Slashdot Mirror


Newest Patent Threat to MPEG-4

Sachin Garg writes "After the notorious JPEG patent which has made many big and small names pay huge amounts to Forgent (total more than $105 million), PCMag reports that AT&T claims to have a patent covering core MPEG-4 technology and has warned Apple and others of Patent Infringement. Pentax and Nero have already paid them."

3 of 365 comments (clear)

  1. And I have a patent for ... by neonprimetime · · Score: 5, Funny

    And I have a patent for Windows Viruses ... so ya 'all better stop writing them or I'll sue your @ss.

    Is AT&T Serious?

    1. Re:And I have a patent for ... by dave-tx · · Score: 4, Funny
      And I have a patent for Windows Viruses ... so ya 'all better stop writing them or I'll sue your @ss.

      You'll do better if you go after end-users.

      --

      >> "What would the robut do? Frame someone!"

  2. Re:Typical by rs79 · · Score: 4, Funny

    " If MPEG-4 or something like it existed before the patent was filed, that would be an example of prior art."

    Hey I remember seeing an implementatio of what would fall under these patents twentry years ago. There were these cool videophon... oh shit.

    --
    Need Mercedes parts ?