Slashdot Mirror


Three Neptune-sized Planets Found Nearby

WillAffleckUW writes "CNN reports the discovery of three Neptune-sized planets found in orbit around a sun 41 light years away. The star they orbit is similar to our Sun, and the planetary distribution is probably similar to our Solar System. Recent observations by NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope last year revealed that HD 69830 also hosts an asteroid belt, making it the only other sun-like star known to have one. No word on if they have habitable moons, or monoliths yet."

9 of 337 comments (clear)

  1. It's still in the Milky Way by StringBlade · · Score: 4, Informative

    As opposed to something that is over 7,000 - 10,000 light years away, 41 isn't very far. I mean it's no Alpha Centauri, but it's close in astronomical terms.

    --
    ...and that's the way the cookie crumbles.
    1. Re:It's still in the Milky Way by jbrader · · Score: 2, Informative

      41 light years = 12.5703778 Parsecs. I love google calculator.

      --
      You are so boring that when I see you my feet go to sleep.
  2. Re:Which planet again? by oskay · · Score: 2, Informative

    Since Neptune and Uranus are about the same size, it looks like the units were chosen precisely to avoid that particular lame joke. =)

  3. So if I understand you right.... by anotherzeb · · Score: 2, Informative

    Space is big. Really big. You might think it's a long way to the chemist on the nearest non-Milky Way Nuptune-sized planets 41 light years away, but that's peanuts compared with space

    --
    Good luck sometimes arrives disguised as bad
  4. 192 planets and counting by sdfad1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    It wasn't that long ago (err, wow, 10 years, maybe that's long) that the first extrasolar planet was discovered. I still remember that news announcement I watched on TV...

    Anyway, since the discovery of those 3 planets, another planet has been found. Check out the exoplanet encyclopedia (my favourite exoplanets site). It has a catalog with all the data of those planets, some with uncertainty factors. Discovery method, size, catalogue number, the whole lot. Try chucking all that into a spread-sheet, and plot some scatter graphs. Should be a lotta fun. The last time I tried this, it was a bit problematic because the masses are not really known (for planets discovered using spectral shifts), but are merely minimum (maximum?) limits only. But still, an order of magnitude plot could be fun.

    Anyway, the 3 planets are already in the catalogue under HD 69830. Don't forget to check out this one as well. Exciting times. I look forward to 200 planets!

  5. Re:Inteligent Life by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 2, Informative

    Wait, did you just say radio waves don't travel at the speed of light? Hmm, yes you did. FYI, radio waves are light.

  6. Very difficult, but perhaps not impossible. by ClickOnThis · · Score: 2, Informative

    I reckon aliens would have a hard time picking up TV stations from mars, never mind light years away.

    Assume that the aliens have a radio telescope that is comparable to the one at Arecibo. I don't have numbers on its sensitivity after recent upgrades, but a ball-park figure I have heard is that it can pick up a cell phone transmission within a sizable part of the solar system near earth.

    A rough calculation reveals that perhaps a 10^14 W source at the centre of our galaxy (2.2 x 10^4 light-years away) could be detected by Arecibo. Compare this to terrestrial television (~10^6 W) and radio (~10^5) stations, and you'll find that it could be on the edge of possiblility for Arecibo to pick up TV transmissions from a planet 41 light-years away.

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  7. What is a light-year and how is it used? by Tumbarumba · · Score: 3, Informative

    Dude, you could at least give some attribution to http://starchild.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/StarChild/ques tions/question19.html

    --
    My business: Farstrider Studios.
  8. Mars by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 2, Informative

    Get your ACKs to Mars!