Slashdot Mirror


Black Holes and Cosmic Snapshots

deeptrace writes "The New York Times reports that Andrew J. S. Hamilton, a professor of astrophysics at the University of Colorado used video game technology and Einstein's equations for general relativity to calculate what it might look like to fly through a black hole." On a somewhat more tangible note bahstid writes "The Hubble Team has assembled the largest ever image of the Pinwheel Galaxy beyond Ursula Major from 51 Hubble shots and some terrestrial images. The final composition weighs in at 12392x15852 pixels - just over 10 light years per pixel. In an effort to burn out their server properly their European page is making the 450Mb file available for download, along with some slightly more manageable sizes."

61 comments

  1. The increases in technology are amazing by Kranfer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I love how science is now using video game technology to attempt to figure out theory... I know while it is not a new concept/practice, I still find it amazing what kind of educated guesses a computer can make over the human mind. Not to mention that huge 450 MB image of the galaxy mentioned in the article is amazing as well. I cannot wait until we can directly photograph extra-solar planets. Our quest to find life and answers in this mindboggling sized universe is increasing all the time. The sheer size of the Telescopes being used is amazing as well. I recently traveled to Hawaii and viewed the Telescopes at the top of Maunea Kea... Just seeing the Size of the Subaru Telescope or the Keck Twins is just... awe striking. I have pictures too! Head over to: http://www.ussamazon.com/live/hawaii/telescopes.JP G yeah upper case JPG, case sensative, blah blah blah.

    --
    -- Josh
    "Whoopie! Man, that may have been a small one for Neil, but that's a long one for me!" - Pete Conrad
    1. Re:The increases in technology are amazing by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      He's not used video game technology to work the theory out, he's used it to crunch numbers and produce pretty pictures. It's a tool for visualising the results that come out of general relativity, nothing more (and nothing less).

    2. Re:The increases in technology are amazing by Bromskloss · · Score: 1

      I cannot wait until we can directly photograph extra-solar planets.

      I have pictures too! Head over to: http://www.ussamazon.com/live/hawaii/telescopes.JP G

      I think I just might have spotted no less than three small planets in your picture. Isn't astronomy fantastic!?

      --
      Swedish plasma phys. PhD student; MSc EE; knows maths, programming, electronics; finance interest; seeks opportunities
  2. 450 megabytes? by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

    450 megabyte download? Too bad I don't have a big enough hard drive to download that onto, but maybe I will if and when I get a second hard drive.

    (Here's my attempt at some humour, so hopefully I don't get modded down if someone takes me seriously.) I wonder what that's going to be like on their servers. Posting a story like this on slashdot linking to a place where there's a 450 megabyte file.

    1. Re:450 megabytes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What?

    2. Re:450 megabytes? by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

      That's the size of the download.

  3. Wow by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Informative

    450 megabytes.

    Thats astronomical!

    They do actually have a zoomable version for folks who don't want or need the entire thing. Thats available Here

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:Wow by l_bratch · · Score: 1

      I'll be downloading the full thing just for the sake of seeing how fast I can rotate it with GLiv.

    2. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wooha! I guess you were kidding, but please do try it! :)

    3. Re:Wow by l_bratch · · Score: 1

      Attempts to load it just max out my swap and ram :( Perhaps I'll put in another disk to mount some more swap space ...

    4. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      go, 865693, go! :)

      best of luck! (I'd try it myself, but unfortunately am restricted to an inferior, unsupported, and altogether very crappy OS...

  4. Ursula Major? by DiamondGeezer · · Score: 3, Funny

    I knew her at school. Lovely girl.

    --
    Tubby or not tubby. Fat is the question
    1. Re:Ursula Major? by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 2, Funny

      I dated her little sister for a while, but their father was too much of a bear to deal with.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    2. Re:Ursula Major? by aminorex · · Score: 1

      Knew her? Heck, I almost *minored* in Ursula Major.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  5. And in other news ... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... shortly after this story went public, a certain server room in Europe resembled the inside of a black hole ...

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  6. bittorrent by ryran · · Score: 1

    Is bittorrent really that unknown? What the hell? It's a win/win..what are they thinking...

    1. Re:bittorrent by 246o1 · · Score: 1

      The only reason I can dream of for the lack of bittorrent on things like this is that the media witchhunt has made people feel that:
      Admitting Knowledge of Bittorrent = Theft.
      This is far from the first time a big file has been stupidly distributed when bittorent would be the obvious solution, but it is, as always, quite disappointing.

      (I suppose there's a possibility that NO ONE associated with this knows about bittorrent, but that strikes me as quite unlikely.)

      --
      Although the moon is smaller than the earth, it is farther away.
  7. Thru a black hole by rossdee · · Score: 1

    Does it take into account the tidal forces acting on your eyeballs will distort your vision?

    1. Re:Thru a black hole by rknop · · Score: 2, Informative

      I haven't looked at the video yet, but... ... if the black hole is big enough, this won't be a problem, at least for crossing the event horizon. It is true that if you cross the event horizon, you are destined to hit the center and will eventually be paste. However, the bigger the black hole, the less troublesome tidal forces are as you cross the event horizon. For a stellar mass black hole, they will rip you to shreds before you get in, yes.

      I suspect, though, that the video is done from the point of view of a "point-camera". Easier that way....

      -Rob

    2. Re:Thru a black hole by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 2, Interesting


      Added to that, there is the fact that as the observer is accelerated towards the singularity, reletavistic effects kick in and time passes more slowly for them. Given a big enough black hole, it's possible that the observer may not notice they've indeed crossed an event horizon.

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    3. Re:Thru a black hole by rknop · · Score: 1

      Actually, if the tidal forces rip them apart, nothing in particular happens at the moment the observer passes the event horizon. It does mean that the observer is destinated later to hit the center (whereas before crossing the event horizon, it's in priniciple possible to esacpe). However, nothing strange happens at the event horizon. But that's not because time is moving more slowly.

      It's not really quite right to say that time passes more slowly for the observer going into the black hole. There is a time dilation effect so that (say) somebody who cruises near a deep gravitational well (say near the even thorizon of a black hole) and comes back out will have aged less than somebody who stayed far away. It's also true that if a distant observer watches somebody falling into the black hole, he will see the faller's clocks slow down. But the faller doesn't "feel time slowing" or anything like that.

      -Rob

  8. TORRENT!!! by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

    My Kingdom for a torrent!! The Slashdotting alone will fry the server withing seconds!!

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
    1. Re:TORRENT!!! by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      I'm currently getting around 100KB/s downloading the image.

      Two things to remember:

      1) this isn't on the front page, little summary link notwithstanding
      2) if slashdot can survive the slashdot effect, so can other sites; this is apparently one of them

    2. Re:TORRENT!!! by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      1) makes sense, but for 2), Slashdot serves (basically) only text.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  9. Verizon DSL by scooter.higher · · Score: 0

    But did spacetelescope.org pay Verizon to deliver the content to Verizon DSL users?

    Mod me 'Off-Topic' - I don't care! It's still funny to me.

    --
    Ramen
  10. a thought by bluewolfcv · · Score: 1

    Real math + actual physics + nifty visualization = people actually learning something! *shocking!*

    I helped design an astronomy exhibit for a local science museum, and the process you go through in order to make it accessible to the public is mind boggling. Especially when you try to show more than just pretty pictures, but the science behind those pictures.

    One question though, does anyone know what variable the simulation was using colors for? Was it temperature (most likely), or something more exotic?

  11. Flying through a black hole, eh? by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 1

    I thought that the effects of flying through a black hole were known since 1979! In fact, if you zoom in on this massive image, you can just barely make out the survivors of the Nostromo! (Okay, that was lame, but I'm shocked that I appear to be the first to make reference to the movie.)

    In an effort to burn out their server properly

    Okay, that was funny.

    --
    The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
    1. Re:Flying through a black hole, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > (Okay, that was lame, but I'm shocked that I appear to be the first to make reference to the movie [imdb.com].)

      Ye gods, its from the last millenia! Not many are old enough to have whithnessed it themselves!

    2. Re:Flying through a black hole, eh? by CTachyon · · Score: 1
      ... the survivors of the Nostromo! (Okay, that was lame, but I'm shocked that I appear to be the first to make reference to the movie.)

      Or, you would have if you'd said "Cygnus" instead of "Nostromo". (The Nostromo was the cargo ship that most of Alien took place on. I mean, it was a good movie and all, but it didn't have much to do with black holes.)

      --
      Range Voting: preference intensity matters
    3. Re:Flying through a black hole, eh? by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 1

      Argh!! You're 100% correct. My bad. I think the joke was lost on the generation gap anyway. :)

      --
      The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
  12. holy big file batman!! by tscheez · · Score: 1

    big enough?

    --
    Supplies!
  13. Protons have Mass? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't even know they were Catholic!

  14. Where's the movie? by Zitchas · · Score: 1

    Call me blind, but I can't seem to put my virtual hands on a copy of that movie. And I'd rather like to see it. Sounds intresting, and I've always liked visualizations of cutting edge physics. Or would that be vanishing edge?

    --
    Z
    1. Re:Where's the movie? by Bromskloss · · Score: 1

      Call me blind, but I can't seem to put my virtual hands on a copy of that movie.

      I haven't been able to find it either, unfortunately. In the mean time, you might wanna have a look at the guy's webpage which has interesting info on general relativity. There is for example a guide to what a trip (fall) down into a black hole would look like with explaining text along with images and animations.

      --
      Swedish plasma phys. PhD student; MSc EE; knows maths, programming, electronics; finance interest; seeks opportunities
    2. Re:Where's the movie? by Zitchas · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the links. They should satisfy my curiosity for the moment. *grin*

      --
      Z
  15. Viewing large images by dargaud · · Score: 1

    I don't know in what format they provide the image, but if it's some kind of bitmap I've written a freeware for the express purpose of displaying quickly large image files (64 exabyte limit). Windows only, sorry.

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
  16. Quite an improvement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hamilton has had a set of visualizations of falling into a black hole up on his web site for almost 10 years now. It's great to finally see him do a much more sophisticated visualization. If you want to see cruder versions, look at the aforementioned web site.

  17. Finally a nice hi-res wallpaper... by Guru+Meditation · · Score: 1

    ...for when I get around to building that video-wall.

    --
    'We have no choice in what we are. Yet what are we,
    but the sum of our choices.' --Rob Grant
  18. No more comments? by Neurotoxic666 · · Score: 1
    I think it's sad there are no more comments here. I remember taking an introduction to astrophysics back in college and having lengthy discussions with the teacher. And I was the only person in class who was interested at all. There are so many unanswered questions and so many beautiful things we see but can't explain yet in space, I can't believe humans don't spend more energy trying to solve all these mysteries.

    Black holes were one of my favorite subjects. Say, for exemple, that you would fall into a black hole, and let's say that light doesn't get trapped in, so outside observers could see what's going on and let's also pretend you do not get crushed/melted in the process. What you would see could very well look like what TFA shows. But what if you look backwards, what if you gaze towards the universe instead of the chaotic center? Because a singularity is in fact an infinite curvature of space-time, that makes a black hole a spot where the universe ends. Would you see the universe fast foward to its end? Would external observers see you fall slowly, until the end of time?

    Ok, IANAAstrophysicist. But I'm damn good at day-dreaming. And, again, I think it's a shame we spend trillions in weapons but cannot manage to have some sort of reasonable space program. Of course there are no direct economic benefits when going into and exploring space, so let's just forget about our origins, our future and everything that surrounds us. Let's just say we come from Jesus' father's balls and pretend we're the center of the universe. There. That's easy.

    --
    You are more than the sum of what you consume. Desire is not an occupation.
    1. Re:No more comments? by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I asked some of the same questions, but I was under the impression that asking what is inside a black hole is eqivalent to asking what happens outside the universe, i.e. totally irrelevent to anything that happens inside.

      It is interesting to think about black hole intyeriors yes (BTW how can something with zero volume have an interior?), but is it useful? It may be defeatest to say no, but then again it may be the truth...

      On the otherhand, I believe that in the last couple of years string theory made some advance that indicated that information may be preserved inside a black hole. What that advance was I was totally unable to wrap my brain around, but I think it caused Stephen Hawking to loose a bet.

      So if information is preserved in a black hole what happens inside may be relevent after all.

    2. Re:No more comments? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Others might be interested in the answers to your questions:
      But what if you look backwards, what if you gaze towards the universe instead of the chaotic center? [...] Would you see the universe fast foward to its end?
      No, your past light cone does not encompass the entire future of the universe.
      Would external observers see you fall slowly, until the end of time?
      They would see you approach the horizon more and more slowly; they would never see you enter it (even though you do). At some finite time when you're just outside the horizon, they would see the last photon emitted from your body, and nothing after that.
    3. Re:No more comments? by techno-vampire · · Score: 2, Informative
      BTW how can something with zero volume have an interior?

      You're confusing the singularity at the center of the black hole with the hole itself. The hole itself is the volume inside the Schwartzchild Radius, which is where the escape velocity equals the speed of light. Only the singularity has no volume of its own.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
  19. Light Speed! by Hangeron · · Score: 1

    Here's another fun toy for special relativity http://lightspeed.sourceforge.net/.
    It shows how an object's appearance changes when it travels near light speed.

  20. Text version by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    Here's a text version of the movie for those with low bandwidth.

    w0000t
    Whoa....
    aaaaaa
    *SPLAT*
    (static)
    THE END

  21. Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay I am not a mathematician much to my chagrin. I keep telling people in my next life I am going to be a genius at math.......the next Einstein, so to speak.
    The thing is people think I am kidding. Anyhow when the article states "10 light years per pixal" what exactly does that mean? From one side of the pixal to the other side is 10 years? Please do not laugh. I love astronomy and have a passion for galaxies.

    1. Re:Question by qeveren · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's pretty much what it means. The smallest resolvable unit in the image (ie. one pixel) is roughly 10 light years across.

      That's not to say that individual, very bright objects can't be seen in the image, however they'll wash out everything else in the 10-light-year space around them, appearing (at their absolute best resolution) as a single pixel. If they're too bright, they'll wash out neighboring pixels, too.

      --
      Don't just stand there, get that other dog!
    2. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes, that's pretty much what it means. The smallest resolvable unit in the image (ie. one pixel) is roughly 10 light years across.
      that doesnt make much sense, seeing as how the objects seen in this are at different distances... the resolution is 10 ly at what radius?
    3. Re:Question by Squiffy · · Score: 1

      Since the distance to this object is about 27 million light years, and since it lies facing our point of view, everything in it is at the same distance from us to within a fraction of a percent.

  22. Impossible? by Ixne · · Score: 1

    So how exactly does one get any computer in this universe to compute what happens when all known laws of physics (newtonian or quantum) break down, as in a black hole?

    1. Re:Impossible? by chriso11 · · Score: 1

      The laws may break down in the black hole itself, but the event horizon is not really the "surface" of the black hole. The same rules apply between the event horizon and the black hole itself. Of course, I'm not a physicist, so I may be completely wrong here.

      --
      No, I don't trust in god. He'll have to pay up front, like everybody else.
  23. 10 ly? It's an angular displacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    10 lightyears?

    Shouldn't that be quoted in arcseconds?

  24. Wow! The resolution is so incredibly high, by Alsee · · Score: 1

    heay I can see my house!

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  25. Here's a trailer by Bromskloss · · Score: 1

    The movie is apparently showing at a Museum, which has a page about it with a trailer. It's in WMV format :-( and I haven't been able to view it so I don't know if it's anything to see.

    --
    Swedish plasma phys. PhD student; MSc EE; knows maths, programming, electronics; finance interest; seeks opportunities
    1. Re:Here's a trailer by Zitchas · · Score: 1

      Well, VLC plays the sound well enough, and it sounds kinda intresting, but it doesn't have support for wmw3 video, so I can't comment on that yet. I wish people running these places would recognize that there are better formats out there than wmv, or at least alternate formats.

      --
      Z
  26. Dr. Hamilton is obviously not a sci fi geek... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I would love to see a 'Star Wars'-type battle take place in the proximity of a black hole, with the physics intact," Dr. Hamilton said.

    Farscape, man! Farscape.

  27. Drivel by Expert+Determination · · Score: 1
    Video game technology and Einstein's work on relativity may at first seem as unlikely a couple as Oscar and Felix.
    Um...no. They both might benefit from number crunching. What's unlikely about that?
    90 hours of supercomputer calculation for each second on screen.
    Big deal. Go see a movie and you'll see thousands of individual frames that take days to render (adding up everything from simulation, 3D rendering and compositing).
    a graphics language called Open GL
    Language?
    The visualization software that allows players to live and die in cyberworlds like Call of Duty 2, he said, is destined to be the future chalkboard of science.
    You mean OpenGL? It was developed for scientific visualization work. Are we supposed to be amazed like this? This is like benig amazed that the Bible (in English) and Penthouse both use letters from the same alphabet. I don't see the parallel or connection that the author of this article is trying to highlight.
    as computer geeks in the movie industry realize that the real cosmos as defined by Einstein's legacy is far more mind blowing than fiction.
    Er...I'm one of those geeks. I started with Einstein's field equations and went on to make movies. Where does this guy think people with degrees in physics and mathematics go? They don't all do research in academia.
    Hollywood, he added, "simply doesn't realize the richness of nature."
    No, this guy doesn't understand the constraints of making a movie whose job is to entertain. What he fails to realize is that someone could just make up a silly light show using a tiny fraction of the CPU power and the audience would be just as entertained if told that it was a 'real' simulation of a black hole. Come to think of it, that's exactly what I did for some documentary or other way back when...

    It's funny the lengths journalists will go to in order to convince people that science is interesting. In this case highlighting an unbelievably tenuous link between games and astrophysics. Maybe someone should write a story about how astrophysics and finance are linked because those presentations so beloved of managers are also likely to have components rendered using OpenGL.

    --
    "The White House is not an intelligence-gathering agency," -- Scott McClellan, Whitehouse spokesman.
    1. Re:Drivel by techno-vampire · · Score: 1
      It's funny the lengths journalists will go to in order to convince people that science is interesting. In this case highlighting an unbelievably tenuous link between games and astrophysics.

      Would you rather they were writing stories about how boring it is? They may not always get their facts right, if indeed they ever do, but they may be sparking an interest in kids young enough that they haven't decided what to study yet.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    2. Re:Drivel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are very tense.

      You need to get laid.

      That'll do you a lot of good.

  28. Azathoth by ShadowXOmega · · Score: 1

    " ...finds that there is an exit via a wormhole, and witnesses a kind of ultimate chaos."

    Azathoth!!!!
    (you might put carmina burana (O Fortuna) music here)

  29. Crossing the event horizon is undefined by wintermute42 · · Score: 1

    I Am No An Astrophysicist either, or any kind of physicist, for that matter, but...

    At the center of the galaxy there is a black hole (in theory) that is large enough that the tidal forces would not rip you to your component particles as you approach the event horizon. So lets say that you decide that you have nothing left to live for in this universe and decide to journey to another something by traveling into this massive black hole.

    By definition when you reach the event horizon, you will be traveling at the speed of light. As you approach the event horizion, the time dilation factor gets approaches infinity, until, at the event horizion it become infinite. So as you cross the event horizion, time has come to an end in the universe you left.

    So relative to our universe, "stuff" that falls into a black hole never actually reaches the event horizon. The object just sticks there, as time dilation takes effect. This was, by the way, something that Fredric Pohl used his science fiction novel Gateway. The main character keep thinking of his lover, who is falling toward a black hole and who will fall throughout time.

    As you approach the event horizon your mass also increases infinitely, as does your kenetic energy.

    In short, an object that crosses the event horizon does not seem to make any sense. Things with mass simply do not travel at the speed of light. So in crossing the event horizon it seems like you've crossed into an undefined area. So this film seems misleading from the point of view of relatively theory. They are trying to simulate something which is outside of definition, because of all of these infinite terms.

    But as I noted, IANAAstrophysicist, so perhaps I've gotten it all wrong. I read the New York Times article too, so I would appreciate it if someone pointed out any errors in what I've outlined above.

  30. Hawking radiation makes a difference by InAbsentia · · Score: 1

    My understanding of string theory is that the strings are wrapped around the surface of the black hole. So in this view nothing can go down into the interior it just gets wrapped around the event horizon.

    This raises the question of what happens when someone falls into a nice big black hole where the tidal forces at the horizon are small and you might think you could just cruise on through and down into the interior. However, from the point of view of an external observer no one ever gets there they just get slower and slower. From the point of view of the fallee however it takes a finite time to get to the horizon. Flip this around though and from the point of view of the fallee the external universe rushes off to infinite time - end of the universe whatever - in the time it takes to get to the event horizon. Now anything that comes in from the external universe will arrive at the event horizon at near light speed, this includes stuff like the micro-wave background which will be incoming as gamma rays and Hawking radiation from near the event horizon which will be similalrly coming in hard and energetic.

    The conclusion from this seems to be that any one falling into an event horizon will be fried and turned into subatomic particles or strings before they get there. This is just a thought experiment and I would be fascinated to hear from any astrophysiscists out there who understand what would really happen.

    This also implies that the simulation is somewhat misleading.