Slashdot Mirror


Space Jackets Down to Earth

Roland Piquepaille writes "Several technologies used to design the space suits protecting astronauts are now being adapted to protect workers facing extremely hot and dangerous conditions. According to the European Space Agency (ESA), these 'space-cooled' jackets are using three different technologies: special 3D-textile structure, cooling apparatus derived from astronauts' suits, and a special water-binding polymer acting as a coating. Even if these protective clothes are primarily intended for firefighters or steel workers, several applications are possible, such as in sportswear or in cars as parts of air conditioning systems. Read more for additional details and pictures."

22 of 87 comments (clear)

  1. Sounds Boss by RedHatLinux · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wonder how long until these things get adopted for use in regular clothes.

    1. Re:Sounds Boss by TubeSteak · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just as soon as they can ramp up manufacturing to bring the price down.

      There are lots of cool (pun intended) technologies that aren't available because demand isn't high enough to justify investing billions in a manufacturing plant.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:Sounds Boss by CyricZ · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How are you defining 'regular clothes'?

      Indeed, it is likely we will see clothing such as this used by firefighters quite soon, for instance. While that isn't everybody, it would start to bring such textiles into everyday usage.

      If such materials are too expensive to be used for consumer-grade clothing, we may initially see it used for items such as cooking gloves. Eventually the technology will be developed further, and likely will become economically feasible for widespread use.

      If I had to make a guess as to how long it would take, I would be inclined to think three to five years for more generalized applications, and widespread availability no more than five years after that.

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    3. Re:Sounds Boss by eh2o · · Score: 4, Funny

      Two words. Laptop pants. Ouick, somebody call Steve Jobs! Its not too lata to put the G5 in the macbook!

  2. erm.. by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 3, Funny

    Maybe it's just me here but I have a slight problem with the wording of the article.

    "special 3D-textile structure"

    At what point did we start making 2D clothes? Arn't all clothes and materials 3D by being oh.. part of a realm using 3D form?

    Maybe this is just going over my head, but seems like bullshit marketing for idiots to me.

    --
    I like muppets.
    1. Re:erm.. by everphilski · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Traditional fabrics are woven in 2 dimensions. Consider cloth a plane, a 2 dimensional entity. It is wrapped about a 3-D body to create a piece of clothing. Cloth is very 2-dimensional.

      Instead here the fabrics are being considered in three dimensions from square one - their manufacture is in three directions to provide sweat wicking and other interesting properties.

  3. Huh? What was that noise? by FF8Jake · · Score: 3, Funny

    Can anyone say "Sneaking Suit"? *hides in a cardboard box labeled "Nuclear Warhead Storage Building"*

  4. Synthesizers rule! It's THE FINAL COUNTDOWN! by Wayne_Knight · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The only experience Europe has with space travel is situated in Sweden, and they have very long hair and annoying synth lines. Why doesn't the Europe Space Agency just save some of their taxpayer's money and ask NASA how they accomplished this AMAZING FEAT back in the 1980's?

    But seriously, you'd think Europe would want to streamline their space budget since they're planning on releasing a technology to compete with the United States' GPS system, but if they keep throwing away money like this it won't happen anytime soon.

    Space travel has not progressed like it should have in the decades following the amazing progress of the 1960s. Hell, it hasn't progressed like the exploration of the New World in the 1500s.

    I feel that it is because we (as in, both Europe and the U.S.) have become completely and hopelessly terrified of danger. Many men and women died in those eras exploring the great unknown. But without their sacrifice, we would never have been able to accomplish what we have.

    Apollo 1, The Space Shuttles Challenger and Columbia's losses were all tragic. And I am NOT saying that their loss should be shrugged off as "eh, someone had to die to explore space." What I am saying is that we as humans needed to grow and explore space, much as the Europeans needed to grow and explore beyond their continent. When there was a tragic event in colonial exploration (Jamestown), those people learned from their mistake and tried again and usually succeeded. When we fail today, we usually cower up and shut down all exploration for a half-decade or so.

    It's actually a bit sad how Europe is learning from the mistakes made in the United States. A few years ago it was the other way around. Re-inventing the wheel doesn't make driving any safer, and considering the wheel (in this case, the spacesuit) is the LEAST of space travelers' worries, I cannot see our presence in space advancing much further.

    1. Re:Synthesizers rule! It's THE FINAL COUNTDOWN! by radarsat1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I feel that it is because we (as in, both Europe and the U.S.) have become completely and hopelessly terrified of danger.

      Could it also be because we've realized that there's actually not a hell of a lot out there to explore? In the 1960's everyone was so excited about space because we'd never made it that far off the planet, but now that it's been done... there's not a lot to do out there except keep some interesting zero-g science experiments running. (It is a vaccuum after all... by definition, somewhat empty of interesting stimuli.)

      The next important milestone in space exploration will be getting a man to Mars (and back). However, the technical problems in doing so are vastly more difficult than getting to the Moon, and that was hard enough as it is. And the fact is, once we get there, there's nothing financially benificial in it, so there's hardly a commercial reason to pursue this goal, except tourism, perhaps, but I doubt that tourism dollars can possibly fund a trip to Mars.

      I'm as disapointed as you are. I really hope to see a man on Mars within my lifetime, I think this would be absolutely fantastic. However I think it's a bit of an oversimplification to say that we haven't done anything merely because we're "scared of space".

    2. Re:Synthesizers rule! It's THE FINAL COUNTDOWN! by thogard · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why doesn't the Europe Space Agency just save some of their taxpayer's money and ask NASA how they accomplished this AMAZING FEAT back in the 1980's?

      Maybe NASA won't tell them? A while ago a friend told me that the tech behind the US space suits was still classified. Apparently it was classified because it was assumed that the Russians hadn't figured out how to use Peltier Effect devices in a space suit and used normal compressors to cooling. He claimed that there had been an active misinformation campaign at NASA to help hide this fact that included bad technical drawings of suits using larger cooling systems and even fake suits built for traveling museums. He learned from one of the Russian space suit designers the reason they didn't use the Peltier Effect devices is that they thought their compressor systems were more reliable and didn't have as high of a thermal stress risk.

      As far as Apollo 1 was concerned... the same guy was part of the team that had done the fire risk analysis for earlier spacecraft and somewhere along the line the details got lost when it came to Apollo. I know many of the engineers that were involved at the Cape when that happened went to their graves with a nagging feeling that it was their fault the problem hadn't been caught before the disaster.

    3. Re:Synthesizers rule! It's THE FINAL COUNTDOWN! by TERdON · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, Esrange indeed is the only place AFAIK in Europe where rockets are shot. Or perhaps you heard about French Guyana? Even if it's not exactly in Europe (well, it IS in France, so you could argue that politically, it is), it's a lot closer to the equator, where it is a lot more efficient to launch rockets - you can use the earth's rotation as a help to save rocket fuel. And indeed, ESA has a base there. Surprising.

      --
      I have a really elegant proof for Fermat's last theorem. If this sig was only a bit longer...
  5. what a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ScuttleMonkey posts another Roland Piquepaille story.

  6. Bully Protection by Musc · · Score: 2

    Would these be useful for young nerds to wear to school, as a protection against bullies.
    Imagine being a bully taking a nice swing at your gut, when his hand his stopped by space-age meteor
    shielding!

    Maybe we can get thinkgeek to carry it....

    --
    Hamsters are at least as feathery as penguins. HamLix
  7. Rolands template by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful


    gues who's posts come up on a google phrase search on

    read more for additional details

    Sad that Slashdot keep accepting stories from this spammer, a billion websites with billions of articles and we have to have the same names/spammers/copy&pasters/desperate individuals crap over and over again

    no wonder people block adverts here and dont subscribe, try adding value to this site and listening to your potential audience, it might give people an incentive to help this place and donate/unblock ads instead of being teated as fskin idiots ready to lap up whatever shite some shill is pushing (in this case that advert application called ZDNet)

    AC

  8. Page with the actual jacket by HoneyBunchesOfGoats · · Score: 4, Informative
  9. AW alert. by acid_zebra · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Roland Piquepaille writes"... that put me off, right there.

    Yes this is a troll. But Roland is an attention whore. It's worth the karma burn.

    --
    -- No Sig is a Good Sig
  10. I am a firefighter - and I find this suspect. by CFD339 · · Score: 5, Informative

    When I go into a building with uncontrolled fire I have gear currently weighing between 60 and 80 pounds. This includes a pants and jacket made with a gnomex fabric, traditional helmet, heavy leather boots with steel under the foot, in the toes, and at the shins (which is nice when you bark your shin on a ladder). I'm wearing on my back an air bottle and SCOTT pack good for 30 minutes or so (a full hour if I'm acting as a member of a Rapid Intervention Team - RIT). My face is covered with mask that allows me to use that air, and I'm wearing a carbon fiber hood that encircles the mask and covers my head and neck. Long leather gloves cover my wrists to the inside of my jacket. I am "Fully Encapsulated".

    I am fairly safe from heat and smoke up to the point of a 'flashover' -- in which case I have between 4 and 16 seconds to be somewhere else before being incinerated. I am so well protected, that many of the guys refuse to wear the hood or else won't fold down the leather flaps on the helment to cover their ears further because their warning for when the heat is too intense is when their ears start to feel too hot even through the protection.

    In addition to all this, I am carrying one or more of the following: Radio, Light, Axe (or other similar tool), Water Can, Thermal Imaging Camera, escape rope, hose line.

    Exactly how is it that this fancy jacket or undershirt is going to help me? I'm hot, but not so much that I can't make it through the 20 minutes in there. When I come out, I am handed a 20oz bottle of water and expected to finish it on the spot while having my pulse and respiration checked before even considering going back in.

    This jacket would supposedly protect me from flashover -- several thousand degrees where anything that can combust, will.

    BULLSHIT.

    Even if the jacket worked, my face mask would melt to my face while the straps on my airpack along with the protective clothing I'm wearing would literally disintegrate.

    The way to be protected from a flashover is to jump out the nearest window or to use the axe you're carrying to make a hole in the exterior wall and dive through it. That's pretty much it. When it comes to flashover -- Don't be there. If you are there, get out. I've taken classes that involved practing the fine art of going out a second floor window head first onto a ladder and flipping over, or slamming an axe into a wall braced across the corner of a window, tieing off a big of rope to it and bailing out the window -- even if its just to hang 20 or 30 feet down from the room where the flashover is about to happen until someone gets around to moving a ladder to you.

    Don't believe this crap that a little water held in that jacket is going to help.

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
    1. Re:I am a firefighter - and I find this suspect. by fuego451 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Just wanted to say, your department really needs to get with the times and I would also recommend a department subscription to Fire Engineering magazine and a complete set of IFSTA and NFPA manuals.

      You should know that there are modern methods of combating flash over. The first is to ventilate the structure and the second is to use short burst of spray from a 60 degree fog nozzle which cools the unburned particles of combustion (aka smoke) just enough to eliminate flashing but not so much that the smoke banks downward. The latter is known as the 'Swiss' method because it was developed by Swiss engineers and firefighters.

      You should also know that leather boots are not recommended for structure firefighting by the NFPA. Your department should be wearing bunker boots, we wore Fire-Walker bunker boots made by Ranger Footwear, and Nomex pants jackets and hoods.
      I don't know of a fire department anywhere that still wears 'traditional' firefighting helmets with leather ear protectors, except yours, I guess. Most department have been wearing composite helmets with face shields and Nomex ear protectors.

      Everything I've described here is 'old' technology.

      Oh, and sticking a pick-headed ax in a wall, tying a rope to it and jumping out a window to escape a flash over? Sounds like something someone pulled out of their ass.

      By the way, over a 24 year period I was a Firefighter I, II, III, Firefighter/Paramedic, Fire Specialist, Fire Engineer and Engine Company Captain. I've been retired for 8 years.

  11. Funny you say that...my instructors covered that.. by CFD339 · · Score: 3, Funny

    During the training for that kind of move (which actually isn't QUITE that dramatic) we were told quite clearly that the exit procedure was very dangerous and should only be done in one of two cases....

    a) the room is about to flashover

    b) there is a news crew out side -- it looks GOOD on film.

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
  12. RTFA -- it claims to protect you from flashover. by CFD339 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    regardless of the moronic and inciteful way you made it, you're point is accurate if we're talking about how to PREVENT flashover. It is NOT, however, what the FA is about.

    The story (and Slashdot isn't the place I read it first -- I think Science Daily covered it earlier in the day) claims the suit will protect firefighters during flashover.

    If you've cooled the overhead there IS NO flashover. If you've vented right, there is no flashover.

    If someone doing a search gets too hot and decides to break a window before you're ready to vent -- you may set the stage for something that this suit is NOT going to help protect you from. THATS my point.

    As to using a pick headed axe to get out? Putting the Axe across the corner of the window and using your own weight to hold it while you bail is a well known practice. I've done it in training, from a second floor, with a blindfold (and a safety line). I've done it over, and over, and over. I've done it using a figure 8 and my built in harness, and I've done it without a figure 8 just looping the rope around my back and using my gloved hands for the friction device.

    On your last comment, my copy of the NFPA Essentials guide is 3 feet to my right.

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
  13. I'm a firefighter, and I hope this works by MikeyTheK · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ugh. I literally JUST got back in the door from a structure fire (sorry, no links to pictures yet, but they'll be up in the morning at www.kuhlhosefire.org). My bunker gear was sopping wet when I finished my second bottle, and we were just doing RIT/overhaul! (Uh, sorry, overhaul is what you do when the main fire is out and you find all the hot spots and burning debris and put it out so that you don't get called back three hours later once everyone is home in bed).

    There are a couple of major issues that this technology might address that would be helpful.
    1) At hazmat incidents, turnout gear is frequently inappropriate. The people doing the hot zone work are in "level 1" suits, which are fully encapsulated. However, level 1 suits are HOT, and level 1 techs are hard to come by. This might make it easier for level 1 techs to stay in the hot zone for longer periods of time or perform more evolutions.
    2) For my brother firefighter who pointed out that structural firefighting gear including nomex hoods provide inadequate protection for flashover (or getting steamed by the idiot outside who started squirting when we're inside), imagine having a level-1 type of setup for fighting fire. Your hands and head are no longer the most vulnerable because with this new technology your whole body is being cooled actively. I realize that level 1 is bulky and wouldn't be appropriate NOW, but if the technology is available someone will figure out a way...
    3) Barn fires in August just KILL crews. If you're standing outside in the sun for any length of time in turnout gear, you get completely baked. This might make it easier for us to endure fires in summer.
    4) Brush fires suck. SOG for departments that don't have nomex jumpers for fighting brush fires are to wear FF boots, turnout pants, and gloves. So you're slogging around through chest-high red brush getting cut to hell, a mile off the road, getting your ass kicked in your heavy gear, taking a shovel, axe, or if you're a rookie an Indian Can strapped to your back. Again, it doesn't take long to get overheated. Maybe not any longer.

    I hope that the technology performs. I'm whipped.

    --
    Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies.
    Never forget: 2 + 2 = 5 for extremely large values of 2.
  14. moronic by fuego451 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Okay, I was a little harsh. Probably why I never made B/C because I always spoke my mind. However, you never enter a structure without an attack line and any firefighter worth his salt can see a flash-over develop, as I have many times. So, I really don't understand your point or where you are coming from at all. Also, I still say this out the window escape is bogus. Imagine being exhausted, wet leather gloved hand holding a combination tool or pick-headed ax in the corner of a window you just broke, and cleaned of course, and hanging your body weight outside. I'm thinking broken wrist, maybe a silver fork fracture and a fall to the ground. Oh, you said safety rope. Let's see, emanant flash-over, and you have time to break a window, clean the corner of shards, tie a safety rope? I don't think so babe. This might work at the drill tower but this isn't good fireground practice and if I were on your department it would be eliminated.