Slashdot Mirror


Plan For Cloaking Device Unveiled

Robotron23 writes "The BBC is reporting that a plan for a cloaking device has been unveiled. The design is pioneered by Professor Sir John Pendry's team of scientists from the US and Britain. Proof of the ability of his invention could be ready in just 18 months time using radar testing. The method revolves around certain materials making light "flow" around the given object like water."

36 of 342 comments (clear)

  1. Obligatory by HeXetic · · Score: 5, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new invisible overlords.

    --
    http://www.chmodoplusr.com/
    1. Re:Obligatory by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 5, Funny

      > I, for one, welcome our new invisible overlords.

      Invisible overlords? Frankly, I can't see it happening.

    2. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      We're over here, you insensitive clod.

    3. Re:Obligatory by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 2, Funny

      >Invisible overlords? Frankly, I can't see it happening.

      No? It was perfectly clear to me.

  2. Re:Tenuous at best by vodkamattvt · · Score: 3, Funny

    I have millions of venture capital for you my friend. Please give me your bank account number and I will deposit my funds which are stuck in Nigeria at the moment.

  3. Re:Government Uses by Metabolife · · Score: 3, Funny

    Forget the government, I know a lot of this I could do with this. And most of them violate the constition, and morality, and decency, and privacy, and...

  4. The Romulans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    will be pissed. :D

  5. Slashdot's at it again by SoVeryTired · · Score: 5, Funny

    I long for a month where slashdot doesn't announce a new design for a cloaking device...

    --
    Slashdot: news for Apple. Stuff that Apple.
    1. Re:Slashdot's at it again by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know why everybody's so excited about cloaking devices. We clearly won't use them because you can't fire weapons when they're engaged and a clever chief engineer or science officer can always figure out a way to detect the ship anyway. On the rare occasion when we actually NEED a cloaked ship, like when we need to go back in time and pick up some whales, we'll just lift a Klingon ship.

  6. Alternative Technique by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    WEAR A THICK CLOAK THAT ADMITS NO LIGHT. You will become "INVISIBLE" because according to Wiktionary, you (meaning your body proper) are no longer visible!

    Honestly, where do our tax dollars go, eh? Eh? Am I right, folks?

  7. Re:Tenuous at best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    You don't have a problem with the bricks into diamonds part, just the 20lb bricks?

  8. Re:Tenuous at best by schon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Given a brick weighs less than 20lbs - how do you propse doing that?

    Well, you start by throwing it through a jewellery store window. :o)

  9. Ooops! by udoschuermann · · Score: 5, Funny

    AP Wire (2019): In the news today, once again the military claims to have "lost" an F-22 somewhere on the grounds of Andrews Airforce Base (AFB). Said Captain J. Andrews (no relation): "I could have sworn I parked the thing right over there. Last night's storm must have blown the locator-ribbon off the nose or something."

    --
    --Udo.
    1. Re:Ooops! by Cl1mh4224rd · · Score: 3, Funny
      --
      People will pass up steak once a week, for crap every day.
    2. Re:Ooops! by modecx · · Score: 2, Funny

      once again the military claims to have "lost" an F-22 somewhere on the grounds of Andrews Airforce Base.

      It's not really a big deal... But you do have to wait for it to rain! :)

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
  10. Good by owlman17 · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is good if the enemy doesn't have a Comsat or a Science Vessel.

    1. Re:Good by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      So it will work well vs Iran who's going nukes and can't build a comsat.

    2. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      If this is the case, then I, for one, would have to welcome some Overlords.

  11. Re:Tenuous at best by TheDreadSlashdotterD · · Score: 2, Funny

    magic

    --
    I have nothing to say.
  12. Doesn't this vialate our treaty with the Klingons? by NerdENerd · · Score: 2, Funny

    Doesn't this vialate our treaty with the Klingons?

  13. Imagine the market! by Arthur+B. · · Score: 2, Funny

    In the pr0n business

    --
    \u262D = \u5350
  14. Obligatory Star Trek reference by thedarkone64 · · Score: 1, Funny

    psh, this can easily be overcome by a Tachyon detection grid. n00bs.

    1. Re:Obligatory Star Trek reference by jpardey · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or a bag of flour.

      --
      I have freaks! I did something right...
  15. If it bleeds we can kill it by Timbotronic · · Score: 2, Funny

    Here's a picture of the prototype...

    --

    One of these days I'm moving to Theory - everything works there

  16. Re:Doesn't this vialate our treaty with the Klingo by dark404 · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, it violates our treaty with the romulans stupid!

  17. Re:Doesn't this vialate our treaty with the Klingo by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2, Funny

    Romulans actually.

    And no it doesn't, because we've got a couple of centuries until we actually sign it.

  18. Re:Useless for people by pnewhook · · Score: 5, Funny

    yea, an invisible tank is great until you get out and forget where it's parked.

    --
    Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
  19. Re:Radar? by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 2, Funny
    [...] the return (on either end) would be weak sort of like a large bird
    So you're essentially looking for a bird doing just under mach one? No way that that'd make you pay attention ... not at all.
    --
    We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
  20. Re: My God! by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2, Funny

    All they have to do is cover the planes with animated ads and most of us would never be able to see them!

    My eyes instinctively ignore them these days if the browser doesn't block them to begin with.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  21. A cloaking device? by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'll believe it when I see it.

    --
    -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  22. Re:Tenuous at best by jpardey · · Score: 5, Funny

    Here's a picture of one:







    Pretty incredible, eh?

    --
    I have freaks! I did something right...
  23. Re:Useless for people by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 4, Funny

    No, not useless. The first guy to invent a fat ass-cloaking device for women will make billions, except in the hip hop community.

  24. Re:Useless for people by shawb · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's why you have the alarm button on the key fob.

    --
    I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
  25. Re:Useless for people by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 4, Funny
    yea, an invisible tank is great until you get out and forget where it's parked.

    Just look for where the tank treads end.

  26. Re:Useless for people by Cervantes · · Score: 2, Funny

    yea, an invisible tank is great until you get out and forget where it's parked.

    It's disguised to look like two homeless people fighting over a wheel of cheese...

    --
    If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
  27. Re:Tenuous at best by Holi · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes but then my secretly stashed pile of bricks will be worth MILLIONS.

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.