypal was "we'll make our money off the float, totally free for you!". That lasted what, 8 months? Now they fee you to death, police what you can buy and sell, and penalize you whenever they feel like it with absolutely no recourse. I'm trying to set up my own paysite soon, but I can't really use them, and I can't afford a proper merchant account.

      I hope google kicks their ass. Hell, I hope google sets up its own auction site.

  2. Re:Yes, please. by ionpro · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Google doesn't do anything of the sort. Google.com is provided completely uncensored to Chinese audiences. However, the government disables cached pages, translation, and a few other services. It's also very slow, because it has to go through the firewall. All Google did was provide a point-of-presence inside China for google.cn. They would be shut down for this point of presence if they didn't at least pay lip service to Chinese Internet law. As the silly ways to break the Google filter show (searching in UPPERCASE, adding a period, ...) it's obvious Google is doing as little as possible to ensure the government doesn't shut them down. But people are protesting their so-called human rights violations. It's rediculous, and the only reason people do it is because Google has become big enough that it's cool to bash them.

    Google philosophy is that they can make more money, long-term, by doing no evil. I've yet to see anything from them that shows they've abandoned that philosophy.