Slashdot Mirror


Illumio to Launch Social Network Advice Software

hdtv writes "The New York Times is reporting that Palo Alto-based Illumio will soon try to figure out the experts among your social network with a new online service." From the article: "Illumio is not a search engine, like Google or Yahoo. The system works by transparently distributing a request for information on questions like "Who knows John Smith?" and "Are Nikon digital cameras better than Olympus?" to the computers in a network of users. The questions can then be answered locally based on a novel reverse auction system that Illumio uses to determine who the experts are."

19 of 132 comments (clear)

  1. Hmmm ... by Petrushka · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hmmm ... sounds kinda like the Slashdot moderator system.

  2. My first question by Negatyfus · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is Digg better than Slashdot?

    *ducks*

  3. Opinions anyone... by packetmon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How could this model label someone an expert when all they're doing is an assessment and rendering an opinion. I can see this posing a problem if say Company X introduced fakesters into a social circle to hype up a product. For example, a social circle with MS workers will likely give negative influence to someone seeking to say purchase Redhat. Coca Cola... Pepsi, and the possibilities become endless. Sounds like an idea, but there is no guarantee of getting untainted honest results simply catered opinions.

    1. Re:Opinions anyone... by innocence18 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ideally you would want to end up with a situation like Wikipedia where you have such a large number of contributors (experts) that it cancels out all the garbge like you've mentioned. Whether or not that is feasible in a system like this remains to be seen I guess.

      --
      Anonymity of the internet is responsible for the views expressed in my post.
    2. Re:Opinions anyone... by kfg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Consider, however, a situation in which an audio engineer actually recommends Bose speakers as an optimum solution to a particular problem, even though in general they are crappy.

      He'll be out in left field all by himself, even though his opinion is the most correct.

      Trust systems are really only valuable in finding average solutions to average problems. In unique situations requiring real expertise they will tend to reject the true experts right along with the clueless wonders.

      KFG

  4. Sounds promising. by Escogido · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What could be complicating matters, though, is the fact that the concept is very natural for any blogging or social networking service. It would make sense if the feature gains popularity (which seems very likely) if LinkedIn or even LiveJournal would release such a feature shortly. There we could have a problem Houston for Illumio, because it would be then hard to compete against the existing monsters.. unless their "killer algorythm" is "too good".

    Otherwise, *rubs hands in anticipation*

    1. Re:Sounds promising. by Escogido · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The piece of software may be a vaporware for what it's worth. The idea, however, is not, and in fact very clever. They may flop with the way they want to implement it.. but think of all the possibilities.

      Say, you need a new mobile phone and have some twenty or something friends in a social circle whose opinion you value. You decide you want to start with a brand first. You do some preliminary research and end up with say Nokia and Motorola. From that point, you can proceed no further since you really haven't a clue.. or maybe torn for options.. or maybe behind the trend and want to keep up.. doesn't matter. You want opinions of the people you know.. so now here's what you supposedly do in such a system:

      You issue a 'call for opinions', type your question and nokia on the left and motorola on the right. Your friends hopefully indicate their opinions, maybe attach some notes why they think so and what models they recommend. You have your answers and make your decision. Now you have to select a model, you follow the same routine, probably in more than one step, and somehow end up with a conclusion. You now go and buy the phone and after using it some time you can issue some feedback by rating how helpful and truthful the friends' tips were.

      Now if your friends do the same, and their friends etc. and a system that does some magic with the ratings is in place. There you can have a weighted rating of how useful or not opinions of the people you know to you are. With the advantages of the other networking, and public queries/answers you would hopefully then be able to fine tune your preferences in such a way so that you would be taking advice from the people you feel you trust the most.

      From a commercial POV, this really seems to be a goldmine, if implemented properly, that is. Given that in general some personal information on you is availiable to the owners of such a system, Nokia and Motorola would kill for such information as who buys their phones and what models and possibly attached feedback.

      Well let's see anyway. Oh, and somebody else in the comments has the link to the site.

  5. New way to create a blacklist by slarrg · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now all I need is a way to automatically blacklist all of the "experts" and the number of opinionated blowhards who contact me will decrease.

  6. How does it sort the posers from the gurus? by rolfwind · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The beginning of the article has a makebelieve scenario where you get answers to question like "are brand X cameras better than brand y". But that is such a generic question - how do you answer that? What metric? It really depends on what you want, and being an informed consumer, hitting all the usual spots for tech specs and opinions (usenet, amazon with reviews, other places with reviews, etcetera) might be better.

    I'm sure they are trying to develop something more commercial, perhaps to be used in large organizations, but the article begins badly to present it that way, and isn't really clear.

    1. Re:How does it sort the posers from the gurus? by Escogido · · Score: 5, Insightful

      From what I've read, it looks like they are trying to make it work like this. I ask a question, is A better than B? My friends state their opinion. I then make a decision, given all the opinions, and rate afterwards whether it was useful to me or not. There we have a rating. And if I know somebody is rated by the majority of their friends as an expert, I would be more inclined to believe them.

      As to commercial possibilities, the capability to know who really your TA is (sex/age/background/whatnot) is priceless, and the questions kind of reveal it. Looks like they could hit a goldmine if done 'properly': it's much like polls, but with more or less honest answers and done voluntarily!

  7. Another odd note... by packetmon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A desktop search engine enhances your Illumio experience. The DSE creates an index of the files (all or just the ones you designate) and Illumio uses this information to more efficiently filter requests so you receive more precisely matched recommendations. How can a search of files on my machine enhance someone else's opinion... "This is searching your friends' heads as reflected in what's on their computers," Ms. Dyson said. I have about 4 laptops at home. This happens to be my FreeBSD "anything goes machine" and I have my business laptop kept off of my home network. I have about 14+ years working experience in the IT field. On this machine I have nothing but music and art. Does this mean I would not qualify to answer questions about routers, session border controllers, VoIP equipment. Outside of what is known about this software, their words on privacy seem a little off-beat to me... "A simple search of what's on someone's machine will determine their level of expertise... I have another laptop my girlfriend uses to surf. Her cache is filled with "fashion" stuff... Will I be asked to partake based of her cache. Seems slightly ridiculous the more I think about it...

    1. Re:Another odd note... by AccUser · · Score: 3, Funny
      On this machine I have nothing but music and art.


      Yeah. Right. mp3s and pr0n?

      --

      Any fool can talk, but it takes a wise man to listen.

    2. Re:Another odd note... by cgranade · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That does seem very odd. Of further note: the "service" is based on an application that requires Windows XP. Though I imagine it would run under Linux w/ Wine, the default assumption seems to remain that only Windows users are experts. By excluding users of *BSD, Linux, OS X and other OSs, they are dramatically reducing the size of their network, which seems like would only negatively impact the entire project. If they're serious about building a social network, they should either design the frontend to their service in (X)HTML, which has clients under any OS that I can care to name, or they should write versions of the app for all major operating systems at the least. Even using a VM framework like Java or .NET would be better than just leaving all but your pet OS out in the cold.

      --

      #define DRM chmod 000

  8. Eat shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    millions of flies can't be wrong!

    1. Re:Eat shit by Vo0k · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Mod parent up.

      This thing will enforce the power of urban legends, myths and other false but popular memes, people opposing them will be a minority.

      "What is more secure, Windows or Linux"?
      And you get 1000 votes for "Windows" from 10% of Windows users of the service who bother to answer so, and 100 votes for "Linux" from nearly 70% of Linux users who will take time to answer plus another 2% of Windows users who know better.

      And this will favour positive answers for questions with bias on your interests.

      Say, you're an emo. You have your disk full of emo mp3s and dark poetry. And like every emo, you ponder suicide. So just to make the final decision, you type "Should I commit suicide?" and your question goes out to different people. But the most answers come from people who too have lots of emo mp3s and dark poetry on disks, simply, other emos. And you can guess the answers, "If I had enough guts, I would do it." "Yes, darkness, finally", "End your life, I'll envy you." Normal non-emo people don't keep that kind of crap on their disks and their advices to just drop that dark shit and get a life will get dropped by the system as not matching your interests...

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    2. Re:Eat shit by PatrickThomson · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This illustrates an important point about the internet in general. It enables people to only mingle with those similar to them, which is a shame because my most enriching experiences come from a diverse range of different people, coworkers, family, none technically literate. If we are permitted to choose everything we encounter, then life becomes boring and you lose perspective unless you throw in a "surprise me" or two.

      --
      I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
  9. URL to the site by mahesh_gharat · · Score: 5, Informative

    The URL for the illumio is
    URL: http://www.illumio.com/web/home.jsp
    It is still not launched and all you can do is register for their early release program. Looks like they are generating hype by all the means they can utilize including posting on the slashdot.

  10. What about spammers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sounds like a spammers dream.

  11. reminds me of the Usenet Oracle by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 5, Interesting