Slashdot Mirror


Japan's Top 100 Games

Next Generation has a piece with the Top 100 Games of All Time, as voted by the nation of Japan. From the article: "1. Final Fantasy X (2001) 2. Final Fantasy VII (1997) 3. Dragon Quest III (1988) 4. Dragon Quest VIII (2004) 5. Machi (1998) 6. Final Fantasy IV (1991) 7. Tactics Ogre (1995) 8. Final Fantasy III (1990) 9. Dragon Quest VII (2000) 10. Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time (1998)"

108 comments

  1. 4 of the top ten are Final Fantasy? by Gr8Apes · · Score: 4, Funny
    What was the question worded like?
    • Finally, what was your favorite fantasy game of all time? (Don't forget to add which sequel if your answer is "Final Fantasy"!)
    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    1. Re:4 of the top ten are Final Fantasy? by panthro · · Score: 1

      Or maybe they're just good games?

      --
      If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
    2. Re:4 of the top ten are Final Fantasy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The entire thing reads like a freaking Square-Enix ad. When you remember that DragonQuest (3 of the top 10 slots) is also a Square-Enix game, you get seven out of the top 10 being Square-Enix games.

      I'm thinking this was a poll conducted by Square-Enix to the members of the Square-Enix Fan-Club. The only Final Fantasy game that doesn't appear on the list is Final Fantasy XI - which is good, because it's widely considered one of the worst MMORPGs of all times!

    3. Re:4 of the top ten are Final Fantasy? by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They're not that good. Not good enough to crowd out games like Civilization, Ultima 7, Wing Commander, Doom, Quake, Half-Life, and Privateer, all ground-breaking games for their times. A time period which the Top 10 list spans.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    4. Re:4 of the top ten are Final Fantasy? by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to add which sequel if your answer is "Final Fantasy"!

      All the subsequent Final Fantasy games are NOT sequels. The only (and infamous) exception is Final Fantasy X-2 which is a sequel of (obviously) FF-X.

    5. Re:4 of the top ten are Final Fantasy? by Daetrin · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised that FF actually ranked higher than DQ. I'd always heard that DQ was more popular in Japan (take the law passed about DQ releases for example) which is why Enix ended up buying out Square and not the other way around.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    6. Re:4 of the top ten are Final Fantasy? by CashCarSTAR · · Score: 2, Informative

      With the exception of Civilization, none of the games you mentioned feature the min-maxxing gameplay that the readership of Famitsu tends to go gaga over.

    7. Re:4 of the top ten are Final Fantasy? by tukkayoot · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I saw this on Kotaku, and thought it was pretty hilarious. I can't understand how Dragon Quest III is rated above the Ocarina of Time. That particular iteration of Dragon Quest was not particularly outstanding, from what I've played of it ... it's immediate successor, Dragon Quest IV was a lot better, IMO, but neither come close to touching the Ocarina of Time, which was a fresh, exciting game at the time of its release and screamed quality and fun from beginning to end.

      Of course, you have to keep in mind that this a "player's choice" poll, not a list composed by critics or game developers, so it's not surprising to see so much fanboy influence. Still, it leads me to believe that Famitsu readers must be completely out of their gourd to be so utterly in love with menu-driven third person, turn-based RPG combat and cliched storylines to the exclusive of almost anything else.

    8. Re:4 of the top ten are Final Fantasy? by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      That could be. I'm not familiar with Famitsu's reader's predilections. I just comented on the obvious slant of games listed in the top 10. Someone else pointed out the even more obvious slant, when it was factored in that 7 of the top 10 were all produced by a single company.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    9. Re:4 of the top ten are Final Fantasy? by rcamera · · Score: 1

      4 are ff and 3 are dragon quest. perhaps the question was worded as 'what is your favorite square/enix/square-enix game of all time'

      --
      Wave upon wave of demented avengers March cheerfully out of obscurity into the dream
    10. Re:4 of the top ten are Final Fantasy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might want to look up the word "sequel" at some point. A sequel is a "follow-up" to a previous work. Given that all the Final Fantasy games use the same magic, items, and contain common elements with each other - they're all sequels.

      Now just because something is a sequel doesn't mean it can't be innovative (see the Zelda series) - it's just in Final Fantasy's case, they weren't innovative and just more of the same. But they were all sequels.

    11. Re:4 of the top ten are Final Fantasy? by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1, Funny

      >>Now just because something is a sequel doesn't mean it can't be innovative (see the Zelda series) - it's just in Final Fantasy's case, they weren't innovative and just more of the same.

      I would describe Zelda as being "more of the same" before Final Fantasy. At least Final Fantasy has a story with unique charactors. Zelda doesn't even [i]try[/i] (for the most part, though Ocarina did have a cool storyline) to have a unique story or well-made charactors.

      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
    12. Re:4 of the top ten are Final Fantasy? by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      Aside from a very few minor common elements, how exactly are they similar? I don't remember the magic or items that common throughout all the games. Perhaps they had the same names, but they were utterly different in concept. By your definition, World of Warcraft is a sequel to Lord of the Rings, if only because they have elves, dwarves, orcs, and mithril. Even though they are, for the most part, wildly differing in realization, they're more similar than the common threads in any of the Final Fantasies short of airships or chocobos.

    13. Re:4 of the top ten are Final Fantasy? by panthro · · Score: 1

      It's not a list made by experts analyzing the merit of the games. It was a poll: "Which game did you like best?" Clearly, there is a broader range of people (at least in their poll cross-section) that liked certain Final Fantasy style games best, unless they asked the question a certain way or skewed the results to make them look better for some reason.

      --
      If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
    14. Re:4 of the top ten are Final Fantasy? by XenoRyet · · Score: 1
      This just in: Japanese gamers really, really like RPGs...

      --
      If forums teach us anything, it is that logic and critical thinking should be required courses in the public schools.
    15. Re:4 of the top ten are Final Fantasy? by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      The skewed question was precisely my point in the GGGP. How else to explain games that are 15+ years old show up at the top of the favorite list in such a narrow genre?

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    16. Re:4 of the top ten are Final Fantasy? by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      This just in: Japanese gamers really, really like only Square-Enix games

      Or so this article would have you believe.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    17. Re:4 of the top ten are Final Fantasy? by ReverendLoki · · Score: 1
      You might want to look up the word "sequel" at some point. A sequel is a "follow-up" to a previous work. Given that all the Final Fantasy games use the same magic, items, and contain common elements with each other - they're all sequels.

      I hate to be pedantic here, but by the definition you give, no, it isn't.

      1. Something that follows; a continuation.

      Like SW Episode one came out following SW Episode 6, right? This isn't the right usage here.. you want to look at:

      2. A literary, dramatic, or cinematic work whose narrative continues that of a preexisting work.

      By this, no, they are not sequels. For what it's worth, Wiktionary agrees. Of course, that said, you can now just edit the Wiktionary definition to fit whatever meaning you choose, but...

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    18. Re:4 of the top ten are Final Fantasy? by badasscat · · Score: 1

      This just in: Japanese gamers really, really like only Square-Enix games

      Considering Square and Enix were the two largest producers of RPG's in Japan before their merger, and that they are now by extension by far the largest producer of RPG's in Japan after the merger, I don't think your statement is as ridiculous as you meant it to sound. I mean, news flash: Final Fantasy and Dragon Quest are popular in Japan! Who knew??

    19. Re:4 of the top ten are Final Fantasy? by ZakuSage · · Score: 1

      This does seem strange, especially since Japan isn't as gung-ho about FF as even North America is. It seems more like they asked a group of FF fanboys in Japan what their favorite games were.

    20. Re:4 of the top ten are Final Fantasy? by KDR_11k · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's because the point of Zelda is to ignore the clicheed story and enjoy the gameplay while the point of Final Fantasy is to ignore the clicheed gameplay and enjoy the (equally clicheed) story.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    21. Re:4 of the top ten are Final Fantasy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might want to try playing the Zelda games before talking about them and sounding like a complete idiot. Each Zelda game has built on the previous games, and greatly expanded the gameplay based on them.

      The first Zelda was a fairly simple top-down game. The second one was a top-down overworld map with sidescrolling actions in dungeons. The third one returned to top-down action, but added in a ton of new items and abilities. The N64 brought Zelda into 3D movement (doing top-down in 3D doesn't count, which is what Final Fantasy did), and had puzzles involving 3D movement. The GameCube had Link sailing around a world and controlling the wind. From the sounds of it, the new Zelda game will involve different abilities depending on if it's day or night.

      Compare that with the Final Fantasy games. All of them use the same magic system. (Fire, Ice, Bolt, Cure, Life, etc.) All of them use the same items. (Potion, Ether, Phoenix Down, etc.) All of them use the same classes (White Mage, Black Mage, Red Mage, Blue Mage, etc.). All of them use the same game play (turn-based combat - and, yes, "ATB" is still turn based). All they change are the names of the characters, the story is almost always exactly the same (fight your way to big evil dude using rag-tag team of underachieving teenagers).

      If you've played on Final Fantasy game, you know how to play the rest. The same isn't true for Zelda.

      Do yourself a favor and get a GameCube and play through Wind Waker, and you'll understand why Zelda is innovative and Final Fantasy is not.

    22. Re:4 of the top ten are Final Fantasy? by skreeech · · Score: 1

      people in different countries with different cultures don't like the same things as you! I doubt all those even came out in japan. When narrowminded(like you in this sense) japanese people look at north america's favourite games they probably think our list sucks too.

      --
      [20:36] wwwdot/.dotorg
    23. Re:4 of the top ten are Final Fantasy? by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      but western lists most likely wouldn't be comprised primarily of 2 series released by a single company, with an occassional toekn thrown in for "balance"

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    24. Re:4 of the top ten are Final Fantasy? by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1

      >>You might want to try playing the Zelda games before talking about them and sounding like a complete idiot. Each Zelda game has built on the previous games, and greatly expanded the gameplay based on them.

      I've played every one of the Zelda games, including the gameboy games. I've also played every one of the Final Fantasy games. How many have you played?

      Zelda did go through a big gameplay change between 2d and 3d, and the story of Ocarina was really cool. However, there really isn't all that much difference between them gameplaywise, and the storyline is [i]always [/i]Ganon's bad, go take him out with your mute avator Link. Oh, a couple of games have had Vaati as the bad guy, and Link's Awakening had that interesting thing with the Wind Fish, but the Zelda people really do not put any effort into the story. Final Fantasy does tend to reuse the cliche of bad guy tries to take over the world but montley band of youths defeats him, but at least they have actual charactors with backstories, not just placeholders like Zelda does.

      >>If you've played on Final Fantasy game, you know how to play the rest. The same isn't true for Zelda.

      You're wrong. Compare FF8 with FF10. There's a world of difference in the magic system, class system, level up system, etc. Now compare Ocarina to Wind Waker. The battle system is almost exactly the same, with a few extra items like Deku Leaf that don't actually count as creative. Don't get me wrong, I love the Zelda gameplay, but they do reuse the same gameplay from game to game. Final Fantasy is much more innovative and different from game to game than Zelda is.

      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
    25. Re:4 of the top ten are Final Fantasy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're wrong. Compare FF8 with FF10.

      Be glad to. Let's see, the main character in both is a whiney teenager with a large sword, who goes around the world using magic such as Fire and Ice to defeat enemies. Both carry around stocks of potions in case they get injured. Both can unleash large sword attacks after reaching their "limit". Both fight some entity devoted to controlling the world. Both find an airship which they use to travel around the world.

      Feel the innovation!

      But wait, I just described FFVII as well! It would have been FFIX too, except that main character carried a small sword instead of a large one. Some innovation, normal-sized weaponry.

      Oh, right, in FFVIII it was "XP", in FFX it was "AP". I suppose that's innovative too. Changing a letter.

      I have to admit though, I'm rather impressed that you managed to successfully italicize the quotes, but still attempted to use BBcode while posting. Maybe once you've had your morning coffee you can understand this point:

      Zelda does repeat the story, but no one plays games for the story. People play games for the gameplay. (If you're interested in stories, your local library has a large selection.) Zelda innovates with the gameplay each time, while the story remains fairly cliche.

      Final Fantasy doesn't innovate with gameplay, and they certainly don't innovate with story. (Quick synoposis of every Final Fantasy: Small group of whiney teenagers fights some evil group, only to discover that the evil group was being manipulated by an even larger evil. They then go and fight this evil force that seeks to dominate the world.)

      Zelda's story changes between games about as much as Final Fantasy's does - the only difference being that Final Fantasy changes the character names, Zelda doesn't. Given names like "Cloud" and "Squall", I'm not entirely sure that counts as innovation...

    26. Re:4 of the top ten are Final Fantasy? by Pope · · Score: 1

      Doom, Doom 2, Quake, Quake 3... :)

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    27. Re:4 of the top ten are Final Fantasy? by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1

      >>You're wrong. Compare FF8 with FF10. Be glad to. Let's see, the main character in both is a whiney teenager with a large sword, who goes around the world using magic such as Fire and Ice to defeat enemies. Both carry around stocks of potions in case they get injured. Both can unleash large sword attacks after reaching their "limit". Both fight some entity devoted to controlling the world. Both find an airship which they use to travel around the world.

      Alright, now compare Ocarina with Wind Waker.

      The main charactor is a dude wearing green who doesn't talk. He hits things with a sword on the way to defeat Ganon. He can use other items like bows and stuff.

      Feel the innovation!

      But wait, I just describes every other Zelda game!

      >>Oh, right, in FFVIII it was "XP", in FFX it was "AP". I suppose that's innovative too. Changing a letter.

      Not quite. X completely did away with the level-up system and replaced it with the Sphere Grid system. VIII kept the level-up system, but totally overhauled the magic system with drawing magic and junctioning GFs and other wierd stuff not seen in any other FF. Neither game includes the classes that you said are in every FF.

      >>>Zelda does repeat the story, but no one plays games for the story.

      I do. Many games have better stories than your average TV show. I play games instead of watch TV.

      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
    28. Re:4 of the top ten are Final Fantasy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you found three similarities between Zelda games, and I listed seven between FF games. Yep, definitely see how that shows Zelda isn't innovative.

      Not quite. X completely did away with the level-up system and replaced it with the Sphere Grid system.

      It's the same freaking thing! I don't care what they call it, you gain points to increase attributes and learn new abilities. Instead of making this automatic, FFX made the process slow and tedious, which most people would call a step backwards.

      VIII kept the level-up system, but totally overhauled the magic system with drawing magic and junctioning GFs and other wierd stuff not seen in any other FF.

      First off, the magic used in FFVIII is the same magic that's been used in EVERY FF game. Secondly, the "drawing" system is essentially IDENTICAL to "kill mobs, get stuff" - just slower and more annoying. (Seems to be a pattern here...) GFs are just another name for "summoned monster"! They're simply renamed versions of the same thing every FF has done. Just more annoying.

      Neither game includes the classes that you said are in every FF.

      Wanna bet? Each character has a general class. The teacher was a Blue Mage, Squall's love interest was a White Mage, Squall himself was a Warrior. In FFX, Auron was a Paladin, the blue hairy dude was a Blue Mage, Lulu was a Black Mage, freaky summoner girl was a Summoner/White Mage, and I think Tidus was a warrior. Every character is based on some character class.

      I do. Many games have better stories than your average TV show. I play games instead of watch TV.

      May I introduce you to books, then? If you're only interested in stories, you might wanna try out some books. They have good stories as opposed to the drivel your normal console RPG has. No one in their right mind plays video games for the story.

    29. Re:4 of the top ten are Final Fantasy? by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1

      >>So, you found three similarities between Zelda games, and I listed seven between FF games. Yep, definitely see how that shows Zelda isn't innovative.

      You listed simularities between two FFs. I listed simularities between all Zeldas.

      >>It's the same freaking thing!

      Whatever. How come overhauling the gameplay in FFs is "the same freaking thing!" yet adding a couple of new items in Zelda is innovation?

      >>Wanna bet? Each character has a general class.

      No. In 8 and 10 (and 7, 6, and 2) there are no classes, you choose skills that your charactors gain without any class structure. Some charactors have special abilities, like Yuna was the only one that could summon, but you could teach her black magic, fighting skills, etc. White mages don't fight or cast black magic. Warriors, like you claim Squall and Tidus are, don't cast magic, but they do, so obviously they aren't warriors. You could use them as warriors (or any other class, for that matter) but they don't have specific classes.

      You never did answer my question of how many Final Fantasies and Zeldas you've played.

      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
    30. Re:4 of the top ten are Final Fantasy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The similarities I listed apply almost without fail to all the Final Fantasy games, too.

      How come overhauling the gameplay in FFs is "the same freaking thing!" yet adding a couple of new items in Zelda is innovation?

      Because, for the last time, they didn't overhaul the gameplay in any of them! It's the same freaking thing! They renamed a bunch of things, but you're still essentially doing the same thing you did in the original Final Fantasy in Final Fantasy X, just with a much prettier UI and pointless FMV. (Ooo, pretty pyreflies...)

      The the "couple of new items" in Zelda drastically change the gameplay and what you can do. In Wind Waker, you control the wind, which you can float on using the Deku Leaf. In Ocarina of Time, you used music to control your environment and the Master Sword to control time itself. They're not minor differences like the advancement systems in the FF games are, they completely change how the game is played.

      No. In 8 and 10 (and 7, 6, and 2) there are no classes

      Um - yes, there are. I just listed them. Just like in every Final Fantasy game, you can change classes in some form. Not new.

      I've played nearly every Zelda game except for a couple that were on the Game Boy, and have played essentially every single Final Fantasy game (although not all the way through, I'm not masochistic enough).

    31. Re:4 of the top ten are Final Fantasy? by skreeech · · Score: 1

      square enix weren't always the same company. They were competitors until a few years ago I think. Square just made the final fantasies, had nothing to do with the dragon quest ones(except 8, and maybe 7)

      --
      [20:36] wwwdot/.dotorg
    32. Re:4 of the top ten are Final Fantasy? by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1

      >>The the "couple of new items" in Zelda drastically change the gameplay and what you can do.... They're not minor differences like the advancement systems in the FF games are, they completely change how the game is played.

      How the fuck does adding a few items change how the game is played? So you can change the wind, big fucking deal.

      >>Um - yes, there are. I just listed them.

      Dude are you dense? I just explained there aren't. Think Tidus is a warrior? Watch him double-cast Ultima. Think Yuna is a white mage? Watch her steal. Think Lulu is a black mage? Watch her cast Life. While you're thinking about this, what class is Terra? What class is Firion? What class is Vincent? You can't answer those questions without completely making shit up.

      >>I've played nearly every Zelda game except for a couple that were on the Game Boy,

      The gameboy games were actually the best, in my opinion.

      >>and have played essentially every single Final Fantasy game (although not all the way through, I'm not masochistic enough).

      Well, appearently you didn't play far enough into them to understand the gameplay.

      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
    33. Re:4 of the top ten are Final Fantasy? by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Enix ended up buying Square and not the other way around because the Final Fantasy movie was just a financial drain and flop at the box office that it left Square quite weakened. Sadly, the movie division hurt the games division.

    34. Re:4 of the top ten are Final Fantasy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the fuck does adding a few items change how the game is played? So you can change the wind, big fucking deal.

      OK, you've obviously never played the later Zelda games, so I'm not going to bother continuing past this post. HINT: Other items and abilities can utilize the wind...

      As for classes, yes, you can change a character's class/job. Big deal. But the classes I listed are what they start as.

      I don't remember what Terra's official class was, but in FFVI they did all have classes as their special ability was defined by their class. She was essentially a Red Mage as I recall. I think I'll call her a "Bard" because all I can remember about her special ability was that I never used it. I believe Vincent was considered an Engineer. I had to look up Firion, I believe he was classified a Warrior.

      The gameboy games were actually the best, in my opinion.

      Yeah, you've obviously never touched any of the console ones. So there's no point in discussing this with you.

      Well, appearently you didn't play far enough into them to understand the gameplay.

      Oh please. The gameplay doesn't change throughout the game. Once you've played an hour into any Final Fantasy, you've seen all the gameplay there is. The abilities just become "Ability 2". The items become "Hi-" and then "X-" versions of the stuff you started with. The only thing you haven't done in an hour is the stupid minigames, but I'll bet you enjoyed dodging a lightning bolt 200 times.

    35. Re:4 of the top ten are Final Fantasy? by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1

      >>OK, you've obviously never played the later Zelda games, so I'm not going to bother continuing past this post. HINT: Other items and abilities can utilize the wind...

      I've played more Zelda games than you have.

      >>As for classes, yes, you can change a character's class/job. Big deal. But the classes I listed are what they start as.

      You can change classes in 3, 5, and X-2. 1, 4, and 9 have set classes. 2, 6, 7, 8, and 10 have no classes. If you'ld ever actually played these games you'ld know that.

      >>I don't remember what Terra's official class was, but in FFVI they did all have classes as their special ability was defined by their class. She was essentially a Red Mage as I recall. I think I'll call her a "Bard" because all I can remember about her special ability was that I never used it. I believe Vincent was considered an Engineer. I had to look up Firion, I believe he was classified a Warrior.

      Bullshit. If Terra was a Red Mage, then so was Celes, Edgar, Cyan, and everyone else who could equip a sword and use white and black magic, and if you knock out the sword requirement for Red Mage and just say someone who can fight and use white and black magic, then everyone in that game was a red mage (except the Yeti). I don't know where the fuck "Bard" came from, before she certainly wasn't that. Her special ability is "Morph" which changes her to her esper form. I don't know where you get engineer for Vincent either. As for Firion, well he was rather black magey in my game. The FF2 charactors don't have anything to indicate class at all. You choose the spells they learn, you choose the skills they earn. If they follow any particular class, that's you're choice. They learn whatever you want them to.

      >>Once you've played an hour into any Final Fantasy, you've seen all the gameplay there is.

      Then appearently you've never played more than an hour of any Final Fantasy, because it takes more than an hour to really understand the new gameplay systems, and many times you can't even use all the gameplay mechanics until 5 or 10 hours in. In 6, there's no way you could get espers until at least 5 hours in, especially on your first playthrough, and they are a huge part of the gameplay.

      >>The only thing you haven't done in an hour is the stupid minigames,

      After an hour, you've barely scratched the surface of any Final Fantasy. Even the old games have 30 hours of gameplay, without stupid minigames. Why don't you go play through a whole Final Fantasy before going off about what they lack?

      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
  2. Not again... by lightspawn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    * my favorite isn't on the list, so it can't be "right"!
    * the list is biased toward older / newer / console / PC / handheld / RPG / arcade / puzzle games!
    * the list doesn't mean anything, lists like this never do (of course they don't)
    * oh man, I completely forgot that game, that was fun.

    Lists like that are compiled regularly. It's hardly news, but hey, if it reminds you of a game you haven't played in years or lets you know of a gem you'd never have known about otherwise...

    1. Re:Not again... by negative3 · · Score: 1

      I think you nailed my initial response to every video game list I've ever seen:
      Why is the NES Legend of Zelda "not on here" or "ranked so low"? This is crap.
      Why are these all newer games, have people forgotten the greatness of NES?
      These people are obviously idiots (i.e. uninformed youth), but that's alright.
      Hey, where's my copy of "Ikari Warriors"/"SNES Legend of Zelda"/etc.?

      --
      "Physics is to math what sex is to masturbation." - Richard Feynman
  3. They have no taste by jandrese · · Score: 1

    Tactics Ogre? Final Fantasy Tactics was much better IMHO. Maybe they thought the list was getting a little too heavy with Final Fantasy titles? TO is a fine game, but FFT is superior IMHO.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  4. Says a lot about Square-Enix by trogdor8667 · · Score: 1

    7 of the top 10 games of all time was made by Square or Enix... says a lot about this company, and about the type of games the Japanese culture tends to enjoy.

    1. Re:Says a lot about Square-Enix by Echnin · · Score: 1

      Actually, it says more about the readership of Famitsu. Sport games are immensely popular, and fighting games are also, to a degree. Let's not forget rhytm games, which the list entirely neglects. A lot of people who read Famitsu are "Akiba-kei", which is the new and cool word for "otaku". No surprise that RPGs and dating sims are overrepresented.

      --
      Lalala
    2. Re:Says a lot about Square-Enix by trogdor8667 · · Score: 1

      You're very right. Famitsu's readership is dedicated to those genres. It still says a lot about Square and Enix, but not about Japan as a whole.

  5. What about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Asashoryu Sumo 2006 (or 2005, 2004, 2003)? Yes, those sumo games that come out every year are fantastic, each better than the last. Not at all like the Maddan or FIFA series.

  6. Kung fu, but not true classics? by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 1

    No Castlevania, No Contra, No Metroid, No Mega man? Kungfu was ok, like it was the final scene of Game of Death the movie, but there are better games even for its era.

  7. No Katamari Damacy? by RobertB-DC · · Score: 5, Funny

    No Katamari listed in the top 100 Japanese games? Outrageous! We are most displeased!

    Where was cousin Ace? Playing Animal Crossing (#43)?
    We have no idea what you are talking about.

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    1. Re:No Katamari Damacy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naaaa... Nananana na na nana na nana naaaaa.. Naaa... nanananana na na nana na nana naaaaa.........

    2. Re:No Katamari Damacy? by wuie · · Score: 1

      No Katamari? How disturbing...

    3. Re:No Katamari Damacy? by Gilzors · · Score: 1

      Apparently, it wasn't as popular there as it was here.

  8. Popular votes by Miraba · · Score: 1

    I know this is a popular vote, so it's going to be heavily skewed to whatever is recent and flashy, but still...

    I'm both scratching my head at the voters for placing FFX at #1 and thanking them for putting FFX-2 down at #32.

  9. Someone go to Target and buy them some genres by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1, Insightful

    That's pathetic. Not a single FPS on the list? Only two PC games that I can see (Wizardry and SimCity?) Only a two sports games I noticed (Gran Tourismo 4 Super Family Fun Baseball Pro Gold Happy or whatever.) Do they sell video game consoles over there as "RPG Machines?" or something?

    1. Re:Someone go to Target and buy them some genres by SScorpio · · Score: 1

      No, it's just a different market. Just like Adventure games are doing ok in Europe but are almost non-esistance in the US. But looking at the game list is there any wonder why Microsoft has been having so many problems selling consoles there?

    2. Re:Someone go to Target and buy them some genres by badasscat · · Score: 1

      That's pathetic. Not a single FPS on the list?

      Some of us would call that pretty much the opposite of pathetic. I personally think it's refreshing.

      Only two PC games that I can see (Wizardry and SimCity?) Only a two sports games I noticed (Gran Tourismo 4 Super Family Fun Baseball Pro Gold Happy or whatever.)

      Wow, so you're saying an entirely different culture values games differently than we do? I'm shocked - SHOCKED, I tell you!

      Seriously, what's up with your Amerocentric-ness? Just because we like FPS's and sports games doesn't mean we're "correct" in our opinions and the Japanese are not. It doesn't mean the whole rest of the world has to like those games. I, for one, am pretty happy to see any list that does not put freakin' DOOM in the top 20.

      The only thing you can realistically argue with any success about this list is whether or not it actually reflects Japanese tastes. I personally think it's not really reflective of the mainstream there - these are pretty hardcore gamers. Among the mainstream, I can guarantee you games like Winning Eleven and DDR would be pretty high on this list and GTA wouldn't be on it at all. This list is reflective of Famitsu readers.

      Then again, if you did the same thing with EGM in this country, you'd get similarly skewed results... whereas if you asked the general population you'd probably end up with Madden 2006 at #1.

    3. Re:Someone go to Target and buy them some genres by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      The point I was making is that a top 100 list made in the US would have a wide selections of genres represented, not a single one dominating utterly like in that list. I agree with you about Doom, as a kid who played both Doom and Marathon through in the same year, I think Doom is vastly over-rated.

      I wouldn't say what's up with my American-centric-ness, I'd say what the hell's up with the game industry's Japan-centric-ness? I think Microsoft has the right position on this issue, personally. About time there was an American company doing some gaming again.

    4. Re:Someone go to Target and buy them some genres by xero314 · · Score: 1

      The point I was making is that a top 100 list made in the US would have a wide selections of genres represented...

      Yeah really, there is certainly no way the top 100 in the US would be totally made up of FPS, Sports and RTS games.

      Every culture has it biases, including the US. True the list of 100 top games in Japan does not fit what the US has, but it certainly is not limited in it's genres any more than we would. The geners I found a a quick glance are RPG (fantasy and otherwise), 3rd Person shooter, Platform, Turn Based Strategy, Fighting, Racing, Action Adventure, Horror, Simulation, and Sports. The list is no more heavily weighted towards any gener than the US would be other than the fact that most US gamers probably couldn't name 100 games they have actually played. If I recall correctly the last top games list I saw from the US had the top ten as dominated by Rockstar as the Japanes list in dominated by Square, and Rockstar has not release even half as many games.

      I am a US citizen and my list would contain almost exclusively RPGs, Strategy (Turn Based and Real Time) and platform, but I wouldn't complain that may of my favorites would not make the top 100 in my own country.

    5. Re:Someone go to Target and buy them some genres by mowph · · Score: 1
      Only two PC games that I can see (Wizardry and SimCity?)

      Even those probably aren't the PC versions. The 1991 SimCity is more than likely the Super Famicom / SNES title. (The PC version was released in 1989.) The 1997 Wizardry was likely the Famicom / NES title, with the original PC release waaay back in 1984. (I have no idea when, or if, a Japanese PC version was ever released.)

      Gaming in Japan is largely done on game consoles. Computers are, oddly enough, mostly used for computing. If you visit a Japanese game store, you'll likely find that the PC section is almost as small as the XBox section.

      It's still odd that absolutely no PC titles made it onto the list.

  10. Oh Man So Biased! LOL! by panthro · · Score: 1, Troll

    OMFG! 7 of 10 games in the list are Square-Enix! They must have like totally biased the results somehow!

    Or maybe Square-Enix just made some really good games?

    Recall Blizzard in the PC world... every title in the Warcraft, Starcraft and Diablo series is in the top 20 sellers of all time, and most won Game of the Year awards across the board.

    --
    If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
    1. Re:Oh Man So Biased! LOL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guarantee that if you conducted a poll (US, European, worldwide, whatever), 70% of the top 10 would not come from Blizzard, or any other company. Most non-Japanese polls I've seen have been pretty widely spread across the different genres and platforms, regardless of age.

    2. Re:Oh Man So Biased! LOL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having played both Square-Enix games and Blizzard games, it's doubtless that the list was biased. There's no contest. Everyone I know likes Blizzard games, but only a few emo/goth freaks like Square-Enix games. Now I'm willing to accept that there's a cultural difference, but apparently Japan likes CRAP.

      Final Fantasy X, the best game of all time?! The thing was one of the most boring games I've ever had the misfortune of watching someone play. From the emo-story line, to the insanely stupid "grid system", the thing was just - blech.

      We've played Square-Enix games. They suck. For them to be the top 10 games is just - sad. Someone needs to buy Japan some good games.

    3. Re:Oh Man So Biased! LOL! by panthro · · Score: 1

      What a rock-solid scientific argument. I take it back, the list was definitely biased.

      --
      If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
  11. Upset of the Decade --!!! by nevek · · Score: 1

    No Shaq FU --- This japanese style fighting game was what they designed the SNES for!!

  12. Animal Crossing 43, Pokemon 51 ... slate voting by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    I think, based on the list, which shows people rating all the FF titles about the same, that some form of slate voting must have occurred, with people ranking all "their" versions of their game 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,...

    Unless people who play Animal Crossing and Pokemon (both Japanese) tend to be too young to vote in this poll.

    I've noticed people frequently do ballot-stuffing when we have film festival voting here - it's really obvious, because you get something like 500 votes of 5 (best), and maybe 30 votes of 1-4, spread evenly, but the total attendance was only 600, and usually less than half of an audience will ever vote (much lower, actually).

    Anyone from Japan offer any insight into how this voting was done?

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Animal Crossing 43, Pokemon 51 ... slate voting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you are right. Weekly Famitsu's readership probably won't list Pokemon or Animal Crossing as their favorite. The publisher actually puts out a separate magazine dedicated to just the Nintendo stuff, so that's where the Nintendo fans would go.

      Famitsu is also not the most trustworthy source of information. They are routinely accused of jacking up review points for their best advertisement customers, and their reviews for any Square/Enix titles tend to be higher than the norm.

      Next-Gen and the submitter is definitely stretching it a bit to call this the voice of Japanese gamers.

    2. Re:Animal Crossing 43, Pokemon 51 ... slate voting by rohlfinator · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't know that it's an age problem necessarily, but I'm sure Famitsu's market is a fairly limited demographic.

      If the readers of say, PC Gamer (in the US) were to be polled with the same question, their list would likely be dominated by FPSes and strategy games, probably ignoring less "hardcore" games like The Sims. Likewise, if you were to survey the readers of a European Nintendo mag, they'd probably favor Nintendo games over any others.

      This isn't a case of ballot stuffing; it's just a matter of demographics... the people who read Famitsu tend to favor traditional, Japanese RPGs. In reality, there are Yu-Gi-Oh games that have outsold some of those top-ranking FF titles, so clearly this list isn't a very accurate representation of game popularity.

    3. Re:Animal Crossing 43, Pokemon 51 ... slate voting by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      If the readers of say, PC Gamer (in the US) were to be polled with the same question, their list would likely be dominated by FPSes and strategy games, probably ignoring less "hardcore" games like The Sims. Likewise, if you were to survey the readers of a European Nintendo mag, they'd probably favor Nintendo games over any others.

      Well, I've got the Sims (PC, many add-ons), Sims (GameCube), Sims: The Urbz (GameCube), Sims 2(PC, many add-ons), Sims 2 (xBox) and I don't think I've ever even seen a magazine that would follow them, nor would I necessarily buy one for that kind of info.

      Good points.

      This isn't a case of ballot stuffing; it's just a matter of demographics... the people who read Famitsu tend to favor traditional, Japanese RPGs. In reality, there are Yu-Gi-Oh games that have outsold some of those top-ranking FF titles, so clearly this list isn't a very accurate representation of game popularity.

      I thought so, I remember the Konami investors meeting they talked about ranking of games, and Yu-Gi-Oh games were much more highly ranked, as were Animal Crossing. Hence my response.

      I've nothing against the titles listed, I think FF and other genres are quite respectable, even if I haven't played most of them.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  13. Easy by Programmer_In_Traini · · Score: 2, Informative

    While we played Doom I & II, Quake, Heretic, Wolfenstein, Unreal

    they played Final Fantasy, Zelda, Dragon Quest

    its a culture thing.

    --
    If you look like your passport photo, you're too ill to travel. - Will Kommen
    1. Re:Easy by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      "We" played Zelda and Final Fantasy as well. I just don't think "we" were as myopic about our game selection as that presented in the list.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    2. Re:Easy by Programmer_In_Traini · · Score: 1

      >>I just don't think "we" were as myopic about our game selection as that presented in the list.

      LOL.

      Well, that much is true :)

      Although, Zelda and FF are taken to a whole new level in japan... what I meant was, here we like Zelda and FF, you know, they're good games, they sell well, its a hit. but in japan, its really part of the culture of gamers. why do you think square created like 3 final fantasies that were just sold in japan, its because the sales figures were much more impressive over there.

      and that much is also true for Doom over here, I remember the nights i spent playing doom 1, then duke nukem.

      but you know, list in general, especially when published to the public like this are mainly lobbying sessions, they're in fact pushing for games to be more popular. to what end exactly im not too sure, visibility for the company maybe. As with everything in the net, you gotta take it with lots and lots of salt :)

      --
      If you look like your passport photo, you're too ill to travel. - Will Kommen
  14. It's obvious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The real winners here are Roman Numerals.

  15. hmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amazing Im guessing a good chunk of that would be on America's gaming list, though not all of it of course. There were a lot of people over here that liked FFVII, i think more than FFX.

  16. Yet another example of east-west differences by NetDanzr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This list is yet another good example of east-west differences in gaming. If you look at the list, the biggest group are games that are heavily story-driven, but which don't give the player too much freedom. In fact, I found only one typical Western game on the list, Wizardry, which placed 66th. This doesn't mean that eastern gaming culture is bad; it's just different. However, with the proliferation of Japanese consoles in the US, resulting in larger numbers of Japanese games here, the eastern culture seems to take over the western one in gaming, at least on store shelves. It is no wonder then that whenever a western-style RPG is released (Arx Fatalis, Gothic, Morrowind), it creates a very fierce following of people who are starved for more freedom in their games.

    1. Re:Yet another example of east-west differences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I think that we have to look at Japan as a very narrow market when it comes to games. Of the top 10 listed in the summary, all of the ones that were released in America sold well (Tactics Ogre being the exception, due to limited supply). The thing about the US is that we have many, many large markets for games of all genres. The majority of the people that play Final Fantasy will also vote for various Blizzard games as the best games of all time alongside it. These are the same people that probably enjoyed Doom, Sim City, one or more flavors of 2D fighter, etc.

      Look at the kind of RPG's that you can get on the portable systems in America these days. You could easily pass all your gaming time on a handheld. Fire Emblem (+sequel), Legend of Heroes, Popolocrois, Lunar, Generation of Chaos... All variety of RPG's are available...and this is a NICHE market.

    2. Re:Yet another example of east-west differences by patio11 · · Score: 1
      There is no such thing as "Eastern culture", unless you water down the definition so that it means nothing. Starcraft is neither heavily story driven nor does it severely restrict player freedom -- in fact, one of its key selling points is the variety of strategies is very wide and that Internet play lets you play it every day for a decade and it will never get old. Would you consider a nation where something like 20% of the population has played Starcraft to be an "Eastern" culture or not? Take another example, MMORPGs. They're all about player choice and frequently have the poorest excuse for stories since "Uh oh, the princess was in another castle" (oh yeah, incidentally, that game wasn't Western either). Would a nation in which overuse of MMORPGs is a major social concern be Eastern or not?

      Somebody else above has its right -- its not the culture of Japan driving this list, its the culture of Famitsu readers. The magazine devotes large portions of its space to providing the kind of walkthroughs that you really need nowadays to see all the content in $RANDOM_CONSOLE_RPG. (Here is a map of the dungeon, here are the locations of all 42 crystals of power -- #31 is tricky, since you can only see it on the first day of a new moon while standing on one foot)

    3. Re:Yet another example of east-west differences by 7Prime · · Score: 1
      The majority of the people that play Final Fantasy will also vote for various Blizzard games as the best games of all time alongside it.

      I don't think this could be farther from the truth. Tthere is a huge reviene of a gap between the console RPG community and the RTS/TBS communities, as there is with the MMORPG community and the PC RPG community. You're dealing with some huge devides, and a lot of intense in-fighting between these crowds. You've just compared two game series: one is a PC series, one is a console series in the most traditional sense; that right there is a huge demographic devide. Then, on top of that, you have the fact that one is Japanese made, and the other is American made, again, very large demographic differences. There are a lot of American gamers who are just repulsed by Japanese made games, and there are others that find that the majority of American made games have a style that really doesn't fit right with them either. There are some fence sitters, but not all that many.

      To make a fairly strange analogy, you've just said the equivalent of: Catholics will agree with Babtists most of the time about religion. No, they will kill each other over it. I'm not sure you realize just how much tension there is between the PC gaming and console gaming communities. How similar they may be (which is up for debate), they tend to consider themselves polar opposites.

      I'm a huge console gamer, myself, and a big FF fan. And yes, I've played StarCraft, and yes, I did enjoy it. Would I put it up there with the greatest games I've ever played? Hell no. And I think I can safetly say, also, that I'm in a minority of console rpg players who have even given a Blizzard game (besides WoW) the TIME OF DAY. All my console RPG playing friends, and almost all the gamers I've talked to online, tend to consider themselves strongly in one camp or the other. No matter how ludicrus it is, you can't deny that it exists.

      I've noticed it largely to be a control issue. Americans, as a rule, are obsessed with freedom and control, even if it becomes a disadvantage. Conversely, in Japanese culture there is an ingrained emphasis on structure. These two different cultural tendancies become quite evident in the construction of video games. American RPGs will many times choose to sacrifice narrative emphasis in exchange for more open-ended gameplay, as with Fable. Conversely, Japanese made RPGs tend to emphasise elegent narrative structure (even if the narrative itself is worthless, which is commonly the case) over freedom of gameplay, as in the linear plotlines of the Final Fantasy series. I, mayself, have yet to find a game that combined large amounts of freedom and elegent narrative construction... the two are ALMOST if not completely mutually exclusive. Personally, however, I don't mind sacrificing freedom for structure, I actually find it somewhat comforting that I'm not completely out on my own. Too little structure can lead to a game environment where only simple, repetative tasks can exist, without any overarching goals. I realize that others may find structure to be more stifling than I do.

      --
      Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
    4. Re:Yet another example of east-west differences by paedobear · · Score: 1

      Bad example there, as Fable is both British and, though it tries to hide it a bit, very linear.

  17. Know the lineage of the game you're dissing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WOAH WOAH WOAH!

    Final Fantasy Tactics was a direct rip-off of Tactics Ogre. Not only did they directly steal the gameplay mechanics of the game, they actually used the key development staff from Tactics Ogre on Final Fantasy Tactics. Check out Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Final_Fantasy_Tactics /

    If Tactics Ogre lacked- if you're talking about the Playstation version- it's because it was a port of the original Super Famicom game. So compared to FFT, it was clunky, and the load times were irratating. But the game was several years old before it got a port!

    But, FFT was incredibly derivative, AND it had a linear storyline. The best part of Tactics Ogre- if you gave it a chance- was the fact that the story allowed you to make choices that affected your path in the game. There are VERY few games that have given the player such control over the story, and for that at least, the game deserves to be on the list.

    Besides, FFT only allowed you to take 5 people into combat (vs. 10 in Tactics Ogre). How tactical can you get with 5 characters?

    Having Final Fantasy stamped on something doesn't make it better. No more so than adding Mario.

  18. Aw [Bleep] by Ironsides · · Score: 1

    Insert the biggest middle finger here you have ever seen.

    29. Kingdom Hearts II (2005)

    I still have to wait another 22 days for this to come out in the US.

    --
    Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    1. Re:Aw [Bleep] by Fred+Or+Alive · · Score: 1

      Apparently we Europeans are getting it in October, so it could be worse. Especially as we pay more for the privilege.

      If I get a new console, I'll probably get a US one...

      --
      10 PRINT "LOOK AROUND YOU ";
      20 GOTO 10
    2. Re:Aw [Bleep] by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      A question on that (and remember that you'd need an NTSC->PAL converter or a computer card that can take in NTSC), are some of the next gen consoles going to be region free? The Nintendo DS is, as is Blue Ray (or is it HD-DVD). So mught some of the consoles be region free as well?

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    3. Re:Aw [Bleep] by Fred+Or+Alive · · Score: 1

      A question on that (and remember that you'd need an NTSC->PAL converter or a computer card that can take in NTSC)

      Quite a lot of European TVs are happy to take NTSC as well as PAL. Plus PAL / NTSC is a none issue with HDTV, as far as I know all HDTVs basically use the same standards.

      Sadly I don't have either, but my Japanese PlayStation that I picked up is perfectly happy using a European RGB SCART cable, so I'd imagine a PS3 would be the same as it still uses the same connector for SDTV. I could either try a UK RGB cable for the Xbox 360, or be foreced to use my PC's monitor instead (oh the humanity!). I'm not as sure about the Revolution, but I'm sure I'd work something out.

      are some of the next gen consoles going to be region free? The Nintendo DS is, as is Blue Ray (or is it HD-DVD). So mught some of the consoles be region free as well?

      All handhelds are region free, with the exception of UMD Video discs on the PSP. The Game Boy has been region free since the late '80s, but Nintendo didn't turn round and make the SNES, N64 or Gamecube region free. Wikipedia doesn't mention anything about region coding in the HD-DVD article, and give a new 3 region thing for Blu-Ray, but a HD-DVD region coding thing might not have been announced yet or something.

      As for new consoles, the Xbox 360 can have region-free games, like Dead or Alive 4 is, but most are locked. Someone from Sony Australia made noises about the PS3 not having regions, so it'll be locked. Don't have a clue about the Revolution.

      Frankly I don't care that much, there are very few games that are only released in Europe, or released here first, and I probably wouldn't miss them anyway.

      --
      10 PRINT "LOOK AROUND YOU ";
      20 GOTO 10
  19. I would really like to see some qualifiers... by neutralstone · · Score: 1

    ... and the most important of these would be the amount of time that the voters like to spend playing games.  In the linked-to list, it's clear that the voters spend *much* more time on games than I prefer.

    I would much rather see a "top fifty" list compiled where the voters do not like to spend any more than five hours per week on games.  I would expect titles like Wario Ware, Inc and Katamari Damacy to be close to (or in) the top ten.

  20. I hate to say it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but their Hentai RPGs have zero gameplay. Most of them don't even care if you can't read Japanese, just keep clicking until you see the scene you want. If they'd put more work into it, they could easily sell an English version.

    1. Re:I hate to say it by RobertB-DC · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hentai RPGs have zero gameplay. Most of them don't even care if you can't read Japanese, just keep clicking until you see the scene you want. If they'd put more work into it, they could easily sell an English version.

      You say that like it's a bad thing.

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
  21. Wow. by dougmc · · Score: 1
    I look at the list, and I've only played three of the games listed --
    66. Wizardry (1987)
    93. Sim City (1991)
    96. Tetris (Gameboy) (1989)
    and of these three, I didn't play Sim City much, and didn't exactly play Tetris (Gameboy) because I've played Tetris on other platforms. Wizardry, on the other hand, was the first game I got for my Apple II and I played all the way through it and the first few expansions.

    Considering how much I like RPG games, I'd have thought that there would be more overlap. But I guess it boils down to 1) me being in the US, and therefore mostly playing games popular over here, and 2) being a mostly PC gamer rather than a console gamer.

    Though I have to wonder if we're talking about the same Wizardry game. The one I'm thinking of came out in 1981, not 1987. The wikipedia article talks about some Japanese console versions of the game, so maybe that's where the confusion comes from.

    1. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've played 13 of them:

      10. Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time (1998)
      21. Super Mario Bros (1985)
      28. Chrono Trigger (1995)
      31. Zelda 3 (1991)
      41. Zelda Windwaker (2002)
      46. Legend of Zelda (1986)
      61. Super Mario World (1990)
      66. Wizardry (1987)
      69. Super Mario Kart (1992)
      73. Grandia (1997)
      96. Tetris (Gameboy) (1989)
      97. Secret of Mana (1993)
      99. Super Mario Bros III (1988)

      Although honestly I rarely play tetris. Most americans played Wizardry on their computers, but there was a NES version in Japan, which I assume is what the article is referring to.

    2. Re:Wow. by mozu · · Score: 1
      Though I have to wonder if we're talking about the same Wizardry game. The one I 'm thinking of [wikipedia.org] came out in 1981, not 1987

      The Japanese version is a port of the original version. During the late 80s it was ported to PC98 series (Sorry its Japanese.) by company called ASCII (Which owns Famitsu by the way). It came in 5" floppy and you had to abuse the silver write protect sticker so the characters don't get erased if things went wrong. The ported version had the same line art maze but the graphics for the characters and loot were much improved. They became more intricate and colourful with finer pixels and better fonts. Its style was kinda like a mixture of John Howe and anime. The main maze window was located in the middle of the screen just like the x86 version. The modifications made it much more immersive compared with the x86 version and had a more mature feel to it.

      Later on Wizardry was ported to MSX and NES in 1987. I can't really confirm the version for NES as I don't recall it ever being released. The one I played on SNES had beautiful BGM, added castle and town graphics and walls were filled with patters resembling the style of Wizardry 6.

      Typically Japanese gamers don't just go for the gameplay. Characters, style, packaging, storyline and anime is important as well as peripheral franchise products such as magazines, novels, comics, figurines etc. Wizardry is no exception. If the Apple ][ version had been ported as it was it wouldn't have so successful in Japan.

      One of my all time favouries is Hydlide because this was what started the genre called action RPGs but this is not on the charts. Probably because it was never released for NES or SNES. My next favourite is action RPG called Ys which is at No. 52. I played both books 1 and 2 (PC88 version) when it came out in the late 80s. It made such an impression on me (Just like when Aerith died in FF7.) that it still haunts/curses me to this day.

    3. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Which owns Famitsu by the way

      owns --> owned

      Famitsu is now owned by enterbrain. Ownership changed when ASCII went bust.

    4. Re:Wow. by WWWWolf · · Score: 1
      The Japanese version is a port of the original version. During the late 80s it was ported to PC98 series ...

      Arrrrgh! The Japanese got some good ports.

      Just today I ran into a look at FM-TOWNS version of Ultima VI. That's full speech. The rest of the world had to wait for Ultima IX to get our share of awful voice acting. (The samples on the above page are absolutely brilliant compared to U9's garbage.)

      As for what this has to do with the article... um... oh yeah, I'm glad Ultima III got 7 places out of top 10, and there was an Actually Good Game on rank 10. =) =) =)

  22. Ogre Battle Saga by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice to see Tactics Ogre and Ogre Battle on the list at (7)! and (45) respectively. I am not so sure about the rest, but those two definetely belong on the list.

  23. Reflection of taste differences by Swifti · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think this list gets better recognition and merit than the typical lists compiled by 1Up, Gamespy, or GameSpot due to the fact that this is data is a reflection of a market that isn't the English-speaking Western market that we're a part of.

    Just take a look at that list. Most of the games listed are role-playing games and/or games developed by Japanese developers. This data tells us numerous things about the electronic gaming market in Japan and certainly reflects attudinal differences between us and them. They don't like action games as much as we do, they certainly don't like first person shooters as much as we do, a market loyalty or dynasty appears to exist with Japanese developers as they do with foreign developers, and they really seem to like their RPGs.

    It certainly explains why the X-Box 360 or PC gaming, both having strong Western predilections, isn't doing as well in Japan as they are across the Pacific...

  24. Errors? by JLennox · · Score: 1

    According to http://www.the-magicbox.com/ last time Kingdom Hearts II was on the top 30 list (feb 6 to feb 12), it sold a total of 1,088,607 copies. According to the newest (feb 20 to 26), where Animal Crossing DS is number 5, AC:DS has sold a total of 1,957,677 copies.

    This does not correspond with TFA.

    1. Re:Errors? by JLennox · · Score: 1

      Errr, my error. I thought it was top 100 best selling :)

  25. I'm disappointed by kidcharles · · Score: 1

    I'm kinda disappointed Boong-Ga Boong-Ga didn't make the list.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une sig.
  26. Game Quality is the issue by Brothernone · · Score: 1

    The Japaneese all have one thing in common: their disdain for all games and consoles not japaneese. The reason Microsoft is suckin a big nut in sales in japan is their loyalty. The reason Square-Enix rules the top 10, is because they are based in and cater to Japan. Their games and future ideas all comes from what sells well in Japan. The gamer market is incredible in Japan, as almost everyone (if not everyone) has a console of one form or another. Quality of games is therefor much better, because they have precident and expectations to overcome. Sadly in america, games are treated as the bastard child of our economy. They are a plague that right wing legislative cigar smoking monkeys want to abolish. They are blamed for corrupting our youth and blah blah blah. What's corrupting our youth is the bullshit content and hours of crap that most of our games consist of, especially so far in the "Next-gen" wars. Games today in america suck, and I for one am tired of the same names spewing forth 17 different versions of the same game, just with a different sub title. Story telling, and game quality have all gone downhill with the increases in the push for graphics.

    --
    He whom you called four-eyes yesterday, you call Sir tomorrow.
    1. Re:Game Quality is the issue by paedobear · · Score: 1

      The reason MS has problems in Japan is that the marketing is terrible (They use English terms like "high definition" the Japanese don't know), there are almost no games released, and those that are tend to be awful and VERY American (Madden is coming out on 360 next month IIRC. wtf?)

  27. english version of Famitsu? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone know if Famitsu magazine is available in USA/Import in English version?

    Thanks in advance.

  28. 8 out of 10, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    8 out of 10, actually.

    Since they technically own the rights of the Ogre series too :)

    Linkage right here. Surprised to see no other comments have picked up on this yet.

    All hail our Square Enix overlords.

  29. Looks about right by dtfinch · · Score: 1

    Never heard of Machi though, and I would have put Chrono Trigger a bit higher.

    If it doesn't take an hour of random repetitive turn-based monster battles to walk from one edge of the continent to the other, it's not a game I'm willing to waste my time with.

  30. Wait, what? by RealmRPGer · · Score: 1

    Honestly, I didn't think FFX was that great. If it was on the PSX, or the other games had been on the PS2, it wouldn't have gotten anywhere NEAR that kind of recognition.

  31. They have more taste than we do by mowph · · Score: 1

    The Japanese version of Tactics Ogre was originally released in 1995 on the Super Famicom / SNES, many years before Final Fantasy Tactics came out. Considering that its graphics and interface were nearly on par with many PS titles (besides the pretty summoning and magic effects, even FFT really doesn't outdo it), and that the gameplay and class system of Tactics Ogre was arguably superior to FFT, it's not hard to see why Tactics Ogre was considered a more groundbreaking and influential game than FFT in Japan.

    The US version of Tactics Ogre only came out on the Playstation, IIRC slightly AFTER the FFT release in 1998. I never played the PS version, but I understand it was basically a direct port from the SNES version. It's easy to see how Tactics Ogre could appear to be a shallow rip-off of FFT to a US fan, when it was actually a groundbreaking game that later went on to be essentially repackaged as FFT.

  32. Final Fantasy Analysis by mowph · · Score: 1

    I don't find it too big of a surprise that the list is full of Final Fantasy titles, but the order was a bit of a shock:

    1. FF X
    2. FF VII
    6. FF IV (Released in west as FF II)
    8. FF III (NES - Not released in west until much later)
    15. FF V (Not released in west until much later)
    22. FF VIII
    24. FF IX
    25. FF VI (Released in west as FF III)
    60. FF II (Not released in west to my knowledge)
    63. Final Fantasy

    Seeing the original rated lower than ANY of the sequels was a surprise, but nowhere near as big of a shock as seeing FF VI handily beaten by FF III, IV and V! FF VI (later released as FF III in the west) is often considered to be one of the masterworks of the 16-bit era... at least over here. What gives with that?

    I can see that FF IV, being the first 16-bit FF title, and FF VII, being the first fully 3-d FF title, were more "revolutionary" titles at their times, but I thought that FF VI had the best in terms of overall polish and presentation based on the technology available. It's really a surprise that it wouldn't immediately come to mind if asked to name a favourite title of all time. Makes me wonder exactly how that survey was taken.

    1. Re:Final Fantasy Analysis by Fred+Or+Alive · · Score: 1

      FFII has been released in the west, it was in Final Fantasty Origins. FFIII is the one that hasn't been release yet, but is coming out on the Nintendo DS at some point.

      --
      10 PRINT "LOOK AROUND YOU ";
      20 GOTO 10
    2. Re:Final Fantasy Analysis by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1

      I'm not surprised that the orginal FF rated at the bottom, it really didn't age well, IMHO.I'm really surprised though that 6 got so low. I would have thought that would be in the top 3.

      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
  33. My list of 10 best japanese games. by master_p · · Score: 3, Interesting

    1. PacMan: best all-around game, for all ages and sexes (especially Ms Pacman), and its gameplay (or parts of it) still lives in many modern games.
    2. Legend of Zelda:best action RPG ever; I had so much fun with this game!
    3. Outrun: best and most atmospheric racer ever. It helped revived arcades back in '86. Best arcade console (a mini Ferrari moving according to the action on the screen helped by hydraulics). Best soundtrack for racing games ever (Magical Sound Shower).
    4. R-Type: best shoot-em-up ever. An audio-visual experience still not matched yet: there are shoot-em-ups with better graphics, or better sound, or more gameplay, but not with better graphics/sound/gameplay in the same game!
    5. Donkey Kong: it introduced Mario and Donkey Kong.
    6. Bubble Bobble: one of the best arcade games ever; number 1 for gameplay ideas. One of the most addictive games ever.
    7. Arkanoid: best bat-and-ball game ever. No matter how many OpenGL polygons modern games throw at it, Arkanoid is never matched: the metallic hypnotic ping-pong sound can not easily be forgotten.
    8. Metal Gear: First stealth game, with lots of important ideas. Released on MSX.
    9. Space Invaders: most important game ever released: it kickstarted the video game industry.
    10. 1942: Father of all vertical shoot-em-ups. Lot's of fun.
    1. Re:My list of 10 best japanese games. by RubberDogBone · · Score: 1

      Nitpick alert: Ms. Pac Man isn't from Japan.

      That game started in the US as a bootleg Pac Man project which was eventually sold to Midway, the US distributor of Pac Man.

      Midway later sold it to Namco, the developer of Pac Man. Ms. Pac Man was a US er citizen. Pac being. Puck being. Whatever.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ms._Pac-Man

      --
      Sig for hire.
  34. Some Statistics on the List by Dr.+Molf · · Score: 1

    1985 - 2 entries - avg rank: 54
    1986 - 4 entries - avg rank: 59.75
    1987 - 5 entries - avg rank: 61.6
    1988 - 4 entries - avg rank: 58.5
    1989 - 3 entries - avg rank: 62
    1990 - 8 entries - avg rank: 53.62
    1991 - 4 entries - avg rank: 44.75
    1992 - 8 entries - avg rank: 37.87
    1993 - 4 entries - avg rank: 75
    1994 - 6 entries - avg rank: 52.16
    1995 - 6 entries - avg rank: 31.16
    1996 - 4 entries - avg rank: 46.25
    1997 - 4 entries - avg rank: 59.5
    1998 - 6 entries - avg rank: 28.83
    1999 - 2 entries - avg rank: 24.5
    2000 - 5 entries - avg rank: 46.2
    2001 - 3 entries - avg rank: 41.33
    2002 - 5 entries - avg rank: 51.6
    2003 - 2 entries - avg rank: 51
    2004 - 8 entries - avg rank: 55.75
    2005 - 7 entries - avg rank: 65.42

    Year with Lowest Avg Rank: (1999)
    22. Final Fantasy VIII (1999)
    27. Valkyrie Profile (1999)

    Year with Highest Avg Rank: (1993)
    45. Ogre Battle (1993)
    78. Torneko Mysterious Dungeon (1993)
    80. Streetfighter 2 Turbo (1993)
    97. Secret of Mana (1993)

    I have to give them credit since this poll actually spans 21 years of gaming with no individual year with more than eight games (8% of total list)!

    Years with Most Games Listed: 1990, 1992 and 2004 (each with eight)

    8. Final Fantasy III (1990)
    14. Dragon Quest IV (1990)
    35. F-Zero (1990)
    58. Digital Devil Story Megami Tensei II (1990)
    61. Super Mario World (1990)
    77. Super Monaco GP (1990)
    82. Final Fight (1990)
    94. Saga 2 (1990)

    11. Dragon Quest V (1992)
    12. Far East of Eden 2 (1992)
    15. Final Fantasy V (1992)
    20. Streetfighter II (1992)
    53. Romancing Saga (1992)
    59. Shin Megami Tensei (1992)
    64. Puyo Puyo (1992)
    69. Super Mario Kart (1992)

    4. Dragon Quest VIII (2004)
    26. Metal Gear Solid 3 (2004)
    40. Dragon Quest 5 (PS2 remake) 2004
    62. To Heart II (2004)
    71. Monster Hunter (2004)
    75. Gran Turismo 4 (2004)
    76. GTA: Vice City (2004)
    92. Tales of Rebirth (2004)

    One interesting aspect is always how much more popular Dragon's Quest is in the Japan as compared to the US. While Dragon Warrior is a popular series, Final Fantasy is definately more well-known and traditionally was better marketed. However, you can see that DQ is strongly represented in the list and actually has a lower average rank (though that's three less games).

    Years where one or more Dragon Quest games were released:
    2004, 2000, 1995, 1992, 1990, 1988, 1987, 1986 (9 games listed; avg rank: 18)

    Years where one or more Final Fantasy games were listed:
    2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1997, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1988, 1987 (12 games listed; avg rank: 24)

    --
    indeed..