Slashdot Mirror


Cedega 5.1 Released

Gamasutra reports that Cedega 1.5 has been released for Linux gamers looking for a Civ IV fix. From the release: "TransGaming Technologies has released Cedega 5.1, which features support for some of the newest PC titles such as Sid Meier's Civilization IV, FIFA 06 and Need for Speed: Most Wanted. Cedega allows games originally created for the Windows platform to run on Linux, straight out of the box. Other titles supported on Cedega 5.1 include Battlefield 2, Dungeon Siege II, City of Villains, Madden NFL 2006, World of WarCraft, Half-Life 2, Guild Wars, and many others. Cedega 5.1 builds on this growing list of game titles with new features that improve overall game play."

15 of 122 comments (clear)

  1. In related news by dtfinch · · Score: 4, Informative

    Wine 0.9.8 was released today.

  2. Re:How useful? / Machine Requirements by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I tend to agree. I was a subscriber for over a year. Games that were listed as "should work" never worked for me. I used RedHat, Debian, Gentoo, no good. I tried various Nvidia cards across Intel and AMD processors.

    We even had geek LAN parties where we tried to get things to work. We eventually got BF1942 to work a little. And Rainbow6 worked quiet well.

    But, looking back, I think that the vast majority of people claiming success with WineX were company shills. Either that, or people didn't want to admit that their $5 a month was a complete waste.

    --
    I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
  3. I have had good luck. by cosmotron · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have Cedega 4.1 and got Steam working in it (before they changed the skin) and Anarchy Online. I didn't even need to do anything; just fired up cedega and ran the executable.

    --
    Ryan - http://www.thecosmotron.com/
  4. Link Mislabeled by Sean0michael · · Score: 3, Informative

    The link is labeled "Cedega 1.5" while the title and summary clearly state it as "Cedega 5.1". Can we fix this please? Thanks.

    --
    Funtime Candy Wow! - my plan for eventually conquering Japan.
  5. The ass-backwards solution by billcopc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I hate to yank everyone back to reality here, but if you can't get your favorite Windoze games to run with Cedega, and you REALLY want to play those games, why not dedicate a true gaming PC running XP and not munge your clean Linux system with all this patchy crap ? Yes it costs money, but Cedega costs money, and games cost money. You have to pay to play. Either that or invest in an Xbox/Playstation.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
    1. Re:The ass-backwards solution by paeanblack · · Score: 4, Informative

      I hate to yank everyone back to reality here, but if you can't get your favorite Windoze games to run with Cedega, and you REALLY want to play those games, why not dedicate a true gaming PC running XP and not munge your clean Linux system with all this patchy crap ?

      1) Games that have massive memory requirements often run better in wine than on XP. In Simcity 4, I've got some cities that will no longer load in XP, but can chug along in wine.

      2) Laptop drives aren't big enough that I'm willing to have a windows partition, but I still want my gaming fix when I'm on the road.

      In general, though, you are right. A dedicated gaming box often gives the best results.

    2. Re:The ass-backwards solution by ChaosDiscord · · Score: 3, Informative
      "I hate to yank everyone back to reality here, but if you can't get your favorite Windoze games to run with Cedega, and you REALLY want to play those games, why not dedicate a true gaming PC running XP and not munge your clean Linux system with all this patchy crap ? Yes it costs money, but Cedega costs money, and games cost money. You have to pay to play. Either that or invest in an Xbox/Playstation."

      So with Cedega, for $60 per year, I can use my existing Linux PC which is well decked out with lots of RAM, a fast CPU, and a nice video card. As an added bonus I'm supporting WINE development.

      I could convert my box into a dual boot box, but then I'll have to pay for Windows ($268, respent every few years as new Windows releases come out), I have to put up with the nuisance of rebooting, and any services my PC provides are unavailable while in Windows.

      I could, as you suggest, purchase a dedicated gaming PC. For something roughly equivalent to my Linux PC, I'd be looking at about $700 (respent every few years either in upgrades or replacements), assuming I'll reused the monitor from my Linux PC. And I'll need to find space for the extra machine.

      I could buy an XBox or Playstation (I'd hardly call a piece of commodity electronics an "investment"), but I've been having problems getting World of Warcraft, Civ 4, City of Heroes, and Warcraft III running on either platform.

      For some people Cedega is a very reasonable option. Encouraging people to spend money unnecessarily is stupid. Many people can be perfectly happy with Cedega and end up saving money. Personally it isn't for me (I play too many games, so I suffer with the dual boot option), but I'm not sneering at people who make that choice. You're not yanking people back to reality, you're ignoring reality.

  6. Re:How useful? / Machine Requirements by 0racle · · Score: 3, Interesting

    God help you if you want to play something that isn't as popular

    You could always run it on the system it was designed for.

    --
    "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
  7. Re:Wouldn't it have been easier? by QuantaStarFire · · Score: 5, Funny
    Wouldn't it have been easier to just simply port Civ IV to linux?

    Are you kidding? That would require forethought, and research, and abandonment of the precious DirectX API! Fire would rain from the heavens! Locusts would eat all our crops! Everyone would be covered in boils! It would be the apocalypse!

  8. My experience with Cedega by jb.hl.com · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I tried Cedega once. TransGaming claim to support Half-Life 2 through it, so I gave it a go.

    Steam installed fine, so did HL2. After everything was ready to go, I ran the game.

    Hard lock up.

    Rebooted the PC, started again. This time everything worked fine, except I got maybe 1fps. This on a not spectacularly fast PC/graphics card, but one more than capable of properly running HL2 under Windows. Even turning down details, resolution etc until everything was at the level of a NES game didn't help. Frankly pathetic.

    This is why I use Windows...simple tasks, like running a game, just work properly and with a minimum fuss. I can hear everybody going "Well get Valve to release a Linux version then." Well, when they do, and I doubt they will, maybe we won't need stupid hacks like Cedega, which barely work.

    I really do wonder what the deal is with people saying they got speed increases from Cedega. My experience is...well, no way.

    --
    By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    1. Re:My experience with Cedega by Sparr0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      [i]Hard lock up.[/i]

      Then your system is broken at a level far deeper than Cedega. No misbehaving software can completely lock up the average linux system other than unintentional fork bombs, which I am relatively sure you won't encounter with Cedega.

  9. Re:How useful? / Machine Requirements by 0racle · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why get rid of something you obviously still need.

    Other then treating an OS as a religion of course.

    --
    "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
  10. Re:wake me up... by damiam · · Score: 3, Informative

    Unless I'm much mistaken, they don't charge you like an MMORPG. Your subscription buys you voting rights and access to updates. If you cancel, you still have the right to use the software that you've already downloaded.

    --
    It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  11. Why WineX will never be as good by Myria · · Score: 4, Interesting

    People complain all the time about Cedega not being completely open-source. You can blame the DMCA and United States patent law for that.

    The problem is that almost every game is copy protected. Pretty much the *only* current popular games that are not are WoW and Guild Wars. (CD keys don't count as the copy protection I'm referring to here.)

    Because almost all modern copy protection systems rely on intimate details of Windows to make it difficult to crack - most of the modern ones even install kernel-mode device drivers - it is impossible to directly emulate/simulate the API closely enough that these protection schemes. As a result of this, you really have two choices:

    1. Disable the protection. This works well, but it is very time consuming. More importantly, it is in direct violation of the DMCA, a felony.

    2. Rewrite the protection. In this method, you implement the protection yourself, doing whatever CD check necessary and disabling the original protection scheme. This method has three legal problems:

    a. The protection schemes are usually patented by the protection companies.

    b. In order for this to work, you must disable the existing protection. Even though you are adding a protection system to replace it, the DMCA does not distinguish this, and so this is illegal.

    c. Implementing it yourself means that it will be unobfuscated. Anyone with the source - which is just about anyone - can edit out the check in your code and the protection is broken. The fact that the protection is severely weakened might be seen as a judge as violating the DMCA. Considering the way courts have decided lately, I'd say it's quite likely.

    The only legal solution is to have the protection companies make you a Linux version of the protection and/or describe how the system works so you can make a wrapper. There is absolutely no way this will happen without an NDA, something a fully open-source project cannot do.

    Cedega is the best we'll have as long as American law is the way it is now. Everything points to the laws becoming even more strict over time - we haven't even reached the apex of the pendulum swing.

    Melissa

    --
    "Screw Sun, cross-platform will never work. Let's move on and steal the Java language." - Visual J++ Product Manager
  12. Re:I just wish... by Octorian · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Which really annoys me, because if they actually got off their Windows high-horse, they probably could sell application software for Linux.

    If they actually made "MS Office for Linux", and it was actually half-way decent, I wonder how many of us may actually buy it. (as in those of us for whom OpenOffice does *not* cover all the bases)

    Likewise, "Windows Media Player for Linux" would also be useful. I've got some stuff I need to watch that doesn't work in anything but real WMP. (ok, it does work in WMP for MacOSX, but doesn't work in that Flip4Mac thing MS is trying to push as a replacement)