Slashdot Mirror


DoJ Following Porn Blocker Advances?

GreedyCapitalist writes "A new filter called iShield is able to recognize porn images based on the content of the image (other filters look at URLs and text) and according to PC Magazine, it is very effective. The next generation will probably be even better -- which highlights the retarding effect regulation has on technological progress - if we relied solely on government to ban 'inappropriate' content from the web, we'd never know what solutions the market might come up with. Will the DOJ (which argues that porn filters don't work) take note of filtering innovation or continue its quest for censorship?"

20 of 265 comments (clear)

  1. Reversal by orangeguru · · Score: 4, Funny

    Since it is so good identifing pr0n I can't wait to get my first pornbot with that function to find me some more.

    1. Re:Reversal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you're having trouble finding porn on the Internet you're doing something wrong...

    2. Re:Reversal by aichpvee · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe it could syndicate the porn via RSS after collecting it. And before anyone gets any ideas, PornCast(tm) is now officially a trademark of me. I will be submitting my patent on the iPorn Portable Pornography Player shortly.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
  2. our favorite by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does it work on everyone's favorite image, hello.jpg?

    --
    This guy's the limit!
    1. Re:our favorite by ettlz · · Score: 4, Funny

      $ ishield hello.jpg
      Segmentation fault (core dumped)

  3. Backwards.. by onion2k · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can I run it backwards and filter out everything that isn't porn? I'd find that more .. useful.

  4. Need programers ? by lemonjus2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder how many hours the poor programers worked in order to test this thing :)

    Looking for porn that the filter cant handle...

    What those meetings must have looked like.

  5. Re:hmm by spiritraveller · · Score: 2, Funny

    At some point, the computer would have to decide what is arousing and what is not.

    Could give HAL-9000 a whole new outlook.

  6. So much for animal rights by alx5000 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Nobody seems to be caring bout the 10^5 monkeys that check every image thus making the filter work... Poor perverted animals...

    --
    My 0.02 cents
  7. What is porn? by houghi · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is this cameltoe porn or is it only porn if you get exited watching it?

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:What is porn? by grimJester · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...and in a chilling twist of irony, the firewall of my employer blocked that site :(

  8. Dev Meetings by TiggertheMad · · Score: 3, Funny

    Manager: "All right team, looks like Joe has finally come up with a fast and fairly accurate algorithim to spot those dirty old pornographic images. We will need to test it a bit first, to see what the signal to noise ratio is. We will need some test groups, though."

    "Yeah, sure bob, you can run the 'barely legal college girls' tests. Janet and Simone, you check the 'hot lesbian' batches. What? Sure Ramone, you can check the 'young gay studs' test. Now, who is going to run the 'goatse.cx' tests?"

    "Guys....? Anyone?"

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  9. Inconceivable! by rkcallaghan · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does it work on everyone's favorite image, hello.jpg?

    A goatse reference that is helpful and useful? Inconceivable!

    I would buy this software if it could filter me from seeing that ever again.(I jest, but only slightly)

    ~Rebecca

    1. Re:Inconceivable! by ettlz · · Score: 3, Funny
      The best way to remove Goatse from your mind is to find a different, more troubling image to replace it with
      Like this one.
    2. Re:Inconceivable! by ettlz · · Score: 5, Funny
      I would buy this software if it could filter me from seeing that ever again.

      Or you could train your mind, as I have. My occiputal lobe no longer processes Goatse as it "should", and substitutes a fuzzy blur in its lieu. I literally cannot see it!

      Unfortunately, this is not without side effects. For instance, it's no longer safe for me to drive through tunnels.

  10. Why didn't I think of this? by Zapman · · Score: 2, Funny

    if (percent_pink_pixels(image) >= 70%)
          flag_as_porn(image);
    endif

    Step1: use silly algorithm
    Step2: ...
    Step3: PROFIT!

    --
    Zapman
  11. Hmm.. by bigattichouse · · Score: 2, Funny

    So if I build a website for close-up shots of orchids, will it get banned?

    --
    meh
  12. My work so far... by OverflowingBitBucket · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've developed a simple algorithm for checking web pages for pornographic content. It is roughly 98% accurate when fed a random page from the 'net. Here's the code so far:

    bool check_porn_content(const char *url)
    {
        (void)url;
        return true;
    }

    Any suggestions for further development, or licensing queries, please let me know.

  13. Anyone for ""Naked Orion Slave Girls"??? by pandrijeczko · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...and lets see if those porn filters can cope with the prevalence of the colour green rather than pink.

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  14. Re:Screaming so loud we can't hear you anymore by Unique2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Thats because black & white porn is called "art".

    --
    No trees were harmed in the posting of this message. However, a great number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.