Advertisers May Face Ridicule For Adware
An anonymous reader writes "A ZDNet article reports that the FTC may be gearing up to humiliate companies that advertise via adware." From the article: "The FTC would publicly announce and publish the name of a company that advertises using adware that installs itself surreptitiously on consumer PCs or using spyware, Leibowitz said. He would recommend publicly shaming advertisers to the other FTC commissioners if the adware problem doesn't decrease, he said."
Wow, public shaming is as severe as hitting those offenders with a wet bus ticket or a tap on the knuckles.
Wake me up when there's a public stoning.
Uncensored Google results requested and delivered by email
FTC actually siding with the people, instead of corp america??? Whoa, looks like pigs can now free to fly..
"There is no flag large enough to cover the shame of killing innocent people."--Howard Zinn
By... ummm... shaming them... umm... wait.. I think I see a possible flaw in this plan.
For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
{Nothing typed here would be as humorous as just the notion of someone turning Cleese loose to ridicule these clowns!}
This space intentionally left (almost) blank.
I'll place my vote under the "drawn and quartered" category along with Mr. Reason, but only if it's a public drawing and quartering and they sell decent beer and popcorn...and if the executed has to pay all costs associated with his drawing and quartering, including my beer and popcorn...and if they use really big trucks to do the pulling in low-and-slow gear, not wimpy horses who might bolt at the sound of a cheering audience.
Cheers. So who's first?
Everything in the Universe sucks: It's the law!
No such thing as bad publicity.
I don't know about that. How is SCO doing these days with all that free advertising we gave them?
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable" - JFK
Now go away before I taunt you a second time!