Slashdot Mirror


Porn Industry Trials Burnable DVDs

nukular writes "The LA Times has an article discussing porn giant Vivid following the likes of King Kong in allowing users to download and burn movies to DVD. Unlike in the Hollywood plan, these DVDs will be viewable on other DVD players." From the article: "Despite their obvious differences, adult and mainstream entertainment companies face similar pressures in the Internet age. Both are grappling with how to deliver content securely and reliably to devices in a variety of ways, whether it's prepackaged on DVD for TVs or sent wirelessly to cellphones. Both also want to capitalize on digital delivery methods but can't afford to undercut their retail partners: big-box stores such as Wal-Mart Stores Inc. for the major studios and mom-and-pop video shops for the porn producers. They also fear online piracy, which the music industry partly blames for its lackluster sales."

11 of 250 comments (clear)

  1. Wait..... by Mayhem178 · · Score: 5, Funny

    * stops burning porn DVDs long enough to read /. *

    Hey, wait...we're allowed to do this now? Sweet!

    * resumes burning porn DVDs *

    --

    "You will pay for your lack of vision..." - Emperor Palpatine to Ray Charles

    1. Re:Wait..... by IAmTheDave · · Score: 5, Funny
      * stops burning porn DVDs long enough to read /. * Hey, wait...we're allowed to do this now? Sweet!

      Yes, but you see, this is like, one high quality movie per DVD. The burning that you (*cough* and I *cough*) currently engage in involves some 1500 3.2mb 100 px x 100px RealMedia or Divx files, all painstakingly categorized by number of women, boob size, and point of penetration.

      Right? I mean, everyone does that, right?

      --
      Excuse my speling.
      Making The Bar Project
    2. Re:Wait..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Excuse me? No we don't all do that.

      Some of us categorize by hair color, shaved or not, and by facial/anal. I'm a romantic at heart.

    3. Re:Wait..... by geminidomino · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There are seriously not enough porn chicks with glasses.

  2. Slashdot is too sinner-centric... by marcello_dl · · Score: 5, Funny

    In Catholic Italy, pr0n burns YOU! :)

    --
    ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
  3. "Trials" is a noun (are a noun, if you're British) by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Verbing nouns weirds language.

  4. Re:TGP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, that's it. You have this friend, yeah and he has this porn collection ...

  5. Phone Porn!?! by RingDev · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Both are grappling with how to deliver content securely and reliably to devices in a variety of ways, whether it's prepackaged on DVD for TVs or sent wirelessly to cellphones"

    Wow, that would explain my co-workers extended bathroom breaks with his new Verizon 3g phone.

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  6. Cinemanow is Vivids Distributor by microbrewer · · Score: 5, Informative

    Cinemanow owns and operates All Adult Entertainment the distributor of Vivid's Videos so Hollywood is already onto this and owns the technology to distribute burnable movies .They are using porn as their sacrificial lamb to see if the content ends up on Usenet or P2P networks in the next 3 months .

    Cinemanow is a subsidiary of Sony Entertainment .

  7. Vivid is the Microsoft of porn. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's great that someone's doing this-- too bad it's Vivid, and not a company whose movies are actually worth burning to a DVD.

    Yes, Vivid girls are gorgeous. The problem is, the Vivid's movies are terrible anymore. They have about as much replay value as Pitfall on the Atari 2600. Vivid relies on star power to move the product, and they don't worry about the video being awful.

    They burned me so many times in the late 90's, that I no longer purchase their stuff no matter how much I like a given star. And they are still maintaining the low level of quality that drove me away-- I've downloaded quite a few of their recent movies via BT, and spent about 5 minutes skipping through each in search of a scene with some perceptible passion and/or heat-- there's just none to be found. They've all gotten promptly dropped into the Recycle Bin.

    1. Re:Vivid is the Microsoft of porn. by JeremyALogan · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I work at a porn shop and we have a huge wall of Vivid videos (literally a few hundred). You know what? No one ever rents them. They get rifeled through regurlarly, but no one want them. To back up what you were saying, we have shelf after shelf of "star" videos by them and the vast majority of them have never been rented... not even once. To quote the "Who is Paul Thomas and why don't we like him?" question from the RAME FAQ:
      Paul Thomas (also known informally as PT), a big star in 70's porno and the main director of 90's adult video powerhouse Vivid, has often been a target for derision in this group for his efforts. The accusation is that his films are pretentious and unexciting, and that more frequently than not he appears to forget he's shooting a porn flick and not some cheesy daytime soap.
      So yeah, I'm with you. I'd rather see some people with more talent an clout do this first.