Slashdot Mirror


Ars Technica Reviews the MacBook

phaedo00 writes "Ars Technica has performed another of their in-depth and thorough hardware reviews. The subject in this review is the newly released MacBook. From the article: 'The Apple portable web site proudly announces that the "family is finally complete." What began with an announcement from Steve Jobs at the MacWorld conference in January has come full circle with the release of the MacBook this week. Every Apple laptop is Intel powered and moving in what I would consider is the right direction. The laptop line is finally better delineated by pro and consumer features, and the prices have been fixed at points that better reflect the minute differences in the models.'"

14 of 453 comments (clear)

  1. The consumers were clamoring for new laptops by artifex2004 · · Score: 4, Informative

    and Jobs said, "let them eat paste!"

  2. New keyboard by tji · · Score: 4, Informative

    I spent a couple minutes checking out the MacBook at my local Apple store.. It looks good. I think it will do well at that price point.

    But, I did not like the keyboard. Compared to the keyboard on my PowerBook, or the MacBook Pro's, it didn't feel nearly as good. Maybe it's something you could get used to. But, I really like the old PowerBook keyboard..

  3. Re:GMA950 graphics, bah! by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yeah, right. Not even the Dells in this price range have separate graphics cards. Good luck finding a 2Ghz dual-core laptop for a grand or so without integrated graphics. Hell, good luck finding a 2GHz dual-core laptop in this price range, period. To get the equivalent from Dell, you have to get a high-end Inspiron, and that'll set you back more than $1500. Of course, with that you'll get a 17" screen, which is cool, but if you want to stick close to the $1200 price point, you'll have to settle for a 1.66GHz Core Duo.

    --
    Just junk food for thought...
  4. Re:Benchmarks by znu · · Score: 5, Informative

    Don't take the Xbench OpenGL scores Ars reports too seriously. In MacWorld's benchmarks with real-world OpenGL (UT2004), the MacBook Pro, with real video, delivered three times the framerate of the MacBook.

    --
    This space unintentionally left unblank.
  5. Re:$150.00 by TomHandy · · Score: 3, Informative

    The general explanation I've heard is that Apple is pricing the black model higher to try and control demand for it, since they apparently realize that if they made the black version the same price, they would have trouble meeting demand. I guess the question would be "why not just make more black macbooks?", but presumably there is some reason or some difficulty with making the black version (which apparently is not the same kind of glossy surface as the white ones).

  6. Re:GMA950 graphics, bah! by sehryan · · Score: 3, Informative

    "Hell, good luck finding a 2GHz dual-core laptop in this price range, period."

    The parent to my post was implying that the MacBook was a good deal.

    So, Dell:
    $1229

    White MacBook with same specs:
    $1549

    Black MacBook with same specs:
    $1699

    --
    The world moves for love. It kneels before it in awe.
  7. Re:Complete... but I still wish there was a 13.3" by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 4, Informative

    I was really glad to read about how easy it is to replace the HD.

    Some of you might also find this interesting: step-by-step take apart. Text is in Japanese, but fortunately the pictures are in English. =) Click on the left hand picture. Looks like the whole unit is much easier to disassemble than were previous 'books.

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  8. I don't know if you can blame apple for it by undeaf · · Score: 3, Informative

    That gap existed because those were the kinds of hard drives that were available, 6 gig 1 inch drives and 20/40 gig 1.8 inch drives. I'm not even sure if the 1.8 inch drives are more expensive, i'm guessing they're actually cheaper but less shock resistant. They could use multiple 1 inch drives, but that would end up making the smaller players more expensive than the big ones. Perhaps apple could have used their size to influence drive manufacturers to start making 1.4 inch drives, but that would likely reduce overall efficiency.

    Now we have 8 gig 1 inch drives. Anytime now, seagate is supposed to be producing 1 inch hard drives that use perpendicular recording to have a capacity of 12 gigs( http://www.seagate.com/cda/newsinfo/newsroom/relea ses/article/0,1121,2973,00.html ), so if you want a 10 gig mp3 player, and especially if you'd like it to be small, you're in luck.

  9. Not one person has mentioned the hard drive by falcon5768 · · Score: 5, Informative
    The one neat feature on the Macbook that the pro doesnt have and not one person has mentioned it. You can remove the Macbooks hard drive through the battery bay and replace it with whatever size you want by just simply removing 3 screws. No more cracking open the case to replace the hard drive on them.

    K maybe I like those types of neat little nuances.

    --

    "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

  10. Re:Macbook Pro owners didn't get ripped off by gozar · · Score: 4, Informative
    Test number two: try playing the high-definition (1080i) trailers on Apple's website. I'd be absolutely shocked if it manages to do it without dropping frames like crazy. My Macbook Pro barely breaks a sweat.

    I went to the Apple Store today, and this was the second thing I tried! It was able to play the 1080i version trailer of Art School Confidential without any problem (except for some bandwidth issues downloading the 150MB file). I didn't look at how much processor was being used at the time though.

    The Cars trailer (it was 8xx X 3xx something resolution) also played without a hitch.

    --
    What, me worry?
  11. Re:GMA950 graphics, bah! by MBCook · · Score: 5, Informative
    Where did you get THAT number?

    I go to Dell and check out the same model...

    2 GHz Core Duo, 1 Gig of RAM, XP Pro, 100 Gig 7200 RPM drive, glossy screen, you're looking at $1746 shipped.

    The price YOU quoted was for 1.66 GHz, XP Media Center, 5400 RPM drive, non-glossy screen.

    By the way, both prices are after a 22% SALE that Dell is holding. I know they're always holding some sale or another, but even with the sale your price is flat out wrong for the specs you quoted.

    This doesn't include all the great software that OS X comes with like iLife, iWork, and more. Also, the Dell is 50% thicker than the Mac. The video out is VGA only (not DVI). On the plus side, you do get the 5-in-1 media card reader (I'm still surprised Apple hasn't done this yet with all the media stuff they push).

    If I make a white Macbook match the Dell (by upping the RAM, the hard drive, and adding Apple Care)... it costs $1798.

    Ladies and gentlemen, the Macintosh premium: $52

    That's 3%.

    I'd GLADLY pay $52 to get OS X, iLife, and a laptop that isn't 50% thicker.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
  12. Re:Conclusion by NutscrapeSucks · · Score: 3, Informative

    In the Ars review, the mentioned that the thing was throttling the CPU down to avoid damage

    Yeah -- This is an important point. You are buying a 1.83Ghz laptop, but effectively you are only getting a 1.66Ghz laptop. This should never happen under normal use conditions. (And 100% CPU should be considered normal use, so long as you aren't sitting on the beach or something.)

    --
    Whenever I hear the word 'Innovation', I reach for my pistol.
  13. Re:airport wpa pre-shared key macbook by anagama · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have the last g4 powerbook and ibook as well as the last g3 color ibook. Both the g4s have the airport card which does b/g, and the color ibook only does b. All of them connect flawlessly using WPA to a basic consumer Netgear wireless router and also to a wrt54g (version 2 I think). A while back before my Siemens Speedstream died, I had some issue with WEP which was solved by prepending "$" to the WEP key when entering it into the mac.

    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  14. Final Cut Studio not supported on MacBook by noahmckinnon · · Score: 4, Informative

    from the Apple Support site: "If you have a MacBook, the Final Cut Studio (Universal) crossgrade Installer does not prohibit you from installing the pro applications, but this configuration does not meet the minimum system requirements for Final Cut Studio. See the Final Cut Studio system requirements for complete requirements. Note: The integrated graphics processor in the MacBook does not permit float processing in Motion and will result in degraded performance and other issues in Motion and other Final Cut Studio applications." http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=303 782