Slashdot Mirror
Microsoft to Acquire ProClarity
Gosalia writes "In order to increase its presence in the business intelligence market, Microsoft announced its plan to acquire business analytics software developer ProClarity. 'This acquisition advances our (business intelligence) strategy and our ability to deliver performance management applications to customers,' Jeff Raikes, Microsoft business division president, said in a statement."
have some software that some manager will want to buy because of its colorful view graphs that supposedly helps them make business decisions quicker and easier.
In reality, most management types don't understand analytics at all, and when one of their math-geeks does, they are often overlooked as geek-speak.
My feeling is that this is a swipe at Siebel/Oracle/SAP/whoever so Microsoft can add a feather to their cap and say that they are relevant in the enterprise space because they have a one-size-fits-all BI solution.
I could be wrong, but I'm not.
Other than this text, there is no discernible information contained in this sig.
The biggest problem MS faces is the fact that they don't have any solution to support the SQL Server 2005 Analysis Services. Oh sorry I forgot, the half cooked BSM or internally called Maestro, what a joke. MS has been lementing on this issue for years and was going back and forth between ProClarity and Panorama. Now Panorama is officially screwed... MS has had tons of problem implementing Panorama... So it's no surprise that they went with ProClarity... But they still have at least 3 different initiative that I know of that provide similar functionality at different scales...
Google Analytics has nothing to do with this software. Despite the fancy "analytics" term, its really nothing more than a slick version of WebTrends that feeds data back to Google's servers.
This is actually a fairly smart move by Microsoft as much as it is an admission that they don't understand the space or the customer base. Not that they care - now that they have a more or less complete front-end and lovely middle tier, their technology is end to end now. ProClarity has smart people who understand MDX better than just about anybody in the industry. MDX is the multidimensional equivalent of SQL and it handles things like cross-tabs (to be non-technical about it) very nicely. In fact when I last checked a couple years ago (I'm certified, thank you) they were the only people in the industry who had built a competent MDX code generator. Their developers have scoped out a complete API for the product and I have little doubt that the whole thing will fit very nicely into the .NETframework. This means that .NET geeks will have no obstacles to building integrated analyic products into anything with an MSSQL back-end. This is something a small tech company with all the smarts cannot market by itself, but that Microsoft can definitely market.
The ProClarity suite of products has many more features than the average MSSQL customer uses and will enable people with lightweight ( 3 years) experience in the BI space to build relatively competant applications. So as an entre into your generic IT shop, they've got a headstart. But it also is plenty extensible. I wouldn't be surprised if a bulked up ProClarity group within MSFT didn't start building analytics into Great Plains under the Microsoft Dynamics label.
It shouldn't take long for MS to integrate ProClarity into its product offering. All the hard stuff is already built.
This is a slap in the face of Panorama Software, the Israeli company that helped usher in 'Plato' some of the original technology behind MSAS - MS' multidimensional server now embedded with MSSQL. It's also something of a slap to the interal people behind Microsoft Reporting Services, which although not very good for high-end apps is a good me-too against Business Objects, Cognos and Hyperion on the low end. It's reasonable to say, generically, that anybody who wants to run static format reports is a low-end analytical application anyway. Nobody expects much more who buys MSSQL anyway.
What's most interesting to me is whether or not ProClarity will continue to support MDX for Hyperion Essbase, the industry standard server for MDX on Linux & Unix boxes. Its got Yukon beat for scalability and does fabulous things on 64bit hardware. But as usual, the difficulty is getting people who understand high end BI to build with the pure technologies when so much of analytics is marketed in packages aimed at BPM and CRM etc. The last time I checked the ProClarity folks were very impressed with Essbase' Java API and how smoothly they were able to build. IE it worked the first time and did what it was supposed to do. The new MDX book out covers the differences between Essbase and MSAS, let's see how closely to the standards MSFT will remain.
Microsoft really had to do this since Hyperion has already released their System 9 integrated platform 6 months ago. Oracle just recently made their announcement within the past week, and I suspect that MSFT is announcing their strategy to make this another tentacle in their .NET multiverse. This puts a great deal of pressure on Microstrategy, Business Objects and Cognos who are selling middle tiers and front-ends but don't own their own database technologies, but you never know, SAP might try something and Informatica is something of a wild card in this. IBM? Well they have the technology but who knows if they really care?
All in all this is a good way to seed future Yukon buyers with stuff that Microstrategy used to get away with. Since all the Yukon buyers are going to wait anyway, piling on some of the ProClarity stuff won't hurt MS.
fault-tolerant