Slashdot Mirror


MS Proposes JPEG Alternative

automatix writes "Microsoft's new competitor to the omnipresent JPEG format has been shown at WinHEC and is discussed on CNET. The Windows Media Photo format has many promises associated with it. The program manager is claiming 'We can do it in half the size of a JPEG file.'. While 'the philosophy has been that licensing should not be a restriction', it is interesting that the specification requires a click-through agreement to even read it."

18 of 633 comments (clear)

  1. Atl least they didn't call it... by EnderGT · · Score: 2, Funny
    .WMP - Although "Windows Media Photo" would have been more straight-forward than "Windows Digital Photo" (or whatever), can you imagine how much fun the punsters would have with that....

    If they can keep from killing it with DRM and licensing, I for one would love to have a photo format where the quality doesn't degrade as much as JPEG does at high compression.

  2. Only one problem by sjonke · · Score: 4, Funny

    All images encoded with Windows Media Photo have a blue cast to them

    --
    --- What?
  3. The click through agreement: by goldaryn · · Score: 1, Funny

    4. You have no obligation to give Microsoft any suggestions, comments or other feedback ("Feedback") relating to these Materials [...] Microsoft may freely use, reproduce, license, distribute, and otherwise commercialize Your Feedback in any Microsoft Offering

    Hi MS,

    It's rubbish.

    Cheers.

  4. wmf like features by brenddie · · Score: 2, Funny

    I cant wait to see what wmf like features this one has. If it doesnt have at least one vulnerability (buffer overflow, embeded executable code....) I refuse to use it.

    --
    The best test environment is production. - Me
    chrome://browser/content/browser.xul
  5. WAHAHAHAHA by JaJ_D · · Score: 2, Funny

    Microsoft... and 'the philosophy has been that licensing should not be a restriction'.

    WAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    wipes tear from eye

    WAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
    HA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA


    please stop.....

    WAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
    HA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
    HAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    *sound of side splitting....*

    Seriously one of the funniest thing's I've heard resently...

  6. Open Arms... by Avogadros+Letter · · Score: 3, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our 50% smaller, lossy overlords...

    --
    $ touch .signature
  7. Re:Lossless AND Lossy by iainl · · Score: 4, Funny

    Woah, you mean we've got to use a second file extension if we switch to lossless?

    That's far too much work, let's just invent an entire new standard, just so our image directories look neat.

    --
    "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  8. Re:Ummmm why? by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you click the 'I agree' it takes you to download some file that ends in ".DOC" - since I couldnt find any specifications for *that* file, I wasnt able to read them.

  9. Re:Embrace and Extend by shaggykl · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hmm. Maybe new ads will be rendered in this new format. Then non-IE browsers will get ad-blocking for free!

  10. Re:Ummmm why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Egon, I'm a little bit fuzzy on this lossless thing

  11. Re:JPEG-LS Vs JPEG by shades66 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Since it's a MS format, presumably the codec will be embedded within the OS and will have an easy hook to read/write the format from any program..."

    don't forget the hooks to allow an image to format your hard-drive/ run executables as root and maybe even give it facilities to copy your secure account/bank details and mail them out.

    --
    ---- There are 10 types of people in the world. Those that understand binary and those that don't
  12. Re:7Z by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Your whole post is parody of something worthwhile.

  13. You know what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Forget about what we said earlier, let's keep the borg icon for anything Microsoft-related.

  14. Re:Ummmm why? by KilobyteKnight · · Score: 4, Funny
    In the footer is this notice:
    Microsoft Confidential. © 2005-2006 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. By accessing, using or providing feedback on these materials, you agree to the attached license agreement.

    Someone should change that to: "By accessing, using or providing feedback on these materials, or attempting to sue anyone over these materials you agree to the to give the person who altered this document $37,000,000,000 in US currency." And then promptly distribute it widely.

    By the way, anyone replying to, reading, commenting about, or in any way accessing the material in this post; including but not limited to moderating, meta-moterating, storing in a database, retrieving from a database, viewing in a web browser, including it in or making a reference to it in a legal document, or accidentially glancing at this post agrees to send $100 to me for each occurance.
    --
    When will Windows be ready for the desktop?
  15. Re:Ummmm why? by cp.tar · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hey... I think I'll have to change my .sig...

    --
    Ignore this signature. By order.
  16. Re:not really by BiggyP · · Score: 4, Funny

    it's widely accepted that the full spec for MS word's doc format is on display in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying "Beware of the Leopard".

  17. SAT question by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 3, Funny

    1) UNISYS : Microsoft

    A) Pitbull : Beelezebub
    B) 9mm : Howizter
    C) Dog shit : Milwaukee Sewage System
    D) All of the above.

    --
    WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
  18. Re:Another Debate by taylork · · Score: 2, Funny

    Microsoft never perfected operating systems. Go learn about Windows.