There Is No 'Microsoft of Linux'?
SDenmark writes "Linux Format has an interview with Greg Mancusi-Ungaro, the director of Linux and OSS marketing at Novell. Asked if any company can become the 'Microsoft of Linux', Greg responds "Well, if we ever woke up one day and said 'Wow, Novell is the Microsoft of Linux' or 'Red Hat is the Microsoft of Linux', then the Linux movement would be over." Is he right -- is the open source world free from such possibilities? Greg also discusses the internal Novell migration to Linux."
There won't be a Microsoft of Linux until Microsoft decide to release a Linux distribution of their own, which is extremely unlikely to happen. Ever.
It's like slashdot's turned into some sort of linux site.
No Apple stories in three days
This is a tragedy!1!!!!1!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
Who is the Linux of Microsoft?
http://www.mslinux.org/
Wait, so Big Macs are the PowerPC of Linux? I'm not sure I follow that logic.
How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
I guess that would make Richard Stallman the IBM of Microsoft....
Or something. My head is spinning....
"All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
Steve Jobs has not farted in three days. Mac zealots dismissive of investor concerns.
120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
Gates Private Licence that is.....
GUI LINUX (aka SUSE) is moving towards Windows without DOS every day. No CLI. In the end the article headline is correct and Novell are doing just that. SUSE IS the WINDOWS of the LINUX World. ... that is why we use SLACKWARE or FREEBSD.
MS is who you go to if you want to go Windows? Making microsoft the "microsoft of ..." Microsoft ? And I'm the one talking in circles?
My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love