Slashdot Mirror


Star Wreck Creators Announce Iron Sky

An anonymous reader writes "The makers of the Star Trek and Babylon 5 cross-over spoof Star Wreck: In the Pirkinning have announced their upcoming movie Iron Sky. It's apparently another sci-fi comedy with its own universe. Says Director Timo Vuorensola: 'It is still an open question whether it will be distributed also for free. We would very much like it, but it will depend a lot on the financiers.'"

24 of 98 comments (clear)

  1. The first one was great by Ricken · · Score: 3, Informative

    I saw the first one, it was really good, even though you need subs because of the finnish.
    Amazing what some students can do with some computer skills and amateur acting.

    1. Re:The first one was great by Golias · · Score: 2, Funny

      It is called 'parody':
      Twist drive - Warp drive
      Maggot hole - Wormhole
      See?


      Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1!!!!

      That is HILARIOUS!!!! OMG! When I saw the title "Star Wreck", I thought it would be lame and unimaginative, but jokes like that are comedy GOLD!!! I gotta see it now!

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  2. Finns Can't do Parody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's a shame that they're doing comedy again. In the Pirkinning suffered from one clear drawback: Finns can't do parody. We suck at it - sorry.

    ItP had really good special effects and decent everything else for an amateur movie - unfortunately the script was the weakest part. I hope they'd either try to make a serious movie or get someone else to try to write the funny parts, since there is potential in the other aspects of the earlier movie.

    1. Re:Finns Can't do Parody by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "It's a shame that they're doing comedy again. In the Pirkinning suffered from one clear drawback: Finns can't do parody. We suck at it - sorry."

      Oh, I dunno about that. On a sci-fi forum I'm an active member of, we found quite a bit to laugh at. I'm wondering, though, if the humor was a little too niche'y. My parents would have gotten a huge laugh out of Galaxy Quest, but ItP, even if it were in English, would have missed many moments with them. I don't think it's that the Finns cannot do parody, I think that they just got a little too close to the details.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    2. Re:Finns Can't do Parody by EvilNTUser · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "It's a shame that they're doing comedy again. In the Pirkinning suffered from one clear drawback: Finns can't do parody. We suck at it - sorry."

      What? SW:ItP was funnier than any Mel Brooks movie I've ever seen.

      The difference is that Brooks needs to make sure everyone gets the jokes, whereas the SW team was free to base them on references maybe 0,5 % of the population will recognize. If you don't get them, of course you're not going to like it.

      --
      My Sig: SEGV
    3. Re:Finns Can't do Parody by MemoryDragon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Maybe if you are a Fin it is not funny, but believe me, the combination of the northern language together with the really funny script made me roll on the floor. This movie was way funnier than spaceballs.

  3. Fan film to original by angryflute · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think it's great that these fan-filmmakers are moving on to doing their own original work. But why do comedy? Science fiction and comedy don't go together well -- okay, maybe nobody has done it right. Or maybe it's just damned hard. Doing either comedy or science fiction well by itself is already hard to pull off. At best, maybe these guys will produce something of the brilliance of Red Dwarf or even the Hitchhiker's Guide. Or, worse, it will be (an unfunnier) Spaceballs.

    1. Re:Fan film to original by pimpimpim · · Score: 3, Informative
      I think space balls was a pretty nice movie! Maybe it's not hot shot intelligent kind of humor, but I laughed my ass off!

      Qalaxy Quest with Tim Allen is much less known than the other ones you mentioned, but also pretty nice: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0177789/ Especially because of the many references to Sci-Fi fans and their peculiarities. Or am I insulting people here now :)

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    2. Re:Fan film to original by aevan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Firstly, comedy is really subjective...I've seen people fall down laughing at things I found dull, and other times I was the one laughing in a silent room. Good example is Spaceballs..plenty thought it was hillarious (during its time).

      Secondly, sci-fi shows tend to rely on their gimmicks, focusing the special effects to let us know 'this is sci-fi'. Add in the suspension of disbelief necessary, it's hard to bridge that little gap to 'be funny' to the viewer. Generally the jokes would either just be 'sci-fi' versions of normal jokes, slapstick style humour...or have to satirise other movies. It would require a series of episodes or movies to establish a 'baseline' from which you could make humour.

      Overall I agree with you, truly humourous sci-fi is rare (and HHGTG i hated since i prefer the radio play and books), and they might be better off doing an action or dramatic sci-fi. However, it also depends on the amount of humour they plan to inject....small amounts should work.

    3. Re:Fan film to original by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sorry to reply to myself.

      Take a look at Wikipedia's list of comedy science fiction movies and notice all the good ones in there.

  4. hi's and her's by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 2, Funny
    with it's own universe
    That would be a universe where if something belongs to a woman, you write "her's", and if it belongs to a man, you put "hi's"?
    --
    Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
  5. Break the model by suv4x4 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Releasing the first movie for free was refreshing and bold. It did what they wanted, and gained them popularity.

    Now it's time to plant feet firmly in reality and have some business model. If they release it for 2 bucks via PayPal or credit card, most people will be able to afford it and still enjoy the product.

    Another thing they can do is release a free copy with some ad blocks.

  6. To the creators by sabit666 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sorry, your effort was commendable, however the movie wasn't that funny.

    1. Re:To the creators by prurientknave · · Score: 2, Funny

      Fukov you are wrong as usual!

  7. Perspective by cephalien · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I watched Pirkinning some time ago.

    The biggest problem I see is that the more advanced computers get, the easier it is to get _good_ Trek-style special effects.

    No computer in the world can help you write a better script, though. I certainly hope more emphasis is put on the writing this time around -- don't get me wrong, I thought the premise in Pirkinning was certainly interesting -- but calling it a Star Trek/B5 crossover is somewhat unrealistic, given what happened in the movie.

    That doesn't mean I have any major issues to complain about overall. These people are doing this because they want to, and we really don't have the right to argue against a labor of love.

    As for charging a fee to view this new movie: If it's reasonable, I'll pay without question. There's a difference in charging because you need to recoup operating costs: despite the (relative) ease in creating special effects, you need computers, props, makeup, time, effort, catering (pizza), film equipment, and so on, as opposed to churning out Star Trek: XI (thanks again, Paramount. After that last one, the idea makes me sick), to continue milking the cash cow for profits, damn your viewers to hell.

    --
    If firefighters fight fire, and crimefighters fight crime, what do freedom fighters fight? - George Carlin
  8. I have to disagree by phorm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There was some definate cheese in there, but...

    "Scream my rank"

    That had myself and all my buddies watching at the time in stitches.

  9. Re:He's kidding right? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If they charge for it, someone will put it up for "free" within one day.

    Star Wreck was "free" from day 1. Yet I tried very hard (and very unsuccessfully) to get a DVD. If it weren't for their decision that it was legally too risky to sell DVDs to the US market, they would be ~$20 richer today, and I would have a DVD in my possession.

    Being able to download a movie isn't everything.

  10. With the brunette, their movie may be watchable. by slashdotmsiriv · · Score: 3, Informative

    The only thing that saved their last totally unfunny movie was the special effects and the smoking hot brunette (what's her name anyone?).

  11. Not sad at all by CrystalFalcon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No, it's not sad at all that somebody will put up a copy within hours. Copyright as we know it is ending - it's not a matter of if, it's a matter of when and how.

    The reason is simple; you can't charge for non-work in the long run. Making an additional copy of something digital is nonwork today; it wasn't when you had to produce an additional physical copy; there were tangible costs associated with that.

    Yet, some people are stuck in yesterday's copyright-based business model and are trying to adapt it to a world when making an additional copy 1) is nonwork, 2) is done anyway, infringing on the copyright monopoly, by so many millions of people that the monopoly cannot possibly be enforced by less than draconian methods.

    Copyright is ending, it's just a matter of how. And it's a good thing.

  12. Re:With the brunette, their movie may be watchable by mwooller · · Score: 3, Informative
  13. Free or not, it doesn't matter by kentrel · · Score: 2, Funny

    It doesn't matter if they have to charge for it - slashdotters will just pirate it anyway, because um... information wants to be free.

  14. Get the DVD? Support the creators! by hicksw · · Score: 2, Informative

    It appears the star wreck store is offering to ship DVDs anywhere now

    http://store.starwreck.com/epages/TP.sf/?ObjectID= 4604&Locale=en_US

    They are also accepting donations toward "Iron Sky" at

    http://www.ironsky.net/

  15. Re:English version please? by 9Nails · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Quote: "Errr... why? It is a Finnish film, made in Finland by Finns - it would follow that they develop, script and shoot in Finnish. Surely."


    I guess my answer is best given as a quote from some other web site, "First of all, Finnish is currently spoken by a mere .05% of the world's population; secondly one cannot learn the language in ten easy lessons; thirdly, a large number of Finns still do not understand it."

    http://www.mit.edu/~tahnan/finnish.html

    ...That, and so the English speaking world could enjoy the film too. If it's subtitled, might as well just throw it into a PDF story book format.

  16. Re:English version please? by nissu · · Score: 3, Insightful
    ...That, and so the English speaking world could enjoy the film too. If it's subtitled, might as well just throw it into a PDF story book format.
    The English speaking world cannot read or what's the problem with subtitles? I'll take subtitles any day over badly spoken English or, worse yet, dubbing.