Slashdot Mirror


Apple Switched Chips Too Soon?

Ctrl+Alt+De1337 writes "C|Net is reporting that IBM has announced a method of altering silicon that will allow its next generation of Power chips to run at speeds between 4 and 5 gigahertz, and consume less power as well. From the article: 'Instead of just making transistors smaller, IBM came up with a process to alter how silicon behaves by placing a layer of insulator underneath a layer of silicon less than 500 atoms thick ... The higher speed of the Power6 will be achieved with existing chip manufacturing technology that etches transistors only 65 nanometers wide, several hundred times smaller than a human blood cell.' These won't be out until 2007, but it still raises the question: did Apple jump the gun by switching to Intel?"

19 of 533 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Both supported by John+Napkintosh · · Score: 4, Funny

    Doesn't mean Apple can't rethink and switch back

    Don't you mean "think different"?

    --

    Long signatures suck.
  2. Re:Apple too soon or IBM too late? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    WWDC 2010...

    Jobs on stage: "Oh, one more thing, (dramatic pause) the Mac OS has been living a dual life... again.... remember a few years ago when we secretly had the Mac OS under development for the Intel platform!? Guess what, we still kept the PowerPC binaries going and this year we're going offer you both Intel AND PowerPC chips!

    and We call it.... iHAL".

  3. Re:Begs the question? by mopslik · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes, just like "hacking" and all the other words people have taken over to mean something different.

    For all intensive purposes, I could care less.

  4. Re:Begs the question? by GaryPatterson · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's one I pacifically can't stand.

    Supposably it's said quite a lot.

  5. Is your name Rumpelstiltskin, by any chance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    Maybe I'm mistaken but doesn't it take roughly 18 months to tape out a CPU design?

    Once upon a time it did. But since then we've had the computer revolution, the industrial revolution, and oh heck, the American revolution...

  6. Re:Begs the question? by Plunky · · Score: 2, Funny

    Geez, you grammar nazis are really prophetic.

  7. Re:Both supported by psycho8me · · Score: 5, Funny

    Grammer nazi says, "think differently".

  8. Re:Begs the question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    For all intensive purposes, I could care less.

    Irregardless of the forgoing, shouldn't you be busy tapping someone's line?

  9. Re:Begs the question? by Pope · · Score: 3, Funny

    Irregardless of the intent, you have hurt my self of steam with such statements.

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  10. Re:Both supported by jcr · · Score: 5, Funny

    Spelling Nazi says "Grammar".

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  11. Re:Apple too soon or IBM too late? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm still waiting for the eight pound, 10-inch screen iPod that Steve Jobs announced during his podcast demo at MacWorld last month. :P

  12. Re:Both supported by FidelCatsro · · Score: 3, Funny

    Bannkontrolleur National Sozialist sagt Grammatik

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
  13. Re:Good news by damsa · · Score: 2, Funny

    You mispelled, Nintendo Armagedden.

  14. Re:Both supported by HoneyBunchesOfGoats · · Score: 2, Funny

    Punctuation Nazi says, "Grammar."

  15. Re:Good news by Reaperducer · · Score: 3, Funny

    You misspeled Armageddon.

    --
    -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
  16. Re:Both supported by jcr · · Score: 5, Funny

    Das echte Bannkontrollier sagt: "Bannkontrolleur" sieht Französisch aus.

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  17. Re:Both supported by skingers6894 · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Think previous"

  18. Re:Apple too soon or IBM too late? by spectre_240sx · · Score: 1, Funny

    An AC with an informative post? Looks like this warm winter we've been having is about to come to an end.

  19. Re:IBM and AMD makes this good for apple too by adrianmonk · · Score: 2, Funny
    If IBM once again liscences this to AMD then you will have this technology running on 0x86 instruction sets.

    I don't get it -- what's a 134 instruction set?