The Epic Ebert Videogame Debate
Via Kotaku, a column at Ebert.com going into some depth on the are-games-actually-art debate. Ebert engaged in a public debate on the subject at last week's Conference on World Affairs. From the article: "Going in to the videogame panel, I'd been hoping the audience (mostly students) would be fired up about the subject and challenge the panelists, but they were unfortunately pretty passive. Maybe they were intimidated by the rather formal (for Boulder) theater setting, I don't know. Ebert began by explaining why he felt a game (particularly the shoot-shoot, point-scoring kind) was not an experience equivalent to that of reading a great novel like, say, 'The Great Gatsby,' because games don't delve very deeply into what it means to be human."
For a second there, I thought the article was about a controversial game coming out on a future release of Ubuntu.
If you'd seen some of the headshots I've seen, you'd take that back.
Why am I not rapping? I am rapping with you in a way.
Let's face it, Ebert is epic enough as it is.
Usually 1 extra feat, plus +4 skill points / lvl.
Oh, and Common.
Is there a latin term for "the act of snobbishly dismissing an argument based because it uses a common source and offering an sourceless/uncited counter argument"?