Slashdot Mirror


An Interview with 180 Solutions

Paperghost writes "Here's a great interview between Jimmy Daniels and an anonymous ex-employee of 180 Solutions, who portrays the company as being somewhere between turmoil and meltdown. There's so many notable quotables it's scary, but here's one that really sets the tone: 'Shutting down these rogue distributors turned out to be a lot more difficult than they expected though. When you lose them, your daily installs go down drastically and the revenue goes to hell. The layoff in September could be laid directly at the feet of this effort.'"

29 of 133 comments (clear)

  1. Goes down drastically? by Phantombrain · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How can they have so many "rouge distributors" and not notice? It seems like someone had to say "Oh, this doesn't look right". I guess it's hard when you're a spyware company.

    --
    echo YOUR_OPINION > /dev/null
    1. Re:Goes down drastically? by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 5, Funny

      > How can they have so many "rouge distributors" and not notice?

      You'd think having so many "rouge distributors" would cause a lot of red faces.

  2. eh? by rscoggin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How can they even exist without "rogue distributors"? I was under the impression that that was about 90% of their installs... I don't really know anyone that decides to install that on their own >_>

    1. Re:eh? by lintux · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well you know when you, or somebody else, installs that addictive new flash game? Well one of the 15 yes buttons that you click is your permission to install that spyware and adware.

      Yeah, saw that. But I'd consider that a rogue installation too, by exploiting the user instead of his/her software.

  3. Who? by Eightyford · · Score: 2, Informative
    I know I'm not the only one has has never heard of 180 Solutions. From Wikipedia:
    180 Solutions is the company that produces adware applications such as Zango and Seekmo. Formerly, they also produced the 180 Search Assistant (also known as 180sa) and ncase.
    1. Re:Who? by Glonoinha · · Score: 4, Funny

      I know I'm not the only one has has never heard of 180 Solutions. From Wikipedia:
      Those fuckers are evil - even the Wikipedia page on 180 Solutions tried to install spyware on my computer.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    2. Re:Who? by ximenes · · Score: 3, Funny

      You sure showed him.

    3. Re:Who? by Onan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      By far the worst thing about slashdot editors--worse than the dupes, the typos, the mischaracterizations--is their apparent inability to write headlines and summaries that mean a damn thing to readers who don't already know every bit of obscure trivia about what's being discussed. I'm longstanding geek, I read slashdot more or less daily; I'm smack in the middle of the target audience. And yet, at least once a week I see a "summary" that's completely incomprehensible gibberish to me.

      One has to wonder why, if the editors submit writeups that are meaningless to anyone who doesn't already know exactly what's being said, they bother writing anything at all.

    4. Re:Who? by ximenes · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, but I would consider selling it for $400.

  4. Screen Saves and Wallpapers AHOY! by komodo9 · · Score: 3, Informative

    180 Solutions has forever ruined the free multimedia industry of the internet. Anytime I see a "free screensaver" or "free desktop wallpaper", they're usually somehow connected with spyware and adware.

    And their popups/popunders.... ugh.
    --
    BMW Forums

    1. Re:Screen Saves and Wallpapers AHOY! by Tezkah · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Complaining about advertising and then he pastes advertising at the end of his post. Typical of 2006 astroturfers.

    2. Re:Screen Saves and Wallpapers AHOY! by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Complaining about advertising and then he pastes advertising at the end of his post.

      He complained about spyware and then posted a link to a free web forum in his (hideable) signature.

      In other news, yesterday I hypocritically complained about noise pollution and then tied my shoes.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  5. content economy? by opencity · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You're not creating a content economy by making your advertising an anoyance. This 'blink tag' mentality doesn't work when everyone can provide content. How many of you, googling the capital of faroffistan, type 'wiki'? No ads, obnoxious loaders, browser crashing javascript.

    Now that content is a two (multi?) way stream we have to go back to a pre-electronic mindset. Some of the greatest paintings of the 19th century were sold to hang in restaurants. Now that's good advertising.

    --
    Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical results, but that's not why we do it.
  6. Vmware? by crossmr · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Uninstalls? Yeah. I've taken it off my neighbors computer a couple times He has three girls and it finally got so bad that I rebuilt his laptop and installed vmware, then decreed that he was the only person in the house allowed to use the computer without starting vmware first and surfing from it. He backed it up and has been happy ever since.

    Who sets up Vmware as a permanent use type of solution like this? Why not just install anti-spyware tools, use mozilla, and even toss on the tea-timer from spybot.

    I guess its been so long since I've been that naive I forget what its like..

    1. Re:Vmware? by grcumb · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Who sets up Vmware as a permanent use type of solution like this?"

      I do. I run a few public access computer centres, and this is the only way to keep them intact. The computers run Ubuntu by default, but if someone absolutely positively needs Windows (e.g. Teaching a class about Word), they run XP in a VM, which reverts to its initial state the moment it's powered off. Thank heavens for snapshots!

      In public access situations, I really do have an 'infinite number of monkeys' at the keyboards, and this is the best way I've found to guarantee that things never break.

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    2. Re:Vmware? by Jerf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Setting up to run Vmware simply to surf because you're afraid of spyware is absolutely ridiculous.

      You can make a very good case that the exact opposite is true, especially if you're dealing with someone who insists on using Internet Explorer. IE has had a large number of flaws that allow hostile remote websites to do silent installs of arbitrary software. It quite likely still has some. I'm also not prepared to say Firefox doesn't have any, even though I'd expect it to be somewhat better.

      So what, you say? You only browse the safe websites? I respond, oh, you mean you absolutely, positively never make a typo in the location bar? The websites you browser are absolutely guaranteed to not be hacked?

      Heck, I've accidentally clicked on links in my spam when my touchpad acts up. I use Linux so I'm not too worried, but in Windows, that could have been enough!

      It certainly ought to be ridiculous, but if you really examine the facts of the case as they are rather than as they should be, setting up a VM for browsing makes quite a lot of sense in any situation where the user can't be trusted to re-install their OS if necessary. If that includes home use for some family where all the members have better things to do with their time than learn the arcana of Windows, so be it. The only downside is memory consumption and the fact that it makes downloading things for the host system that much harder... something in that scenario I'd be inclined to call a feature anyhow.

    3. Re:Vmware? by grimwell · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed, the education is the priority. Part of the learning experience is making mistakes; both the freedom to make them and to learn from them.

      I would much rather take the time to explain to them how to proplerly use stuff, and maybe get them using another browser like mozilla/firefox, then come up with some asinine solution like forcing them to run Vmware.

      Setting up VMWare doesn't mean the parent gets out of educating their child. It just provides an easier to support&maintain computing environment. Which remember was the original point; instead of uninstall/removing crap just copy virgin image over and you're done.

      A number of children websites just don't work in non-IE browsers, e.g. ToonTown. Even in a corporate/adult environment a large number of website don't work properly in Firefox. Or worst yet work in Firefox in Windows but don't work in Firefox in unix. MBNA ShopSafe is that beast.

      A lot of children & game websites install a lot of crap. The crap isn't malware but will degrade the performance of the machine over time. If the virtual machine is configured to start from a virgin machine each time it avoids your "what if they hose it?" problem. But this can also being a pain for the user, as they would need to keep re-installing stuff(e.g. ToonTown).

      What if they hose their install and you're not there? Suddenly they fire up the browser in the host OS and go to town.

      This is really a trust issue. If they are only allowed to use the virtual machine and it got hosed, they need to wait for an adult to repair it. If they disobey a rule, then they get punished.

      Going back to your education theme, you could teach them how to restore the virtual machine to a virgin state. e.g. if your virtual machine breaks, run this batch file. The batch file overwrites their virtual machine with the virgin image and they are back in business. This is the beauty of VMWare&virtual machines.

      VMWare is basically being used in place of a seperate kids PC.

      --
      If the govt becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law, it invites man to become his own law, it invites anarchy
    4. Re:Vmware? by incabulos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Good call, and its worth pointing out that this is not a security concept limited to Windows and Microsoft software specifically either. Its the reason why an increasingly large number of *nix server daemons are set to run in a chrooted or jailed environment - Apache, many of the OpenBSD-affiliated projects like OpenSSH, OpenNTP, etc all can run this way.

      The idea of course being that a remote compromise will only gain access to the chroot environment rather than your juicy and tender /etc files, /sbin binaries, and anything else that can be used to compromise the system further. The same justification of IE browsing via a VMware environment that is either locked down, or easily restored back to a known-good state.

      Its simply good security practice regardless of the OS.

  7. Oh yeah... by thej1nx · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Shutting out your primary distribution channel and clientele is ofcourse, a bad business policy.

    Which no sane company will ofcourse do. Especially considering that their entire business model depends on adware/spyware.

    So all I can surmise is, they are trying to get at least some good PR value out of a bad quarter :p

    They do need a more positive public perception of them, considering the recent cases against spyware makers/distributors.

  8. Oh....no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I feel so bad for these guys...especially the guys that are surprised by the pink slips.

    Poor malicious coders.

    Wonder what they put on their resumes...probably would load it with spyware if the paper supported it.

    AC

    1. Re:Oh....no... by jcr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wonder what they put on their resumes

      "Please don't kill me"?

      Mind you, if I ever got a resume from someone who'd worked for a spamware company, it would go to the very same place as the spam.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  9. 180 solutions can burn in hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I had a run in with one of their people not too many months ago. I had been put on one of their spam mailing lists and I emailed their address to ask for my domain to be removed. Initially, I got a person who said that they wouldn't do it. When I replied and said that I would file a complaint with their upstream data provider, I found my email address mailbombed with additions to about 5000 mailing lists. Luckily these days most mailing lists ask for a confirmation and those that don't I weeding out pretty quick. The moron also didn't realize that most mailing lists confirm messages also include the IP of the subscriber. I replied again and included the draft letter to the upstream provider and a letter of the local police department's electronic crimes office for an attempted DoS attack, but this time someone else responded and apologized. Never heard from them again. Before the slashbots jump on me for replying to SPAM, I'd like to say that I've already paid the price.

  10. good news to me by xamomike · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I welcome the day when adware/spyware companies start going out of business. These companies should expect that these are not long term ventures, and most people are very irratated by their software no matter how they try to present it. Yes, a small economy surrounds the business of spyware, but it's business based on mass numbers (i.e. casualties) and not by innovation, or any sort of usefullness. Just like the old days of selling blind-link traffic and 404 traffic, except we knew it had its days numbered. Surfing the net for most people means easy access to information, it shouldn't be a blind pit of junk waiting for you to stumble upon the wrong link :)

    --
    There are 10 types of people in the world; those who can read binary, and those who can't.
  11. Re:I don't want them to go under... by Jerf · · Score: 2, Informative

    You're not directly claiming this, but you might want to read up on the broken window fallacy. If you were not always fixing damage done by others, society could use your skills in a more productive manner.

  12. Re:You shouldn't have let them off the hook. by Splab · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You know, not everyone is a vendictive bastard.

    Yes the representive of the firm did a bad thing, and yes the firm in itself is probably a bad thing. But two wrongs don't make a right unless you are going left - so calm down, smile and try to be polite even though people are pissing on you.

  13. 180 Solutions exploits Wikipedia for marketing by Brushen · · Score: 5, Informative
    http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zango_Me ssenger&oldid=14840188

    Look at this Wikipedia revision, creating an article on a 180 Solutions product. Look at the history tab, and you will note this revision was done by the IP address 206.169.156.2. The IP address corresponds with 180 SOLUTIONS HOOKED-2 when looked up in the American Registry for Internet Numbers.

    The article was changed to give it a more neutral tone many times, but in all cases the IP address tried to revert to the original version. The article in its current form is located here, but with a sign that says that everything in this article but not be accurate, nor true. The IP address range for 180 Solutions is 206.169.156.0 - 206.169.156.255. See this American Registry for Internet Numbers entry for 180 Solution's physical address. The city can be confirmed by Wikipedia itself.

    This was done in June 2005, around the same time the U.S. Congress staffers began editing Wikipedia, coincidentally. Again, using Wikipedia as a source, this company has less than 250 employees. Because this IP address came from the company, what are the odds that the editor created that article about that "instant messaging service" for love of the company alone? It reads like an advertisement.

    They used Wikipedia to market their filth, and spyware company or not, that's something I'll always hold in contempt. (mod up)

    1. Re:180 Solutions exploits Wikipedia for marketing by orkysoft · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In the article's history, click on the IP address in question, and you'll see the other articles that person (or persons) have edited. Then click on a link labeled "diff" to see what was added. Here's a funny example...

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
  14. Re:OT: TV Ads by gstoddart · · Score: 2, Insightful
    huh? that made absolutely no sense. explain again in english.

    Simple, they're usually MLMs or some other crap. The people on the other end of those sites are probably going to charge you a fee for participation -- they make money. You sign up for some silly scheme, you might make money, or you might just waste your time and the money you have now.

    Classic money making scheme:

    Send me $20, and I'll send you instructions on how to make a fortune. They send you $20, and you tell them to get people to send them $20 in exchange for secret money making secrets. For every person you sign up, I get a cut.

    Somewhere in the maze, there might be one or two actual products -- there has to be, or it's a straight up fraud. But mostly it's comission structures and fluff that says if you can sign up other people or market to other suckers you'll make a fortune. The money is made by all sorts of intermediary comissions, not on the actual product -- unless you're the manufacturer. [ In the case of spam, the guys sending the messages are getting paid if you buy, so you annoy a million or so people with "g3t a big p3nis" crap ]

    The people who have large amounts of people below them in the pyramid ... ahem ... business opportunity rake in money like mad. The people at the bottom try very hard to get more suckers. so they can make money like mad. Only a few people ever make any real money, everyone else is slavishly making money for someone else, thinking they're gonna make themselves rich.

    Think referral programs. Think Amway. Think of 'affiliate' programs from the 90s. Think spammers, cold callers, or other creative ways of seling. Advertiser pays promoter for qualified hits/leads/sales/eyeballs. Promoter hires lots of little promoters to do the volume, then make their money of economies of scale.

    Any time someone wants to get you to listen to a 'business opportunity', and won't tell you what it is up-front, is probably hawking one of these. Frequently, it's accompanied by trying to get you to come to a presentation, where hopefully they can fill your head with ideas of being rich, and have some more experienced shark button-hole you and sign you up. Run from these people -- very fast! They're very slick, and they generally over-represent your odds of actually making any money. [ You could make a fortune selling red smarties, and get your own supply of red smarties at wholesale prices. The real money is in finding other people who want to make a fortune selling red smarties ]

    The guy who signs you up is hoping to make money from you. The guy who signed him up is hoping to make money from you, and so on. You're just grist for the mill. The more people they sign up at the bottom end, the more the guys at the top roll around in piles of money they no longer need to work for, because a large number of guys are schlepping the products they no longer remember anything about.

    At best, most of these things are dubious. At worst, they can be quite cultish and downright scary (*cough* Amway *cough*) -- these people approach the whole 'free money' game with almost religious zeal. It's in their interest to convince you that your family and friends don't recognize a good business opportunity (and who needs 'em anyway), and that the snake-oil they're selling is really worth the money.

    Make a fortune by working at home for 2 hours a day in your underwear? Yeah, right. They just prey on vulnerable people who are currently not making enough money and can't get a job that lets them. Or unscrupulous people who don't mind working in grey areas.

    There is no free lunch.
    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  15. Another misleading Slashdot heading by smallpaul · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How can an interview with an ex-employee be regarded as "An Interview with 180 Solutions?"