Slashdot Mirror


Mac Calendaring Solutions?

ubercombatwombat asks: "I have been tasked with providing groupware for the administrative office at the school district, for which I am the network admin. Laetly, I have been searching in vain for an Entourage compatible groupware calendar solution. We have Communigate Pro, which was supposed to support Entorage by now, but doesn't. Meanwhile, I have placed HP 2410 iPaq's with The Missing Sync for PocketPC on the 10 desktops without groupware. Secretaries use Apple Remote Desktop, a few times a day, to update their bosses Entourage calendar. It is not the best solution, but it is all I can come up with, at the moment. Incidentally, we also have Brown Bear Software's excellent iCal product (yes, Apple licensed the 'iCal' name from them), but Brown Bear doesn't work with Entourage or Apple's iCal in a groupware role. As far as Exchange goes, I'd rather not use it. Does anyone have a Mac OS X groupware solution?"

80 comments

  1. Here are a few options... by Urd · · Score: 3, Informative
    1. Re:Here are a few options... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why not use opengroupware.org ? you can still use the mac front ends.

    2. Re:Here are a few options... by helge5 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what you mean by "mac front ends". OGo has some support for iCal.app subscriptions and publication. Though iCalendar-over-HTTP is not a protocol which is particularily well suited for calendars which can be written by multiple users. Hopefully Apple will support the CalDAV standard (still in draft) in one of the upcoming releases.

      For simple needs an Apache WebDAV server (included in OSX) is sufficient to accomplish the same thing and installing a full OGo server is probably overkill.

  2. Kerio by akac · · Score: 4, Informative

    Try Kerio's mail server if you must host your own. Or 4SmartPhone.net for hosted Exchange. I personally use CGPro as well because we need a solid mail backbone that is easy to administer, but otherwise we'd probably go with Kerio or 4SmartPhone.net. Both support Entourage in groupware mode as well as Outlook.

    1. Re:Kerio by CptTripps · · Score: 2, Informative

      I REALLY agree. We had CommuniGate for years, and got sick of the licensing BS, and the lack of support for programs like you state above. Kerio is a GREAT app...and...

      It supports iCal...and Address book...and does it well.

      Not cheap, but if you already own CommuniGate...you are used to that. If you ask me, Stalker missed the mark by a MILE. the rested too long, and I can see Kerio taking a LARGE chunk of their already small marketplace.

      --


      My .sig can beat up your honor student.
    2. Re:Kerio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I use Kerio and I'm in exactly the same position you are. It's wonderfull, it supposedly works with entorage and outlook, but we just tell everyone to use the webmail. It supports all the same features as entorage and outlook, so why use a client at all? It also can host your calendars for ical, which means that with the phpicalendar project you can provide awesome calendars for your school's website without dual entry. We have plans for using public calendars in our kerio mail server to track everything from the lunch menu to scheduling gyms. We have had only minor bugs, and they were all fixed in the last update. Right now I have my cell phone and a palm synchronized with several public calendars and my personal calendar. I did this with isync.

  3. CalTalk by foniksonik · · Score: 4, Informative

    While this doesn't solve your problem it may interest /. macheads out there....

    CalTalk is a 'Bonjour' enabling app for iCal that lets you automatically share and find shared iCal calendars on the network. It only works on the local subnet because that's all Bonjour supports but that's just right for at home or at work use... ...though it does allow you to share iCal shares you've subscribed to from the internet ;-p which is nice, cause you can basically set up one Mac as a calendar server and have it subscribe to all the various published iCal files from external urls and share them out to the subnet for everyone else.

    And of course it's a Free as in Beer app you can download now.

    p.s. I'm not affiliated w/ the developer in any way

    --
    A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
  4. Broaden your search by dorkygeek · · Score: 1
    Why not looking for Unix groupware solutions? Don't narrow your mind by only looking for Mac OS X.

    Or how about web-based solutions?

    --
    Windows is like decaf - it tastes like the real thing, but it won't get you through the day.
    1. Re:Broaden your search by eobanb · · Score: 0

      How about their workstations run Mac OS X, so that's the platform on which the software for which they're looking runs?

      --

      Take off every sig. For great justice.

    2. Re:Broaden your search by ScuzzMonkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I dunno if this is what the grandparent was getting at, or if you are ignorant as to the BSD underpinnings of OS X and the relative ease of compiling *nix based code for it, but there is an awful lot of Unix-based software that has already been ported over to OS X via the DarwinPorts, Fink, and other projects, so it's not really a bad suggestion. I use a lot of desktop programs on my Mac which are traditionally associated with Linux and might not turn up in a search for OS X only software--but they work great on my Powerbook. I can't say for server-side solutions but it's certainly worth taking a look.

      --
      No relation to Happy Monkey
    3. Re:Broaden your search by dorkygeek · · Score: 1
      I hate to break it to you, but Mac OS X is Unix!

      --
      Windows is like decaf - it tastes like the real thing, but it won't get you through the day.
  5. Online Calendar by the_bahua · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Your situation sounds like it's ideal for an online calendar. The newly-released AJAXified 30 Boxes is a great little online calendar, and is definitely worth a look.

    1. Re:Online Calendar by pythas · · Score: 1

      So how do they get entourage & their PDAs syncd to this?

    2. Re:Online Calendar by the_bahua · · Score: 1

      That's all in the works, the developers say, and will be available very soon. They have been very good about rolling out new features when they say they will, so I don't think it's an empty promise.

  6. Open-Xchange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about Open-Xchange? 8.2-R3 is out. You may want to check that out too htt://open-xchange.org

    1. Re:Open-Xchange by helge5 · · Score: 1

      Thats *0*.8.2-rc3, not 8.2 ...

  7. check out this thread on macslash by mr_burns · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://macslash.org/article.pl?sid=03/11/25/113421 1&mode=thread

    You may want to use the search on that site with a few other keywords. This subject comes along every once in a while so there's likely more than one thread about it.

    --
    "Let him go, Ralph. He knows what he's doing." --Otto Mann (simpsons)
  8. What to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ask Slashdot, because things like Google don't exist

  9. Now Up-to-Date and Contact by dn15 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Check out Now Up-to-Date and Contact. It's not exactly my favorite program, but it does the job. There's also a Windows version in case you have and PCs that need to connect. http://www.nowsoftware.com/

  10. Mac Groupware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of my clients has been the main beta-tester for a Mac centric Calendar program called Daylite.

    http://www.marketcircle.com/daylite/index.html

    It's a groupware based calendar system. Works great over VPN connections into the server. Apparenly the new version also plugs into some of Apples apps directly.

    We've been using it for a good while now and it's finally coming into shape because of the all feedback my client gave to the company.

    Much much better than using Apple Remote Desktop.

    Best,

    C

  11. Calendar Sharing via OS X Server by Crisses · · Score: 1

    My last long-term consulting gig used an OS X Server used to publish iCal calendars from their computer. Each computer/user had 1 public and 1 private calendar. It utilized WebDav, and was passworded.

    From there, other people subscribed to the public calendars.

    I can't recall whether there was an option to allow others to edit your calendar, but you can allow them to view notes or have them get the alarms from your published calendar, and they were visible from the web as long as the server was web-accessible.

    --
    ---- I'm out of your mind!
  12. XC Connect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My company is evaluating XC Connect by Xchange Network (http://www.xcnetwork.com/index.jsp). We plan on using it calendaring while we use Communigate Pro for e-mail.

    Product quote.

    "Looking for a simple and inexpensive solution to share contacts, calendars and tasks between and across Microsoft Outlook, Microsoft Entourage for Macintosh, iCal and Address Book for OS X and Novell Evolution for Linux?"

  13. Web Based Service by democritus · · Score: 0

    Why not try a wab based service like WebEx WebOffice. It's a full groupware suite that's easy to use, works in Safari, Gecko and IE and you don't have to administer a bunch of servers. Easy as can be.

    1. Re:Web Based Service by PHPfanboy · · Score: 1

      My company uses this. It's partly the re-badged intranets.com system. Works really nicely on Windows with MSIE, but with Firefox it's a complete dog and the pages don't render the same (seem to be some bits missing, but it's still usable). Same story on Safari. Just annoying, but I guess what that's what the creators of ASP.NET wanted for non MS users.

      If he's into a totally web-based solution, the guy looking should also probably have a look at the Horde project (PHP-based) - http://www.horde.org/ though I don't know if it works nicely with PDA's.

      --
      29 mpg. YMMV.
  14. Oh the irony!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... laetly ...

    I am not sure who needs to be sent back to class in the school district, the submitter or the so-called editor...

  15. Daylite by jcr · · Score: 1

    Check out this app. It's generally well-regarded in the Mac community. Does rather more than calendaring, though.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  16. Try Zimbra by bkazez · · Score: 1

    Zimbra attempts to provide this (and much, much more):

    http://www.zimbra.com/

    1. Re:Try Zimbra by commanderfoxtrot · · Score: 1

      Zimbra is getting a lot of press time at the moment.

      Have you used it significantly? how does it compare to the competition?

      --
      http://blog.grcm.net/
  17. Ha!!! by dslauson · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Mark me off topic or troll if you like, but I have to say it...

    You know it's Friday night in nerdtown when there are four back to back "Ask Slashdots".

  18. Just use iCal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I don't understand is why you don't just use iCal. And Apple Mail and Address Book. I use all of the free native Apple programs to run my business and they are great. You gain nothing from Entourage especially if you aren't using Exchange server.

    iCalanders can be uploaded to any WebDav capable server and be subscribed to or viewed as a web page. Addresses can be dropped onto schedules and used as links for sending appointment or update emails, etc.

    The three apps together are almost Lotus Notes without being advertised as such. I've used Lotus Notes, I've used Microsoft and other CRM tools, and I can honestly say what comes installed on my Mac is easier to use, cheaper, and in some cases, like Lotus Notes, isn't a resource hog.

    1. Re:Just use iCal by metamatic · · Score: 1

      Yeah, iCal lets you publish your calendar, send people invites, and so on... however, it doesn't do meeting room booking. If that's what you need, you need something more than iCal.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    2. Re:Just use iCal by La+Camiseta · · Score: 1

      Maybe something like iCal/LDAP address books (and logon)/open source groupware solution. That way you have standard address books for everyone (invites, etc.), as well as standard users for the groupware solution when using things like room checkout, etc.

      Set up the email to use IMAP, that way everybody could access their email from their Macs as well as over the internet.

    3. Re:Just use iCal by nightgeometry · · Score: 1

      This is a fairly old skool way of doing it but...

      I have often used calendars where each meeting room had it's own calendar, and you just included the room on the invite, or variations around that. Has always seemed to work well. A nasty hack if you are used to something better, but it just works(tm), pretty much(tm)...

      --
      The best is the enemy of the good
  19. ha couple of ideas by nocomment · · Score: 1

    Maybe Novell Groupwise or IBM lotus domino? ($$$)

      I've heard Kerio is good, but I've never used it.

    --
    /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
    /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
  20. Meeting Maker by KerberosKing · · Score: 3, Informative

    Meeting Maker the server runs on Windows, Mac, Solaris or Linux. Native clients for Macs and PCs, Web clients for anything with a decent browser. Lots of good features like iCal or outlook integration, PDA sync, all sorts of cool bits.

    1. Re:Meeting Maker by scolby · · Score: 1

      Exports to iCal, but not automatically. Got to do an export any time you want to see it in iCal.

    2. Re:Meeting Maker by KerberosKing · · Score: 1

      You can script that can't you? Then just drop the script in crontab and you're done.

    3. Re:Meeting Maker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meeting Maker is not scriptable. You can screenscrape an export if you want to go to that trouble, but they have yet to provide a dictionary for Applescript use.

  21. Web DAV? by Hadlock · · Score: 1

    I'll admit I don't have any real experience with it, but as I understand it, iCal supports webDAV servers other than .mac; Perhaps you could "roll your own" webDAV server, which both entorage and ical talk to?

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
    1. Re:Web DAV? by SlamMan · · Score: 3, Informative

      iCal only handles publish and subscribe calendars. No actual syncing. Thus, no mutli-user editable calendars.

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
  22. Linux box by Udo+Schmitz · · Score: 2, Interesting
    In our office (multimedia/public sector) we are right now in the process to decide on a groupware solution. We have Macs and Windows-PCs and right now people use different e-mail-clients and use a very old version of Now-Uptodate. After comparing an upgrade to this with MS Exchange and OSS solutions I recommended a Linux-PC based solution with either Open Xchange or Open Groupware. We "outsorced" this to a small local company who will decide what exactly will be used. They'll sell us a machine with everything build and configured to our needs and give us an introduction. We then will use it through a web-interface.

    I'm a Machead myself but I think this is the best solution, it surely was the cheapest and will run on everything with a webbrowser. And it is the savest solution for the future. Right now there are some people who want to change everything from Mac to Windows, who knows if in a few years our city switches to Linux?

    1. Re:Linux box by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      I know you are going for a F/OSS solution, but I can't say enough good about the smartermail server it's .Net based, so it requires a windows based server (2003 web edition is pretty reasonably priced, and will work)... the latest version supports outlook integration, and iirc iCal/WebDav and LDAP support for calendar and contacts... I'm using the 2.x version myself, but will probably upgrade in the next few months.

      Honestly, imho it's the best interface outside of outlook web 2003 (slick), or gmail (simplicity) ... they have a demo site that shows off most of the newer functionality.. as a mail server itself, it simply kicks ass...

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
  23. There are a *lot* of OS X Calendaring apps by Lproven · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sticking with Entourage may be a problem, though.

    You might want to look at or evaluate these:

    Crm4Mc 2.0
        http://www.ibizzi.com/

    DayChaser : Econ Technologies
        http://www.econtechnologies.com/site/Pages/DayChas er/daychaser_overview.html

    DayLite : Marketcircle
        http://www.marketcircle.com/

    ecOrganizer
        http://www.ecorganizer.com/

    intuiware : HotPlan
        http://www.intuiware.com/

    Now Software : Now up to date
        http://www.nowsoftware.com/

    Organizer software by CSoftLabs
        http://www.csoftlab.com/

    Pure Mac : Personal Information Managers
        http://www.pure-mac.com/pims.html

    RadicalBreeze.com - Formation
        http://www.radicalbreeze.com/formation/index.shtml

    SOHO Organizer
        http://www.chronosnet.com/Products/sohoorganizer.h tml

    OD4Contact
        http://objective-decision.com/en/

    --
    Liam P. ~ "Intelligence is a lethal mutation." (me)
  24. Oracle Calendar by trboyden · · Score: 1

    Oracle also has a multi-platform product - Oracle Calendar - that is part of their Collaboration Suite (which includes email, calendaring, PDA sync, etc...). It's not free, but Oracle has fairly generous licensing terms for schools. They also offer it in a hosted environment for low monthly fees. It'll do everything you want and more, and they are constantly working on providing enhanced support for applications that are part of the respective operating systems.

  25. can try obm free groupware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  26. SOHO Organizer by marchie · · Score: 1
    --
    ~Why not go mad? -Douglas Adams
  27. using iCal as groupware... by pelorus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There's some work being done on this - using iCal on Mac OS X as proper groupware using SyncServices. Initial release will support Mac OS X only - further releases will link to Sunbird and Vista Calendar. Just started investigating the possibilities of linking to other online calendaring solutions (30boxes etc). There is a working prototype but it's not released yet. Stuff will be posted on sourceforge as well.

    http://www.infurious.com/blogs/

    (Warning: Link is to a blog. And yes, I'm involved in this. So, this is almost a cheap shill advert!)

  28. Try FirstClass by Pekonius · · Score: 1

    from Open Text (http://www.cirstclass.com./ They have a free fully functioning intro-server. It is a full workgroup solution, server can be Mac OS X, Windows or Linux and it serves all af those platforms. We have been using it for years.

    1. Re:Try FirstClass by rtorkian · · Score: 1

      FirstClass is a great option, and one that I forgot to mention in my post below. I looked at it for us, but the main problem was I found the client to be somewhat non-intuitive and non-OS X-like. (when creating a new email, the first line is "subject", not "to:"? huh?) Plus, it does way more that we need (which is just email/contacts/calendar). Still, it's a worthy option, just not for us (nor for this guy, from the sound of it).

    2. Re:Try FirstClass by Slorv · · Score: 1

      We've been using FirstClass since mid 90's and it has evolved from a BBS system to a groupware solution. I run the systems on a university department with about 700-800 students and 40 in the staff. We also run the distance learning for a different department thru the web interface. Why you should try it: You get mail, conferencing, common and individual: calendars, documents, adressbooks, a webserver that can be used as a publishing system, etc etc. Check it out on ahref=http://www.firstclass.com/rel=url2html-9100h ttp://www.firstclass.com/> A someone else said there even is a fully working tryout system for you to install on your Win/OS-X/Linux server. It is VERY reliable which is cruical if you run a groupware system. The underlaying systems - how files are stored and how messages are handled within the system - are very similar to Exchange Server. The major difference from Exchange is that with FC you have LDAP instead of AD sync nor do you get Microsoft Office documents integration. It also scales nicely from 2 :) users and up. The largest system I've heard about has 450.000 users . And why shouldn't you run FC? Very important, First Class does not sync calendars or adressbooks with anything outside it. Of course you have import and export but not sync. They offer directory integration over LDAP but I haven't looked into the details on how and what part of a User entry they support. Syncronisation of calendars, contacts, and of course the directory are important factors when designing your office system. A lot of water seems to run under the bridges on the company 'formerly known as' Soft Arc. FC used to be a Mac only server with great integration of the Mac UI on the client. Not anymore. The Mac knowledgeables has vanished, it seems, so has the urge to do anything new that is not based on Windows UI and Win standards. This means that new features always comes on the Windows version of the server first and maybe they migrate them to Mac. This despite that Open Text repetedly states that they are commited to all three platforms. Since a year or two they offer a unix version of the server but the marketing dept. rarely, if ever, talks about it. The Mac client has poor placement of windows and buttons so many times you must scroll a few pixels within a window just to see an OK button. Sad. Maybe I'm just bitter but it seems to me that the Open Text bean counters has laid out the path for the development of the system. By offering a product below par on non-windows platforms they might hope that we will all migrate to Windows servers. The beans counters also has changed the licensing so that you cannot upgrade directly from say 6 > 8, yo must buy the intermediate upgrades aswell. Tech stuff: We use a dedicated 2xG4 2GB XServe with the database on a small 60 GB drive with a similar mirror drive. The mirroring takes care of failures on the main drive during normal use but since our database is only about 5-6 GB it takes less than 20 minutes to do a full backup. Because of this and since our system is also our main mail system we backup every 12 hours. It would be impossible to do any work without it. The FC system itself has failed only due to outside problems like power failure, network trouble so despite the backup frenzy I'm pretty relaxed with leaving it over the summer vacation weeks etc. It's just that WHEN problem occurs, and they will, I want to be able to have it back up again within an hour. /Per Mattsson

      --
      Bikers.....The only people that understand why a dog hangs his head out a car window.
    3. Re:Try FirstClass by Slorv · · Score: 1

      Urgh, I always forget to format messages on Slashdot.
      the URL should be http://www.firstclass.com/

      --
      Bikers.....The only people that understand why a dog hangs his head out a car window.
  29. Forget "groupware", pick the pieces you need. by rtorkian · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I went through a similar process recently for our all-OS X org (35 people/3 offices).

    After LOTS of searching, I gave up on the all-in-one groupware solution and decided to pick individual apps that just do what we need, nothing more. There is no good groupware solution w/ a full client for OS X outside of Exchange/E'rage and Notes; this is a big hole someone should fill.

    I chose Communigate Pro for email, because it's solid, and I don't want to spend precious time fooling w/ a cranky email server. Exchange was out, it's expensive, and I have zero experience (or desire) adminning it or windows server. It was either CGP or Kerio, and Kerio has more groupware features, but when I looked, Kerio was having some pretty serious bug/stability issues--this was pre 6.1 I think. The support forums were a bloodbath, and I didn't need that headache.

    For calendaring, we're currently testing Meeting Maker. Native OS X client, web interface too, it does calendaring and little else. People like it so far.

    Even w/ individual programs, the administrative burden can be lessened by support for LDAP authentication. Both CGP and Meeting Maker support this (MM w/ an extra bundle).

    If I were you, I'd drop the requirement for Entourage integration, and find standalone solutions that best fit your need. Even just using Meeting Maker would be a huge improvement over what you have now.

    1. Re:Forget "groupware", pick the pieces you need. by peterjhill2002 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, your searching missed a good one. As someone else pointed out, Oracle Calendar is a great product. Oracle bough Stelltor's Corporate Time and integrated it into their collaboration suite. I like the way that Oracle's product works. I can't stand how with Exchange that if I don't use the heinous Entourage program, I need to be careful not to delete meeting invites, for if I do, it is gone forever...

      There are many other things that drive me crazy about Exchange... I personally like how there is a separate UI (application) for email, calendar, and addressbook on the Mac. They all integrate, but the primary interface for all of them is not one application.. I don't have to open up my email app on the road to look up an address (of course I can just use my ipod for that)...

      anyway... not a bad product and way better than exchange

    2. Re:Forget "groupware", pick the pieces you need. by rtorkian · · Score: 1

      I did look at the Oracle Collab suite, and I have heard good things about it.... but it's WAY WAY overkill for us. To get the calendar you have to get either the Unified Messaging package or the full Collaboration Suite, both of which include other stuff we just don't need.

      Even as a complete solution, either package is too much for our 35 person org. Maybe if we were 10x that, and more tech-oriented, it'd be up our alley.

  30. download the trial by johnjones · · Score: 1

    you can download a trail for 30 days unlimted in very way from

    www.kerio.co.uk

  31. that should have been by johnjones · · Score: 1

    that should have been

    www.kerio.co.uk

  32. eGroupware by Shawn+is+an+Asshole · · Score: 1

    I does calendars, project management, wiki, issue tracking, email, etc. It's a great app, fully web based and it now uses AJAX. Give it a try.

    http://www.egroupware.org/

    --
    "It ain't a war against drugs.it's a war against personal freedom" --Bill Hicks
    1. Re:eGroupware by Xochil · · Score: 1

      Web-based PIMS are pretty much useless in any organization having mobile users. How is one supposed to view or make adds/changes/deletions to PIM data if they don't happen to be net connected at a given moment (say on a plane or something)?

      --Mike

    2. Re:eGroupware by Shawn+is+an+Asshole · · Score: 1

      Well, I haven't tried it but eGroupware does support XML-RPC and it can sync (both ways) with clients such as KDE's Korganizer/Kontact.

      --
      "It ain't a war against drugs.it's a war against personal freedom" --Bill Hicks
    3. Re:eGroupware by helge5 · · Score: 1

      Doesn't eGroupware support SyncML synchronisation? I think so.

      Having a web interface does not imply that servers do not provide other ways to access the data ...

  33. Zimbra by tachijuan · · Score: 1

    Have you checked out http://zimbra.com/? It's a complete OSS email, contact, calendaring solution. I'm not sure about the Entourage integration, but it does have outlook integration in the commercial version. I'd be surprised that it doesn't work. It does come with an AJAX interface that's well worth looking into as an addition/replacement for entourage.
    ----
    tachijuan
    http://amuyu.com/

    --
    -- thoughts on one of those things: http://amuyu.com/
  34. half cooked, useful bits = commercial by SuperBanana · · Score: 1
    After comparing an upgrade to this with MS Exchange and OSS solutions I recommended a Linux-PC based solution with either Open Xchange or Open Groupware.

    OpenGroupware is still in beta; has been for years. The Outlook and Palm plugins for Open Xchange are commercial.

    Also, I'm a Linux sysadmin, and unless the company building the linux box really knows what they're doing, you can't really treat it like an appliance. Additionally, both projects on their own strike me as immature (ie some monitoring and such would be a great idea).

    1. Re:half cooked, useful bits = commercial by nmos · · Score: 1

      FWIW I've set up a few clients with phpgroupware which I think OpenGroupware spun off of. The web mail isn't the slickest one around but it has been reliable, easy to use and easy to maintain.

    2. Re:half cooked, useful bits = commercial by helge5 · · Score: 1

      OpenGroupware.org did not spun off PHP, its not even developed in PHP but in Objective-C.

    3. Re:half cooked, useful bits = commercial by helge5 · · Score: 1

      The OpenSource version of OGo has been in beta since about one year, previously it was marked trunk, then alpha ;-)

      The server software itself is developed since about 10 years and was available in stable commercial versions for years (Skyrix 3..4.. currently 5). The first community release, OGo 1.0.0, is expected in May (LinuxTag 2006).

    4. Re:half cooked, useful bits = commercial by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      The open-xchange plugins are commercial, but you can use many other clients for free with them.

      On the other hand, if your using exchange or lotus notes you need both commercial clients *and* servers, so it's still a lot cheaper.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  35. iCal and merge calendars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...i did a search last week for s/th to merge icals calendars and ended up writing al little (250 lines) ruby script which does that job. the script idientifies different events by UID and merges the attributes, adding the old summary and start-time to the description-field. we sync our calendars to our osx-server when the screensaver activates (stop ical to make it write its changes, rsync the ical-dir to the server) and trigger the merge via folder-action-script on the server. one minute late the client gets the merged version back and starts ical again. works fine so far. i know, many other calendars can do this out of the box, but i like the ical interface best.

  36. open you requirments... by capsteve · · Score: 1

    open your requirements to include other platforms. i've tackled this problem several times in the last five years for different employers. it seems like it's a holy grail when i speak with others that have similar needs, even with folks who have already deployed commercial groupware products. being too narrow to the mac will bite you in the ass later. at the very least consider a system that is both mac and pc compliant.

    consider an all web deployment, one that does not require specific software on the client side but will work with a variety of client apps. php and mysql based systems seem the most flexible.

    take a look at phpgroupware, geeklog, and joomla.

    --
    three can keep a secret, if two are dead - benjamin franklin
  37. Zimbra by Aron+S-T · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Zimbra is a neat new open source offering that is very Mac OS X friendly, integrates with just about everything and runs on OS X server and various Linux flavors.

  38. Novell Groupwise is worth a close look by beep999 · · Score: 1

    Groupwise has an awesome feature set and a very nice Java-based
    client that runs great on Linux and MacOS-X. It basically has all
    the features of Exchange and more, without the administration
    hassles and it runs on Linux servers.

    You look like you're at an educational institution, which means you
    can probably get their ALA pricing (only $5k/year for several hundred
    users).

    1. Re:Novell Groupwise is worth a close look by risc++1024 · · Score: 1

      We tried Novell Groupwise on SUSE Enterprise with Linux and Windows clients. Firstly the groupwise server was VERY unstable on SUSE Enterprise. Secondly the Java client for Groupwise is unstable and lacks many features. Their support for Evolution sucks. In short, we dropped Groupwise after a month and converted to Kerio mail server in two days. Kerio is a wornderfull experience.

    2. Re:Novell Groupwise is worth a close look by beep999 · · Score: 1

      For us (as per management), it was either Exchange or a solution by a
      major vendor that offered all of the features of Exchange. That
      equals Groupwise. What version did you have trouble with? Beyond us, I know of a couple other companies running GW v7 on SUSE and it's rock
      solid for all.

  39. How about this? by david-bo · · Score: 1

    Hava look at http://indie.yi.org:8000/gesall/en. It is still just a demo but if there is enough interest the service might be released.

  40. Did you misunderstand the concept? by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 1

    Two things:

    1. You forgot to put "Oblig." in the subject. It seems like every time there's an Ask Slashdot, someone says this.

    2. While Google can provide you with the product names, there is some benefit to the personal opinions and experiences you find on Slashdot. People can say, "I used this, and this works great" or "stay away from this if you need it to do this". You have to really dig to find information like that, elsewhere.

    Apparently, none of you ever considered the benefit to shared knowledge. This is another thing people with common interests do; they talk about things that interest and concern then, typically with the goal of informing each other. I don't need a Mac OS X groupware application right now, but I learned about CalTalk, which I can use.

    In conclusion, if you don't think there's benefit in asking questions of your peers, then skip the article and let the rest of us learn.

    --
    That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
  41. MeetingMaker by hkb · · Score: 1

    Go with MeetingMaker. It's not the prettiest, but its the most reliable we've tried. We also use(d) Kerio as another person here recommended, it's crap, don't bother.

    MeetingMaker (I think they just changed their name to PeopleCube) is solid on all its platforms (OS X/OS9; Windows; and the Web Client). Also has Palm conduits, and can interface with Blackberry and WinCE with Intellisync.

    --
    /* Moderating all non-anonymous trolls up since 2004 */
  42. Mac groupware by Altschuler · · Score: 1

    If you're willing to consider an on-demand, SaaS solution, which would be available through any Internet-connected Mac (or PC), take a look at NetOffice -- http://www.netoffice.com./ It has all the features of Entourage or Outlook but adds a slew of other contact, communications, and file sharing capabilities.

  43. Dynamic online calendaring by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

    Let me highjack this for a moment and expand to the Windows platform -

    Are there any decent calendaring applications that let me /subscribe/ to online calendars?

    Plenty of programs will import iCal calendars (which seems to be the most popular format), but it's a one-time thing. I'm looking for something more like RSS - import what's there now, and check back on a regular basis for updates.

    Importing isn't very helpful if I have to do it manually every couple days.

    I think the time is ripe for a new kind of calendar application. Most calendars programs are pretty simple and assume there's just one person involved - you. The assumption is any event on the calendar is one that you are involved in. There's not much notation for differentiations like "This is something I'm doing" and
    "This is something I'm interested in"

    Here's a use case. I open my calendar program. I go to my custom views for "entertainment". I check out what movies are showing next week, what plays, what concerts, sports events, etc. I see my favorite band is coming to town, so I mark that entry. Now, if I go back to "my" calendar, I see that concert. Two days later, the bassist gets sick and the concert is postponed two weeks. When I open my calendar program, it alerts me that the event that I was interested in has changed.

    Nothing I have found comes close to this. To be honest, most were just plain painful to use, and none had anything close to my dynamic calendars ideal.

    There's some hope. Nat Friedman started the Hula Project last year (though JMZ had some reservations -- a good read, as Jamie's obversations usually are) which is open source and has the backing of Novell. I'm not sure if they've actually gotten anywhere, though; the open source landscape is littered with failed projects that started off as a code-dump from some major corporation. But at least someone seems to have the same idea and is trying to make a go of it...

  44. this kinda sucks by klickerklicker · · Score: 1

    Calendering is a real mess