Slashdot Mirror


University Bans wi-fi as Health Concern

BaltikaTroika writes "A Canadian university has banned wi-fi, since the university President sees a possible link between electric and magnetic fields and brain tumors. According to the head of the university, "the jury's out on this one, I'm not going to put in place what is potential chronic exposure for our students." Is anybody outside of this university's administration concerned about this?"

6 of 693 comments (clear)

  1. Not an incredibly bad idea by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    There's the possibility that wifi could be problematic, so he's playing safe.

    Remember the people who got laughed at in the 50's and 60's when they suggested that tobacco could be carcinogenic... or all of the clock painters who 'sharpened' their radium paint brushes by licking them.

    And it's not like you really lose that much -- It means that you have to physically wire your access points I argued a long time against my roommate putting a wireless network (but I ultimately lost). I still keep most of my machines wired, just on principle. (that, and having all these freaking network cards!).

    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  2. Re:Well fuck, let's hope nobody lets slip to him by miro+f · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    well that's ok, because the study was about Electromagnetic fields, not magnetic fields, which are two different things. As far as I am aware, there is absolutely no danger to humans from a magnetic field.

    --
    being vague is almost as cool as doing that other thing...
  3. Re:Should I Be by Urkki · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    You read /. and your nick is NerdENerd.
    Why do you care if your nuts are ok?

    At least I apparently don't, as I'm not concerned even though I'm typing this with a hot laptop on my lap and both WiFi and Bluetooth in use...

  4. Re:NO, 2.4 GHZ IS NOT THE FREQUENCY by brainnolo · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Jeez, I wish people who have no earthly clue what they're talking about would refrain from posting.
    Well, but the mods will give those people what they deserve... +5, Insightful.

  5. Re:Well fuck, let's hope nobody lets slip to him by flyinwhitey · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Dude, get over yourself.

    If you can't explain the concept simply, you don't understand it well enough.

    And seriously, "theocratic medium"?

    God you're a pompous asshole.

    --
    How pathetic are you that you follow me from topic to topic and waste all your mod points at once modding me down?
  6. Re:What about cell phones? by ahsile · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Hey dipshit... get your facts straight. Old car phones and "bag" phones used to emit 3 watts. New ones are capped at around 0.6 watts.
    "In terms of wattage, wireless phones maximally emit power in the range of 0.2 to 0.6 watts."
    http://www.letstalk.com/radiation/radiation.htm