Slashdot Mirror


Cedega 5.1 Released

Gamasutra reports that Cedega 1.5 has been released for Linux gamers looking for a Civ IV fix. From the release: "TransGaming Technologies has released Cedega 5.1, which features support for some of the newest PC titles such as Sid Meier's Civilization IV, FIFA 06 and Need for Speed: Most Wanted. Cedega allows games originally created for the Windows platform to run on Linux, straight out of the box. Other titles supported on Cedega 5.1 include Battlefield 2, Dungeon Siege II, City of Villains, Madden NFL 2006, World of WarCraft, Half-Life 2, Guild Wars, and many others. Cedega 5.1 builds on this growing list of game titles with new features that improve overall game play."

32 of 122 comments (clear)

  1. In related news by dtfinch · · Score: 4, Informative

    Wine 0.9.8 was released today.

    1. Re:In related news by flatface · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He's commenting on the summary saying "Gamasutra reports that Cedega 1.5 has been released".

  2. How useful? / Machine Requirements by jmusits · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've been off Microsoft(TM) for about 8 years. I fooled around w/ Cedega a while back and although it could install games I wanted to play (X-Wing Alliance, Command & Conquer). It would always segfault when I tried to run them. Now my hardware is nothing spectacular, but these games are older and shouldn't require the latest and greatest. I actually had better luck w/ dosemu to play another version of X-Wing vs. TieFighter that was DOS based instead of Win95 based.

    I was wondering how much more taxing the games are on hardware than when running natively on a Win based machine. Also does Cedega have requirements itself?

    Jason

    -- 42

    --
    -- 42 --
    1. Re:How useful? / Machine Requirements by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I tend to agree. I was a subscriber for over a year. Games that were listed as "should work" never worked for me. I used RedHat, Debian, Gentoo, no good. I tried various Nvidia cards across Intel and AMD processors.

      We even had geek LAN parties where we tried to get things to work. We eventually got BF1942 to work a little. And Rainbow6 worked quiet well.

      But, looking back, I think that the vast majority of people claiming success with WineX were company shills. Either that, or people didn't want to admit that their $5 a month was a complete waste.

      --
      I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
    2. Re:How useful? / Machine Requirements by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Informative

      They focus on making the most popular games work and screw the rest. I have no trouble admitting that my 3 month subscription of $5/month was a waste of money. I signed up so I could participate in the voting, only to discover how truely shallow people are. So I gave $15 to a quasi-open-source company, better than giving it to Microsoft I guess.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    3. Re:How useful? / Machine Requirements by ahpx · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm not sure about all of you guys. But it plays what I want with no problems.
      I just bought the Command and Conquer: The First Decade pack. Wine it errors on the installer, Cedega, it installs and runs perfectly. No gameplay problems, no lag, any of that crap.
      Guild Wars, works.
      World of Warcraft, works.
      Steam and All the apps, they work too.
      Civ 4, yep.

      What more can you want?
      Alot of games work with Cedega.. I don't see why all of you have these problems.
      My box isn't top of the line, in fact it's almost 3 years old, and I run everything without a problem.

    4. Re:How useful? / Machine Requirements by 0racle · · Score: 3, Interesting

      God help you if you want to play something that isn't as popular

      You could always run it on the system it was designed for.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    5. Re:How useful? / Machine Requirements by 0racle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why get rid of something you obviously still need.

      Other then treating an OS as a religion of course.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    6. Re:How useful? / Machine Requirements by corvair2k1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So grab some source (don't know if Cedega's is available, but you can get Wine) and make it work. Voting is not a bad thing... You want to cater to a general audience before the niche. It's not unreasonable to expect a low marketshare game to not get priority treatment. If your low-popularity game was going to get made, so would every game as popular or more popular... That's not reasonable.

  3. Bit of a step backwards by BertieBaggio · · Score: 2, Funny

    From the blurb:

    Gamasutra reports that Cedega 1.5 has been released for Linux gamers looking for a Civ IV fix

    A bit of editorial nostalgia, perhaps?
    --
    If all you have is a grenade, pretty soon every problem looks like a foxhole -- MightyYar
  4. Judging by the link in this article... by DarkJC · · Score: 2, Funny

    You must mean Wine 8.9.0

  5. Cedega and Punkbuster by GrmpyOldPgmr · · Score: 2, Informative

    I was just evaluating Cedega 5.x the last 2 or 3 days with Battlefield 1942 and it worked pretty good but there's still plenty of issues with Punkbuster unfortunately. After a day or two of messing with manually updating Punkbuster (I think) I may have actually successfully updated it and was able to get on a few Punkbuster servers without getting the annoying O/S privileges messages. A good tip is to change your profile to WinME or Win98 if you have it as WinXP or Win2K. I'm still debating if I want to actually subscribe or not though. I would almost be able to run Slackware full time now that I have Windows 2000 running satisfactorily in QEMU. A Cisco VPN client and about 5 or 6 games are all that's keeping me dual-booting these days.

    1. Re:Cedega and Punkbuster by Rhys · · Score: 2, Insightful

      * net-misc/vpnc
                  Latest version available: 0.3.3-r1
                  Latest version installed: [ Not Installed ]
                  Size of files: 58 kB
                  Homepage: http://www.unix-ag.uni-kl.de/~massar/vpnc/
                  Description: Free client for Cisco VPN routing software
                  License: GPL-2 BSD

      Cisco makes a client themselves too but it sucks. I have used vpnc successfully in the past on my laptop with the ipw2100 drivers to get on the wireless network here at UIUC.

      I ran cedega for a while, but even doing hardware swaps (my windows and linux machines are identical except for the video card) CoH ran about 10-20% slower on average in framerate.

      This would probably have been okay but as I sad that was average. Standard deviation was way up there, which was the problem. Smooth smooth smooth smooth frame-per-second-crawl-for-3-seconds smooth smooth smooth. Didn't look like it was a lack of memory issue or what-not.

      --
      Slashdot Patriotism: We Support our Dupes!
  6. I have had good luck. by cosmotron · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have Cedega 4.1 and got Steam working in it (before they changed the skin) and Anarchy Online. I didn't even need to do anything; just fired up cedega and ran the executable.

    --
    Ryan - http://www.thecosmotron.com/
  7. wake me up... by Truekaiser · · Score: 2, Insightful

    when they stop charging you like a mmorpg.

    1. Re:wake me up... by damiam · · Score: 3, Informative

      Unless I'm much mistaken, they don't charge you like an MMORPG. Your subscription buys you voting rights and access to updates. If you cancel, you still have the right to use the software that you've already downloaded.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  8. Link Mislabeled by Sean0michael · · Score: 3, Informative

    The link is labeled "Cedega 1.5" while the title and summary clearly state it as "Cedega 5.1". Can we fix this please? Thanks.

    --
    Funtime Candy Wow! - my plan for eventually conquering Japan.
  9. The ass-backwards solution by billcopc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I hate to yank everyone back to reality here, but if you can't get your favorite Windoze games to run with Cedega, and you REALLY want to play those games, why not dedicate a true gaming PC running XP and not munge your clean Linux system with all this patchy crap ? Yes it costs money, but Cedega costs money, and games cost money. You have to pay to play. Either that or invest in an Xbox/Playstation.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
    1. Re:The ass-backwards solution by paeanblack · · Score: 4, Informative

      I hate to yank everyone back to reality here, but if you can't get your favorite Windoze games to run with Cedega, and you REALLY want to play those games, why not dedicate a true gaming PC running XP and not munge your clean Linux system with all this patchy crap ?

      1) Games that have massive memory requirements often run better in wine than on XP. In Simcity 4, I've got some cities that will no longer load in XP, but can chug along in wine.

      2) Laptop drives aren't big enough that I'm willing to have a windows partition, but I still want my gaming fix when I'm on the road.

      In general, though, you are right. A dedicated gaming box often gives the best results.

    2. Re:The ass-backwards solution by Octorian · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's exactly what I used to do, back when my "UNIX Desktop" was a Sun machine. But as I progressively got fed up with Sun's lack of decent 2D graphics hardware, I found the machine was probably better used as a server. (Already had a Sun server running a bunch of Sun Ray thin clients, but that desktop was a faster machine.)

      For the longest time, I did want to maintain the dual-machine setup. As such, I really wanted to build some sort of Opteron super-workstation for *only* UNIX-like OSes (Linux or FreeBSD). But it always looked like it would cost me at least $2-3k, and I never had the money laying around.

      As such, my "Windows gaming machine" has since become my "Linux desktop". While I could reboot, I've grown accustomed to a persistent desktop session. I also want to go straight back to *nix after playing a game. So, I try and use Cedega when it works for me, or just "deal with it" when it doesn't. (rebooting is a very rare occurance, since I don't have that much gaming time these days, and rebooting is only good if I want to spend a lot of time gaming)

    3. Re:The ass-backwards solution by ChaosDiscord · · Score: 3, Informative
      "I hate to yank everyone back to reality here, but if you can't get your favorite Windoze games to run with Cedega, and you REALLY want to play those games, why not dedicate a true gaming PC running XP and not munge your clean Linux system with all this patchy crap ? Yes it costs money, but Cedega costs money, and games cost money. You have to pay to play. Either that or invest in an Xbox/Playstation."

      So with Cedega, for $60 per year, I can use my existing Linux PC which is well decked out with lots of RAM, a fast CPU, and a nice video card. As an added bonus I'm supporting WINE development.

      I could convert my box into a dual boot box, but then I'll have to pay for Windows ($268, respent every few years as new Windows releases come out), I have to put up with the nuisance of rebooting, and any services my PC provides are unavailable while in Windows.

      I could, as you suggest, purchase a dedicated gaming PC. For something roughly equivalent to my Linux PC, I'd be looking at about $700 (respent every few years either in upgrades or replacements), assuming I'll reused the monitor from my Linux PC. And I'll need to find space for the extra machine.

      I could buy an XBox or Playstation (I'd hardly call a piece of commodity electronics an "investment"), but I've been having problems getting World of Warcraft, Civ 4, City of Heroes, and Warcraft III running on either platform.

      For some people Cedega is a very reasonable option. Encouraging people to spend money unnecessarily is stupid. Many people can be perfectly happy with Cedega and end up saving money. Personally it isn't for me (I play too many games, so I suffer with the dual boot option), but I'm not sneering at people who make that choice. You're not yanking people back to reality, you're ignoring reality.

  10. Re:Wouldn't it have been easier? by QuantaStarFire · · Score: 5, Funny
    Wouldn't it have been easier to just simply port Civ IV to linux?

    Are you kidding? That would require forethought, and research, and abandonment of the precious DirectX API! Fire would rain from the heavens! Locusts would eat all our crops! Everyone would be covered in boils! It would be the apocalypse!

  11. My experience with Cedega by jb.hl.com · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I tried Cedega once. TransGaming claim to support Half-Life 2 through it, so I gave it a go.

    Steam installed fine, so did HL2. After everything was ready to go, I ran the game.

    Hard lock up.

    Rebooted the PC, started again. This time everything worked fine, except I got maybe 1fps. This on a not spectacularly fast PC/graphics card, but one more than capable of properly running HL2 under Windows. Even turning down details, resolution etc until everything was at the level of a NES game didn't help. Frankly pathetic.

    This is why I use Windows...simple tasks, like running a game, just work properly and with a minimum fuss. I can hear everybody going "Well get Valve to release a Linux version then." Well, when they do, and I doubt they will, maybe we won't need stupid hacks like Cedega, which barely work.

    I really do wonder what the deal is with people saying they got speed increases from Cedega. My experience is...well, no way.

    --
    By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    1. Re:My experience with Cedega by damiam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Cedega probably wasn't your problem. I'd bet that you probably didn't have hardware 3D acceleration set up for your video card. The stock installs of most distros use the 2D-only open-source drivers distributed with X, which are useless for gaming. You wouldn't expect games to work under Windows without installing the proper drivers, and the same is true for Linux. With decent drivers (i.e. binaries from nVidia, or the open-source drivers for older Radeons), most games should run at similar framerates under Windows and Linux/Cedega.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    2. Re:My experience with Cedega by Sparr0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      [i]Hard lock up.[/i]

      Then your system is broken at a level far deeper than Cedega. No misbehaving software can completely lock up the average linux system other than unintentional fork bombs, which I am relatively sure you won't encounter with Cedega.

    3. Re:My experience with Cedega by the_greywolf · · Score: 2, Informative

      the binary nVidia driver isn't bug-free, either. i've had some major terminal lockups (requiring that i either SSH in and reboot or simply reset or it's just effectively headless) due to that driver. though i do with they'd open-source it so we could get these terminal driver problems fixed. :\

      --
      grey wolf
      LET FORTRAN DIE!
  12. Re:WoW, Amd 64, Via Chipset, ATI Radeon 9200 by the_greywolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    many people, including myself (GeForce FX 5900, non-ultra) have been playing WoW nearly bug-free for a long time. in fact, i heard most of the texture problems have been resolved, but most of those that remain are due to the ATi drivers. there are numerous known (and acknowledged) issues with ATi cards and drivers in particular, and the forums are rife with people complaining about their Ati stuff not working as expected.

    that said, support improves every month with every new release, and with your subscription, you can vote for what matters to you. (and, since ATi issues come up every voting cycle, VOTE, DAMNIT.) (note, i typically vote -1 on most ATi issues, but i'll stop that if you agree to start voting.)

    also, read the forums. it's a bitch, i know, but really, there is a lot of helpful information there if you just take the time to find it. the really big things get stickied (0x10000000 mem loc. fix for mouse in WoW, for example) and everything else will come up from time to time. and don't rule out your distro's forums, either. the official Gentoo gamer forum has threads for all sorts of problems that come up in Cedega, with tips on getting other games to work in vanilla Wine.

    they claim it's out-of-the-box compatibility, but as with anything on linux, you have to care enough to fiddle with it a little.

    --
    grey wolf
    LET FORTRAN DIE!
  13. I just wish... by Khyber · · Score: 2, Funny

    Microsoft would bother trying to write a full DirectX port for Linux. Who knows? It may actually work for once, and there may be a boost in the software market, if perhaps it's done free. I'd buy software if I had the free tool to run it flawlessly on another OS. *Might have opened my mouth too late*

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:I just wish... by fm6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Microsoft will not do anything to help Linux. It's the closest thing they have to actual competition.

    2. Re:I just wish... by Octorian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Which really annoys me, because if they actually got off their Windows high-horse, they probably could sell application software for Linux.

      If they actually made "MS Office for Linux", and it was actually half-way decent, I wonder how many of us may actually buy it. (as in those of us for whom OpenOffice does *not* cover all the bases)

      Likewise, "Windows Media Player for Linux" would also be useful. I've got some stuff I need to watch that doesn't work in anything but real WMP. (ok, it does work in WMP for MacOSX, but doesn't work in that Flip4Mac thing MS is trying to push as a replacement)

  14. Why WineX will never be as good by Myria · · Score: 4, Interesting

    People complain all the time about Cedega not being completely open-source. You can blame the DMCA and United States patent law for that.

    The problem is that almost every game is copy protected. Pretty much the *only* current popular games that are not are WoW and Guild Wars. (CD keys don't count as the copy protection I'm referring to here.)

    Because almost all modern copy protection systems rely on intimate details of Windows to make it difficult to crack - most of the modern ones even install kernel-mode device drivers - it is impossible to directly emulate/simulate the API closely enough that these protection schemes. As a result of this, you really have two choices:

    1. Disable the protection. This works well, but it is very time consuming. More importantly, it is in direct violation of the DMCA, a felony.

    2. Rewrite the protection. In this method, you implement the protection yourself, doing whatever CD check necessary and disabling the original protection scheme. This method has three legal problems:

    a. The protection schemes are usually patented by the protection companies.

    b. In order for this to work, you must disable the existing protection. Even though you are adding a protection system to replace it, the DMCA does not distinguish this, and so this is illegal.

    c. Implementing it yourself means that it will be unobfuscated. Anyone with the source - which is just about anyone - can edit out the check in your code and the protection is broken. The fact that the protection is severely weakened might be seen as a judge as violating the DMCA. Considering the way courts have decided lately, I'd say it's quite likely.

    The only legal solution is to have the protection companies make you a Linux version of the protection and/or describe how the system works so you can make a wrapper. There is absolutely no way this will happen without an NDA, something a fully open-source project cannot do.

    Cedega is the best we'll have as long as American law is the way it is now. Everything points to the laws becoming even more strict over time - we haven't even reached the apex of the pendulum swing.

    Melissa

    --
    "Screw Sun, cross-platform will never work. Let's move on and steal the Java language." - Visual J++ Product Manager
  15. DirectX on OS X by Phantasmo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe Microsoft should try to beat Cedega to the punch and port DirectX to Mac OS X? They could sell it for $30 per major revision, with free updates in between to keep things in sync with Windows. MS could start losing some serious business if Cedega ever gets "good enough" (although this doesn't seem to be the case so far).
    Also, if it was done really well, it would discourage the development of native OS X games, which I'm sure they'd see as a nice bonus.

    --

    The US Army: promoting democracy through unquestioned obedience