DoJ Following Porn Blocker Advances?
GreedyCapitalist writes "A new filter called iShield is able to recognize porn images based on the content of the image (other filters look at URLs and text) and according to PC Magazine, it is very effective. The next generation will probably be even better -- which highlights the retarding effect regulation has on technological progress - if we relied solely on government to ban 'inappropriate' content from the web, we'd never know what solutions the market might come up with. Will the DOJ (which argues that porn filters don't work) take note of filtering innovation or continue its quest for censorship?"
Since it is so good identifing pr0n I can't wait to get my first pornbot with that function to find me some more.
Does it work on everyone's favorite image, hello.jpg?
This guy's the limit!
Can I run it backwards and filter out everything that isn't porn? I'd find that more .. useful.
http://twitter.com/onion2k
I wonder how many hours the poor programers worked in order to test this thing :)
Looking for porn that the filter cant handle...
What those meetings must have looked like.
At some point, the computer would have to decide what is arousing and what is not.
Could give HAL-9000 a whole new outlook.
Nobody seems to be caring bout the 10^5 monkeys that check every image thus making the filter work... Poor perverted animals...
My 0.02 cents
Is this cameltoe porn or is it only porn if you get exited watching it?
Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
Manager: "All right team, looks like Joe has finally come up with a fast and fairly accurate algorithim to spot those dirty old pornographic images. We will need to test it a bit first, to see what the signal to noise ratio is. We will need some test groups, though."
"Yeah, sure bob, you can run the 'barely legal college girls' tests. Janet and Simone, you check the 'hot lesbian' batches. What? Sure Ramone, you can check the 'young gay studs' test. Now, who is going to run the 'goatse.cx' tests?"
"Guys....? Anyone?"
HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
Does it work on everyone's favorite image, hello.jpg?
A goatse reference that is helpful and useful? Inconceivable!
I would buy this software if it could filter me from seeing that ever again.(I jest, but only slightly)
~Rebecca
if (percent_pink_pixels(image) >= 70%)
...
flag_as_porn(image);
endif
Step1: use silly algorithm
Step2:
Step3: PROFIT!
Zapman
So if I build a website for close-up shots of orchids, will it get banned?
meh
I've developed a simple algorithm for checking web pages for pornographic content. It is roughly 98% accurate when fed a random page from the 'net. Here's the code so far:
bool check_porn_content(const char *url)
{
(void)url;
return true;
}
Any suggestions for further development, or licensing queries, please let me know.
...and lets see if those porn filters can cope with the prevalence of the colour green rather than pink.
Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
Thats because black & white porn is called "art".
No trees were harmed in the posting of this message. However, a great number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.