Slashdot Mirror


RFID, Sign of the (End) Times?

andy753421 writes "Wired is running an article featuring Katherine Albrecht who, with her new book 'The Spychips Threat: Why Christians Should Resist RFID and Electronic Surveillance', is warning that RFID tags may in fact be the "mark of the beast". Among her arguments are that in a futuristic world anyone who wishes to buy and sell goods would be compelled "to receive a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads," as is foretold in the book Revelation. Others are skeptical saying that many new technologies, such as the printing press, bar-codes, and several others, have also created fears about the beginning of the end."

59 of 843 comments (clear)

  1. Fallacy by XanC · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just because those other inventions weren't the mark doesn't mean this one isn't.

    1. Re:Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just because some old book tells a pointless fairy tale doesn't mean it has any connection to reality either. ( -1, Flamebait, I know.)

    2. Re:Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I never did understand the Christian aversion to the Beast. The Beast must come as part of Christ's second coming, prophecy says so. Why would they resist this? If I were a Christian, I would be doing anything I can to hasten the return my my God.

    3. Re:Fallacy by Nutria · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And why the sobbing at funerals? Aren't they happy their loved ones went to be with Jesus?

      The (original, non-commercialized) New Orleans Jazz Funeral recognizes this fact.

      The band plays dirges while the casket travels from the Church to the cemetary. Then, from the cemetary to the deceased's house, the music is lively and happy, celebrating the fact that the deceased is now in Heaven.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    4. Re:Fallacy by porcupine8 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Why do parents cry when their child graduates high school or college? Aren't they happy their loved one will finally become a useful, productive member of society?

      Of course they are, but they're also sad that the child is moving away from them. Most people crying at funerals aren't nearly as sad for the person as they are for themselves, having lost the person.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    5. Re:Fallacy by croddy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It doesn't matter whether you are religious or not -- an identification system that can be read remotely and surreptitiously is a friend to no one but evil.

    6. Re:Fallacy by theStorminMormon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When did religious conviction become ignorance?

      -stormin

      --
      The Southern Baptist Convention has creationism. On Slashdot, we have porn.
    7. Re:Fallacy by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No. We already know it's not whether the other inventions were or not. How? Because the Bible says that NO ONE knows when it'll happen.
      Plus, the Book of Revelation was written as a consolation to the early Christians who were being prosecuted.

      And wasn't the War in Iraq also supposed to be the beginning of the Apocalypse? I don't believe that one bit, but I'd certainly believe that more than I'd believe RFID is the beginning of the Apocalypse.

    8. Re:Fallacy by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Funerals (New Orleans Jazz or otherwise) are just rituals designed for the living, not the dead.

      There are asshat relegious types who'll hold a relegious funeral, even against the express wishes of the dead. But like I said, the funeral isn't really for the deceased.

      Funeral Directors get this, which is how they've managed to turn it into a business.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    9. Re:Fallacy by teknomage1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      More importantly when did willful ignorance become revered as religious conviction?

      --
      Stop intellectual property from infringing on me
    10. Re:Fallacy by cammoblammo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      some consider suicide to be an unforgivable sin (esp. when there's no time to repent for the sin of suicide).

      Assuming we're talking Christianity here, there's no biblical reason to believe that suicide is an automatic hell penalty. Nothing. Nada. Zilch.

      Of course, some feel they've got to threaten those who would like to shortcut life, but there's no biblical way to justify it.

      I could get into the theology of this, but hey, this is /. and I'm already an ignorant blowhole for daring to say I'm a Christian.

      --

      Cogito, ergo sig.

    11. Re:Fallacy by Thangodin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The funny thing is that the whole book of Revelations is far more likely to be about events in the first century, with either Jerusalem or Rome being the Whore of Babylon and the Beast being the Emperor or the Roman Army. The Mark of the Beast probably refers to the tatoos that were given to slaves to mark them as such, usually in an easily visible place like the face or the hand. Early Christians also wore tattoos as a sign of their faith. Facial tattoos were sometimes worn by Roman Soldiers, although the Romans regarded tattoos as barbaric.

      In fact, the Book of Revelations was a controversial addition to the early Bible, and several Bishops argued against including it in the canon due to the difficulty of interpreting it, and hence, its potential for abuse--particularly the type of abuse so typical of fundamentalists, who keep claiming that the end times are upon us. Other portions of the Bible specifically warn against doing this, because only God knows the time when the world will end. To this day the Eastern Orthodox Church does not consider it part of the Canon.

      If you're a non-believer, like I am, all of this is moot--the whole thing is either about the world John lived in, or he got dosed with some grain ergot while in prison. If you are a Christian, however, steer clear of belief that these are the end times. It's a definite no-no in the religion. And if you believe in the Rapture, rest assured that the people who compiled the Bible would have denounced you as a heretic, and you probably would have ended up being used for sword practice by a Roman Legionnaire. This is a spin from the lunatic fringe on a single line of a book that almost ended up in the fireplace of history. It is also a morally corrosive doctrine because it undercuts personal responsibility, encouraging people to believe that God is going to solve all of their problems for them, kill all their enemies, and build them a whole new world.

    12. Re:Fallacy by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      How is the End of the World going to come "as a thief in the night" if you recognize the mark? Will it be a surprise to anyone if they predicted it? Or do you think that no one will recognize the mark and we're all damned to Hell?

      There's a lot of confusion here in general, and this whole thing is stupid. The Book of Revelation doesn't predict ANYTHING. It was written as a coded message to the early Christians - it was written so that only they could understand it, which is why there's so much confusion about it.

      Let me help things out a bit:

      1) In ancient times, the Jews and Christians had a special system for translating names and words into numbers. "666" could be the translated form of "emperor" or whoever the emperor was at that time (maybe Nero? I'm not sure).
      2) Certain numbers in the Bible represent different things - the number 3 represents God, 6 represents man, 7 represents perfection. Therefore, a 3-headed beast with the number "666" meant a man pretending to be a god - and the Romans believed that their emperor was a god. So it would've represented the emperor, whoever that was.

      What did the Mark of the Beast represent? I don't know. Maybe the Romans dressed differently than the Christians. Maybe it was the Romans' brutality which only the Christians saw as a problem. Maybe it was their inability to be non-conformist (the Christians were seen as "unpatriotic" because they were pacifists and refused to become warriors - certainly there must've been others in Rome who didn't want to fight but did so simply to avoid prosecution?)

    13. Re:Fallacy by The+New+Stan+Price · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Most think evil wears a black hat and can be seen from miles away too. Many will not be convinced that they already HAVE the mark when they do. In other words, if people are raped slow enough, they won't know they are being raped.

    14. Re:Fallacy by empvirus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Indeed. Did this lady just pull all this stuff about avoiding RFID because "it'll end the world" out her ass, or what? I'm a christian too, but wow, that is a VERY extreme point of view there. And as such, it isn't too likely she'll have alot of followers. She should probably point more toward the facts if she really wants to be heard Go ahead and troll/flame me.

      --
      Sometimes I comment just to hear myself typing.
    15. Re:Fallacy by Tom · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why didn't anyone ever think to just explain it to them?

      Because for much of history since then, they killed anyone who tried.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    16. Re:Fallacy by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      particularly the type of abuse so typical of fundamentalists, who keep claiming that the end times are upon us.

      As with any cult, how could the Christian church recruit new members if the End of Times was more than a lifetime away?

    17. Re:Fallacy by I(rispee_I(reme · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The funny thing is, when I was in high school, there were constantly reports on oil-company funded studies, with headlines like, "Global Warming: Fact or Fiction?".

      Now that the evidence of global warming is becoming irrefutable (recall the polar bears drowning because the ice at the poles is receding?), there are new, oil-company funded studies, with headlines like, "Global Warming: Are Humans Causing It?"

      I predict that within a decade, there will be further oil-company funded studies, with headlines like, "Global Warming: Is It Too Late To Do Anything About It?"

      Presumably, in the far future, we will see, "Global Warming:

    18. Re:Fallacy by letxa2000 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Interesting that RFID usually seems to be part of the evil things Slashdot hates (Microsoft, SCO, patents, privacy violations with RFID, etc.), but as soon as it's brought up in a religious context, suddenly RFID is not evil... religion is evil and RFID is defended.

    19. Re:Fallacy by Scarblac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Personally I believe there is a difference between "RFID is the mark of the beast, and a sign that the end of time is here" and "RFID is evil", don't you?

      --
      I believe posters are recognized by their sig. So I made one.
    20. Re:Fallacy by tutori · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I dispute your claim that even bright christians are capable of evaluating new information that goes against their preconceptions, btw - purely anecdotal, but there you go.

      Unfortunately, I believe this to be pretty much par for the course for the majority of humanity.

  2. There will be an end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful


    every society has had an end, the mayans, egyptians, romans, greeks
    it all comes to an end, if you truly think the culture of greed, capitalism and consolidation can continue for ever then you are deluded, so when that time comes how will we know ? at what point do we give up and start again ? 20 years ? 50 ? 100 ? 500 ?

    its not IF but WHEN

    1. Re:There will be an end by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "every society has had an end, the mayans, egyptians, romans, greeks
      it all comes to an end, if you truly think the culture of greed, capitalism and consolidation can continue for ever then you are deluded,"


      Except that looking at your examples (Mayans, Egyptians, Romans, Greeks), I'd say that greed, capitalism and consolidation have been around for a long, long time indeed.

    2. Re:There will be an end by crazyvas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just because every society *until now* has had an end, that doesn't mean that every society from this point on will have an end. A culture of of greed, capitalism and consolidation may not be what is traditionally thought of as "good", but that doesn't mean that such a culture may not be the most successful one yet. "Good" and "successful" don't necessarily have to occur together.

    3. Re:There will be an end by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1, Insightful
      every society has had an end, the mayans, egyptians, romans, greeks

      Sheesh. Those societies ended because of a LACK of modern Capitalism. Note that modern Capitalism also requires a) Representative Democracy b) Stable Contract Law, and c) Stable Money Policy.

      The only way the USA will die is if the government weighs down capitalism (also known as "freedom") so much that it can't function anymore (like, say, France with their insane worker policies). Unfortunately, we've been on that road for awhile, but it seems to ebb and flow. I'm fairly confident that we'll never get full-blown socialism. As long as we stay away from that, the US will live forever.

      (And just to make the necessary disclaimer, no, I'm not a Libertarian)

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  3. I love Slashdot, but.. by aychamo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    why are you guys posting articles by some flakey Christian who thinks progressive technology is the devil?

    1. Re:I love Slashdot, but.. by MobyDisk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ooh, I have a non-troll answer to this one! It is a valid question.

      Slashdot seems to consist of people who are equally interested in new technology, but also smart enough to be concerned about its effects. RFID could be very beneficial. And it could be very oppressing. While most Slashdotters probably don't believe that the number 666 will literally mean anything, or that it really matters which hand it will be or who the antichrist is. But they do heed the warning that it implies. The fact that it is a Christian mythology doesn't make it any different than if it was in a modern dystopian novel like 1984. Whatever sort of fiction it is, it was forward thinking and applicable now. And so, people will be interested.

      Now, back to your regularly-scheduled trollish Christian-bashing replies.

  4. Thank Allah for the distraction by RedHatLinux · · Score: 3, Insightful

    now maybe Christian fundies can occupy themselves railing against something harmful, rather useful things like evolution or Middle East peace talks.

  5. So.. its RFID today is it? by nurb432 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    40 years ago, it was the 'social security card'....20 years ago people said barcodes were it.. in anoher 20 it will be something else... no need to panic.

    Now if some guy with horns and a tail, and breathes fire, comes out waving an RIFD injection machine THEN you can panic..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:So.. its RFID today is it? by croddy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It is a very limited and fundamentalist reading of Revelation that requires a one-to-one correspondence of symbols in the text and historical events.

      The reason the image of the "mark of the beast" is frightening is that authorities in human history have always attempted to assert their control in ways that reach into individuals' lives and compel them to function as slaves for a self-serving power.

      Social Security cards, bar codes, and RFID tags all provide valid readings of the text in Revelation. There is no reason to try to force a fundamendalist, literal prophecy onto a text that's not asking for it. Take a warning about authorities' will to dominate mankind for what it is.

  6. Re:Barcodes by microarray · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "The only reason barcodes weren't the mark is because they can't mark humans"

    I can tattoo myself with a barcode, does that count?

  7. oh cmon by lpret · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Revelations is a perfect specemin of apocalyptic literature. Here's a good definition of such literature: Hermeneutics.

    It's written to warn and to use descriptive language to explain what the future holds. The idea of head and right hand are frequently used to depict what we think (head) and what we do (hand). As such, in this particular instance, the warning is not when we have implants in our heads or hands, it's when we think and do evil things.

    Interpreting apocalyptic literature as truth verbatim is not only stupid, it's dangerous.

    --
    This is my digital signature. 10011011001
  8. Not gunna happen by TubeSteak · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Everyone who thinks that somehow, someday, everything is going to switch over to an RFID system are insane.

    Lemme tell you why: The Black Market

    The black market is never going to dissappear. It is fueled by personal anonymity and cash (because cash money is anonymous).

    While the black market isn't necessarily something to be proud of, it shows up whenever there are market inefficiences or certain niches that aren't being fulfilled.

    Money from the black market is like money from Bush's tax cuts... it trickles down into the rest of the economey and boosts it up.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:Not gunna happen by big+tex · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When that happens, the new 'Numbered Swiss Bank Account' will be the currency from one of the countries that refuses to tag their currency.
      You won't ever be able to stop the currency exchange.

      --
      I think I need a new sig here.
  9. The end is NEAR(er) by schroedogg · · Score: 0, Insightful

    We are getting closer to the end of the world every day. That is true no matter what your religious convictions.

  10. Re:ends vs means by wall0159 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I love it..

    "... it is a little too big brother" (emphasis mine)

    yup.. just an eeensy teeenny bit to much. A barcode on the forehead would be just fine. ;-)

  11. Other Technology isn't readable without contact by thegrassyknowl · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Others are skeptical saying that many new technologies, such as the printing press, bar-codes, and several others, have also created fears about the beginning of the end.

    Barcodes and print can be covered. Credit cards and magnetic stripes have to be practically inserted into the machine to read em.... the field strength is too weak otherwise. If you keep em in your wallet your are safe.

    All of the other technolgies that might be used to track your actions require you to willingly and deliberately use them. You don't have to use plastic to pay for purchasses is one example. Use cash.

    With RFID tags, they can be read from within metres of you so anyone just passing by you on the street can access all of the tags on you if they like. Anyone outside your house can read all of the RFID tags on your household equipment, books, porno, etc and figure out a bit about you completely without your knowledge.

    RFID is this technology that nobody really cares about except the people who would want to misuse it and the tinfoil hat brigade. Problem is that the tinfoil hat brigade will be made out to look like crackpots by the people who seek to abuse the technology.

    --
    I drink to make other people interesting!
  12. Yes, it's very unfortunate... by bADlOGIN · · Score: 4, Insightful
    That one group of Church leaders under the direction of then Roman emperor (Constantine) chose to include Revelations instead of The Apocalypse of Peter (see the APOCRYPHAL GOSPELS for all the rest of the stuff left out) when they were whimsically throwing together a collection of writings that they believed were correct according to thier power induced plans of what direction Christianity should go in a full 300+ years after Jesus was dead.


    If only that had been arbitrarily put in and Revelations left out. We'd all be talking about how Jesus went to hell and that after the Apocolypse, if those who ascended to heaven asked to for clemancy for those in hell, it would be granted. Guess it just didn't have the fire and brimstone to keep the stupid peasants under controll that all the 666 bullshit and no redemption theme Revelations does.


    The worst thing about modern so called "christians" is that they don't know thier own history.

    --
    *** Sigs are a stupid waste of bandwidth.
    1. Re:Yes, it's very unfortunate... by ajwitte · · Score: 2, Insightful

      OP was talking about the canonization of certain texts, which was done well before the translation of the King James Version.

      --
      chown -R us ~you/base
    2. Re:Yes, it's very unfortunate... by rarty+bone · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Okay, history lesson time. Nothing about the Christian Bible was arbitrary. Have you actually read these Apocrypha? Completely riddled with holes and just plain weird stuff that clearly does not flow with the rest of the Bible. That does not make it completely clear why they are not in your hotel night stand nowadays though. They really are just not that good of a source.

      See, you have it reversed. The best corroborating evidence suggests that the four gospels and the Pauline epistles were written between 30-80 years of Jesus' ascension, i.e during the lifetime of witnesses. That is CENTURIES before even the now famous Gospel of Thomas and the Apocalypse of Peter (which Peter couldn't have written) you mention. To put it bluntly, any scholar would laugh at the thought that the Bible was orchestrated by Constantine.

      Also, the 'Harrowing' of hell (when Jesus descends after his crucifixion) is still very much a part of the Catholic tradition. The church's reall beef with the Apocryphal gospels is that they were not written by anyone with direct connection or experience with Jesus. Those that claim to be written by famous apostles or Mary don't show up until well after they would have died, making them unreliable. The gospels that exist in the canon now are the same gospels that spread across the world 2000 years ago - very soon after Jesus left. Not to mention the fact that the writers were pretty much unknown and decidedly not famous. Matthew - a former tax collector (cheated people out of their money). Luke - a physician, but not an apostle or anything. What I am trying to convey is that serious thought and research has gone into corroborating the authenticity of the gospels and also Revelations. While Revelations was one of the last books accepted by the church, it was not an arbitrary or manipulative inclusion.

      As for widespread RFID adoption, it can be interpreted as many things. I think it is interesting about the burns when exposed to EMP. But above all right now, I think that being tracked and watched and monitored is going to become a big problem for Christians and everyone else. Well, except Wal-Mart and the Feds.

    3. Re:Yes, it's very unfortunate... by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That one group of Church leaders under the direction of then Roman emperor (Constantine)... whimsically throwing together a collection of writings that they believed were correct according to thier power induced plans of what direction Christianity should go in a full 300+ years after Jesus was dead.

      Emperor Constantine had more influence over the process than you indicate. Just ask Arius or Marcius. Jesus's divinity was decided by a non-unanimous majority vote of men.

  13. Re:Crazy Cult Believes End of Times Coming by donscarletti · · Score: 5, Insightful
    In this case, the cult is Christianity. If they were any other group, we'd be laughing at them. Unfortunately, they are large enough that their crazy belief system may cause trouble for the rest of us (yet again).

    Christianity does not believe end times are heralded by RFID tags, some Christians do. That is what separates Christianity from crazy cults, since it is large and diverse enough to have people make up their own minds on such things. Cults need centralized leadership to tell its adherents what to do and what to believe, Christianity hasn't got a central authority and so its adherents are free to interpret the canon however they see fit and form groups where they share crucial facts of their interpretation. Most Christians believe the book of Revelation to be a non-literal message about what kind of persecution the church has faced and will face in the time between Christ's first and second coming, others believe it is an allegorical prophecy of the history of the thousand years after it was written in about 50AD and some (like the RFID nutter) believe that it is an allegorical prophesy of the thousand years before Christs second coming (whenever that may be). What almost all scholars agree on is that whoever the beast may be is irrelevant when one simply holds to the principles that the bible teaching when dealing with the beast as with dealing with anyone, thus finding the beast is pointless. Unfortunately, not all Christians are scholars and some like to draw shaky parallels and make accusations without merit.

    I know I have just bitten a troll, but someone had to clarify it.

    --
    When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
  14. Re:Crazy Cult Believes End of Times Coming by grub · · Score: 2, Insightful


    I know I have just bitten a troll, but someone had to clarify it.

    You didn't clarify, you were acting as an apologist for followers of christian mythology.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  15. Re:Crazy Cult Believes End of Times Coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    so during the time of Christ, christianity was a cult.

    couldn't resist

  16. It's Easy to Make Fun of the Pious by Morosoph · · Score: 2, Insightful
    But then it's easy to ignore any group warning about anything.

    Ignoring end-times psychosis, what is the reason why the "mark of the beast" is evil? Could it be something to do with the commoditisation of human beings? RFID would fit right in... I'm not saying that these groups are right, but when you look at why such things are seen as being evil or wrong by religious groups, they often have a certain consistency, and are in fact a pretty mainstream view.

    Quoting from revelations isn't going to help their cause, but it is surely entirely possible that such things as RFID could, in some sense, be symptomatic, or even causative of what people who consider themselves spiritual would perceive to be a decline of civilisation.

    Even if the delivery and mythos is nutty, this doesn't mean that the message itself is!

  17. Hurray, more corrupt mods by dsanfte · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Truth isn't flamebait.

    --
    occultae nullus est respectus musicae - originally a Greek proverb
  18. Re:Crazy Cult Believes End of Times Coming by blaksaga · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Christianity hasn't got a central authority

    Isn't he called the Pope?

  19. Re:Clarify this, Pilate! by donscarletti · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I never said the roman catholic church wasn't a cult. If you confuse the roman catholic church with Christianity as a whole you are doing your understanding a grave disservice. As for the "Paul is a Roman spy" theory, I won't pretend that is the first time I heard it but I would like to see your evidence. For the first 50 years of Christianity almost all of its members were ethnically Jewish, many of whom were Roman citizens. And may I point out that most evidence seems to suggest that Paul was executed by the Roman authorities after spending much of his last few years in jail for illegally preaching, this doesn't seem like what the empire would do to one of their own. I would also point out that the Christian extermination policy never really started up until after Pauls death, until Paul, Christianity wasn't even on the Roman radar and if it was, it was largely tollerated by the Romans in Judea since it took people away from Judaism. By the time Christianity was first persecuted in earnest, doctrine was largely based around Pauls letters. This makes no sence whatsoever in the context of your theory.

    Limbo (together with pergatory) however was never part of the bible, it was simply part of that pagan stuff that was folded in by the Roman church to allign it with other popular beliefs of the day, it is part of what protestant churches reject. The catholic church actually did the bible a service by getting rid of that dogma. I don't think you personally know what the bible says, how different churches interpret it. I think you should learn a little about theology and church history rather than a bunch of crazy conspiracy stories if you want to talk rationally about something.

    I don't let my personal Atheism prejudice my study of faith, I don't see why you should either.

    --
    When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
  20. Re:Crazy Cult Believes End of Times Coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Christianity does not believe end times are heralded by RFID tags, some Christians do. That is what separates Christianity from crazy cults, since it is large and diverse enough to have people make up their own minds on such things.

    But Christians do believe that the end times are coming. That is 100% pure cult.

    Cults need centralized leadership to tell its adherents what to do and what to believe, Christianity hasn't got a central authority and so its adherents are free to interpret the canon however they see fit and form groups where they share crucial facts of their interpretation.

    Yes, there are many flavors of Christianity, standing as separate cults. Each has its own central authority.

    Most Christians believe the book of Revelation to be a non-literal message about what kind of persecution the church has faced and will face in the time between Christ's first and second coming, others believe it is an allegorical prophecy of the history of the thousand years after it was written in about 50AD and some (like the RFID nutter) believe that it is an allegorical prophesy of the thousand years before Christs second coming (whenever that may be).

    Nice to see you speak for "most Christinans." Too bad that you are completely wrong, as most Christians do believe it literally.

    I know I have just bitten a troll, but someone had to clarify it.

    Pull your head out of your ass. Take a look around. Study history. Come to accept that your religion is just as absurd as the myriad religions of yore that people don't take seriously today. You are nothing but a chump buying a load of crap. You are being sold down the river just as much as an ancient Greek who prayed to his gods for help. You are a dumbass.

  21. Re:Crazy Cult Believes End of Times Coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    That is what separates Christianity from crazy cults, since it is large and diverse enough to have people make up their own minds on such things.

    HA! Remind me again how you decide right from wrong? Oh, that's right, you don't, you get told what is right and wrong by your imaginary friend. And how is it that you "made your own mind up" on the existence of heaven? Oh that's right, you didn't, you just got told it.

    The whole religion is founded on faith. That's practically the opposite of making your own mind up.

  22. Re:Crazy Cult Believes End of Times Coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    but America is, by and large, becoming less religious as time goes on.

    Nationalism isn't a religion?

  23. Re:Crazy Cult Believes End of Times Coming by bjason82 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    To begin with, you Anonymous Coward, your use of the word CULT is meant in a sarcastic and demeaning way, and you're therefore attempting to label all religions as cultic in order to negate their value and relevance. You do this because you are attempting to pronounce your own personal beliefs and marginalize religion. I find it all too common now a days for atheists to take that superiorist attitude and look down upon us all too ignorant and feeble-minded idiots who believe in a higher order, a spiritual realm.

    That said, and using Christianity as an example, I would like to point out that no Christian knows for sure when the events of the End Times will begin; not in march, not in 2012, and not in 2300. The Bible states that the rapture will come "like a thief in the night," and nobody knows the time of Christ's return. Many generations throughout history have thought the rapture will come during their lifetime, and of course, none have been correct.
    I think why you have a lot of people saying the end times are near is because there are way too many conditions being set in place that coincide with Biblical and non-Biblical Prophecy. One prophet named St. Malachy wrote down in the 11th century his papal prophecies and stopped in detail with our current pope. He only vaguely mentions one more, peter of rome, who will be a martyr and the last elected pope. At least, until now, he has been eerily accurate, it will not take much more time to find out if he was correct. Benedict is pretty old and may not last too much longer.
    The Non-Biblical prophecy of the Mayans says that the end of our current age will be around 2012, some scholars think that when you account for the inaccuracies of our calendar the Mayan 2012 might actually land on our 2006!

    Even if you look at current events it seems like things are becoming more unstable and the United States is threatened by a looming great depression (reference: look up petroeuro). The dominance of the dollar is weakening and in order to maintain its dominance the Bush administration is trying to prolong the inevitable by resorting to war and aggression. There is no way a country can exist solely on a war economy, but that is what has been happening since WWII. The collapse of the American Empire will only lead to the rise of the European Union as the world's leading power and ultimately the much prophesized one-world-government. Of course, some of what I have just said is hearsay and speculation, but it is hard to deny that there are a lot of signs pointing to that outcome.

    Now, once there is a Unified world government under the leadership of a single individual, he might prove to be malevolent and require the allegiance of all who serve him. The "Mark of the Beast" will be his way of purging those who might stand in his way and threaten his authority, we're talking about the Christians. His "Mark" will most likely be some sort of technology that can interface with computers, presumably this technology will contain the numbers "666" signifying the wearer's allegiance to this leader or even the leader's ownership over them. Those who refuse to wear the chip that, in some way, contain the number "666" will, at first, not be allowed to participate in normal commerce and functioning within mainstream society will be all but impossible. Then it will escalate and full scale persecution will commence on those who refuse the "Mark". You can almost look at it as a reverse of what happened during Nazi Germany and the Jews, the Jews were forced to wear the star of David as a way to set this minority apart from the rest of German society. The only difference is that this new designation system will be displayed in an opposite manner of the Nazi's system. Everyone has the choice to accept the mark, but those who choose not to are instead choosing martyrdom and sacrifice.

    It is difficult for even the staunchest atheist to deny the possibility of a future like this.
    I think it is way too easy for atheists to call names saying Christians are "cra

  24. Leave it to the propagandists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...to frame the debate as "the end of the world." No, it's not going to be the end of the world. RFID is a great way to track inventory, but it's also a clever way to spy on everybody and track their every move. And the problem with that is the potential for the abuse of power. ABUSE OF POWER is what we have to fear with no governmental controls on this technology. Not a ridiculous "end of the world" scenario. Albrecht may be leading the charge to collectivize people who are against this technology in order to devise some way to "handle" them later. Good lord, anything but an honest public exploration of the issues. Deception seems to be the fast track to bringing change to the masses.

  25. Re:And there's no suffering now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If you're gonna be hungry again why eat? If you're going to die why live?

  26. Re:Christianity == Crazy Cult [Read all first] by ndansmith · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Interestingly, I learned in a Catholic high school that the 4 Gospels were written ~50 years after Jesus **died**. How well could you write about something that happened 10 years ago?? How about something that happened 50 years ago? 50 years later, how many people are going to be alive to verify/contest your story???

    This fact seems to be heavily obscured... And of course, the Testaments have undergone revisions since then. Also the 4 Gospels are basically the same in content, so three seemed to have mainly copied off the 1st, and just re-wording them for different audiences.

    We do not know the exact dates of composition of the gospels. They are not dated, and we do not have to autographs. Still, 50 years after Jesus' death is one estimate, with 25-30 years being a lower one. It is also true that though the gospels themselves were written (or compiled) later, their actual source materials may have been written long before that, likely when Jesus was still alive. Also, three of the gospels have very similar content, while John is fairly unique and written quite a bit later. The postulation of scriptural revision is not so sure as to be a matter "of course." We have manuscripts from the early seconds century onward, so we can establish the textual history of the new testament to a greater degree of certainty than any other historic document collection. This means that even if major revisions happened (which they didn't), we can see through them. The compositional history of the gospels is a very complicated thing, in case you were wondering ;-).

  27. Re:Christianity == Crazy Cult [Read all first] by TemporalBeing · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Interestingly, I learned in a Catholic high school that the 4 Gospels were written ~50 years after Jesus **died**. How well could you write about something that happened 10 years ago?? How about something that happened 50 years ago? 50 years later, how many people are going to be alive to verify/contest your story???

    This fact seems to be heavily obscured... And of course, the Testaments have undergone revisions since then. Also the 4 Gospels are basically the same in content, so three seemed to have mainly copied off the 1st, and just re-wording them for different audiences.


    We do not know the exact dates of composition of the gospels. They are not dated, and we do not have to autographs. Still, 50 years after Jesus' death is one estimate, with 25-30 years being a lower one. It is also true that though the gospels themselves were written (or compiled) later, their actual source materials may have been written long before that
    Also, remember that the culture was a very oral culture. Oral cultures tend to have far better memory in relation to this kind of thing than non-oral cultures (such as ours today) have. For example, many texts were solely known by oral tradition and could be passed on with little to no change; though parts may be embellished, etc. for different audiences by the same author, the majority of the story did not change to the point that it could be accurately transcribed years after it originally occurred - and not simply 5 or 10 year.

    Additionally, remember that the disciples of Christ (Peter, John, etc.) are thought to have been around 18 or 19 at the start of Christ's ministry; so 50 years later they would likely have been about 70 in age - quite likely they would still have been around at the time it was written, along with numerous other first hand witnesses. Now add to that that there was written works (ala Paul and others) that could also be utilized, and it is very possible. For instance - do a modern day writing on the events of the 1963 JFK assassination - there are many written works, first-hand witnesses still alive, and numerous second-hand/after-the-fact witnesses that can attest (sp?) events, etc. It would have been quite doable for the writers to compile things together even 40 or 50 years after-the-fact and still have 100% accuracy.
    --
    Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
  28. Re:"Rapture loans" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The "rapture" contingency would be taken care of by obtaining an insurance policy against the "rapture" for each mortgage (probably from Lloyds or Swiss Re),

    "Hi, I'd like to buy an insurance policy against the rapture."

    "Um, pardon me?"

    "Yes, I'd like to give you a half-million dollars right now, and if vast numbers of Americans go miraculously flying up into the sky, to be followed shortly by the end of the world, you will pay me 500 million dollars."

    "If the US economy completely collapses, and then the world ends, you want me to pay you in dollars?"

    "Yes, that's correct."

    Dude, sign me up! Where can I get in on this deal?

  29. Re:another fallacy (or Thinking 101) by mclaincausey · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I write this assuming from context that by "literary validation" you mean popularity. "Literary validation" would actually mean something like scholars of literature widely citing the book as some sort of masterpiece. The Bible is not a single piece of literature, so I don't think that would apply.

    Sorry, but an appeal to popularity is yet another logical fallacy. At one point (and perhaps still today), the majority of people in America thought Saddam Hussein was involved in 9-11. The popularity of that (deliberately implanted) falsehood does not make it true. Truth is independent of popularity. In fact, many of the greatest scientific revolutions (continental drift and heliocentrism come to mind) were initially met with contempt, disbelief, and even censorship and threats. The popularity of the Bible, and even the fact that some of the events in the Bible are historically verifiable, do not make the other events in the Bible, particularly the ones that are unprecedented, any more credible.

    --
    (%i1) factor(777353);
    (%o1) 777353
  30. Because it may not be a LONE nutjob by abb3w · · Score: 2, Insightful
    why are you guys posting articles by some flakey Christian who thinks progressive technology is the devil?

    If this "flake" is able to convince a large enough number of other Christians to flake out over this, it will impact how RFID gets used. The RFID design or usage plans may get modified, using "avoid freaking out the evangelical nutjobs" as an added implementation criterion. The resulting design changes may make for something that the rest of us will be happier with... or make for something that we will be much unhappier with. This makes it "stuff that matters".

    Society affects technology, and vice versa. Not all of society is rational, but the irrational parts still impact technology. Of course, the Slashdot discussion won't focus on this, because (a) figuring out exactly how this will impact RFID is pretty hard and (b) making fun of fundamentalist christian whackos is more enjoyable for a lot of Slashdotters.

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.