Are Spam Blockers Too Strict?
Myrte writes "Wired.com has a long piece on whether spam blockers are blocking wanted messages." From the article: "For years, e-mail users complained that torrents of unwanted messages clogged their inboxes and crimped their productivity. Now, e-mail users, marketers and mailing list operators are more worried that spam filters are blocking out too many wanted messages. AOL isn't the only company to face charges that it improperly blocks legitimate messages. But, as the world's largest ISP for years, it has long borne the brunt of complaints from mass e-mailers over the problem."
Thanks to my damn spam blocker, I've missed out on hundreds of opportunities to accept millions of dollars from Nigerian royalty.
Slashdot Burying Stories About Slashdot Media Owned
Stop using email. It's 100% effective at blocking email spam.
Sounds like it was working fine to me ;-)
+----------------- | What is the question!
What some people won't do to avoid the Slashdot Lameness Filter.
:-/
Ironically, this is what spammers do
So 25% of doctors are AOL users. Now I'm really afraid to go in for my next checkup.
"It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
I get spam sent via email. I get spam in my snail mailbox. I get spam on my fax machine. I get spammed by cold calls from sales drones/marketers.
Shakespeare got it wrong - The first thing we must do is kill all the marketing department.
It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.