Slashdot Mirror


Movies Losing Popularity at Box Office

andyring writes "Without the slightest mention of piracy, the MPAA said box-office revenues declined by 8 percent last year. About 40 percent of the decline came from the U.S. Now if only they'd realize that the decline is from movies sucking more than my shop vac." It's been a while since a film warranted spending the money to watch it in a room full of strangers.

18 of 795 comments (clear)

  1. Why Movies Suck by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Really. There's jibes all over in the press about it. Most of the films in the past year I spent my money on were at a place like this.

    Why?

    Because I've seen it all before, now they're re-doing it all and nothing surprises me. Then I go to the Del Mar or The Nick and see something

    • See a story which is either deeply thoughtful or genuinely entertaining.
    • I have no idea where the story is going.
    • See really good acting.
    • See a production done so well I forget for a moment I'm actually watching it on a screen.
    • Suprising. Innocent Voices, that was an eye opener. Amelie, that was a charmer. Run Lola Run, that was just cool.
    Steve Martin in the recent remake of The Pink Panther is a prime example. I already have some idea where jokes are going, long before the punch. The acting isn't anywhere near as good as the first (Sellers may have been an ass, but he could act comedy.) Honestly. Steve Martin (The Spanish Prisoner) and Kevin Kline (A Fish Called Wanda) are really capable of great acting, but this was pretty weak.

    I'm a real flim buff. You can tell. I take my own popcorn salt, rather than risk they'll have table salt shakers from SYSCO.

    Hey, get that guys post! i want to create a movie based upon it! car chases! beautiful women! huge fireball explosions! sophomoric humor! It'll be great!

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Why Movies Suck by rlauzon · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Because I've seen it all before, now they're re-doing it all and nothing surprises me.

      The reason for that is that they have choked off the supply of works going in to the public domain. Historically, Hollywood has dipped into the public domain for ideas. Nothing new into the public domain = nothing new in Hollywood.

      Little wonder that Anime and Manga are getting more popular.

    2. Re:Why Movies Suck by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Interesting
      The reason for that is that they have choked off the supply of works going in to the public domain. Historically, Hollywood has dipped into the public domain for ideas. Nothing new into the public domain = nothing new in Hollywood.

      There's still buckets of stuff in the public domain. That said, there were a lot of great movies made of stuff copyrighted, like Gone With The Wind and The Wizard of Oz. I just think they've got some twisted idea that they won't take a risk. I think Heinlein's Tunnel In The Sky would make a killer film, but not with the calibre of actors I've seen cropping up lately. Lord knows they did a real job on Starship Troopers.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:Why Movies Suck by kzinti · · Score: 5, Funny

      Because I've seen it all before, now they're re-doing it all and nothing surprises me.

      Yeah, me too. Remember Gregory Peck and Jimmy Stewart in the 1952 version of "Brokeback Mountain". Now THAT was a classic. Nothing like that crappy remake that came out last year. WHAT was that studio thinking?

    4. Re:Why Movies Suck by rlauzon · · Score: 5, Interesting
      There's still buckets of stuff in the public domain.

      Most of which has been already used in something "new" that is still under copyright, making it a risk to use.

      Last estimate showed that 80% of the currently available works are still under copyright but have no known owners.

      I think Heinlein's Tunnel In The Sky would make a killer film

      Agreed. But who owns the copyright? Heinlein's been dead for nearly 20 years.

      Also, Hollywood doesn't want to pay for writing. Disney, for example, timed their version of Peter Pan so that it wouldn't come out until the story passed into the public domain.

    5. Re:Why Movies Suck by BewireNomali · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I work in film and the logic isn't flawed on paper. you take television from a previous generation and redo it with current generation talent.

      you get the original audience and fans of the current talent. two birds with one stone. by and large that formula isn't broken. it works to the point that people go and see them, and they do rather well.

      there is a dearth of original ideas. this is because more expensive films require compromise to mitigate risk. understand, most films, small or large, are financed by thrid parties. hollywood is notorious for not financing their own films. so these films are beholden to finance guys who want easily reducible commodities. remake plus star talent is a recognized formula.

      the real problem here is this. hollywood primarily relies on the first-timers to make some cash. first timer are the rising young adult - adult generation. this is the problem - the first timeers aren't going to the movies. they're like the second generation to grow up with cable - so technically - they aren't first timers. So when a 30 something guy reflects that films are recycling themselves... hollywood is in the problem place that 18 year olds are saying the same thing. they've seen it all before.

      this is why the movie paradigm is problematic. hollywood has always been cyclical before. They'd wade out the lull and wait for a rising generation and introduce them to old shit that's new to them. It's not new to them - they've probably seen the original on cable or online or via blockbuster. they have prior memory of originals and probably prefer them. so without the first timer cushion - hollywood is quite possibly rready for a paradigm shift.

      --
      un burrito me trampeó.
    6. Re:Why Movies Suck by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny
      Yeah, me too. Remember Gregory Peck and Jimmy Stewart in the 1952 version of "Brokeback Mountain". Now THAT was a classic. Nothing like that crappy remake that came out last year. WHAT was that studio thinking?

      Get ready for in a few years time:

      SLASHBACK MOUNTAIN

      They were nerds. They were there for new and stuff that mattered in their lives. One eventful evening they both confessed in anonymous postings a secret admiration for Jar Jar Binks. If the word got out, they'd be shamed and shunned, lives would be ruined, hearts would be broken...

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    7. Re:Why Movies Suck by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Not only is there a lot of legal, free video entertainment available on the Internet, there is also music, gaming, etc.

      One other thing on the internet is instantaneous Communication with large audiences. Go to imdb and see a few comments and the film already rated and you just may change your mind about seeing it. Before the internet bad reviews got around on two legs.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  2. What, they didn't blame piracy? by crimethinker · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I'm shocked that the MPAA spokesweasel didn't blame piracy. Shocked, I tell you.

    And yes, I'll agree with the submitter's remarks - most movies nowadays are pure shite, little more than CGI thrown everywhere to try to cover a pathetic script. Oh, and don't forget the half-hour of commercials before the movie, too. And they always seem to start the commercials at the published start time. So you arrive half an hour late, trying to skip the commercials, and *this* movie was the one with only 15 minutes of crap in front of it.

    I wait for the DVD nowadays. Cheaper, too.

    -paul

    --
    Pistol caliber is like religion: everyone has their favourite, and theirs is the only right choice.
  3. Home Theaters by expressovi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    With the sale of home theaters on the rise I think that can also attribute to some of the loss. Many people I know who buy a home theater say they now have no reason to go the theater. I just got mine and I always ask why go out?

    --
    i agree
  4. Correction... by Joe5678 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    About 40 percent of the decline came from the U.S.


    Come on, it's in the first sentence of the article. 40 percent of the 23 billion dollars in total sales was in the US, not 40 percent of the decline.

    A misleading summary, here on slashdot, I'm as shocked as the rest of you...
  5. CowboyNeal by anim8 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "It's been a while since a film warranted spending the money to watch it in a room full of strangers."

    If dropping a ten-spot and spending 3hrs in a theater to see King Kong on the big screen doesn't appeal to you then you are beyond hope.

    But I can understand your fear of seeing 'Brokeback Mountain' with others around. I mean with a name like CowboyKneel ...

  6. It never fails... by brian0918 · · Score: 5, Funny

    In a movie theater, no matter where I sit, the loudest person in the theater always ends up sitting next to me. You'd think with my "I've killed already tonight, and you're next" countenance, people would stay away, but I seem to attract the crazies.

    Prime examples:

    In that crappy Sky Captain movie, when the flying ships dive straight into the water, this guy next to me starts shouting "THAT DEFIES THE LAWS OF PHYSICS!!"

    In that crappy Manchurian Candidate remake, some dumb bitch sits down right next to me, babbling through the whole movie. When Meryl Streep goes into a long speech, this woman starts shouting "MERYL STREEP AT HER BEST!!"

    During Batman Begins, some fat ass was munching down bag after bag of chips right next to me. He'd finish a bad, then extend his hand out and drop the bag on the floor, and go for another. Then he'd start belching, or fall asleep and snore really loud.

    What the hell is it with these people?? Can't they see that I want to watch my crappy movies in peace??

    1. Re:It never fails... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      During Batman Begins, some fat ass was munching down bag after bag of chips right next to me. He'd finish a bad, then extend his hand out and drop the bag on the floor, and go for another. Then he'd start belching, or fall asleep and snore really loud.

      That reminds me of the time I went to see Batman Begins .. I sat next to this guy who looked like he'd killed already and like I was to be next. I got so nervous I kept eating bags and bags of chips. As it turns out this happened to cause gas and I couldn't help but belch ..plus i thought maybe it'll make him go away .. well .. when that didnt work .. I just decided to fall asleep.

  7. Box Office Down... DVDs ??? by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Box Office sales dropped.

    What happened to DVD sales?

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  8. The Passion of the Slump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    As Roger Ebert pointed out, the "Box Office Slump" is an myth. 2005 Box Office sales only appear down when compared to 2004, because 2004 saw the release of "The Passion of the Christ", which brought thousands of customers who otherwise do not visit the movie theaters.

    The fact is, 2005 was the second or third best year for film revenue in history.

    --
    N

  9. Re:I just spent by rk · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Under 2 got in free."

    If you took someone under the age of two to a feature length movie, then I hate you.

  10. How dare you? by Maniacal · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Slashdot editors are nice enough to post a non-story about movie theaters/revenues/profits/etc. so that we can rant about prices of tickes/snacks/parking/etc. and brag about the components in our home theaters and you have to come along and screw it all up by presenting facts. Where to you get off buddy? Now what the hell am I gonna rant about? Did you see the front page? There aren't any articles about how Linux isn't ready for the desktop. There are any columns about Windows out performing Linux in a recent benchmark.

    From now on just keep your facts to yourself.

    BTW, mod parent up. Sounds like he hit the nail on the head

    --
    MG