Slashdot Mirror


Venus Probe Returns First Images

The BBC reports on the first images returned from Venus by the EU probe. From the article: "They show the hothouse planet's south pole from a distance of 206,452km. Mission scientists are already intrigued by a dark 'vortex' feature which can be clearly seen in one image. Venus Express will orbit the planet for about 500 Earth days to study its atmosphere, which is thought to have undergone runaway greenhouse warming." They're offering some high-rez images of the planet at the ESA website.

154 comments

  1. Whoa by Xiph · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't really have anything intelligent to say. But i hope others who don't either will give me the peace and just say whoa, instead of coming with stupid puns, because these are truly cool pictures. so, don't write before you view. ESA has finally made something which isn't just cool, but looks cool too, and i hope they get the attention they deserve, because their funding needs it badly. anyway, cheers and enjoy the pics, i hope this'll still be the first post

    --
    Blah blah sig blah blah blah irony blah blah
    1. Re:Whoa by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      I wasn't so taken with the images.
      Infact, I expected much better - they "high-rez" looks very grainy, like a bad jpeg.
      I hope this first capture isn't going to be indicative of the quality.

      Earlier on (when I saw this article) I went looking at the first images from other craft, and one of the more startling comparisons comes from First close-up view of Jupiter from Voyager 1.

      Even the Mariner images shown on the linked BBC article appear to have grater clarity and detail.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:Whoa by dereference · · Score: 1
      Infact, I expected much better - they "high-rez" looks very grainy, like a bad jpeg.

      It looks like a bad jpeg because that's exactly what it is; the 1024x768 "wallpaper" is only 161kB.

    3. Re:Whoa by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Thats my point.

      The image I link to is a smaller gif image yet still contains much more clarity and detail than these deformed images.
      They say first impressions count and the person who considered putting up these images instead of clear lower resolution ones needs a talking to.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    4. Re:Whoa by ichandarin · · Score: 2, Informative

      For everyone who doesn't have anything intelligent to say... here's someone who does: the Planetary society has a good report on the findings at http://www.planetary.org/news/2006/0414_First_Venu s_Express_VIRTIS_Images_Peel.html

      --
      Denn wir sind wie Baumstaemme im Schnee. Scheinbar liegen sei glatt auf, mit kleinem anstoss sollte man sie wegschieben
    5. Re:Whoa by Skim123 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Whoa. Why isn't my Venus inside Uranus?

      --

      I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

    6. Re:Whoa by dereference · · Score: 1
      Thats my point.

      Yes, I was actually trying to agree and expand upon your comment (it seems like it's been longer than normal since I've haven't had any mod points, so it's the best I could do). My apologies if it came across as any kind of disagreement.

  2. well duh by ogarza · · Score: 5, Funny
    Scientists hope to learn how Venus, which is similar to Earth in size, mass and composition, evolved so differently over the last 4.6 billion years.


    Oh i dunno.. maybe the avergae temperature being on avg. 890F, for example?
    1. Re:well duh by MichaelSmith · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Oh i dunno.. maybe the avergae temperature being on avg. 890F, for example?

      Yes but how did it get that way?

    2. Re:well duh by MrYotsuya · · Score: 2, Funny

      Cue the people who say Global Warming isn't real, citing a crappy Micheal Crichton novel.

    3. Re:well duh by ogarza · · Score: 1

      god... or 40 million kilometers in difference from distance to the sun

    4. Re:well duh by SetupWeasel · · Score: 1

      A day that's one third of an earth year might help.

    5. Re:well duh by macshit · · Score: 1
      Oh i dunno.. maybe the avergae temperature being on avg. 890F, for example?

      Yes but how did it get that way?
      SUVs man, SUVs!
      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    6. Re:well duh by techno-vampire · · Score: 3, Funny

      It got that way because there was too much greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Way too much methane. The methane came from ponies. Lots and lots of pink ponies. OMG! PONIES!!!

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    7. Re:well duh by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      Venutian cows.

      If only they had a way to capture the methane like we do.
      http://www.patentlysilly.com/patent.php?patID=6982 161

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    8. Re:well duh by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      Then explain why it is significantly hotter than even the sun-side of mercur even though it gets 3 times less solar energy per m^2?

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    9. Re:well duh by middlemen · · Score: 1

      Yes but how did it get that way?

      Well let's see. Women are from Venus. Women are hot. Venus is hot. QED.
      (Oh wait, it should be in the reverse order.)

    10. Re:well duh by 3waygeek · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, we have other ways to use the methane.

    11. Re:well duh by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 2, Informative
      Then explain why it is significantly hotter than even the sun-side of mercur even though it gets 3 times less solar energy per m^2?

      Well, for one thing, Mercury's atmosphere is extremely thin and contains things like sodium and potassium. Venus has a very thick atmosphere which helps keep much of the heat locked in.

    12. Re:well duh by drinkypoo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yeah, we know that. Here on Earth, we call those kind of atmospheric constituents "greenhouse gases". I'm thinking they don't call them much of anything on Venus, because anyone who might have been alive there is probably gone now :P

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:well duh by lgw · · Score: 1

      Then explain why it is significantly hotter than even the sun-side of mercur even though it gets 3 times less solar energy per m^2?

      Venus is hot on the surface because of the intense greenhouse effect there. Something caused all of the oceans on Venus to boil off, leading to the current situation. That "something" was mysterious until we discovered that Venus basically doesn't rotate. That makes a huge difference in the amount of water vapor in the air (which is the dominant factor in the greenhouse effect).

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    14. Re:well duh by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Perhaps if Mercury was as massive as Venus and could maintain an atmosphere it might be even worse.

      The question with Venus is not why is it hot, but where did that atmosphere come from?

    15. Re:well duh by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the long day and the proximity to the sun means that Venus's oceans took up residence in the atmosphere.

  3. Seeing the future of Earth by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1, Funny

    Sending a probe to Venus ... $xx million dollars

    Getting back hi-res pictures of Venus under massive global warming ... $x million dollars

    Realizing that this is what Earth might look at if we continue ignoring Global Warming ... Priceless.

    For everything else, there's Big Oil PetroldollarCard.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Seeing the future of Earth by SetupWeasel · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not understanding the differences between Earth and Venus... Priceless

      There are some people who take the time to learn about our environment. For everyone else, there's Envirobabble.

    2. Re:Seeing the future of Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So you don't know that the atmosphere of Venus at its surface is sort of like standing on the ocean bottom here on Earth? it's, like, you know, thicker... a bit.

      So global warming will convert our the nitrogen in our atmosphere to carbon dioxide? And load what's left with sulphur dioxide? Wow. Who knew?

      You are too stupid to live.

    3. Re:Seeing the future of Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is amazing how many people would mod parent troll. These people are either living in denial or have no sense of humor. The fact is that we are getting hotter (or warmer - whatever) by the day. Mother Nature will heal herself, no doubt, but are we hurting her too much without leaving heal-time? I do not foresee the Day after tomorow anytime (movie not day), but until we can be sure either way, why release more Gas than needed?? (That applies to grampa's gas too).. Perhaps we can expect all things to get back to OK (in terms of Global Warming) in maybe 50 years or 500 years, maybe we will end up looking like venus regardless of how we treat this earth. I for one will try to reduce gas releases because i bloody hate the stink of it. And maybe some day I would get a Hybrid and (God Forbid) look smug, but the point is this; we could all use less smoke and all that crap in our air. Those of you who've ever been to London would know one thing - The air sometimes STINKS. Those of you in South East Asia who've ever had to smell the stink thanks to Bloody forest fires in Indonesia also know what I mean. The Haze makes even a person who smokes 40 sticks of Marlboro a day feel their lungs burn.

      I don't care about your motivation, I dont care if your ideas and philosophies are correct, Stop the bloody gas release. And don't give me crap about the seas absorbing the gasses. As long as i can smell it (and no i did not fart), the plain and simple fact is that we are bloody polluting our air. Try spitting at the heavens, your saliva will fall back at your face. Thats what we are doing.

    4. Re:Seeing the future of Earth by craXORjack · · Score: 1

      Venus is considered the sister planet to Earth because of its uncanny similarities. Earth and Venus are closer to each other than any other two planets in the solar system. Earth and Venus are almost the same in size, mass, and composition. Earth and Venus are believed to have iron cores of approximately the same size. Earth and Venus both orbit the sun in nearly circular orbits. Venus is believed to have once had large amounts of water just like the Earth. Now, since you claim to understand the differences between Earth and Venus, please tell us what the difference was which made Venus undergo a runaway greenhouse effect and why such a runaway effect could never happen to our planet.

      --
      Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
    5. Re:Seeing the future of Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe its the lack of a magnetic field

    6. Re:Seeing the future of Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "please tell us what the difference was"

      http://www.space.com/reference/venus/overview.html

      Rotation period: 243 days, retrograde (this is the length of Venus' "day," the time it takes to spin on its axis). Venus' day is longer than its year, and its rotation is retrograde, meaning it spins on its axis in a direction opposite its orbit around the sun.

      Water that sits in the sun for over 2,800 continuous hours tends to evaporate.

      THE book on Venus: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0816518300/qid=11 45071373

    7. Re:Seeing the future of Earth by guardiangod · · Score: 2, Insightful
      please tell us what the difference was which made Venus undergo a runaway greenhouse effect and why such a runaway effect could never happen to our planet.

      Maybe being 26.7 % closer to the sun helps?

    8. Re:Seeing the future of Earth by craXORjack · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe it helped. But then why has Mercury which orbits much, much closer never gotten as hot as Venus? We know this by the number of craters on its surface. Venus had a complete surface meltdown within the last 700-800 million years while Mercury has not. Radiation intensity from a point source diminishes according to the inverse square law so a 27% increase in orbit will only make a 38% decrease in solar intensity. Are you suggesting then that the greenhouse effect can not happen if solar radiation intensity is just slightly less than it is for Venus? Now that Venus is surrounded by greenhouse gases, what would happen if we could move Venus out to Earth's orbit? The heat input would only be 62% as much yet the heat output would not be significantly changed. Radiative cooling behaves in accordance with the absolute temperature to the fourth power. So its mean temp of 737 kelvin would only need to drop to 654 kelvin to maintain a steady state if it were in Earth's orbit. But I am still waiting for SetupWeasel to explain it to me since he dismisses global warming as 'environbabble'.

      --
      Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
    9. Re:Seeing the future of Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Maybe its the lack of a magnetic field


      Definitly not. I don't know if Venus does have a magnetic field but Earth's magnetic field is fluctuating over time. Sometimes it's like it is now, sometimes it's reversed and sometimes it's gone altogether.
    10. Re:Seeing the future of Earth by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the probe isn't sent to find any "proof" of what runaway greenhouse gases can do; this is already known. But many details are not known, and this probe will simply try to improve our knowledge in the area, and *may* be able to apply some of this new knowledge to Earth, to either weaken or strengthen the greenhouse effect theories as for Eath.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    11. Re:Seeing the future of Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Water that evaporates does not disappear into space. It becomes clouds. They are the big fluffy things you see in the sky. Clouds make rain. Rain replenishes the oceans. You can see this at home by putting a little water and food coloring in a jar and closing the lid. Then set the jar in the sun and watch what happens! Then remove the jar from the sun and watch what happens!

      Clouds reflect some of the sun's rays back into space. That makes a planet colder. Something else must have kept the heat from escaping. But what was it? Scientist believe it was a gas called Carbon Dioxide.which absorbs infrared light. Infrared light is what makes things feel hot at a distance. Have you ever sat by a campfire and felt the heat, but only on the side of you turned toward the fire? That is due to infrared light coming from the fire.

      On earth the amount of carbon dioxide in the air is still very small though it has been increasing every year since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution. The Indistrial Revolution is when people began building factories with big smokestacks and burning lots of coal and oil to make things go. But on Venus the air is made of 96% carbon dioxide. Like earth, it's air used to have only a little bit but over time the heat released more and more carbon dioxide from the rocks.

    12. Re:Seeing the future of Earth by SetupWeasel · · Score: 1

      1 Venusian Day = 1/3 Earth Year

    13. Re:Seeing the future of Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Mercury is so much closer that the solar wind long since blasted away any atmosphere it ever had? No atmosphere means no heat retention.

  4. Re:Well, yes. by Anonymous+Crowhead · · Score: 1

    If you're interested in science as anything more than a few sound bites to ooh and ahh at then... ...you don't get your 'science' at the BBC.

    (I finished your sentence for you.)

  5. Whoa-Star Attraction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "ESA has finally made something which isn't just cool, but looks cool too, and i hope they get the attention they deserve, because their funding needs it badly. anyway, cheers and enjoy the pics, i hope this'll still be the first post"

    The planet Venus will be wanting a cut of that funding as well.

  6. Anti-US leftist posts alarmist global warming crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tendentious.

  7. Re:well duh or why Venus is Not Like Earth by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1, Troll

    Oh i dunno.. maybe the avergae temperature being on avg. 890F, for example?

    Personally, I think it was a severe lack of Mint Juleps and Long Island Iced Teas.

    That and having all one's wooden stir sticks light on fire.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  8. Venus 'days' are long ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... real long. Look it up, genius.

    1. Re:Venus 'days' are long ... by Floody · · Score: 2, Informative
      ... real long. Look it up, genius.


      Venus has no "days" or "nights", at least not any perceivable by human beings. If you were standing anywhere on the surface of Venus (ignore for a moment a few minor environmental complications that would make such a tad unpleasant), all you would see was a very murky and very dark twilight with no discernable light-source other than perhaps a very very faint glow from all directions. It would look like this all the time, no matter what time of the "day" or what day of the "year."

      Raleigh scattering through Venus' incredibly thick and saturated atmosphere is so significant that no visible light (detectable to the human eye) makes it through without becoming completely diffuse.

  9. Vortices by Joebert · · Score: 4, Funny

    >> Venus Express science team members say they want to know how these vortices remain stable and where they get their energy from.

    If only ET would answer the phone, we could call them & ask which direction the water turns when they flush the toilet.

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  10. Re:Earth days? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes the clarification was necessary, each planet has its own definition of a day (that is, a complete rotation about its axis).

    A single day on Venus takes 243 of our days.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  11. Re:Anti-US leftist posts alarmist global warming c by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Tendentious"

    I guess this means that unless you are FOR global warming you are somehow anti-US and a leftist. That train of tought is in itself tendetious because it espouses a point of view that only rightists who think global warming is a good thing can be pro-US.

  12. Nice image but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Memo to ESA: The whole pole looks like its on the night side, so why not extend the infrared coverage there? It looks like the structure at the pole is cut in half and I'm curious to see what it looks like.

  13. Dept. of Redundancy Dept. by Hyram+Graff · · Score: 1

    The parent post has been brought to you by the Department of Redundancy Department.

    --
    0*0
    00*
    ***
    1. Re:Dept. of Redundancy Dept. by ogarza · · Score: 1

      ha!

      it is perfectly possible to have and average of averages

      which is of course what i was referring to

      ;)

  14. So there's finally proof. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Venus really does contains a giant fucking vagina. But not an ordinary vagina, a soul-sucking vortex vagina.

    Gentlemen: We have witnessed the home of the succubas.

  15. ESA is not a part of the EU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just a minor correction - but the European Space Agency is not a part of the EU - and countries outside the EU participate as well.

  16. Obligatory FSM Statement by HolyCrapSCOsux · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is what happens when Piracy drops to zero. See RIAA? Se what you are trying to do? You are trying to KILL US ALL!

    --
    0xB315AA8D852DCD3F3DCA578FD2E0BF88
  17. A few high-res images? Well, it's a start... by __aagctu1952 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But I really wish ESA would adopt a more NASA-like policy for images and other probe data. I hold NASA in much higher esteem than ESA - not because of some sense of patriotism (hey, I live in Europe), but because with them people like me can more often than not actually get to see the results and access the raw data (and be able to use it for basically whatever purpose I see fit as well). ESA OTOH has a tendency to release only a few selected images, with lots of usage restrictions...

    1. Re:A few high-res images? Well, it's a start... by fermion · · Score: 2, Interesting
      One thing that NASA is really good at is producing and promoting pretty pictures, as in the Astronomy Picture of the Day"

      Now, some would regard this outreach work as a waste of money, but it ignores the fact that exploration and research requires trained motivated persons, person who have been exposed to the subject since childhood. Persons who have seen exploration and research as an exciting and compelling profession. This means making the subject accesible to average children and thier parents.

      NASA used to be much better at this. There was a time when one could get a much closer unsanitized look at the operations. The profit motive and corruption has limited those opportunities, and now visitors are limited to Theme Park representation of the Space Admninistration, involving misrepresentation of science and 20 year old movies.

      In spite of all this, I stil give NASA more points for not forcing a click wrap license before every picture.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    2. Re:A few high-res images? Well, it's a start... by Zen+Punk · · Score: 1

      "The profit motive"??!! NASA is a government bureaucracy! They don't make any profit! You're really showing your ignorance...

      --
      Sleep is futile.
    3. Re:A few high-res images? Well, it's a start... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "The profit motive"??!! NASA is a government bureaucracy! They don't make any profit! You're really showing your ignorance...


      Yes, profit motive. Whether an organization makes profit by selling crap or whether it fights for a share on the taxes: To maximize profit, it has to do ads = theme park presentations.
    4. Re:A few high-res images? Well, it's a start... by ahillen · · Score: 1

      ESA OTOH has a tendency to release only a few selected images, with lots of usage restrictions...

      According to the copyright note that pops up on their site, the might not used to "state tate or imply the endorsement by ESA or any ESA employee of a commercial product, process or service, or used in any other manner that might mislead." Otherwise: "You may use ESA images or videos for educational or informational purposes. The publicly released ESA images may be reproduced without fee." OK, you have to give ESA credit for the pictures. What is so unreasonable about this?

    5. Re:A few high-res images? Well, it's a start... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      OK, calm down. The Theme Park is Space Center Houston and is run by a non-profit, I think it is the manned flight foundation. It was designed by the Walt Disney design group, and charges a "modest" admission of $20, plus $5 parking. It is not a government agency, though it was partly funded by a government bond.

      Even so, though a non-profit does not generate profit, that does not mean it can not enrich political allies. As has been seen with Bush, whose only money making venture involved the dubious sale of a ball park to the good, and now poorer, citizens of Arlington, their is little difference between public and private money. There is also a good deal of math cofusion, as he recieved 4% of the profits, though he only owned 1.8% of the company.We also see that Delay, whose district contains NASA, had little problem with enriching his friends with public money, as long as he got a cut.

      I do not mean to pick the current admin, it is just they control everything right now, so it is hard to find other examples in Texas. If we leave Texas we see examples of democrats getting kickbacks from military outfirs and the like. In fact, I have seen data that military stock actually does better when the Dems are in control, indicated the sweetheart relationship may have been going on for a long time.

      In any case, when talking about the profit motive one is taking about the graft in which a public official, like the government of Arlington, uses it's power to sieze private property, when market forces have already made clear that such use is not desired, for the apparent purpose of enriching certain friends, like the now president Bush. We don't know who was the sweetheart of Space Center Houston, but given Texas politics, I am sure someone got a second home in River Oaks.

  18. Re:Earth days? by Anonymous+Crowhead · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes the clarification was necessary, each planet has its own definition of a day (that is, a complete rotation about its axis).

    Well then now I am confused. The last sentence of the article asks why the Earth and Venus evolved so differently over the last 4.6 billion years. Are they talking Earth years or Venus years? They didn't specify. Or do you only have to do it once, like the trademark symbol? You know, just use it at the first instance and it's implied for the rest. Is that how it works?

  19. Celsius by Crouty · · Score: 2, Informative
    Oh i dunno.. maybe the avergae temperature being on avg. 890F, for example?
    Nah, we're talking Europe here, buddy, so it's 467C. Lest we're talking astrophysics, in which case it would be 740 K.
    --
    On se Internetz nobody noes your German.
    1. Re:Celsius by ogarza · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nah, we're talking Europe here, buddy, so it's 467C. Lest we're talking astrophysics, in which case it would be 740 K.

      oh yeah? 1381 rankine

    2. Re:Celsius by Jesapoo · · Score: 1

      psh... that's so 1860's...

    3. Re:Celsius by Scarletdown · · Score: 1
      Nah, we're talking Europe here, buddy, so it's 467C. Lest we're talking astrophysics, in which case it would be 740 K.

      oh yeah? 1381 rankine


      Or to convert it to laymen's terms...

      The temperature of Venus is unfuckingbelievably hot.

      (Just ask Mercury. I believe he was tasked with taking her temperature.)

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    4. Re:Celsius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is that coarse thread or fine thread???

    5. Re:Celsius by dotgain · · Score: 1

      African or European?

  20. All that Co2 by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 0

    Where is Mega-Maid when you need her. I want my Vacuu-suck!!!!

  21. "Probe's images of Venus' south pole"-hubba hubba! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw a headline in the news about a "probe images of Venus' south pole" and I couldn't help but double over laughing. It read like a description of a pr0n voyeurism movie.

  22. Has it found any chicks? by Zygote-IC- · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's Venus after all -- and according to the book, that's where women are originally from.

    The runaway global warming was probably caused by all their yaps going nonstop, a stream of hot air about "doing the dishes," "mowing the lawn," and "come look at this cute house I built in 'The Sims.'"

    And, yeah, that dark vortex? That costs $15.99 a month, billed to your credit card under the name "OMFGSONOTPR0N.COM"

    Thankfully my wife doesn't read slashdot or I could so get my ass...

    Oh dear God -- CLOSE, CLOSE, CLOSE!!!

    1. Re:Has it found any chicks? by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1

      A Goddess on a mountain top
      Was burning like a silver flame
      The summit of Beauty in love
      And Venus was her name

      REFRAIN:
      She's got it yeah, Baby, she's got it
      Well, I'm your Venus, I'm your fire
      At your desire

      Her weapon were her crystal eyes
      Making every man mad
      Black as the dark night she was
      Got what no-one else had... Wa!

      REFRAIN
      She's got it yeah, Baby, she's got it
      Well, I'm your Venus, I'm your fire
      At your desire

      --
      How ya like dat?
    2. Re:Has it found any chicks? by James+Juno · · Score: 1

      This is classic, Zygote! Absolutely classic! I've been married 12 years and the horrors of Venus are no mystery to me, either.

      --
      I'm too old to worry or care anymore. Lay it on me, man.
    3. Re:Has it found any chicks? by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      Hot chicks?

    4. Re:Has it found any chicks? by solitas · · Score: 1

      DID YOU KNOW: "Venus" is the only song in the history of the Billboard charts to hit number one three times (first time on February 7, 1970 [by Shocking Blue], second time on June 20, 1981 by "Stars On 45"; third time on September 6, 1986 by Bananarama). (courtesy of http://www.geocities.com/ofmang/greg/shockblu.html - I could remember the fact but not the dates, and I have all three 45's)

      --
      "It's time to take life by the cans." ~ Bender ("Bendin' in the Wind", ep. 3-13)
    5. Re:Has it found any chicks? by AstronomicUID · · Score: 1

      Thanks, John Doe.

      --
      You must write The Book, and then tear away belief. Only you can save the light of man --Gary Numan
  23. Difference between NASA and ESA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not entirely unnatural that ESA would have a different approach compared to NASA. NASA is publicly funded and as such they have obligations to the their public - ESA is funded by various governments and is an international organization. Remember that it's not even an institution of the European Union (EU). The end result is that the citizens of Europe cannot influence ESA directly or indirectly in any meaningful way at the moment.

    1. Re:Difference between NASA and ESA by Tx · · Score: 0

      Which is kind of the whole problem many of us Brits have with the whole European project - it's our tax euros being spent, but without anything like the sense of obligation to the taxpayers that there ought to be. You point out that the ESA isn't an agency of the European Union, but even if it was it would make much difference, I could start citing examples, but I better end this OT rant before I get carried away.

      --
      Oh no... it's the future.
    2. Re:Difference between NASA and ESA by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      it's our tax euros being spent, but without anything like the sense of obligation to the taxpayers that there ought to be

      No taxation without representation! Let history repeat itself!

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    3. Re:Difference between NASA and ESA by Tim+C · · Score: 4, Insightful

      NASA is publicly funded... ESA is funded by various governments

      Sorry, you're going to have to explain the difference there. NASA is funded by a single government and so has a duty to the public whose money it receives, while ESA is funded by a number of governments, and so doesn't?

      I can't say that I really see the difference...

  24. Lucky for you that it's returning images by murderlegendre · · Score: 1

    Otherwise, I was going to destroy the Earth.

    It's blocking my view of Venus.

    --
    There's a Starman, waiting in the sky / He'd like to come and meet us, but he hasn't got the time.
    1. Re:Lucky for you that it's returning images by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That's as funny as a screen door on a battleship.

  25. Images are fine by PCM2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I just hope it doesn't return to Earth and go berzerk. Lee Majors is looking a little long in the tooth to do anything about it these days.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
    1. Re:Images are fine by mikesd81 · · Score: 1

      Sad i'm only 25 and I know exactly what show you're talking about....But i that was from mars? Maybe one of the Rovers?

      --
      That which does not kill me only postpones the inevitable.
    2. Re:Images are fine by geobeck · · Score: 1

      It's worse than you think. The reason the ESA is only releasing a few selected images is because it found a planet full of people who were so pacified, they were unwilling to do anything about global warming. Eventually they just lay down where they were... forgot to go to work, forgot to breed, forgot to eat...

      Except of course, for the 1/10 of 1% of the population that had the opposite effect... and became politicians!

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
    3. Re:Images are fine by geobeck · · Score: 1

      No, it was definitely Venus. I'm 36, and the OP brought back perfect images of Steve Austin being chased around by a big, sloping-sided space probe. The reason it was nearly invincible on Earth was because it was designed to stand up to Venus' harsh conditions.

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
    4. Re:Images are fine by mikesd81 · · Score: 1

      That's right. And then they hooked it to a chopper and lifted it in the air and blew it up because of the pressure. Like a shark from the deep sea.

      --
      That which does not kill me only postpones the inevitable.
    5. Re:Images are fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you're saying that Venus is overrun with immortal skinny people?

  26. Puns by wordsofwisedumb · · Score: 1
    "The quibble, the quiddity, the double-entendre, the amphiboly, aye the amphibology, the pun, the punnet, and the pundigrion, all rest upon the fact that some sounds serve for two meanings...

    ...Men, being lazy, have boiled down dozens of varieties, and the labels therefore, into the puny word pun.

    Notice, I call the physical word, not the mental exercise, puny. Puns are called puny by those that can't make them...

    ...Nevertheless, those that can make puns usually do. Tradition forbids applause; the approved reception for a pun is a groan. Yet it has been observed that, in their heart of hearts, people like talk seasoned with puns as much as with praises. And of course, no matter how flat your conversation, most people would like to have it flatter."

    ~Joseph T. Shipley

    Perhaps there should be a way to sort comments into puns and useful comments. They are a respectable form of humor which can serve to entertain and educate. Granted they do tend to get in the way of relevant comments sometimes.
    I know this is off-topic but your comment got me thinking...

  27. High rez my ass by moultano · · Score: 1

    Did they decide to stop uploading the high frequency components of those jpegs or something?

    1. Re:High rez my ass by James+Juno · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it is sorta pathetic, especially compared to NASA's latest from Mars:

      http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/mro/gallery/calibration/R elease_AEB_000001_0000_Color.html

      (click on the "full res" link at your own risk!)

      --
      I'm too old to worry or care anymore. Lay it on me, man.
    2. Re:High rez my ass by Weird+O'Puns · · Score: 1

      You need to take into account that the pictures were not taken from final orbit, where the craft will be as close as 250 km from planet surface, but from over 200 000 km away. The pictures also revealed that giant vortex over south pole, which is something no one was sure about before. I'd say that these first images were pretty good.

    3. Re:High rez my ass by James+Juno · · Score: 1

      The Mars orbiter is not in its final orbit either - won't be until next November. I didn't mean to knock the venus craft, anybody that gets any science from outer space is aces in my book and I'm anxious to see the data returned from both ships.

      --
      I'm too old to worry or care anymore. Lay it on me, man.
  28. Re:Europe or something interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clearly Europe has more satellites in orbit around Venus than you have brain cells in your head. Stop smoking crack and try to be coherent when you post.

  29. Re:We want more Pics! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That link has been posted many times...

  30. Rediculous liberal craptrap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the typical kind of assumption and leaping to conclusions one would expect from the science jihad.

    Listen, just because this is the way you choose to interpret the data doesn't mean it's right. Yes, many scientists hold the opinion that there is a planet named "Venus" between Earth and the Sun. However, there are other, competing, equally valid models for the solar system. The groupthink of science insists that only their model of the solar system, with this so-called "Venus" included, can be the right one, and only this one may be taught in schools or used in public policy analysis. But just because scientists want to bully the public into accepting Venus theory does not mean that Venus actually exists. Science only accepts evidence that reinforces their pre-assumed conclusion that there is a planet of Venus, and suppresses alternate viewpoints. Just try and get a scientific paper published that denies the existence of Venus and you'll see what I mean.

    The evidence for the existence of Venus is an important scientific debate, and the debate must continue with both sides being represented equally. However the evidence is nowhere near conclusive enough to risk the very livelihood of American business by listening to pro-Venus chicken little proponents of so-called "global warming".

  31. Space by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 1
    I think it's fantastic that the ESA is getting so serious about space exploration. They're really becoming a leader in the space industry. Between China, Japan, the ESA, Russia, and NASA, the space industry is becoming truly international. Cooperation and competition, side-by-side, is a great way to get things done, especially with the private sector getting more directly involved.

    It's definitely an interesting time to be alive...

  32. Re:well duh or why Venus is Not Like Earth by pintpusher · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's a direct result of the Great Pirate Migration that coincides with the beginning of our last ice age. The pirates of Venus were able to build a flying "ship" that they used to raid the next planet out from the sun. The Venutian government at the time was glad to see them go. Parlaimentary Spokesbabe Eep-ork-O'p said "Take your pirate asses off of Venus and don't come back. We don't need you guys after all." She later was quoted as saying "That was a damn silly thing to say" just before she evaporated in a puff of super-heated Venutian protoplasm.

    We earthlings, the lucky recipients of this influx of pirates, have, until recently, enjoyed a relatively mild climate as a result and have chortled under our breath as we've watched our Venutian neighbors fry to a crisp.

    --
    man, I feel like mold.
  33. Re:Europe or something interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..another product of the American education system speaks out.

        I'm guessing there are more euroweenies who could inform you about the current status of Voyager and Pioneer than Americans.

  34. I have an idea! by tetrahedrassface · · Score: 2, Insightful

    /sarcasm on
    Lets keep burning stuff like oil, and coal, and once that gone lets start chemically freeing carbon from limestone. Im sure at some point. With enough methane added in the mix we too can be like VENUS!
    Yay,.
    I propose we let our cars all idle..even when we are home! Hey..get involved! Its for America! :0
    /sarcasm off

    1. Re:I have an idea! by jo7hs2 · · Score: 1

      Been drinking the eco-kool-aid a little?

  35. I don't like these image taking satellites by zymano · · Score: 1

    The ones that take core samples might be more useful

  36. Re:Europe or something interesting by techno-vampire · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    But I'm sure the enviro-nazis will be gleefully saying "see, see, you stupid non phds, this is what earth will become unless we all go back to hunters and gathers"

    I'd have a lot more respect for that type of fanatic if they'd just practice what they preach.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  37. Yes, but we've failed to keep up by CFD339 · · Score: 1

    ..our percentage of pirates to the overall population and looks what's happening now. We have global warming and not one but two George Bush's in charge of things.

    Clearly, you have been touched by His noodley appendage.

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
  38. Re:Europe or something interesting by eZtreme · · Score: 1

    The US satellites from the 70s took pictures from the North Pole, not the South Pole. And this mission is not just to take pictures, but also to find out more about Venus (yes, I have to agree with you, they shouldn't waste time researching a burning hot planet that we anyway can't settle on).

  39. High Res Images by imboboage0 · · Score: 2, Informative
    They're offering some high-rez images of the planet at the ESA website.
    Well they were anyway, until they posted a link on the Slashdot front page.
    --
    Honesty may be the best policy, but by process of elimination, dishonesty is the second best policy.
  40. What's that vortex? by bar-agent · · Score: 1

    That polar vortex is the Venusian greenhouse gas factory. They had a bit of a mad scientist problem, and one mad scientist finally "showed them all!"

    --
    i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    1. Re:What's that vortex? by SETIGuy · · Score: 1
      That polar vortex is the Venusian greenhouse gas factory.

      Sorry to be pedantic, but the proper adjective (despite what you may have heard on the 6 o'clock news) is Venereal. So what you are talking about is the Venereal greenhouse gas factory.

      And don't you dare mod this as funny.

  41. Re:well duh or why Venus is Not Like Earth by kclittle · · Score: 1

    Tom Cruise, is that you?

    --
    Generally, bash is superior to python in those environments where python is not installed.
  42. Runaway greenhouse effect? by snookumz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe I'm being tedious, but I don't agree with comparing Venus to the Earth. The Earth is a complex system of oceans, atmosphere, plant, and animal life. Venus never had the kind of feedback loops that the Earth has. Venus is an example of how a planet that never developed a complex ecology would develop with an excess of CO2. Don't get me wrong. Venus is as much an example of the Greenhouse effect of CO2 as anything, but the Venusian skys weren't polluted by to many cars.

    1. Re:Runaway greenhouse effect? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      How do you know that their planet never developed a complex ecology? Maybe Venus was once covered by a lush forest, and it got too hot, there was a forest fire, and the whole planet was consumed by a firestorm? We'll likely never know of course, but believing something is the case when there's not yet any significant evidence either way is pretty silly.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Runaway greenhouse effect? by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 1

      You sir are right on the money, for at the dawn of their 21st Century, Venusian Civilization was at it's peak and they marveled at their technology called AI...

  43. Re:Europe or something interesting by James+Juno · · Score: 1

    Not to mention Venus air is 90 times denser than Earth's and is 96.5% CO2 compared to Earth's 0.033%. That's a whole lotta SUV action, baby!

    --
    I'm too old to worry or care anymore. Lay it on me, man.
  44. Uranus Probe by d4nowar · · Score: 0
    I just hope they never have to send a probe to Uranus.

    ^Bad joke.

  45. Re:Whoa ..yuk by Tuna_Shooter · · Score: 1

    Not very "hi-res" if you ask me..... whats with the pixel issue ???? 161k ...my Razor phone takes better pictures......although i'd have to throw it ...way out there to get some pics.... I know i'm going to get a mod hit with this one but its worth it......

    --
    *--- Sometimes a majority only means that all the fools are on the same side. ---*
  46. Ozone hole by HermanAB · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wow, they found an ozone hole on Venus too? ;)

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
    1. Re:Ozone hole by diablobsb · · Score: 1

      no but they did find a hole in uranus...

      --
      I for one, welcome our new hot grits... PROFIT!
  47. Nobody Walks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy here, pay here, no credit,slow credit, bad credit, it doesn't matter!

    I'll know space exploration is *REALLY * here when I see ads like that for used (I mean "previously pwned") spaceships. It took less than 50 years for normal airplanes to reach that status, but space travel appears to be taking a scosh longer :(

    1. Re:Nobody Walks! by StJefferson · · Score: 1

      Damn straight. On the other hand, it's worth pointing out that even the earliest aircraft were generally good for more than one trip... the Wright brothers managed quite a few hops in Kitty Hawk. Early spacecraft (being designed by a gov't committee) did not have this characteristic.

      Isn't it interesting, though, that the earliest private spacecraft have all had the characteristic of being reusable? Oh, wait... that was a condition of the Ansari X-Prize competition, wasn't it?

  48. Re: unintelligent design by chooks · · Score: 0

    Scientists hope to learn how Venus, which is similar to Earth in size, mass and composition, evolved so differently over the last 4.6 billion years.

    Evolution -- Bah! Clearly this is scientific proof of unintelligent design...

    --
    -- The Genesis project? What's that?
  49. Venus Orbit Insertion by dsci · · Score: 1

    Looks a lot like a party here on earth.

    --
    Computational Chemistry products and services.
  50. Re:Heh-heh... by Jules+Mercuri · · Score: 1

    Images available at www.goatse.cx.

  51. Awesome pictures... by ursabear · · Score: 1

    I think the pictures are awesome. I've always enjoyed space sciences, and all the neat stuff coming from long-distance probes and satellites is great.

    Kinda puts things in perspective when you see a vortex that appears to be covering half a planet...

  52. Re:Europe or something interesting by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Actually, numerous people have put significant thought into how to terraform venus. Clearly it's not as simple a job as Mars, but it's not necessarily impossible, except with today's technology of course. Also, the more understanding we have of other planets in our system, the more we learn about planets in general, which will assist our understanding of the cosmos, which has repeatedly turned out to be relevant back here at home on Earth.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  53. Re:Heh-heh... by Akaihiryuu · · Score: 1

    The name was changed to Urectum in 2620 because of all of the Uranus jokes...

  54. Has to be green house gases by random+coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It cant possibly be that Venus is 23 million miles closer to the sun. It cant be that Venus is 25% closer to the Sun than the Earth. Has to be the carbon dioxide. After all there can be only one cause for any effect.

  55. Re:Earth days? by aevan · · Score: 1

    !! You just reconciled the creation myth!!

    The Earth is 6,000 years old...just which 'year' wasn't explicity stated...so if we use Xena ...that's 3,360,000 Earth years old...

    oh wait, that still a lil short :'(

  56. One More Mastercard: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cost of not having a sense of humor: looking like a total jackass.

    For the truth in life, there's science; for everything else, there's NeoCons.

    1. Re:One More Mastercard: by SetupWeasel · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I'm a Democrat and a self-proclaimed tree hugger. I also have a degree in Astrophysics. Got one of those?

  57. Re:Has to be green house gases by ScriptedReplay · · Score: 4, Informative
    It cant possibly be that Venus is 23 million miles closer to the sun. It cant be that Venus is 25% closer to the Sun than the Earth. Has to be the carbon dioxide. After all there can be only one cause for any effect.

    Well, let's see ... according to wikipedia, here's a small list:
    • Mercury surface temperature: 90 K (min) 440 K (avg) 700 K (max)
    • Venus surface temperature: 228 K (min, cloud tops) 737 K (avg) 773 K (max)
    • Earth surface temperature: 185 K (min) 287 K (avg) 331 K (max)
    • to make
    • Mars surface temperature: 133 K(min) 210 K (avg) 293 K (max)


    Now, if distance to the Sun is all there is to explain it, someone messed up really bad with our basic knowledge of the Solar System, for Venus is the hottest inner planet and should obviously be the closest to the Sun. No way it could be about twice further from it than Mercury.

    Also, could you please enlighten us how can it be that the temperature difference between night and day on Venus is so small in spite of the rotation period being about 243 Earth days? wouldn't ~4 Earth-months worth of night be enough to cool that side of the planet? after all, Mercury's day is almost 4 timers shorter than Venus' and the max. temperature is close, but the min temperature on Mercury is low enough for high Tc superconductivity.
  58. Any undoctored images? by heroine · · Score: 1

    True all images are doctored, but the ESA tends to go overboard with these split views, perspective views, and computer modelled views without ever showing what the original view looked like.

  59. Re:Has to be green house gases by SETIGuy · · Score: 5, Interesting
    It cant possibly be that Venus is 23 million miles closer to the sun. It cant be that Venus is 25% closer to the Sun than the Earth. Has to be the carbon dioxide. After all there can be only one cause for any effect.

    You've got to be a true red Republican to deny the greenhouse effect on Venus.

    If you do the math, since temperature goes as the 1/4 power of the recieved radiation and the recieved radiation goes as the square of the distance, with all else being equal 25% closer gets you about 15% hotter. In other words without a greenhouse effect venus would be about 45C hotter than earth.

    If you put the Earth at the location of Venus, the oceans wouldn't boil. Not immediately at least. What would happen is that the evaporation rate would increase which would put more water vapor in the air. Since water vapor is a greenhouse gas that would increase the temperature which would evaporate more water. That's an example of positive feedback. Eventually it would get hot enough for the oceans to boil.

    Without the oceans to absorb CO2 and without the life forms in the ocean which take CO2 and turn it into rocks, the CO2 released in volcanos (not to mention the forests catching on fire) stays in the atmosphere where it adds further to the greenhouse effect.

    The CO2 and all the water vapor combine to form carbonic acid which increases the weathering of carbonate rocks releasing still more CO2. Meanwhile UV radiation (sunlight) in the upper atmosphere dissociates the water vapor into oxygen and hydrogen. Because it is light, the hydrogen escapes into space. The oxygen oxidizes any unoxidized materials on the surface. If any of those materials contain accessable carbon, you've just released more CO2 and increased the greenhouse effect.

    Plate tectonics continues on for a while releasing more CO2 until the point where the water bearing minerals that enable plate tectonics on the Earth have disappeared. Plate tectonics stops. At this point you've got... you guessed it... Venus. Not that you'd be caring. You died long before the oceans started boiling.

    This is what would absolutely happen to the Earth if we were to raise its temperature by 45C. What we don't know is where the dividing line is. Maybe it's 25C. Maybe it's 5C. And so we've decided to raise the temperature by 3C in the next 100 years or so.

    The main difference between the Earth and Venus isn't the temperature. It's where the CO2 is. In Venus, it's in the atmosphere. On Earth, it's in the rocks. Pour some vinegar on some limestone if you don't think it can come out again. The oceans are already becoming acidic enough to cause difficulties for some shell building organisms....

  60. Re:We want more Pics! by dotgain · · Score: 1

    Since the planet isn't due to be renamed for another 400 or so years, can we just start burying Uranus joke crackers as an interim measure?

  61. oh my god by diablobsb · · Score: 1

    bring forth the "send a probe to uranus" lame jokes...

    --
    I for one, welcome our new hot grits... PROFIT!
  62. Re:We want more Pics! by mlow82 · · Score: 2, Funny
    I'm still waiting for the Pictures from Uranus!
    Here you go.
  63. Re:Earth days? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well then now I am confused.

    Well then you're a fucken spastic.

  64. Re:well duh or why Venus is Not Like Earth by Locke03 · · Score: 1

    Does this mean that ninjas come from Mars? Do we have an interplanetary war taking place here on Earth? Can I enlist on the Martian Ninja side? Will I get a sword and a ray-gun?

    --
    I don't care what youre doing so much as the idiotic way you're doing it.
  65. Re:Has to be said... by Zen+Punk · · Score: 1

    Everyone but you, apparently.

    --
    Sleep is futile.
  66. Re:I don't like these image taking satellites by spongman · · Score: 1

    now, taking a core sample from orbit, that i'd like to see.

  67. Why no Uranus Probe? by dogbreathcanada · · Score: 1

    Bring on the humour NASA and ESA!

  68. Re:Has to be green house gases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    still learning to read? where did he deny anything?

    so... you must be a blue democrat to falsely accuse someone. that was sarcasm, in case you didtn't get it.

    he said being closer to the sun was another factor. and then you went ahead and proved his point. you said if the earth, as it is now, was moved as close as venus is to the sun, it would turn into venus. so, does that make you a denier too?

    btw, i like how you laid out the process of what would happen if the earth was 25% closer to the sun. it was a nice description, bringing back memories of astronomy class.

  69. Oh My God... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They've got a hole in their ozone layer!

    All their precious bodily fluids are leaking out!

    Quick, get Doc Ruby and the rest of the nutters over there to tell them to turn down their thermostats!

  70. Landing Site? by Whiteox · · Score: 1

    From the article: "Venus Express science team members say they want to know how these vortices remain stable..."

    Hmmm... If they are stable, and if they can get a temperature reading, and it's low enough, they may be able to send a craft to the surface that'll last longer than an hour.

    --
    Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  71. Crash something by packetmill · · Score: 0

    These guy will stay in the dark until they come up with a sensible plan to crash something. No advance in modern science can be achieved without a bang, and you know it.

  72. What's Venus Like... by JamesF1 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Let's think about this for a second... What should Venus be like...

    ~ Not a lot of water.
    ~ Extreme temperatures.
    ~ No sign of intelligent life.

    Does that ring a bell? Oh wait, it's exactly like the rest of the planets in our solar system...

    And we just wasted *how* much money on finding that out?

  73. Re:Heh-heh... by jd_esguerra · · Score: 1

    No, no, silly. We're talking about Venus, not Uranus.

  74. Re:Has to be green house gases by nadaou · · Score: 1

    There you go again trying to argue logic in a forum* within which it is not regarded as a strong defense. Common problem, often frustratingly hard for the logically minded to come to terms with. Understand that perception is more important than logic and reality is as observed in political debate. Of course in its detatched ignorarance the planet will ignore all that, but then you just have to redifine reality again and the pesky problems once again go away.

    * ie head-in-the-sands, not /.

    Solution: ?

    Escalading transport costs help send the message I guess.
    But I'm glad I'm not a Polar Bear..

    --
    ~.~
    I'm a peripheral visionary.
  75. Re:Earth days? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    Sort of. If you define a day as how long it takes a particular star that is NOT the sun to return to the same place in the sky (ie how long it takes the planet to rotate), then Venus's day is 243 Earth days long.

    If you define a day as, say, the time between two sunrises, ie how long it takes the sun to return to the same place in the sky, then Venus' day is (-0.9)-1 = -1.9 days per year according to Fuller's law. -1.9 days/year means that the sun rises in the west. Venus' year is 225 days so it's sunrise to sunrise day is about 118.4 Earth days long.

  76. Re:Has to be green house gases by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    Maybe Venus' 300 mph winds have something to do with pushing the heat around?

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.