Reporting Vulnerabilities Is For The Brave
An anonymous reader writes "A recent post on the CERIAS weblogs examines the risks associated with reporting vulnerabilities. In the end, he advises that the risks (in one situation, at least) were almost not worth the trouble, and gives advice on how to stay out of trouble. Is it worth it to report vulnerabilities despite the risks, or is the chilling effect demonstrated here too much?"
All things considered, it's a whole lot safer (not to mention more profitable) to notify the black hats about vulnerabilities rather than the vendors or the public.
Lacking <sarcasm> tags,
Open Source projects don't interrogate and try to prosecute you if you find a security problem and report it.
What you did was open the door litigation against Bob's Software for negligence. Bob's Software doesn't want the flaw to become public. When you stand up and point the finger at Bob's Software, they will be looking for someone to pass on the litigation fees to, so you get sued. Not only that, someone needs to be made an example of so others don't try it in the future.
Anonymous email accounts are easy to come by. Send an anonymous announcement to the Full Disclosure mailing list and be done with it. Otherwise you're risking the legal bills of fighting whatever company decides to sue you.
of course, this means that everyone else finds out about vulnerabilities first. This might not be exactly what they wanted when they make it illegal to report.
"It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
Learn to speak my language (Icelandic), then I am going to take you serius.