Slashdot Mirror


ESRB Changes Oblivion's Rating to 'Mature'

kukyfrope writes "Perhaps reacting based on the debacle that was the 'Hot Coffee' scandal, the ESRB today changed the rating on The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion from Teen to Mature. From the article: 'The content causing the ESRB to change the rating involves more detailed depictions of blood and gore than were considered in the original rating, as well as the presence of a locked-out art file or 'skin' that, if accessed through a third party modification to the PC version of the game, allows the user to play with topless versions of female characters,' said the ESRB in a release."

72 of 282 comments (clear)

  1. So this out yet? by ZiakII · · Score: 5, Funny

    if accessed through a third party modification to the PC version of the game, allows the user to play with topless versions of female characters,' said the ESRB in a release.

    So is this out yet?.....

    1. Re:So this out yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      allows the user to play with topless versions of female characters

      The change in rating is to prevent younger players getting scared by all those women with their heads missing.

    2. Re:So this out yet? by Kjella · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, I tried it a while back... so there's some pixelated tits, but they do absolutely nothing. There's no way to use them in any erotic context. It was about as arousing as an article about breast cancer with illustrations. With the game mostly in 1st person or from behind in 3rd person, you barely see them. If this is "Mature", then the nude skins + kissing in the Sims should make it rated XXX.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:So this out yet? by x_codingmonkey_x · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes right here. I'm using it right now and I just find it makes the game more realistic. When I remove someones shirt they should not have some stupid leather bra under as I believe in the past no one ever used bras. Anyways, enjoy.

    4. Re:So this out yet? by beoswulf · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Half the population has..."? It seems American education is sorely lacking to the point you are unaware that we men have nipples too! And with half of males overweight the boobed population of adults increases to at least 70% after taking into account flat chested women.

    5. Re:So this out yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      In other news, the Disney Magazine is no longer to be sold to minors in stores, due to new information showing that it's possible to buy a copy of Hustler, cut out all the tits, and glue them on to Mickey's face.

    6. Re:So this out yet? by noidentity · · Score: 2, Funny

      Here is what they look like:

      Warning: NOT SAFE FOR WORK

      . .

      You have been tainted for life!

  2. mmmm by GmAz · · Score: 3, Funny

    MMMMMMM...polygon'd boobies!!!

    --
    Click Click Bloody Click PANCAKES!
    1. Re:mmmm by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Funny

      MMMMMMM...polygon'd boobies!!!

      One may laugh, but...

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  3. When I was your age by Burlap · · Score: 5, Funny

    virtual boobs only had 5 polygons and we had to walk to school up hill, both ways!

    1. Re:When I was your age by MarkTina · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Pixels!" LUXURY! When I was a kid the boobies were made up of ASCII characters! Any my dad would beat us to death, bury us in the garden under 10 feet of ice and not even tell us the boobies existed till spring!

    2. Re:When I was your age by Pneuma+ROCKS · · Score: 2, Funny

      ASCII? In my day we had to see the boobies in binary! We had to bang our heads against the screen to make them jiggle, and we liked it!

      --
      Favorite quote: "
  4. Any game? by Eudial · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Uh, you could technically mod any PC game into toplessness. Therefore all PC games should be Mature? Do I smell a console conspiracy?

    --
    GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
    1. Re:Any game? by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 5, Funny

      Let's crack Microsoft Word to make Clippy flash us on command. We can finally bring those fuckers down!

    2. Re:Any game? by esper · · Score: 2, Informative

      You could technically mod nudity into any PC game, yes, but, in this case, the original topless female mesh was already present in the game as distributed, it was simply not usable until a mod enabled it (by pulling the resource out of an archive and placing it into a separate file, overriding the normal female upper body mesh).

    3. Re:Any game? by Babbster · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The source of the data is the critical point. While the ESRB can't base their ratings on third-party content, they have every right to rate the content that actually ships on the disc. So, for a slightly more off-the-wall example, if a T-rated game shipped with a password-protected archive of Playboy photo shoots on the disc - completely unaccessible from, and unrelated to, the game itself - the ESRB would still jack the rating up because the material is being shipped.

      I personally don't think bare breasts are that big of a deal (though they can be a lot of fun in RL), but the ESRB isn't there to either protect me (age 34) or to represent me (childless). They exist to keep f***ing legislatures out of the gaming business, and they've succeeded to a large extent. Since they know that politicians and many parents would care a lot about bare breasts, they've got to rate games accordingly.

      In other words, I think some people here need to learn to love the ESRB...and the bomb...

    4. Re:Any game? by x_codingmonkey_x · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Uh, you could technically mod any PC game into toplessness. Therefore all PC games should be Mature? Do I smell a console conspiracy?

      Personally I don't really see what the big deal with toplessness and/or nudity is. It's a nudity is a perfectly nature aspect of human life. Now, going around and hacking people and seeing peoples heads impaled on sticks, isn't.

      I'm pretty shocked to hear the Oblivion was rated Teen (13+) before, and now that there is a way to show breasts it all the sudden becomes Mature (17+)? After playing Oblivion for a while and especially going into some of the Oblivion gates I have no idea why this was rated for 13+ in the first place?

      Is it better that people see rotting corpses with their ribs hanging out, go around smashing people with a giant hammer and so forth, or that they, god forbid, see a pair of breasts. People need to realize witnessing violence and committing it in a game is more for mature people than seeing nudity.

    5. Re:Any game? by Emetophobe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was thinking the same thing. It's absolutely ridiculous to change the game rating because some player decides to make a modification that contains "mature" content. Why should the game maker have to suffer because someone writes an unsupported mod? (See GTA: San Andreas). Should game companies be forced to now prevent users from modifying the game to protect themselves from rating changes, etc..

      I wonder if Oblivion will lose sales due to this (stores that don't stock Mature games, does Walmart still do this?). Or maybe Oblivion will gain sales from the all the free publicity of the ratings being changed. I think there's already enough hype and buzz behind it (the original game), sales will probably just increase.

  5. so all mod content... by gerbalblaste · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If i make a mod for Oblivion allowing the player to engage in sexual intercourse would that mean the ESRB would have to rank Oblivion AO?

    Basing the rating of a game upon the available third party content seems very stupid to me. I'm sure i'm in the majority of slashdotter who think that changing the rating of a game because of mods is stupid.

    this does not bode well for the future of video game ratings.

    1. Re:so all mod content... by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Informative

      Did you even read the entire summary?

      The "art file or 'skin'" was already present in the game, locked out or otherwise.

      The third party tool gave you access to what was already there... exactly like GTA & their hot coffee disaster.

      What the ESRB is trying to tell game makers is that they need to stop including postentially sexual content on the game discs, even if it's "locked out".

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:so all mod content... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What if I make a third party mod that "unlocks" the "hidden" nudity that comes when you layer thousands of images on top of each other, and for each pixel position selects 1 of the thousands of images to show though. It'd be simple to take pre-existing algorithms and get xxx pictures outta that.

      Now, my mod is simply taking stuff that's already on the disc and displaying it. It's just doing so in a way that the developers didn't intend. 18+ rating for everything!

      There's got to be a line drawn, and it should be drawn by saying that if you can access the content without the use of third party tools/mods/whatever, then it should count for the rating. If you have to hack the system in order to modify the game in order to gain access to content, then it shouldn't count against the rating. Once you allow content unlocked by a third-party modification to the game to count for ratings purposes, you've started down a slippery slope.

    3. Re:so all mod content... by ssj-xordyh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What about DVDs with bonus features and deleted scenes that may contain nudity or gore that would have gotten the theatrical release a more severe rating if they had been in the original film? They still rate the DVD release according to the original MPAA rating, and simply include a disclaimer that says something like, "bonus material not rated." If the core game install, without modifications or hacks added does not contain that content or it is not accessible, it should not be held against the game during the rating. Pretty soon we'll have games being delayed for months to remove all the extraneous bits that aren't necessary for the final build, but tend to lead to cool hacks later on. How much additional enjoyment have people gotten from the unused, hidden levels in games like GTA, Vice City, San Andreas, and Liberty City, to name a few? When does it stop?

  6. Nudity is fine by foundme · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's the marriage with an Orc that summons a Mature rating.

    --
    Please stop entering code 2,2,7,6,6,4
    1. Re:Nudity is fine by I+Like+Pudding · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why? I know plenty of women married to Orcs.

  7. Finally. by Cheapy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I love the game, but there is no way it should ever have been Teen. The necromancer and vampire lairs can be very graphic (If you've seen Memorial Cave, you know what I'm talking about.), way too graphic for a little kid. Decomposing bodies with a noose around their neck hanging from the ceiling? And a 'kicked out' chair underneath them? More decomposed bodies stuck to the wall with spears (Incidently, the only spears in the game, other than the skulls.)

    Way too graphic.

    Now if you'll excuse me, I'll go buy one of the last 'T'-labeled games, and sell it for a profit later on.

    --
    Would you kindly mod me +1 insightful?
    1. Re:Finally. by Tom · · Score: 5, Insightful

      way too graphic for a little kid. Decomposing bodies with a noose around their neck hanging from the ceiling?

      Oh, there's nothing wrong with decomposing bodies, according to the ESRB. But look, one of them has the tits hanging out. And you can almost see the nipple! OMG! Think of the chiiildren!

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    2. Re:Finally. by Azarael · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There are certainly some aspects of the game that aren't suitable for younger audiences, which is the case with a lot of games. What really bothers me is that it wasn't any of the violence that prompted the rating, but something stupid like this. No wonder people don't have much faith in the ratings system.

    3. Re:Finally. by Cutriss · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Please resolve these conflicting statements:

      I love the game, but there is no way it should ever have been Teen.

      The necromancer and vampire lairs can be very graphic (If you've seen Memorial Cave, you know what I'm talking about.), way too graphic for a little kid.

      --
      "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
    4. Re:Finally. by chrisbtoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      FTFS: The content causing the ESRB to change the rating involves more detailed depictions of blood and gore than were considered in the original rating[...]

      You think that was just a cover-up (no pun intended)?

      --
      Registering accounts later than some other chrisb since 1997
  8. Unfair distinctions by Vallimar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why is the ESRB now adjusting a games rating based on post-release modifications? Have you seen what topless Oblivion is like? You have to be pretty desperate to get off on those lumpy misshapen breasts.

    And, since they have started this crusade, why hasn't the Sims 2 been pulled and modded Adults Only yet? That has far more explicit mods and in-your-face sexuality. Hell, the only way to get ahead in that game is to have sex, and that only gets a Teen rating still?

    If the ESRB is going to keep pulling this, all game makers should just slap Adults Only labels on their games and let the parents figure out which ones are safe for their kids, like they are supposed to be doing in the first place.

    1. Re:Unfair distinctions by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, it's interesting isn't it? More interesting is that The Sims 2 has nude bodies in it, they're just pixellated, and you can turn it off with a third-party mod...which is the exact same reason Oblivion is now being marked "M."

      The ESRB is officially punishing game companies for what users do to the game. "Hot Coffee" was never normally accessible in GTA; therefore, they can't be rated for it because a user has to specifically unlock it themselves. The same with this, and it's even more silly because the only reason the nude textures are included is because Bethesda needs a nude body texture to display clothes on top of. It was just for their clothing system, for crying out loud, not some malicious erotic intent. I guess if there weren't any nipples, the ESRB wouldn't care?

      Fucking idiots.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
  9. I think the problem is... by Al+Oser · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From the article..."as well as the presence of a locked-out art file or 'skin' that, if accessed through a third party modification to the PC version of the game, allows the user to play with topless versions of female characters"

    I think the problem is that the content in question is actually included in the game itself, though locked out. I'm not exactly sure what the developers were thinking, including those skins. After the whole Hot Coffee fiasco, you think they'd have learned.

  10. Breasts! OMG! by Tom · · Score: 5, Funny

    Because, you know, you can't possibly confront young people with images of something they've sucked on 10 years ago.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  11. Check out the nude patch in action! by Durrill · · Score: 4, Informative

    I saw a video of this nude patch a few months ago, check it out here.

    --
    If i wanted to hear bullshit, i'd go to church.
  12. 3rd party modification? by hunterx11 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I have been told by reliable sources that the ESRB rating board in fact contains nudity, and that it can be unlocked simply by undressing the board members. I must therefore recommend that this story be rated M, and that /. prevent minors from reading it.

    --
    English is easier said than done.
  13. False claims by Ralph+Yarro · · Score: 5, Funny

    the PC version will carry an additional content descriptor for Nudity

    If the nudity isn't available in the basic game but needs a third party hack, isn't it false advertising to claim "nudity" on the box? I'd expect a refund if I bought this and found no nudity included.

    --

    The real Ralph Yarro posts as Anonymous Coward. Anyone else is an impostor.
    1. Re:False claims by Wylfing · · Score: 5, Insightful
      If the nudity isn't available in the basic game but needs a third party hack, isn't it false advertising to claim "nudity" on the box? I'd expect a refund if I bought this and found no nudity included.

      You just don't understand the new thinking, is all. See, we need to be "protected" not simply against what things are but also against what things can be made to do. And, frankly, it is the fault of godless monsters like Bethesda for putting tools into people's hands that are capable of creating nude images, and they should be labeled as the pornmongers they are.

      Seriously, it won't be long until game makers lock down code so that modding is impossible. There will never be another Counter-Strike for fear that someone will make a whorehouse map.

      --
      Our intelligent designer has never created an animal that we couldn't improve by strapping a bomb to it.
  14. Game Physics by Brent+Spiner · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I bet it has less to do with blood and more to do with game physics. In Morrowind if you attacked something it pretty much just bled and died, there didn't seem to be much of a problem with that. Now when you kill something and wack it's body with your +2 club of Enfeebling it will flail about in a most humorous manner.

    So in other words the stationary boobies aren't the problem, it's the jiggly ones.

    --
    Reality test... am I dreaming?
  15. Great idea... by Thad+Boyd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Because the best way to demonstrate the strength of your ratings system is to REPEATEDLY CHANGE RATINGS AFTER ASSIGNING THEM.

    1. Re:Great idea... by orkysoft · · Score: 2, Funny

      I read that the ESRB rates games by watching game footage, not by actually playing it. That does explain why they never found out about the secret nude Mc. PacMan level... ;-)

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
  16. It's OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    As long as it's one Orc.

    Polyorcamy would warrant mature in this political climate.

  17. Re:The difference between this and The Sims 2 is.. by edwdig · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's not quite how it works. I haven't played the game, but this is what I've gathered from reading the author of the mod's comments.

    Most games handle clothing by making it directly part of the character model. Oblivion models character bodies and clothing seperately. Although this approach increases the complexity of the graphics, it allows more reuse of art assests. With this approach, you can mix and match body types and clothing without having to redo the artwork for the different combos. This patch simply removes the clothing layer.

    Also, according to the mod author's comments, the topless women don't quite look right. The models were designed to look right wearing clothing, not bare.

  18. Hot Mead? by shoptroll · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anyone up for labeling this scandal "Hot Mead"?

    --
    Insert Sig Here
    1. Re:Hot Mead? by LarsWestergren · · Score: 2, Funny

      Anyone up for labeling this scandal "Hot Mead"?

      Hot skooma! Just to confuse those who haven't played the game.

      --

      Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

  19. Screw that, Minesweeper Boobies!!! by winmine · · Score: 3, Funny

    Oh noes! Quick ESRB, slap minesweeper with an M rating!

  20. This sick filth must stop! by Channard · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why, only yesterday I was sickened to find that by cutting out and supergluing the centrefolds from 'Playboy' onto my television, I was able to turn the supposedly child-friendly film 'Bambi' into a cornucopia of filth. I have written to the head of Disney to complain and will be protesting outside my local Best Buy to demand this sick spectacle be taken off store shelves.

  21. The Lusty Argonian Maid by Vo0k · · Score: 3, Informative

    A book, present both in Oblivion and in Morrowind. Contents follow:

    The Lusty Argonian Maid

    by Crassius Curio

    Act IV, Scene III, continued

    Lifts-Her-Tail: Certainly not, kind sir! I am here but to clean your chambers.

    Crantius Colto: Is that all you have come here for, little one? My chambers?

    Lifts-Her-Tail: I have no idea what it is you imply, master. I am but a poor Argonian maid.

    Crantius Colto: So you are, my dumpling. And a good one at that. Such strong legs and shapely tail.

    Lifts-Her-Tail: You embarrass me, sir!

    Crantius Colto: Fear not. You are safe here with me.

    Lifts-Her-Tail: I must finish my cleaning, sir. The mistress will have my head if I do not!

    Crantius Colto: Cleaning, eh? I have something for you. Here, polish my spear.

    Lifts-Her-Tail: But it is huge! It could take me all night!

    Crantius Colto: Plenty of time, my sweet. Plenty of time.

    END OF ACT IV, SCENE III

    ---
    (and make friends to the alchemist in Skingrad, she'll ask you an interesting question...)

    --
    Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
  22. Re:The difference between this and The Sims 2 is.. by LiquidAvatar · · Score: 3, Informative
    My understanding of it was that they accomplished it by replacing the default female torso texture with some other undressed torso texture that was supposedly hidden. Seeing as how they admit that the nipples don't look quite right, is there any chance that they simply replaced the femal torso textures with the male torso textures? Not too many games have males that wear bras, so it would cause nipples to be displayed. And, if the wrong texture was being applied to the model, that could explain the mishapen nipples that have been mentioned.

    If this is the case, it brings up all sorts of interesting questions about the nature of nudity, since the texture, on one model, is perfectly acceptable but the same texture, on a different model, is obscene.

    --
    It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere.
    -Voltaire
  23. Woohoo! by idonthack · · Score: 2, Funny
    That said, some times we are so fucking uptight that if you shoved a lump a coal up the average American's ass, in two weeks you would have a diamond.
    I'm rich!!!
    --
    Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
  24. Europeans watch with mouths agape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The problem that Americans have with nudity is pretty much incomprehensible to Europeans. We laugh when we hear about it, but actually it's pretty sad.

    The greatest nation on Earth is also one of the most primitive and most inhibited cultures in existence. And as it's a core inhibition within the religious fundamentalism of the government, the cultural barbarianism gets institutionalized, and isn't going away.

    Things like this remain around until the current generation of standard bearers die off. The inevitable conclusion is that if you're American but "enlightened" (you know what I mean, and if you don't then don't worry your little head) then you'd better spend part of your year across the pond, even if it's just for the yearly holiday.

    Very sad.

    1. Re:Europeans watch with mouths agape by beoswulf · · Score: 3, Funny

      Please, Your Majesty, I know that I, like many other Americans, have behaved like a total buffoon. But we Americans are England's children. I know we don't call as often as we should and we aren't as well- behaved as our goody two-shoes brother, Canada -- who, by the way, has never had a girlfriend -- I'm just sayin'! But, please, find it in your jewel-encrusted heart to forgive me. And on another note, in 30 years when European women are forced to cover from head to toe those glimpses of an American hottie's calves and ankles are going to look pretty sweet!

    2. Re:Europeans watch with mouths agape by Floydius · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Have you ever been to America? Or read a /. response? Surely you're aware that the porn industry is not lacking for customers.

      No, the U.S. does not have a problem with nudity, though I think we would be better off if more of our population did. (I assume you mean public or publicized nudity, since I've never heard of anyone who had a problem with nudity in and of itself.)

      As far as religious fundamentalism goes, examine the book of Genesis. In the early chapters Adam & Eve started out nude, and would have remained that way had they not taken the steps that compelled them to leave the garden.

      Seriously, though, inhibitions are not always bad. It is certainly unfair to say that inhibitions are a symptom of a barbaric culture. If you really examine your history, you will observe that cultures become more barbaric as they do away with their inhibitions. (Rome, for example.)

      Inhibitions keep us from doing things that would otherwise get us killed, like jumping off of a building without a parachute just because the ride down will be fun. Even if you believe there is no spoon, gravity will get you if you try that little experiment. Besides the health risk of constantly exposing your privates to the elements, vulnerability to disease, etc., there are social ramifications if we normalize and accept public nudity. (That holds true for Europeans, too.) I have lived in Europe (Greece), and while there is certainly more nudity at the beaches (not to mention proudly displayed postcards and magazines), I do not know many Greek women who would be happy to walk down the street au natural.

      The trend is certainly to view the human body as less special, and less private. However, (though it be from my unenlightened, barbaric viewpoint) I think this is not a change for the good. If the media be representative of the entire population, then any attempt at regulating morals is a complete hypocritical joke. Nonetheless, there are some of us who don't want to pass on to future generations that sex should be casual or that self-control is a weakness. For those of us who claim to follow the God of the bible (and the even fewer who act like it), this is a minority stance (especially on any internet forum). I don't expect everyone to adopt it. Still, it is unfair to completely reject an idea just because someone with religious values agrees with it.

    3. Re:Europeans watch with mouths agape by operagost · · Score: 2, Funny

      So which continent is that, genius? Brittanica?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    4. Re:Europeans watch with mouths agape by arkanes · · Score: 3, Insightful
      No, the U.S. does not have a problem with nudity, though I think we would be better off if more of our population did. (I assume you mean public or publicized nudity, since I've never heard of anyone who had a problem with nudity in and of itself.)

      This must be willfull ignorance. Despite the fact that "public nudity" and scanty clothing is becoming more accepted, American culture is stull much less comfortable with it than they are with good old fashioned violence. Witness the fact that all forms of entertainment recieve higher ratings for sexual content and nudity than they do for violence, such as the game mentioned in this article.

      If you really examine your history, you will observe that cultures become more barbaric as they do away with their inhibitions.

      The word you're looking for is decadent, not barbaric.

      Inhibitions keep us from doing things that would otherwise get us killed, like jumping off of a building without a parachute just because the ride down will be fun.

      No, that is self preservation. Inhibitions are what keep you from doing it *with* a parachute.

      Besides the health risk of constantly exposing your privates to the elements, vulnerability to disease, etc.

      There's nothing risky about not wearing pants that isn't risky about not wearing clothes in general. There aren't floating 'disease germs' that will attack your wee-wee if you don't wear underwear. This sort of made up bullshit "medical" advice is exactly why some people *do* have a problem with "nudity in general".

      If the media be representative of the entire population, then any attempt at regulating morals is a complete hypocritical joke.

      Any attempt at regulating morals *is* a complete hypocritical joke. It's also sadly common amongst a certain breed of insecure, repressed, power hungry person who is so uncomfortable with himself and his humanity that he needs to control everyone, not just himself (or herself. English needs better non-gendered nouns). It's right there in the Genesis as you mention above, although apparently you don't grasp the implications. Adam and Eve felt *shame* for their nudity.

      Nonetheless, there are some of us who don't want to pass on to future generations that sex should be casual or that self-control is a weakness.

      Self control isn't a weakness. But repression is. Look at the history of our culture and your religion.

      For those of us who claim to follow the God of the bible (and the even fewer who act like it), this is a minority stance (especially on any internet forum). I don't expect everyone to adopt it.

      You don't expect everyone to adopt it, but you're perfectly happy with attempting to legally mandate it?

      Still, it is unfair to completely reject an idea just because someone with religious values agrees with it.

      I do no such thing. However, I do reject an idea when its only supporting foundation is those same religions values. Your only non-religious mention here are ambiguous medical dangers if you walk around naked, a total falsehood. Do you have any non-religious support for the dangers of informed, mature, casual sex? Are you aware that the rate of sexual predation is higher among members of your religion than among others? That as our acceptance of nudity, pornography, and sexual freedom has raised so too has sexual equality?

  25. Re:Adult Quests by webmistressrachel · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I have no problems with porn, adult content, and hardcore sex, which I download gratuitously. I have problems with rape (which I have experienced) and encouragement of vice. Your view is typical of the far-right, anybody who expresses the truth should be deliberately misrepresented.

    Just to make it clear again, I like Oblivion, Hardcore, and eMule. I don't like rape and the encouragement or incitement to do so, and hope Oblivion is not associated with Hot Coffee and other last-minute changes. Clear enough for you ? RTF POST!

    --
    This tagline was transcoded to result in at least one smirk. If you experience failure to smirk, please consult your Gen
  26. Perhaps the rating should instead be... by ahem · · Score: 2, Insightful


    'I', for 'Immature'?

    --
    Not A Sig
  27. Re:Adult Quests by Slack3r78 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Just to make it clear again, I like Oblivion, Hardcore, and eMule. I don't like rape and the encouragement or incitement to do so, and hope Oblivion is not associated with Hot Coffee and other last-minute changes.

    Care to actually be informed and know what you're talking about? From the wiki entry on the Hot Coffee mod:
    Anti-videogame activists have also frequently claimed or implied that the Hot Coffee mod involves rape. This is not the case as the sexual content is depicted as being consensual. While there may be merit to claims that it objectifies or demeans women, assertions of rape are unfounded.

    Moving forward:
    I have no problems with porn, adult content, and hardcore sex, which I download gratuitously. I have problems with rape (which I have experienced) and encouragement of vice.

    Who defines vice? Further, who defines the encouragement thereof? Where's the line between commentary and implicity? I'm not going to touch the other element of your comment simply because I feel that it'd likely come across in a manner I wouldn't intend - I assure you I've got nothing but the highest level of compassion for you in that regard.
    Your view is typical of the far-right, anybody who expresses the truth should be deliberately misrepresented.

    First of all, screaming "You're facist righty scum" or "You're just a pinko commie" over a disagreement's is a bit childish. Not that it really matters, but, in reality, my politics are much more along the lines of western European socialism with a strong libertarian bent than they are Bill O'Reilly - I'd have my mic cut off on The Factor in a matter of moments.

    *You* are the one who made an incorrect assertation without even actually saying what made it immoral. If it's my fault that I was actually informed about the issue and aware of the content of the mod (and not some assumed rape element that *does not exist in the game*), then I apologize. My statement about puritanical ideology may have been a bit overboard, but your comment absent the undertones about rape (which again, is not present in the game) reads exactly as I responded to it.

    Sorry again for the mix up, but I still stand in the same place on this one.
  28. Re:Oblivion nudity by Covin · · Score: 4, Informative

    The parent is correct, the underlying skin of 'female upper body, nude' was only included to allow additional clothing to look correct when it exposed portions of what the bra was covering.

    The nude female skin included in the file isn't even female. The proportions are quite distinctly male as evidenced by the placement of the nipples being way too far appart and thus rendering them on the side of the breasts rather than the front when it is placed over the female upper body mesh in the mod. The mesh file of the supposed nude still distincly shows the folds of the bra (rendered normally as a folded up, dirty off-white cloth going around the upper body) giving the topless characters lumpy shadows where the bra was.

    In other words, this was not a 'hidden' nudity thing. The males can be rendered without shirts and clothing made with exposure of various parts of the upper body. The female was made the same way, and since the nipples would never be shown, it didn't matter that they used the male skin 'skin' for it as well.

  29. Re:Oh man! Are you kidding me? by DoctorPhanan · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just to reiterate, the nude texture was included into the game because Oblivion's clothing and armor textures/meshes would not always look correct with a bra texture going straight through it. The bra mesh would also cause clipping and it would be rather clunky to retexture it with every armor. Rather than make some convoluted script that checks skin tone and modifies the existing texture, Bethsoft used a much simpler solution.

    I think that the presence of nipples are the foremost concern for those who object to the "nudity" nipples are apparently the most offensive part of the mammary and must therefore never be shown to children of any age. But if we consider the role a nipple might play in the modelling of armor and clothing (although I will admit that I have no experience in this matter and will defer to the knowledge of anyone who does), such as providing a boundary for how far the neck of a peice of attire can go. The nipple play a part in determining where a seam might be placed on a blouse or an indentation on a tight fitting dress.

    Unlike the Hot coffee mod, which was an intentional inclusion of graphic content, Oblivion's mesh and texture were created to make the game run more smoothly and quite possibly as a modder's resource. The "nipple" on the topless mesh is barely distinguishable from the rest of the breast, and Bethsoft goes to great lengths to make it's content appropriate for younger audiences. For example, in Daggerfall (and Arena?) the book series known as "The Real Barenziah" had very graphic sexual content, Which they removed from Morrowind (and Oblivion) and replaced with the phrase "this passage has been removed by order of the church" They also removed all nude daedra or provided more consevative versions of them for Morrowind. I don't think Bethsoft ever intended for the mesh and texture to be used for this purpose, and while Bethesda certainly expected nude content to become available, they should not be obliged to provide such content for ESRB screening purposes.

  30. Accountability in Gamin by Goblez · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So I'm addicted to Oblivion, at least an hour a day of late. It's a great game, and one of the aspects that builds on this is that there is a sense of Accountability in the game. If you outright kill someone, things change. If you steal, people get pissed at you. If you punch someone, they go rounds with you. Isn't it more important when rating a game that it enforces proper consequences upon the player?

    This is in addition to how ridiciulous it is that you can Mod it, therefore it's MA. Guess what, I can render porn in another well known program, called Windows, so I want it rated MA too (MA for what I say when it crashes).

    --
    Goblez

    --
    - Kal`Goblez
  31. Might as well take it the whole way by R3PUBLIC0N · · Score: 2

    Would somebody hurry up and release a hardcore pornography mod for "Barbie's Horse Adventures" so that people can see the idiocy behind re-rating games based on mods?

  32. If I modded my pants... by Sathias · · Score: 2, Funny

    1/ If you mod Oblivion you can unlock nudity skins, so they need to treat Oblivion as if people will do so.
    2/ If I modded my pants I could cut out the crotch so my old feller is hanging out for all to see. Does that mean I should be treated as if I will and locked up for potential indecent exposure?
    3/ And if its possible for me to do this, its also nothing stopping Jack Thompson from doing this.

    Conclusion: If Oblivion is classified as mature for potential modded nudity, Jack Thompson needs to be locked up for indecent exposure. It's amazing how ironic the world is when you use specious logic.

    --
    Blessed are the 1337, for they shall pwn the earth.
  33. Re:idiot by DrEldarion · · Score: 3, Funny

    Freud would like a word with you.

    So would Oedipus.

  34. Ooh yeah by Spacejock · · Score: 2, Funny

    allows the user to play with topless versions of female characters

    Now there's a candidate for rephrasing if ever I heard one.

  35. Re:Slap an M on my ass, under my clothes I'm naked by triffid_98 · · Score: 2, Funny
    With your reasoning it is perfectly reasonable to claim that sex doesn't matter as well, because after all it is natural and everyone does it, yes even 14 year olds, Oh my gosh!!!


    Personally, I believe this has a lot to do with the aging of America. The same dorks that were getting wasted and making babies in the 60's are now called Senator and/or Mr. President. Bush talking about the evils of drug abuse sounds about as believable to me as Shwartzenager talking about the evils of steroid abuse.
  36. Just responded in their "Contact Us" form... by adam.dorsey · · Score: 2, Informative

    My message to the ESRB:

    I just heard that you re-rated The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion based on a third-party content patch that unlocks the base skin used under the clothing models.

    This is absurd.

    I can make a third party patch for anything that will turn any 3D model into a naked chick in The Sims 2, Barbie Horse Adventures, etc. What I or anyone else does to a game that we have purchased should not affect the rating of the unmodified game sold in stores. This is just a cheap ploy to get attention.

    Their form is at http://esrb-web1.client.logicworks.net/about/conta ct.jsp.

    Let 'em know if you feel the same way.

    --
    You are still innocent until proven guilty. What's changed is what they do to innocent people. - notnAP, #26891325
  37. Re:The difference between this and The Sims 2 is.. by TheSteve · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So basically they don't want kids taking the shirts off their dolly.

    Better start checking IDs for all those Barbie dolls! We've got to think of the children!

  38. My answer to these problems. by Blaaguuu · · Score: 2

    On the game box infront of me for a T rated online game, right under the "T: Violence" part it says "Game experience may change durring online play.". How about when a publisher submits its game to the ESRB, one thing they have to tell them is if the game will have any sort of SDK, for creating mods. If so add "This game may be modified to reflect a different rating". Seems like that would be fair enough warning to parents, even though the majority would still ignore it and complain later...

    It is pretty rediculous for a developer/publisher to leave content such as nude skins in the game, to be easily unlocked... Almost as rediculous as changing the rating of a game because of two nipples. The movie Titanic was rated PG-13 for fucks sake... and as I recall that contained nearly full frontal nudity.

    --
    My hand touched her hand. Her hand touched her boob. By the transitive property, I got some boob! Algebra is awesome!
  39. Barbie Dolls are now Adult Only!! by DeadboltX · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Barbie dolls are now Adult Only toys, to be sold only in adult sex shops due to the fact that they have built-in nudity, and by modifying the doll (taking the clothes off) you can reveal said nudity which is not only unrealistic but exagerated for the purpose of sexual attraction (bigger tits)

  40. It's still a mod by Moraelin · · Score: 2, Informative

    Regardless of how those textures got there, the semantics of it are sorta like this:

    1. There's the game as you bought it, and it doesn't show any nipples.

    2. You download a mod which, regardless of HOW, replaces the bra texture with a skin and nipple texture.

    Exactly what difference does it make where that texture was? If the mod was 100k larger to include its own textures, would that have prohibited anyone from downloading it? Well, no. Would an extra 100k have made the parent pay more attention to what little Billy is playing? Hah.

    Or does anyone imagine that if the game shipped without that texture, someone else wouldn't have painted it? It's been done before for countless games which _didn't_ include nipple textures, and which in fact had the bra as an integral part of the texture. So what? It didn't stop anyone from recolouring that area, or swapping in a naked texture from another game.

    So exactly what conceptual difference does it make? Why is it ok to have a naked mod for The Sims 2 or Morrowind or (don't laugh) SWG, but not in Oblivion? It's still something you have to explicitly search for, download and install, not something you can discover by accident.

    If it was a case of "Oops, I bought this "Test Clothes" from a vendor hidden in a valley, and now my character is naked", _then_ I'd understand it. Well, ok, then it would be something that people (kids or otherwise) could stumble upon in the game as it was shipped. But that wasn't the case.

    So let me tell you what it really is: idiotic hypocrisy. That's all. Bunch of retards trying to look more moralistic and puritan than the Joneses. "*GASP* You mean those nasty game developpers were playing with naked textures? Why, the evil perverts... let's punish them! Let's gather an outraged mob with pitchforks and torches!" That's all there is to it. A bunch of SFVs (Stupid Fashion Victims) and prom queens trying to be fashionably outraged, when they think it's fashionable to be outraged.

    Groupthink is a funny thing. Or as Terry Pratchett once wrote, the IQ of a mob equals that of the most stupid member divided by the number of members. It's funny how whole towns or whole countries can be such a mob. Take a bunch of people who, taken individually, have nothing against X or pro Y, put them in a group where they think it's fashionable to be pro Y and against X, and watch them try to be the ones who scream the loudest against X and pro Y. Just to fit in the perceived group standards.

    In this case, the perceived standard (at least in huge areas of the USA, but not only) is that to be a fashionable pillar of the community you have to be fashionably outraged by nudity, sex, etc. Watch the bunch of hypocrites try to outdo each other in being outraged of it.

    It's freaking sad, that's what it is.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  41. Re:Adult Quests by webmistressrachel · · Score: 2
    I am sorry if I was misrepresenting Hot Coffee - it would appear that eventually after our little flame war, we stand in the same place. My original comment actually was more aimed at saying "I like Oblivion, maybe it should be adult, but I don't want the scandal that happened with GTA."

    I appreciate your sensitivity regarding rape and wish to point out that I have seen lots of press articles referring to rape in Hot Coffe.

    Therefore, no hard feelings and I retract my overly political statement..

    Yes, this is a backpedal, your argument is fair and reasoned!

    --
    This tagline was transcoded to result in at least one smirk. If you experience failure to smirk, please consult your Gen
  42. Dear ERSB... by Bahumat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Dear ERSB: A modder adding nudity to the game? This is the software equivalent of a kid picking up a pen and comic book and drawing breasts and a mustache on Wonder Woman.

    The Teen rating was appropriate. The Mature rating based off of third party modifications is not.

    --
    "To pass through the jungle; silence, courtesy, ferocity, as the occasion demands." -- Kamau, "Proper Passage"