Slashdot Mirror


Xbox 360 Backup Discs Bootable

An anonymous reader writes "The firmware of the Xbox 360 DVD drive has been hacked, allowing users to boot backups of games on the new Microsoft console. A group of hackers on the xboxhacker.net forum managed to trick the DVD firmware into reporting a recordable disc as an original Xbox 360 disc. This means that it will not allow booting of unsigned homebrew code (like Linux), as the signature check is not bypassed. This hack will just trick the Xbox 360 into thinking you inserted an original Xbox 360 disc, so it'll only boot unedited executables. A video has been released, the hack has not been released to the public (because it will be mainly used for piracy), but all the research of the last few months is publicly viewable."

19 of 287 comments (clear)

  1. "we don't want to support piracy" by Quick+Sick+Nick · · Score: 5, Funny

    yeah, and I read playboy for the articles.

    1. Re:"we don't want to support piracy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I read Playboy mainly for the page numbers, and the index. I mainly enjoy looking up a random page in the index, and then finding it in the magazine by binary search. I've written a program in Perl that helps me train; I type in the number of pages, and then it selects a random page for me, following a gaussian distribution (I don't want to have to find the index! lol!) and then I navigate to it. After a few years practice, I've got down to an average of less than two seconds for any given page number. I've got my girlfriend doing it now as well, we can sometimes spend entire evenings sitting down with my Linux box, seeing who can get to page 58 first! Its absolutely fantastic.

    2. Re:"we don't want to support piracy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, Playboy articles are pretty good, providing good analysis of all the hot topics, like global warming, politics, religion, law, freedom, etc., etc.

    3. Re:"we don't want to support piracy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You are winner of Slashdot!
      This website can now close down.

  2. better video by Quick+Sick+Nick · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you don't want to wait 30 seconds to download the video, stream it here:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XyZQ4k7Bi-8

  3. Re:firmware check on new games? by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Funny

    How long until they hackers then change the checksums or add the obvious GOTO 30 line?

    Yes, but Microsoft is cunning you see, they number their program lines one by one instead of 10 by 10, so you can't insert a GOTO line. And RENUM is disabled. Clever I tell you!

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  4. Ability to boot non-Microsoft code more useful by Animats · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is the "piracy" hack. A way to cleanly boot non-Microsoft content would be more useful. Microsoft probably couldn't do much about that legally; if you own the unit, you have no obligation to play only approved content.

    1. Re:Ability to boot non-Microsoft code more useful by Aranth+Brainfire · · Score: 5, Funny

      The DMCA always means something, even if it's just "Haha, boy am I glad we don't have a law like that here"

      --
      "Quoting yourself is stupid." -Me
  5. drm sucks by MikeFM · · Score: 4, Insightful

    DRM is a stupid idea. It never stops hackers but it stops the average consumer from having the full use of the device they've legally bought. Making backups should be a fully protected right. Not a limited number of backup copies - as many as I happen to want to make. If I make a backup and then run it over with my car it shouldn't matter because my original is in a safe location and I can just make a new backup.

    Of course 'backup' for the copy you're using isn't a very good term.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    1. Re:drm sucks by GlassHeart · · Score: 5, Insightful
      DRM is a stupid idea. It never stops hackers but it stops the average consumer from having the full use of the device they've legally bought.

      I don't like DRM either, but one fallacy among opponents is the distinction between "average consumers" and "pirates". The problem is that average consumers can easily become pirates if various conditions are ripe: the original seems expensive, copying is easy, nobody is ever punished, etc. There are entire countries of "average consumers" who almost never buy original software or music.

  6. Tut, tut, tut... by dwalsh · · Score: 4, Funny

    the hack has not been released to the public (because it will be mainly used for piracy)
    It is sad to see so much cynicism in the world :-)

    --
    ${YEAR+1} is going to be the year of Linux on the desktop!
  7. Surprised it took this long by ryants · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Frankly I'm surprised it took this long, given that the Xbox 360 will boot burned CDs/DVDs for backwards compatibility updates.

    I always thought that was a pretty good area of attack right there.

    --

    Ryan T. Sammartino
    "Ancora imparo"

    1. Re:Surprised it took this long by cnettel · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, it doesn't help that much, as it's the signature that determines how a valid image may be started (and no commercial game will say "burned booting OK"). Now, all software written by MS really "sees" the disc as a real DVD, completely independent of whether booting from burned DVDs is supported or not. The only way to block this would be to block flashing DVD firmware (wise) or blocking reading burned discs in hardware. The latter would of course make it less usable for playing CDs or video in more or less legitimate ways that MS still wants to support.

  8. Re:firmware check on new games? by hazem · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Isn't that just a really bad "security" model... that any old game you put in your system has the ability to re-write the firmware? Isn't that just asking for trouble?

  9. Re:Morality by Haeleth · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's clear that the submitter of the article doesn't think the moral case for this type of thing is strong enough to stand on its own. He has to help it along, and slightly mislead his audience despite the fact that the vast majority of the copies this is used for will be pirated copies rather than backup copies.

    Huh? The submitter wrote, right there in the summary, "it will be mainly used for piracy". I really don't see how he could have been any blunter about it. It does not look to me like there is any attempt being made to mislead readers in any way whatsoever.

    But I'm not surprised to see a response like yours. However someone phrases it, there's always someone who thinks they should have phrased it more strongly. I expect that even if the submitter had opened the article with "Filthy bloodsucking terrorist pedophile pirates have raped America's freedom once again in a savage assault on the copyright protections that keep our children safe", then someone would still have complained that he was being too sympathetic to them... ;)

  10. Re:Mainly used? by Aneurysm9 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Well, to be fair, killing is not illegal per se.

    Neither is creating a backup copy of software you have purchased, nor is utilising that backup copy. As for the DMCA, there is an explicit exception for reverse engineering for interoperability that does not limit it to interoperability of software with other systems. It could just as easily be read to allow modification for interoperability with other software.

    --
    There was Cowboy Neal at the wheel of a bus to never-ever land.
  11. Re:Forget Piracy. Solution For Disc Scratching Mes by SpryWeb · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you want to stop scratches on your original games, use d_skin protectors... Every game should have one... http://www.gamestop.com/product.asp?product_id=801 784

  12. Re:One small step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    to hack a disc? this is the entire disc authentication system completely reverse engineered with little or no understanding of the inner working of the 360 kernel. this is a complete sidestepping of what was probably 3 years of complete tightening of all of the 360s internal communication, integrity checking and copy protection. no one made any claims about it taking a day, and when a loose community does this in 4 months it IS god damned impressive since it is more than most people on this board could do in a fucking lifetime.

  13. RtFA... by Faeton · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Please read the article!

    This isn't just a "Oh, I'll put this firmware on a disk and load it up and Bam!, insta-pirate!". This is a firmware for the DVD-ROM, which you first have to A) physically open up the XBox360 B) Then remove the DVD-ROM C) then desolder the firmware chip D) then read the firmware and figure out where to edit, because each DVD-ROM has a unique ID tag E) then you have to reprogram the chip using specialized equipment F) reinstall the chip and hope you didn't ruin a $400+ machine G) get a good copy of a game and hopefully it'll work.

    Currently, this is *far* harder than the average modchip. Since each chip has to be custom-programmed, this isn't an easy hack, even if you did have the hacked firmware available.

    Still, hopefully this is a taste of things to come. The 360 has been only out for 4 months, and this is much better progress than with the original XBox.