Slashdot Mirror


The Economy of Online Crime

hdtv writes "You might call the thugs or thieves, but on their own closed forums and referral-only Web sites, they value honesty and reputation. Fortune magazine looks into the black market for stolen credit card numbers and identities. What's interesting is that so few of the criminals retrieve their information via breaking into online stores." From the article: "Gaffan says these credit card numbers and data are almost never obtained by criminals as a result of legitimate online card use. More often the fraudsters get them through offline credit card number thefts in places like restaurants, when computer tapes are stolen or lost, or using 'pharming' sites, which mimic a genuine bank site and dupe cardholders into entering precious private information. Another source of credit card data are the very common 'phishing' scams, in which an e-mail that looks like it's from a bank prompts someone to hand over personal data."

31 of 119 comments (clear)

  1. pharming? by ergo98 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Isn't pharming when DNS is actually hacked in some manner? How many cases of this actually happening have been documented? Simply setting up a website that mimics a legitimate financial institution or pertinent party (e.g. Ebay), is, and has always been, phishing. The phishing emails are just lures to the bait of the phishing websites.

    1. Re:pharming? by Aardpig · · Score: 4, Funny

      In fact, I thought 'pharming' referred to genetic manipulation of animals and plants to produce pharmaceutical products. For instance, one might produce a strain of cows that express Viagra in their milk. Of course, they'd be a right bugger to milk...

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    2. Re:pharming? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Of course, they'd be a right bugger to milk...

      Here's a hint; if it only has one teat instead of four ... don't try to milk it. Just stop and walk away, before you owe it dinner.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  2. Phising getting more and more "important" by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No kidding. We're seeing an incredible increase in phishing attacks, either in the form of fake pages (and the corresponding spam mails telling you to go there), or in the form of trojans that hook into the browser.

    It's interesting. Place a person, a very clever person, master degree in commerce or law, with a Ph.D., people who're worth their 6 digits a year, place them in front of a computer and you will be amazed. Something inside this computer turns the smartest person into a gullible idiot.

    Ok, idiot being too hard a word. But it is VERY intriguing to see people who would never ever fall for a con job in real life to fall without even thinking twice for one online.

    And I wonder why. What makes an e-mail more credible than snail mail? If they got a mail from their "bank", telling them to send their CC number or other details, they would NEVER do that. Online? No problem.

    Why? Why are online scams so much more successful than offline?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Phising getting more and more "important" by datafr0g · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why? Why are online scams so much more successful than offline?

      It's easier to attempt to scam more people at a time online, thus the ratio of suckers is higher.
      Also, and more importantly, most people still don't understand the internet / web / email, etc and how it all works. So they're going to be in a far more vunerable position online. Most people don't think to check to see what web site that link takes them to - it looks like eBay - that's good enough. Most people wouldn't even think to look at that ugly URL bar in the browser and why would they - they can't make sense of it - dozens of letters, numbers and squiggles.

      Learning the internet is like learning another language and another culture in the real world and it can take a great deal of time and experience to get to grips with it. For example, I bet it's much easier to scam a tourist or a new immigrant visiting your local country than it is to scam them in their home country.
      You move to a new country - most people will learn as much as they can about it. You want to use the internet? same thing - but how many people are there who really want to learn about it - most people just want to use it but it doesn't work that way. Well it can, but like in the real world - you end up making yourself more vunerable and more susecptable to making mistakes.

      --
      "Who says nothing is impossible? Some people do it every day!" - Alfred E. Neuman
    2. Re:Phising getting more and more "important" by JMemmert · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Why? Why are online scams so much more successful than offline? As far as I understand the mechanisms, there's several at play:
      • The technicalities of spoofing an address are lost on most people. So "if it says it's from my bank and it looks like it is, so it must be".
      • The second problem, to me, is pattern recognition. We've been trained to identify stores or banks by their corporate identity. It is perfectly obvious that the combination of that color and that logo represents that corporation. Nobody else uses these colors, this logo. So everything with these characteristics is automatically associated with that corporation. And since item one is not understood, there's no reason to doubt that assumption.
      • The third problem is that people want to believe. They want to believe that something is done to keep them and their money safe because it is oh so unsafe and dangerous out there. This has a much wider area of applicability, of course, but on topic, the fact that the bank does something to keep my money safe is good. I want to keep my money safe and so do they. If they want my cooperation in doing that, that's fine. It's in my interst as well. And since they do not understand the implications of spoofing, they accept things on face value. You probably know that line of thought.
      • The fourth problem that I see is that we've gotten used to being treated as a number. So a mail that does not correctly identify me with my full name and only states "Dear Sir or Madam" or "Dear Customer" is considered acceptable.
      • The fifth item I think plays a role is the fact that non-technical computer users have become accustomed to do things that they do not understand. If you told them that performing a rain dance every morning over their machine will keep it from crashing, they will do it, because it's no more arcane to them than a sequence of finger-breaking key combinations that they are so accustomed to. This extends to error messages and application failures, etc. Even when there's evidently a problem, the software more often than not does a rotten job at explaning what's wrong. This is why "we have increased the security of your credit card. Please enter all your data." works so fine. It's nonsensical, but it's no more arcane than any number of other messages our machines give us every day.
      • This leads into the last issue of today. Tunnel-vision. I believe that computer users know exactly as much as they need to to perform a specific task. They look neither left nor right. The classic example is people overlooking UI elements that are right next tho those they've been using for years, simply because they do not use them. Once you leave that comfort zone of things that they know and use regularly, all is new, all is strange. And they have learned that it's lots of work to find out what is going on. It's easier to go with the flow. Unfortunately.
    3. Re:Phising getting more and more "important" by AhtirTano · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Why are online scams so much more successful than offline?

      Immediate response without time to think about it.

      I once got a phishing email supposedly from Amazon.com. I had had too much to drink, and I had been up for about 20 hours. I clicked the link and gave them my Amazon password, where they had access to my credit card information, address, etc. As I hit enter, the fact that it was fake finally penetrated the fog in my head. I quickly changed the password on my account, and have not had a problem. I would not have fallen for the scam if I weren't drunk and/or very tired. I would not have fallen for it if it was a snail mail message.

      My roommate almost fell for a telephone scam. He was pretty high when the call came, so was only a little bit suspicious about a call from a "government office" at 9pm on a Friday night. I stopped him.

      We both have advanced degrees.

      (Secondary moral: Pot and alcohol do make you do stupid things you wouldn't do otherwise.)

    4. Re:Phising getting more and more "important" by MukiMuki · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, it's quite possible to use snail mail to this day to get compromising information. Phishers just pose them as contest entries, and ask for information like a social security number, birth date, etc. A lot of people are more than willing to jot this down if it looks like a prize is headed their way.

      Some less-than-scrupulous telemarketers do the same thing by calling people and telling them that they just won something, and then asking for a subscription to a magazine or whatnot as almost a side portion of the call. However, cancelling the latter results in a hang-up.

      Finally, sending a million letters via USPS costs something like $380,000. Sending a million phishing emails is considerably cheaper and more likely to get the info you want.

      Finally, on an off-topic note... Dear Slashdot : Make Plain Old Text the fucking default or give me the option to. WTF is WRONG with you.

    5. Re:Phising getting more and more "important" by shmlco · · Score: 2, Informative

      Apparently your degrees aren't advanced enough. While they might have had access to your addresses, at no point in time did they have access to your credit card information. When asked Amazon only shows the last four digits of your card, not the complete number. Moreover, should they have attempted to buy something and have it shipped to them, Amazon would have asked for a new number.

      About the worst they could have done was order 500 romance novels in your name and have them delivered to you. The modern equivalent of the "you ordered a pizza" gag.

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    6. Re:Phising getting more and more "important" by JMemmert · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree with the statements you make about pattern recognition skills.

      However, I believe that the skillset you describe is too narrow.
      As far as I can tell, most people are well able to distinguish two banks based on their flyers, even if you remove the names of the banks. They don't read the text, they don't look at the offerings, they merely look at the colors, layout and the logo.
      On this level, pattern recognition works just fine for them and it's usually enough.
      And since trademarks prohibit someone else from using that combination of colors, fonts and logos, this, eroneously, serves as a unique identifier.
      Once a "document", electronic or not, passes the initial, faulty "test" of validity, based on colors, layout, logos, it's considered to be valid. No questions asked.

      As for the level of pattern recognition you mention, not being able to identify structural components of a page or URL, I agree. Most people don't understand that unless they have been shown.
      For most people, the WWW consists of links and pages. The fact that each page has a unique name that can be decomposed is something unknown. They live in a world of "blue underlined text that brings them to other pages", so to speak.
      I've seen uses browse without the navigation bar, simply using their bookmarks, the history and search engines (and keyboard shortcuts to go back). For them, the actual text of an URL has no meaning. You might call that faulty pattern recognition, but I believe it's more along the lines of faulty usage patterns. Ymmv, of course.

  3. Phishing by Joebert · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What if thoose sites are phishing sites setup by law enforcement to catch phishers ?
    What kind of criminal masterminds would fall for their own scams ?!

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  4. The Problem Is The Credit Card by omegashenron · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I work at a b&b where we continually get reservations by people wanting to pay with a credit card. Our customers make their bookings over the phone, fax and even e-mail - to process a payment, all we need is the card number and expiry date. When a receipt is printed (from entering the numbers), it actually has the card details on it!

    I have seen many people collect their receipts from us upon checkin and just throw them away, without any thought about the information contained. Anyone willing to stick their hand in the bin would be able to collect these numbers for themselves.

    I often think a better credit card system would be to have a credit card number and require the use of a temporary code for a transaction to take place (similar to my online banking) where we have an electronic device which has a changing code, of course, this would only be practical for over the phone and website bookings rather than fax/e-mail (although fax/e-mail bookings are insecure now as e-mails may not be deleted from the system and fax's could be just thrown away with the numbers on them).

    --
    Excuses Are Like Assholes - Everybody's Got One
    1. Re:The Problem Is The Credit Card by 44BSD · · Score: 3, Informative
      Interesting. IANAL, but it looks like your B+B better get with the program, or it will be breaking a federal law:
      SEC. 113. TRUNCATION OF CREDIT CARD AND DEBIT CARD ACCOUNT NUMBERS.

      Section 605 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681c) is
      amended by adding at the end the following:
      ``(g) Truncation of Credit Card and Debit Card Numbers.--
      ``(1) In general.--Except as otherwise provided in this
      subsection, no person that accepts credit cards or debit cards
      for the transaction of business shall print more than the last 5
      digits of the card number or the expiration date upon any
      receipt provided to the cardholder at the point of the sale or
      transaction.
      ``(2) Limitation.--This <<NOTE: Applicability.>> subsection
      shall apply only to receipts that are electronically printed,
      and shall not apply to transactions in which the sole means of
      recording a credit card or debit card account number is by
      handwriting or by an imprint or copy of the card.
    2. Re:The Problem Is The Credit Card by omegashenron · · Score: 3, Informative

      We are in Australia, not the USA

      --
      Excuses Are Like Assholes - Everybody's Got One
  5. The banks really don't seem to care... by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They are raking in such huge margins on credit card debt that until very very recently, they seemed to more or less wink at online fraud. Only now that it's starting to really cut into their margins are they really taking notice and making half-hearted attempts to deal with the problem.

    As much as I want to blame the "online idiot" who falls victim to phishing and other scams, the banks really bear a lot of blame themselves for making it so damn easy to steal from these people.

    1. Re:The banks really don't seem to care... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why would they care? Banks never EVER lose a dime on fraud, except for a some labor involved in procesing chargeback requests. ALL fraudulent transactions and chargebacks are immediately deducted from the vendor's account. The customer is fully protected. The banks NEVER take a loss. Only the vendors get farked. Over and over again.

      Yes, I am a vendor with my own merchant account. :-(

  6. good and bad by Umbral+Blot · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well it's nice to know that my online shopping is safe, it is somewhat scary to know that real life shopping is less secure. Just one more reason to never leave the room.

  7. Honesty and reputation? by 77Punker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Honesty my ass. They're all just being extra careful not to get caught.

  8. My First Credit Card Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    my first credit card theft occured in the mid-80s while living in Indianapolis... i used my Amex card to pay for dinner with friends at a local Japanese restaurant... i rarely used the card (and have never been over my head w/CC debt), but was surprised to see a charge from a florist in Chicago...

    this really ticked me off, so i called the florist, got the order number, product, and phone number and address of the delivery...

    apparently, someone at the restaurant had a girlfriend in Chicago, and used my card number to order flowers delivered there...

    i called the girlfriend and told her that the flowers she received were purchased with a stolen card and that i would be contacting the police...

    next, i called Amex... to my amazement, even back then, they really didn't give a rat's patootie about the fraud - i had to force my info on the customer service rep - although the info was taken...

    i was never subsequently contacted, so AFAIK, the scumbag got away with credit card fraud...

    my only consolation was that the dipstick wasn't going to be getting any anymore! :-)

  9. Re:Will the real site please stand up. by iminplaya · · Score: 3, Funny

    BOA is using a pictograph means to reduce pishing.

    But then your bladder might exshplode.

    --
    What?
  10. Re:Rumpelstiltskin by rabel · · Score: 4, Informative

    Remember that you don't sign the receipt as "authentication", you sign it to indicate you agree to the terms of the credit. That's the only purpose. If a store attempts to verify your signature against the back of the credit card, well, that's sort of bonus, but not required by the credit company.

    For reference, see this link

    In my own life, I have my daughter sign the credit card bill (and compute the tip, if necessary) and since she's an art student she has been coming up with some pretty creative signature designs.

  11. Why so cheap? by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 2, Interesting

    >$3 per CVV, or $20 for a card number with CVV and the user's date of birth

    For a card which may have a $10,000 credit limit or higher. Either it's hard to turn a stolen card into money, or the supply is more than meeting the demand.

    Contrariwise, why so expensive? Mail theft rings, bribed insiders, credit report lookups by crooked merchants -- there are so many sources that maybe the price should be lower. After all, what's the cost of a botnet PC to a crook who wants to use it?

    1. Re:Why so cheap? by patio11 · · Score: 2, Informative

      All of the illegal stuff gets *expensive* fast. I lurk over at specialham.com, the spammer forum, to keep abreast of new changes I need to make to the spam filter I'm coding. People want several hundred dollars for a script to verify addresses for one major ISP, etc. And "cashers" have the most dangerous job in the criminal supply chain, since they're the ones that have to associate a physical identity (even a fake or obfuascated one) with the theft to make their money. The guy who just nabs the information, on the other hand, just has to go to the forum/IRC channel, demonstrate his bona-fides, and then arrange a swap with payment dropped into some blind eGold account (the black market doesn't apparently like paypal that much, from what I've seen).

  12. Amazing complexity by iamdrscience · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've been to one of these credit card forums (not as a user, I don't have that kind of moral flexibility) and the thoroughness of these forums is quite amazing. The one I went to in particular required that if you wanted sell something, i.e. CC numbers, fake IDs, card skimming equipment (ATM bezels and strip readers), etc. you first had to provide free samples to the administrators of the forum to verify the quality of your product. If your product was found to be satisfactory, you would be allowed to sell your products, but first you had to put up a certain amount of cash (like $500, iirc) to be held by the administrators -- this cash would be used to refund your customers money in case you didn't deliver your products to them.

    1. Re:Amazing complexity by vastabo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now that's customer service worthy of a credit card company!

  13. The real victims of cc fraud: merchants by Zaphod2016 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Back in the day, I had a small business where I accepted the "big 4" credit cards. We were selling sporting gear via mail order and the web.

    One day, some kid called up and placed a decent-sized order for about $1,000 worth of gear. Naturally, I demanded to speak with the card holder, and he put his mom on the line who prompty told me "no problem".

    Week later, Dad calls me up furious. You guessed it: divorce. Kid and mom are getting back at a dead beat dad, and he's none too amused about it. Dad calls the CC issuer, demands a chargeback. I get hit for $1,000 refund, plus the fees coming in, plus the fees going out, plus some other "service charges" for the "bad order".

    Of course...I'm still out $1,000 in gear! I call mom and kid, explain that *I* am none too amused either, and that I'd like my gear back. She implies that my parents were never married, and that I might wish to visit Satan.

    Having accepted that this situation could only get worse, I called the police. They explained that no crime had occured: a) mom had "paid" for the goods and b) she had the legal right to use her husband's credit card. I called my bank, and my credit card services, and they each told me it was my own damn fault for selling a quality product at a fair price and that no one could force her to mail back goods because (by then) she was claiming she had never recieved the order in the first place.

    I am sure some merchants have done lousy things, but as one of the "good guys" it simply blows my mind when I think about this, even now years later.

    Epilogue: never got the gear back, but funny enough, I *did* win about a grand from a scratch off ticket the week I closed the business. Save your mod points, I must have some real karma around here somewhere. =)

  14. pharming? rare? by wjsroot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Its very easy to do on wireless networks. There is a program called KARMA which will make a wifi card mimic an AP. It waits for computers to probe for a SSID and then mimics an AP with that SSID. once they think your computer is an AP its amazingly easy to phish them for data. Makes you wonder about all of those places with free wireless (St*rbucks, P@nera)...

    --
    Mod others as you would have them mod you.
  15. I do systems work for a major card issuer.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am one of the people who tries to plug the holes, and build the systems that help our agents fix fraud. So I know my way around some of this stuff, and I'd like to clear up a few things.

    - I don't know how things were "back in the day", but these days, if a family member racks up a credit card bill without permission, and the cardholder won't press criminal charges and file a police report, the cardholder is stuck with the bill. That said, if a merchant just gets approval from "the cardholder's wife", then it's no wonder the merchant got stuck holding the bill and with a penalty to boot. Both are part of the agreement you signed that allowed you to accept credit cards. You did read that, right? Just askin'.

    -Banks are actually very serious about stopping fraud. Not only do banks end up covering a fair amount of the tab because the hoops you have to jump through to get Visa/MC to cover it get harder and harder (and in the world of banking, profits are generated by pennies a transaction, so even $50 of fraud is significant in terms of lost profits), but all the major issuers understand that no one wants to be the next one caught with their security wanting. The bad press associated with lost laptops, wayward tapes and hacked websites is something no one wants - and, in fact, it practically killed CardSystems. We are under major pressure to make sure our bank isn't next - because you do lose a lot of customers from this sort of thing. And reissuing cards to a swath of cardholders is both expensive and time-consuming. The bank I work for hasn't been involved in any of this so far, but we make a point not to brag about it - it just invites trouble.

    -You DO sign the receipt as a verification. Signatures are not necessary for certain types of transactions, or for transactions under a certain fairly low limit, but if there is fraud or a dispute, the merchant has to produce the signature. Or they lose the dispute. This is why many merchants now use the CVV2, although, as you can probably infer from the story, it also is not perfect.

    -Why the cheap price for high-limit cards? Because actually using them is much riskier than stealing them. Either you need your ill-gotten gains shipped somewhere, or you need to show up somewhere in-person. Or you go for fairly small stuff. In any case, it's a lot more risky than the number theft, and if you steal numbers, you probably sell a batch at a time. With the risk goes the reward, so to speak.

    -Phishing, we're working on that too. All the major issuers have places on their websites where you can report phishing activities. Do so, whenever you see it. And the major issuers are also all conducting informational campaigns, trying to teach people what a legitimate communication looks like.

    Overall, though, massive card number theft is unusual. Most people lose their information by losing their wallet, being careless with their info (like with phishing), or by a family member/friend up to no good.

    1. Re:I do systems work for a major card issuer.... by mike2R · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know exactly where you are in the chain, but the impression from a merchants point of view is that no one gives a rat's arse about (cardholder not present) fraud except the merchant. We cover 100% of the losses, we even get charged a handling fee on chargebacks!

      I'm not really disagreeing that the merchant should be resposible for most, or even all, of carholder not present losses. I'm just irritated by the complete lack of interest from card issuers, merchant service providers and the police.

      A lot of fraud attempts are blindingly obvious, and when you get an order like that you not only know it's a fraud, you know where the fraudster is going to be to receive the parcel. It seems so easy for police to dress as couriers, deliver a dummy parcel, and nick whoever signs for it - I even know of this being done once, many years ago.

      However the police don't care when they get a call from a merchant over an attempted petty crime. The big card companies - who could certainly work with the police to set up some sort of scheme to do this - don't care because they don't suffer finacially.

      The problem at the moment is that online/mailorder fraud is virtualy a risk free business. It should and could be a very risky one if anyone could be bothered to make it so, but they can't.

      --
      This sig all sigs devours
  16. Well, whatya know... by ZoomieDood · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There's honor among thieves....

  17. Re:Will the real site please stand up. by patio11 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Yeah, I use Bank of America, and their SafeKey thing, well, points for effort guys. I barely understood what was going on and I knew, going into the signup, what the whole purpose was. Basically, it works like this: you're told to pick a picture from a random set of them. When you sign into the bank, signon takes two steps if its from a computer that hasn't used your account recently: first, you put in your userID and state. Then you are taken to a *second* page, which shows the photo you picked and asks for your password. The idea is the photo is another secret known only to you and the bank, so if you go to The Bank of America Website you'll see that the photo was not the one you picked, and so you'll realize "Wow, phiser! No thanks"

    Here's the problem: the whole rationale behind the process goes WAY over the head of the average user. I watch my non-technical sister signing up for this thing. You might as well have written the interface in Chinese (oh, bad example, she reads that fine -- Swahili, then). And I had to spend 15 minutes looking through pages of randomly generated photos (they're all clipart of iconic things -- a bowl of fruit, a watch, etc) until I found one that I'd remember after two months without seeing it. For my mother (the archetypical phishing victim, knows nothing about technology and forwards every "If you send this to 15 people Bill Gates will cure cancer!" email she gets), I think this whole process would be hopeless.