Slashdot Mirror


Google Releases Picasa for Linux

chrisd writes "Hi, everyone. Today I'm pleased to announce that we're making Picasa, our photo management application, available for Linux. This is a pre-beta labs release and since we're still learning on how to best make software for Linux, we're asking that you submit your bugs as you find them. Picasa for Linux uses Wine internally; this shows a bit in the interface, but it works even better than we had hoped. Download it and check it out! A list of supported distributions can be found in the FAQ. We hope our patches to Wine will help make it easier for everyone to run Windows apps on Linux and other Unix-like systems. Thanks to our pals at CodeWeavers who did much of the heavy lifting, and to Marcus Meissner, whose libgphoto support patch was a welcome surprise."

13 of 486 comments (clear)

  1. not free by Anneco · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Nice that you can use Picasa with Wine under Linux. But it is no free software (GPL, BSD or open source).

    No source code.

    1. Re:not free by MojoRilla · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Typical Linux whine.

      No where in this annoucement do they say that they are releasing Picasa as open source software. They do allow use of it free of charge.

      Software developers are really in a bind with Linux. If you don't create software for Linux, Linux people whine that you are not supporting them.

      Create software for Linux, Linux people whine that its not open source.

      Picasa is an awesome photo management application. Be glad Google ported it to Linux, and that you can use it for free. If you demand that all software you use is open source, look elsewhere. Note that there are many useful applications that developers, for many reasons, don't want to release as open source. Limiting yourself to open source limits your choices.

    2. Re:not free by Bromskloss · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Limiting yourself to open source limits your choices.
      Many of us care about the freedom that comes with free software. Compare with free speech and free press. In the long run, it's really non-free software that limits ones choices. Compare again with free speech in this example:

      Someone offers you to come live in their country, but only under the condition that you keep very quiet about your own opinions and never criticize the government. Initially, it may seem that standing firm in your belief in free speech would limit your choices -- you would have to turn down the offer to live in that country. It is not hard to see, however, how abandoning free speech is what really would deprive you of your freedom. Who knows, after some time you might not even be able to leave their country, would you wish to do so.
      --
      Swedish plasma phys. PhD student; MSc EE; knows maths, programming, electronics; finance interest; seeks opportunities
    3. Re:not free by Entropy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Limiting yourself to open source limits your choices.

      Our choices to limit, neh?

      Or do you think your argument works well with other things -

      "Why be a vegetarian, it limits your choices!"

      "Why boycott company _x_, it limits your choices!"

      or even:

      "Why be straight, it limits your choices!"

      Limiting choices is not, of itself, such a horrible thing. Especially when much of that "choice" is shit software made by a company who doesn't give a flying monkey anus about making quality products, or anything remotely secure.

      --
      The sea changes color, but the sea does not change.
  2. It's NOT "fairly standard", it's for LINUX! by ThinkingInBinary · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Why announce a fairly standard application on /.?

    It's not a "fairly standard application" that we all take for granted. It's Google, a big corporation, openly and freely providing one of their major software applications for Linux (albeit using Wine). This does NOT happen very often, and we should bow down and praise those (Google) who do it! It's NOT just a "regular" software release.

  3. Re:"Google" software for Linux by FictionPimp · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wine is not emulation. Its an API. Its no different then any other linux app. No different then chosing QT over GTK or any thing else. Whats wrong with coding to a cross platform library?

  4. Re:story title wrong. by Bungopolis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wine is an implementation of the Windows API. It is not an emulator of any kind. It enables code written using it to run natively on non-Microsoft platforms. By extension of your logic it would seem that any application written using a library "intended" for use in the Linux world (such as Gaim and GTK+) cannot be considered "native" to Windows when ported to it, but this is clearly not the case. Using Wine may not be the nicest way to develop an application from the ground-up for Linux, but if it works, it works. What Google has released is indeed a native Linux application. Furthermore they have obviously made an extensive effort to improve both the code of Picasa and of Wine to address any bugs in Wine that might have resulted in poor performance.

  5. Re:Recommendation by barzok · · Score: 5, Insightful
    If this runs using wine internally, then couldn't we have run Picasa using Wine before anyway?
    Apparently not, since it took 225 WINE patches to get things working.

    Google funded 225 WINE patches. How many people who won't even use Picasa will benefit from that? IMHO, that's more important than Google releasing a package that lets Picasa run on Linux.
  6. Re:Why US only? by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why is the Linux version restricted to the US only?

    US Export restrictions.

    Land of the Free, except when you try to get stuff out.

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
  7. Re:Recommendation by adpsimpson · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Don't be lazy and actually, you know, port the code so it works natively without having to use Wine internally to run

    Why?

    If this installs and runs easily on Linux, why does it matter whether it's a 'native port' or some other hoops and tricks method? If it installs and runs, the that counts as released for linux.

    One of the biggest prospects for Linux's wide-scale adoption will be the ability to run programs designed for Windows. If the end result of Wine's development is that programs only need written once and then can either use a customised Wine to run under Linux, or slot into a supported, pre-installed and easy to use version of Wine (like Crossover Office or Cadega), then that counts as a better conclusion in terms of getting all vital software running on Linux than requiring a complete re-write of every app we want which, let's face it, will never happen.

    I've used Linux for over 2 years as my primary operating system. 2 months ago, I installed Microsoft Office via Crossover Office. It works as well as under Windows, installed as easily as under Windows thanks to Crossover's fine work, and has given me no problems. Although I still use Openoffice for most things, I have software in Access that I am currently porting to an Apache/PHP/MySQL system to which I need access from Linux. Plus, compared to 'Impress', Powerpoint is a breath of fresh air in terms of usability.

    Wine provides the promise to be able to run any software on Linux. Where's the problem when companies like Google take advantage of that to release software they wouldn't otherwise have the time or manpower to re-write?

    --
    Is crushing a suspect's child's testicles illegal?
    John Yoo: "No, [if] the President thinks he needs to do that."
  8. Everyone has missed the "real" announcement here by pla · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I don't get it. Why announce a fairly standard application on /.?

    This announcement has very little to do with Picassa.

    Read between the lines (or even one particular line, explicitly):
    "We hope our patches to Wine will help make it easier for everyone to run Windows apps on Linux and other Unix-like systems."
    OUR patches to wine.

    Google, which has a proven track-record of success when they start off in some strange new direction, has taken on the task of making Wine work better.

    Think about that for a minute, and you'll get the "big" news here.
  9. Re:wow by damiam · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Using wine to run windows software is NOT porting apps.

    True, but that's not what they're doing. They're using winelib, which is a native Linux/X toolkit. It only just happens to behave very similarly to the Windows API.

    --
    It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  10. Where's the love? Give Google a break :/ by Kiaradune · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Google have no obligations to the Linux/OSS communities, period. The fact that they've invested so much time, money and effort into not only their own Linux app, but also back to the Wine community should be applauded. Nobody is forcing you to use this. Don't like the way they've done it? Don't use it.

    Seriously, give them a break. They're making baby steps in the right direction. They've released what, a pre-beta via their labs? And so many people on Slashdot are expecting it to be a polished product... that's just wrong. Their forte is definitely not Linux desktop apps, but from the sounds of things, they certainly want to improve. Oh shock! They're not there on day 1. Or day 2. Well, Linux wasn't written in a day, nor were the plethora of other desktop apps for Linux.

    Let's not forget the human factor. Those programmers that worked on getting Picasa running on Google I'm sure would love some positive feedback to encourage them to continue working hard on it. I know I would. They're probably also unhappy that this pre-beta version isn't 'up to par' with the Windows version, but they're working on improving that. Reading their FAQ endeared the team that did this to me.

    As for Wine usage. Big deal. It's not like they're charging you $69 for the app. It works, and they aim to improve it. Sounds to me like they had a hard time trying to get it to work on so many different distros, instead of just say.. Red Hat. This project was only announced 4-5 months ago. Let's hope to see Google Earth before Christmas!

    --
    This space for rent.