Slashdot Mirror


Pojmanski Comet in View

Wolfwood writes "For the Astronomers - the Pojmanksi Comet is a very recently discovered comet, magnitude 5.3, and is currently viewable in the morning sky around 5 am in the North America."

31 comments

  1. Strange... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 0

    When I tried to view the comet, I get this message flashing in the sky: "Nothing for you to see here. Please move along."

  2. 5 AM?! by Krach42 · · Score: 1

    currently viewable in the morning sky around 5 am in the North America

    I'd rather enjoy my sleep thank you.

    But I'm certain there are other people who care, so I'll let them enjoy the comet.

    --

    I am unamerican, and proud of it!
    1. Re:5 AM?! by Rei · · Score: 1

      At mag 5.3, I'll join you in the whole "sleeping in" concept. The faintest stars observable with the naked eye are around mag 6. In a city, you generally can't see anything worse than mag 3.

      --
      I was watching this thing on TV about some guy named Hitler. Someone should stop him!
    2. Re:5 AM?! by edbulldog · · Score: 0

      That's when I take my coffee brake. Then I get back to work ;P

  3. I for one by Oldsmobile · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome our new long tailed overlords.

    Break out the Nikes and chop off those testicles. I'm outa here!

    --
    Some say he is made with ascii, others that he is eyeballed daily by millions. All we know is, he is known as the Sig
  4. Pojmanski by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is spelling wrong in the write-up. the 'k' and 's' should be switched.

  5. flashing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lay off the drugs, mang...

    1. Re:flashing? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Yeah... I need to stop reading Slashdot...

  6. No tail for you by iMaple · · Score: 1

    From the aricle "looking like a small, circular patch of light with a bluish-white hue and an almost star-like center".

    No tail :( !! Probably pointing away form us. I personally prefer comets with long tails, they look nice :) This will just look like some nebula. Anyway, thats not gonna dissuade me from trying to spot it (aagh will have to wake up before sunrise).

    1. Re:No tail for you by aiabx · · Score: 1

      The solution is simple; stay up until sunrise!
      Yeah, I'll be looking for it too. Next lifetime, I'll get a hobby that keeps me indoors when it's cold and too early in the morning.
              -aiabx

      --
      Just this guy, you know?
    2. Re:No tail for you by iMaple · · Score: 1

      The solution is simple; stay up until sunrise!

      Thats exactly what I'll do this Friday :) (I actually do that whenver I have an obscenely early flight)

    3. Re:No tail for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      god maybe you two can jack each other off while you wait jeez..

    4. Re:No tail for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there is a tail, http://spaceweather.com/ has some nice pictures

    5. Re:No tail for you by CptNerd · · Score: 1


      Actually, since it's past perihelion and heading towards Earth, the tail is likely pointing roughly towards us.

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
  7. /.ed by boldtbanan · · Score: 1

    I tried checking out the comet, but the server seems to have crashed. There's a big 'bandwidth exceeded for this month' message in the sky. Way to go /., you've ruined nature.

  8. Great by Eightyford · · Score: 1

    Glad to see they named a comet after a child molester. Oh... Pojmanski? My bad.

  9. Good old wikipedia by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grzegorz_Pojma%C5%84s ki
    Dr Grzegorz Pojmaski (born April 16, 1959, in Warsaw, Poland), Polish astronomer, worker of Warsaw University Astronomical Observatory, Poland.
    Maybe I was the only one who wondered what kind of a name Pojmaski was.

    Apparently he's discovered two new comets. I don't know enough about astronomy to know if that is a "big deal" or not.

    The Warsaw University website has a page with a cool java-based model. http://www.astrouw.edu.pl/~gp/asas/asas_c2006.html
    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:Good old wikipedia by Shag · · Score: 1

      Having discovered more than one comet is a reasonably big thing, yeah. Ernst Wilhelm Leberecht Tempel and David Levy each discovered or co-discovered 21, but that's an uncommonly large number. I suspect Fabrizio Bernardi, a postdoc where I work, is happy to have recently discovered Comet P/2005 V1 Bernardi, since he wasn't even looking for comets at the time.

      --
      Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
    2. Re:Good old wikipedia by technoextreme · · Score: 1
      Maybe I was the only one who wondered what kind of a name Pojmaski was.

      No but then again Im Polish and I could tell that the name was Polish because of the -ski at the end of the name. Supposedly it was a sign of nobility and then everyone got the idea to add that to their last names.
      --
      Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
  10. Star Magnitudes by Logreybaby · · Score: 1

    Stars' brightness are rated starting at -1 for the brightest. The larger the number the dimmer the star.

    More info.

    1. Re:Star Magnitudes by darkstar2a · · Score: 1
      General speaking, objects of 6 magnitude and brighter (lower) are considered visible to the naked eye. This object would presumably be MUCH more visible with a good pair of binoculars which gets you down into the 9 magnitude range.


      If your going to be viewing with the naked eye, let your eyes get accustomed to the darkness for a bit first and eat some carrots the night before. ;) More importantly, if you live downtown, good luck, you might not be able to see through the light (or other) polution.

    2. Re:Star Magnitudes by Shag · · Score: 1

      Yeah. (Well, um, the Sun is magnitude -26.7 for us... but anyway!)

      The brighest non-sun star we can see, Sirius, is a +1.4 magnitude; in the city anything beyond about +4 to +5 isn't going to be visible, but with properly dark skies you can get to +6 or +7 naked-eye. So this comet should be visible to the naked eye under dark skies.

      Oh, and obviously, these are all apparent magnitude - how bright things appear to be. There's also absolute magnitude, or luminosity, which is basically how bright things actually are, but since they're at all different distances from us, that's not terribly useful if you're just trying to find a given star in the sky. :)

      I wonder whether it'll be visible here in Hawaii...

      --
      Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
    3. Re:Star Magnitudes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, Sirius is magnitude -1.4, not +1.4

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sirius/

  11. Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I missed the chance to ride Hale-Bopp. It was about time for another mother ship to stop by, anyway.

  12. 5 AM?! - yes! by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 1

    The city is at its darkest and quietest just before dawn, and the astronomy is as good as its going to get. Sometimes I actually set my alarm and pad out to the back yard to see what's up.

    I still think it's neat that the stars at dawn are the evening stars of the next season. Perhaps I need to get out more. A couple of years ago at a star party I remember watching Orion rise at dawn in August. Magic!

    ...laura

  13. the North America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...5 am in the North America.

    Not just any North America, folks, but the North America.

  14. Completely O/T by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    I realize this is completely off-topic, but what happened to all the mods? I browse comments at a threshold of +3, and there's a single digit number of posts that meet that criteria for all but a handful of topics over the past few days. Did /. stop handing out mod points?

  15. Should be Comet Pojmanski really by Trapezium+Artist · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sounds a bit picky, but a more proper way to refer to it is "Comet Pojmanski", rather than "the Pojmanski Comet". Nevertheless, it's very good to see my old friend Grzegorz having visible success with his automated all-sky monitoring cameras (ASAS) down in Chile.

    Amateurs work hard to learn the sky in sufficient detail so as to be able to recognise new interlopers such as comets as they search each night, whereas Grzegorz's system is fully automated both in terms of taking the CCD images and in searching through the data for new objects and monitoring variability in known objects: the hard work lies in writing the software. The discovery of two comets is good, but almost a sideshow compared to the vast amount of useful data on transients, novae, variable stars, and so on which the ASAS project has accumulated over the years.

    Returning to Comet Pojmanski finally, it's moving into the northern sky now, so even though it's not predicted to get any brighter, it should be available for more of us to see with binoculars in the early morning sky.

  16. New discoveries by ThreeDeadTrolls · · Score: 1

    The fact that we discover something just now thats apperently so close to earth,(comets are small compaired to planets, stars, ect and the fact we can acually see it, to me at least, says it is fairly close compaired to other objects in the solar system.) just tells me we should put more money out there for observation-like technology. If we missed a comet, what else have we missed *shrugs*, there could be more interesting things out there.

    1. Re:New discoveries by Trapezium+Artist · · Score: 1

      The reason we've previously "missed" this comet is that it's normally extraordinarily faint, when far from the Sun where it spends most (if not almost all: I don't know if this is a periodic comet) of its life. Most comets originate either in the Kuiper Belt out beyond Neptune, or in the Oort Cloud, way, way out beyond Neptune: these are generally the most distant objects in the Solar System, but occasionally fall inwards.

      Thus, new comets are generally only discovered when they fall in close to the Sun: they get heated up and eject material, which makes them brighter, plus, since we're pretty close to the Sun ourselves, they just appear brighter from here too.

      Not that I'd turn my nose up at new money for large telescopes, mind you: as we start to build the next generation of 20-50 metre diameter telescopes, we'll be looking for a few billion $/Euro, one way or the other.

    2. Re:New discoveries by Yoik · · Score: 1

      I wonder how big the core object is. It wasn't seen until it passed Earth orbit, and started to cook out gas.

      That feels like noticing that stones are being thrown at you when they hit the water. I would sure feel better if we invested a bit more in watching and preparations to do something if targeted.