Point and Click Cracking

An anonymous reader writes "Washingtonpost.com is running a story about a number of botnets and keylogger operations being controlled by Web-sites with point-and-click type front-end software interfaces. The sites mentioned in the story look like fairly slick PHP pages designed to sort through password data from keylog victims and update infected computers with new code or instructions. From the story: 'The hacking software also features automated tools that allow the fraudsters to make minute adjustments or sweeping changes to their networks of hacked PCs. With the click of a mouse or a drag on a pull-down menu, users can add or delete files on infected computers.'"

Comments

Most of the problem is the users

[solarbob]

Most of the reasons PC's get hacked now days is that end users are still clicking on the links in phising emails and then holes in the browser being exploited. Surely it wouldn't take much for the main browser makers to put in a user idiocy filter to just say aren't you being a bit silly? Of course user education would be best but there will always be a certian newbie segment who are on the internet for the first time and will keep doing this. That software though does look pretty comprehensive

Re:Most of the problem is the users

[G)-(ostly]

It's not going to work. People don't know how to use warnings in the physical world properly. Look at warnings provided on the road. How many people ignore Yield signs and try to merge right into oncoming vehicles? How many people just blow right through a blinking yellow without thinking? How many people just blow out of parking lots or driveways? How many people actually look to see if a train is coming before they cross tracks with a warning light and bar?

It's a matter of risk/reward that's inherent in human nature. If 99 times out of a hundred you approach a crossing with a light and bar there's no train coming when there's no lights, you're going to get used to that. Of course, that one time you come along and the lights are broken, you're going to die, but that's the risk/reward. You're taking the 1% chance that you'll get killed by an unannounced train and comparing it to the fact that you'll have to do the extra work of slowing down, looking and speeding back up for nothing 99% of the time.

People just don't take serious warnings seriously unless there's a very good chance that they could be harmed by not following them. It doesn't matter how serious the consequences if they occur too infrequently to stay fresh in one's mind.

Sure, why wouldn't it?

[Enigma_Man]

I often migrate things to web-interfaces that were previously shell scripts. It's more convenient, 'cause I can do the things I need to do from any browser without having to ssh in (which isn't always a possibility, rare, but it does occur). Also, it's easier to show to other people without giving away a shell account. Also also, it's easier to show to people who aren't "in the know" because it looks like something.

-Jesse

point and click oblivion

[digitaldc]

Frost's data, along with information stolen from thousands of other victims, made its way to a Web site hosted by a Russian Internet service provider. The site is currently the home base of a network of sites designed to break into computers through a security hole in Microsoft's Internet Explorer Web browser.

So why aren't the police kicking down the doors and confiscating equipment from this ISP? Are they 'protected' or 'special?'
After reading stories like this Dutch hacker arrest,I am not sure why.
Aside from that, Microsoft needs to do something like pushing out mandatory security patches for all users of Windows and/or IE.
I am not sure why they don't do this either. I guess Microsoft thinks that all these lazy suckers deserve to be hacked.

Why do people write these?

[failure-man]

One thing I've always wondered about script kiddies: who writes their tools for them, and why? What does the actual black hat get out of the deal? It's not like script kiddies pay for things.

Is it for fame? Signal-to-noise manipulation? Are the little fuckers getting "0wn3d" by backdoors in their "1337 h4x0r t00lz"?

Or is it something else entirely?

They should see the cracking tools for Yahoo, etc

[BlueStrat]

Seriously, websites abound with cracking/booting/keylogging programs for Yahoo chat, and many other protocols, but for some reason, it seems there are more written for Yahoo chat. I'm not including IRC tools, as it seems to me to be a different class, mostly CLI tools.

  I'll sit in a Yahoo chatroom using gyach and FreeBSD, and I'll watch my pflog monitor and see dozens of scans, boot attempts, etc within a couple hours. (I love the chatroom "tough guys" that come in and threaten to "boot" me and "bluescreen" my PC..they get *really* frustrated when their little VB booter programs fall flat against a BSD box with a PF firewall and *nix chat client :D)

There are numerous chat "crews" that trade in "cracked" accounts/screen names. I've never had my account cracked, but I follow proper practice regarding passwords, which most don't.

I've had chatrooms I'm in fill up with an entire "crew" all trying simultaneously to "boot" me after one of their members fail. They finally tire and drift off with vague threats about cracking my account and having their "1337" friend ("..my buddy is certified by Microsoft, he'll crash your hard drive!" :D) hack my PC.

Anyways, back on topic, there are hundreds of very slick-looking cracking and booting programs available for Yahoo/AIM/MSN, most free (as in beer).

If there are programs just for *chat* that are this slick GUI-wise, it doesn't shock me at all that there are similarly-polished underground tools for other tasks and protocols.

Strat