Slashdot Mirror


McNealy Steps Down as Sun Microsystems CEO

SlashdotOgre writes "Mercury News reports that Scott McNealy, CEO of Sun Microsystems, will be stepping down from his role as CEO. McNealy will continue as chairman, and fellow co-founder Jonathan Schwartz will now take the helm."

29 of 325 comments (clear)

  1. Rumors from a few days ago were true by kbahey · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am surprised the editors did not link to this rumor that McNealy is stepping down from a few days ago on Slashdot.

    Funny McNealy dismissed this as a 22 year old rumor only a few days ago.

  2. That's odd... by Otter · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Schwartz is a PR genius, and the way he continuously trolls the Linux journalist/zealot community for attention is masterful. But that seems like a strange fit for the CEO position.

    At any rate, this should prompt the 30-something crowd here and elsewhere to reflect on just what the hell they've been doing with thir careers while this guy becomes the CEO of Sun...

    1. Re:That's odd... by kfg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      At any rate, this should prompt the 30-something crowd here and elsewhere to reflect on just what the hell they've been doing with thir careers while this guy becomes the CEO of Sun...

      In the words of the great Tom Lehrer:

      "It's a sobering thought that when Mozart was my age. . .he'd been dead for three years."

      KFG

    2. Re:That's odd... by rco3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Excellent point. Let's see, what have I been doing with the last 18 years of my life... Ooh! Ooh! I've been NOT becoming a suit! I don't have to fucking TOUCH business or management! I can sit back and do engineering and research without having to do any of the bullshit that McNealy and Schwartz have to do.

      Do they make more money? Yes. Do I care? Amazingly enough, not so much. Right now I have a roof over my head, food on the table, health insurance, decent transportation, daycare for the munchkin - and approximately 50% of my income is currently in the "disposable" column - meaning unallocated and available for new cars, nicer houses, fantastic stereo systems, huge monitors, etc. Next year, when I go full time, it gets better.

      So thanks for pointing out what a difference there is between my position and Schwartz's. He does stuff I don't want to do, and gets paid more than he needs for doing it. I do what I love, and get paid more than I need for doing it. Sounds like I chose the right path. That was your point, right?

      --

      Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
    3. Re:That's odd... by Tyr_7BE · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Before you take such a smug tone, consider that the "suits" are the ones dictating what engineering and research you'll be doing. It's a matter of where you want to fit in. Do you want to be at the helm, leading the company, or do you want to back the visionary at the helm in the form of taking orders?

    4. Re:That's odd... by Homestar+Breadmaker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, his point was trolling to drag out the insecure people who feel the need to puff up their feathers and show everyone how big they are.

    5. Re:That's odd... by jcr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Schwartz is a PR genius

      If he were a "PR genius", he'd be attracting positive attention.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    6. Re:That's odd... by Frogbert · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know you didn't ask for my advice but I'll give it anyway. Don't bother going full time, you can't put a price on free time. Especially if you have kids.

  3. Re:Rumors from a few days ago were true by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Funny McNealy dismissed this as a 22 year old rumor only a few days ago.

    Well it was a 22 year old rumor a few days ago...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  4. Massive layoff forthcoming by winkydink · · Score: 4, Insightful

    McNealy was resistant to a massive layoffs (25-35%), which analysts say are the only way to revamp Sun at this point.

    More importantly, revamp as what? Big iron only?

    I dunno

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:Massive layoff forthcoming by jadavis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's sad that Sun is looking at so much financial trouble right now (assuming they actually are, and it might not actually be that bad). Solaris 10 is really quite amazing software, and their chip designs look very promising. I think it would take Linux/FreeBSD a long time to catch up to some of the things in Solaris 10 like ZFS and DTrace.

      I'm really pretty new to Solaris, however as soon as I started using it I could tell that they did real research on the kernel. I was very impressed after using Linux/FreeBSD for a long time. I can't think of any other companies actually doing that kind of research still. IBM does a lot of Linux development, but I sometimes get the feeling it's more to just make Linux into an AIX replacement (not that I know much about AIX).

      --
      Social scientists are inspired by theories; scientists are humbled by facts.
    2. Re:Massive layoff forthcoming by Kadin2048 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Unless, of course, they fire the wrong people.

      I've worked for a few big companies, and I can tell you with certainty that at any given time, AT LEAST 10% of the people working there were dead weight and could be eliminated.

      But that's like saying, 3% of people in society are criminals. Okay, fine; but knowing that doesn't make picking the right ones any easier. You can't just decide to go out on Tuesday and round them all up.

      You can spend the rest of your life (and a whole lot of people have) trying to find ways of figuring out which 10% or whatever are the unproductive ones. Occasionally, it's obvious. But more often, it's quite subtle; someone who looks unproductive on the surface might be just the person you need occasionally -- like some of the old-guard guys in my office: they don't do much but sit around and eat donuts 90% of the time, but when you need a piece of information, you know where to go to. And in that other 10% of the time, they make well up for their donut-munching. Likewise, there are interns and brand new hires who slave away constantly from 7:30AM to 6:30PM in some cases, but what they're working on is often not the most useful stuff around. (Of course, they're cheap, so they stay hired regardless.)

      Firing people is like playing a game of russian roulette, but instead of just playing for your own brains, you're playing for a whole lot of people's jobs, futures, careers, and fortunes. I'd much rather keep around a few extra people than pull the trigger on someone that turns out, in some subtle and unforseen way, to be crucial to daily operations. Human social networks are a complex thing, and that's what you're really dealing with in "management." (Of course, only a few percentage of managers--usually the best ones in my experience--realize this.)

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    3. Re:Massive layoff forthcoming by wwwillem · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If analists know so well how to run a company, how come they are still analists and not CEO of either a startup or a mature company? So, better take their words with a a grain of salt.

      --
      Browsers shouldn't have a back button!! It's all about going forward...
  5. Re:Fellow co-founder by fm6 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    If you want to get technical, neither is McNealy. He was one of the first people recruited by Khosla and Bechtolsheim, but he had nothing to do with the initial creation of the company.

    Schwartz actually did found a company: Lighthouse Design, a NextStep application developer that Sun bought out in 1996, and turned into the core of their Java Applications Group, which was supposed to develop applications for those Java-based network computers that were going to put Microsoft out of business.

    What's always bugged me is that McNealy spent a ton of money to acquire LD and the other companies that got folded into JAG — all of which was wasted, because it soon became obvious that nobody was going to buy network computers, and there was no reason to keep JAG going. JAG wasn't the first, and it wasn't the last ill-conceived attempt by Sun to win the desktop war with Microsoft, and McNealy has never been called to account for all the money he wasted on that war — a war that already a conspicuous victory for Microsoft long before Sun even got involved.

    Instead, McNealy is being forced out for failing to sell high-end computers at a time when nobody's buying them. Wall Street is stupid.

  6. Re:Future of Java without Sun? by hrvatska · · Score: 5, Insightful
    How would Java evolve without Sun to "guide" it. What would Sun certifications mean without Sun there to back it up?

    IBM and a passel of other organizations who have based their application strategies on Java would put together an open source consortium that would support and guide Java. Something along the lines of the Eclipse or Apache foundations.

  7. Re:Future of Java without Sun? by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hell, if M$ bought Java from SUN, we'd probably end up with better APIs.
    I doubt it. Microsoft has had a couple of bold attempts to kill java, why would it better it?
    It shipped JVM 1.1 with extensions, so that it really wasn't a compliant JVM. That left sun with the choice of either 1) accepting the changes, and having it controlled by MS, or 2) fighting them, leaving the Windows platform with an older JVM, and Bill G a "look we tried but Sun is so unreasonable" mood. They chose #2. Sucks for the people who are still saddled with a 1.1 JVM, most people wouldn't know to upgrade, and think that any suckitude is due to Java, not MS's hacking of it. I for one am saddled with not one but two apps that require JVM 1.1 and are they ever slow.

    Even that wasn't enough, MS created C# as a Java killer. Think of it as Java as if the initial version was 1.4, already had learned the failures of the previous editions. They were able to learn from Sun's early mistakes. And you can also bust out of the VM when you want to, to tie you to Windows more tightly.

    MS wants to destroy anything that it feels can destroy Windows. ANything that can be a platform that doesn't force you to use Windows is a threat. If it were possible to "buy" Java (and i'm not sure of the status of the JCP) they'd tightly tie it to windows, and make things not quite work right elsewhere.

    And the M$ thing is old. Microsoft is a for-profit corporation. It is not the only for-profit company. Unless you feel the need to add $ to every company (do i hear $un anyone, Ci$co? $u$e?) it seems kind of pointless. Yes they have been convicted in a court of law for dirty tricks, but they are not the only one. There may be more use in targetting companies that actively kill people or foster repressive regimes ($hell Oil?)

  8. Re:Future of Java without Sun? by Decaff · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Java from SUN, who have failed Java like only SUN could.

    I don't know what planet you are on, but on mine Java is one of the most successful and widely used development languages of all time. If that is 'failing', I would be interested in your definition of 'succeeding'.

  9. Re:What does Sun need to do to succeed? by Decaff · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Despite all that, the company has really screwed up. I don't think they did a good job advocating Java or buying the mindshare of the development community.

    Eh? Have you any idea of the size of the Java development community?

  10. Re:What does Sun need to do to succeed? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Most sys admins would still rather use Linux and all the cool toys it comes with compared to Solaris.

    Java started out as a loss leader for solaris, which is why I can compile python up on NetBSD, but not java.

    Now that their OS business is a lost cause sun should release the java sources under a license which lets people port it to different platforms. The user base will increase and they may be able to compete with C#

  11. Executives and Engineers by kbahey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    he was an amazing businessman (he told stories about his job before Sun... at a dog food company) but simply had no connection to the tech.

    Some of the lousiest managers and executives are techies. This is not to say that every techie is lousy manager/executive, but rather that it does not go automatically that a good engineer would be a good manager.

    Some of the best executives for tech companies were non techies. Look at who turned around IBM from another dinosaur to be to what it is today: a tech capable respected company that is kinder and gentler: Lou Gerstner came from non other than Nabisco...

  12. Re:Future of Java without Sun? by Decaff · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No! That would kill Java.

    Not necessarily. What matters is that distributions pass the compatibility tests. There is nothing to stop open source versions passing these tests.

  13. Re:Fellow co-founder by MOBE2001 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Co-founder or not, my advice to Schwartz is the following. Don't try to beat either Linux or Microsoft at their games. You will lose. I suggest instead that you do something that will take the rest of the industry completely by surprise. Invest your remaining resources into the next big thing, the one thing that will solve the biggest problem in the computer industry: unreliability. Put all your money in non-algorithmic, signal-based, synchronous software. It will revolutionize both the hardware and the software industry and usher in the biggest change in computing since the days of Charles Babbage and Lady Lovelace. Don't say you weren't warned. ahahaha...

    Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:

  14. Disappointed... by loony · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Am I the only one disappointed in Jonathan Schwartz? I met him a few times and while he seemed very knowledgeable and charismatic, he lacked quite a bit in mental flexibility. I doubt it was my comments on the panels I was on, but he pretty much laughed in my face when I made certain comments - and now, two years later the software at sun is treated pretty much in exactly the way I talked about. Now, its Sun's money and whatever - but that (and a few similar incidents with him) left a bad taste in my mouth. He does a good job at hiding it, but he's incredibly arrogant and suffers under the not-invented-here issue that already brought down many companies of substantial size - think Digital.

    Sorry to say that - but Sun needs someone who is more open and listens better than Schwartz. He's a good leader, but he certainly lacks in vision and new, revolutionary ideas.

    Peter.

  15. Re:Future of Java without Sun? by javacowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How did we go from McNealy leaving Sun to Sun going out of business and Java being "abandoned". Do I sense wishful thinking on your part? And you get moded "insightful"?

    How did you infer that Sun was going out of business? They're not consistently profitable, but they're not bleeding red ink either. The company also has healthy cash reserves.

    As for Java, the spec is wide open for anybody to implement, which the Apache Harmony project is in the process of doing. Sun may head the JCP, but other companies like IBM, Oracle, and BAE would pick up the slack, as they have too much invested in Java to abandon it.

    --
    This space left intentionally blank.
  16. Re:Sun Needs a Free Desktop Revolution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Ah, yes. You've shared your expertise on the whole Sun issue before. Didn't go well then, either.

  17. Re:What does Sun need to do to succeed? by killjoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Do you know why people are writing AJAX applications? It's because Sun failed the promise of java. Do you know why there are so few java gui apps? Because Sun failed java. Do you know why Ruby on Rails exist? Because Sun failed Java.

    Java was all full of promise. Cross platform, run from the browser, free yourself from the drudgery of writing stateless apps using http and and that abortion known as javascript, no more learning 15 different gui toolkits, etc.

    Sun failed misreably in fulfilling the promise of java. They took forever to get swing to perform at 70% of native applications, they still don't have VM sharing, java web start is still the ugliest and worst behaving application ever put out by a fortune 500 company.

    So yes there are a billion java programmers all writing web apps but it's become a ghetto. Java was destined for bigger things.

    --
    evil is as evil does
  18. Re:how to make money by Vengeful+weenie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Absolutly. It should also be understood that what made PCs (of any kind) a break away success was the ability to avoid the IT guys always telling you what you need, and never giving you what you want. Until and unless a thin client give application flexibility to the organization as a whole instead of just handing power back to the IT shops, it ain't gonna happen.

  19. Re:What does Sun need to do to succeed? by MemoryDragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually Java is one of Suns biggest successes, if it wasnt for java they probably would have gone the way of SGI. Face it Java is one of the most successful languages currently in existence and has replaced Cobol and C++ in the Enterprise application area. If you are just a guy who runs a few BSD boxen at home or small companies you never get the picture on how much impact java has had in the enterprise area.

  20. Re:Day Late and a few Billion Dollars Short by Alioth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If Apple is also a failure and being beat upon by Gates like a rented mule...then give me some of that failure! It must be wonderful to be beat like a mule and to be an utter failure, after all, your stock price quadruples over the period of a couple of years. I think more of us can do with failure like that!