Slashdot Mirror


Windows Live Search goes Live

novus ordo writes "Microsoft has launched the Windows Live Search. Among the reports, Microsoft Search Senior Product Manager, Justin Osmer says that "The beta, and a revision expected in a few months, will challenge market leader Google."" I like the more dynamic image searching tool. It seems really slow- I'm not sure if that's the dynamicness (is that a word?) or just standard launch lag.

16 of 546 comments (clear)

  1. From-the-before-the-beginning-of-time dept. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    See, this is the differance between MS and Google. All of google's products are Beta and work perfectly.
    But when microsoft says Beta they mean: "In the beggining there was nothing, And God said Let there be light..."

    -first post?

  2. Already Slashdotted by Buzz_Litebeer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, that was an interesting product demo, I got the "server busy" message. At least it wasnt blue.

    --
    If you don't vote, you don't matter, so don't waste your time telling me your opinion
  3. Did they #%^ing kill google? by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 5, Funny

    I searched for "google" and got a long wait, then an error popup

    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
  4. Wow that is SLOW! by DebianDog · · Score: 5, Funny

    We /.ed a search engine? or is it this slow by design?

  5. Hmm by MrShaggy · · Score: 5, Funny

    MAybe its becuase we are using non-ms browsers?? can you imagine their logs.. stating that the firat 80% was firefox or others?

    --
    I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them.
  6. Quick test by smooth+wombat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A quick test I performed showed interesting results. I plugged in the word Galen in both Live and Google. Live returned 1,160,846 results while Google gave 13,200,000 results. Considering Live was just released the discrepancy isn't hard to understand. What was interesting was what the first result was. In the case of Live the first result was a photo studio run by Galen and Barbara Powell. For Google the first result was much more relevant: a link to the University of Virgina Health System which talked about the medical practice from the past of which Galen is listed in the links.

    The second result for both Live and Google were the same, the Galen Institute homepage.

    While one test doesn't a study make, considering Microsofts track record of returning results, I don't forsee myself using their service (especially with all the clutter on the screen).

    As an aside, does everyone else get the weather forecast for LA in the lower left corner? I'm on the opposite coast so maybe it's related to where the servers are rather than what IP you come from.t

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  7. Already /.ed - Mirror here by PinkyDead · · Score: 5, Funny

    www.google.com

    I know that's just pure nasty - I just couldn't help it.

    --
    Genesis 1:32 And God typed :wq!
  8. oracle? by Soothh · · Score: 5, Informative

    I got an error on the page... looks like they are using oracle as a backend?
    Was ms sql 2005 to strong for such a simple search engine? :)

    --
    We have seen that living things are too improbable and too beautifully "designed" to have come into existence by chance.
  9. Re:What is up with the scroll bar? by Lewisham · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Agreed. It's impossible to know where you are in the list, I can't use my mousewheel on it, it's not where I expected it to be... pretty much every single mistake Flash designers were making back in the late 90s.

    Just because it's in AJAX doesn't make it any more of a good idea.

    I guess what they were trying to do was just get the adverts always in view, something that could have been achieved with CSS and web browsers that support CSS properly. Oh wait, hang on...

  10. miserable failure by Menotti+M · · Score: 5, Informative

    Interestingly enough, a search for "miserable failure" leads www.michaelmoore.com at the top, instead of Google's standard George W. Bush biography

  11. Trying too hard to be an "application" by bitflip · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The dynamic window showing the results...well, it just sucks. It doesn't show enough results, and the scroller doesn't give any kind of context as to where you are within the results. Its slow. That may be due to this computer being slow, but I don't have to worry about it on any other search engine. I'd almost prefer frames (not by much).

    I was going to tell all of that to MS, but the "help us improve" link was 404 when I tried it...

  12. Re:Server is too busy by farlcow · · Score: 5, Funny

    I just get a "Loading..." message that keeps spinning. I'm pretty sure its just pre-caching the internet for faster searching.

  13. Re:What is up with the scroll bar? by kebes · · Score: 5, Informative

    Agreed. Another problem is that you cannot do a text-search on that page. Even if a word appears (later on in the list), if you do a search for it, you won't be able to find it. In firefox, you usually jump to the search term... but now you can't because it is hidden in some way. So you can't actually navigate the page.

    Also you can't do the whole "I remember it was on the third page of the Google search results" thing. You have to laboriously find things in a long list that you can't scroll through quickly. Why do they feel the need to put a fancy scroll-thing when browsers have that functionality built in? It just makes it run slow.

    There are times when AJAX is helpful (like for smoothly scrolling dynamic maps). Displaying text results is NOT a good time to use AJAX... just use normal clean HTML and everyone will be happy.

  14. Even their *own* browser has trouble with it... by BeBold · · Score: 5, Funny

    Did anyone else notice this in the source??

            document.write(""); /* normalizes ie and ff, else ie sees an additional top margin */

    Seems they have the same problems the rest of us have in building sites that actually work in IE...

    --
    Be Bold! BoldEverything Interactive
  15. Degrading. by loyd86 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Have you every tried to go to googles website with javascript turned off. Everything degrades properlly and is still usable. Try to use this search with javascript turned off and it utterly flounders.

  16. Re:can it get me to google? by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I guess I remember the 90's too well. I am in my late 20's, and watch all those companies that had foosball tables in the lobby go under. So perhaps I am prejudiced by facts.

    I lived through the same thing. Have you ever heard that correlation is not causation? This is a perfect example. Sure lots of companies with foosball tables went under, but so did plenty without. It was not the relaxed atmosphere that killed them, it was the fact that their business plans were junk. Some of them were just ways to funnel venture capital to "the guys" and have some fun. Some were incompetent people who thought because something was "cool" it was profitable. Google is not going out of business, they are making money, and so are we. Any HR drone who does not think keeping employees happy is a important concern is an idiot. Stress and poor working conditions lead to turnover, medical problems, and people motivated to do the least work possible. If I come in on a sunday to get something from the office, or grab some papers so I can answer someone's question I'm proving that keeping me happy helps, because I am there on a sunday. It is not unusual for someone else to be in the office on a sunday either. People pull all-nighters, not because they have some manager breathing down their necks, but because something really interesting is happening or because they want to make sure a customer is happy. Of course having some real stake in the company helps to motivate people too.