Slashdot Mirror
Virtualized Linux Faster Than Native?
^switch writes "Aussies at NICTA have developed a para-virtualized Linux called Wombat that they claim outperforms native Linux. From the article: 'The L4 Microkernel works with its own open source operating system Iguana, which is specifically designed as a base for use in embedded systems.'" Specific performance results are also available from the NICTA website.
Ignore the second link. The actual performance results are here.
The summary is misleading a bit - it's only faster on ARM v4 or v5 processors.
From TFA:
Wombat, NICTA's architecture-independent para-virtualised Linux for L4-embedded, can be faster than native Linux on the same hardware. Specifically on popular ARM v4 or v5 processors, such as ARM9 cores or the XScale, Wombat benefits from the fast address-space switch (FASS) technology implemented in L4-embedded, while this is not supported in native Linux distributions.
Could it be because linux for ARM is not that well optimised . I can't imagine such massive performance gains otherwise , bar a massive bug in the kernel.
Fast Address-Space Switching for ARM Linux Kernels
The Fast Address-Space Switching (FASS) project aims to utilise some of the features of the Memory Management Unit in the ARM architecture to improve the performance of context switches under the L4 kernel and ARM Linux.
The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
It benefits us all of more performance can be extracted from such chips, just because they're so widely used.
The reaction is not against the performance but the disingenious presentation. A cursory reading makes it seem as if the performance gain was somehow tied to it being a microkernel, or that the virtualization step somehow magically speeded things up. It wasn't - their kernel is using some platform specific optimizations that Linux doesn't, that's all.
Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
I've been researching more and more into NICTA's microkernel and virtualization (for my L4::BSD idea) and one thing that is important to understand is that NICTA's development is mainly on ARM, the Kenge toolset, as well as the Iguana OS are both much further along on ARM as opposed to i386
;)
Considering the work that NICTA does with companies that produce embedded hardware like Qualcomm, this isn't surprising, but don't go crazy about this.
Linux development is much more fine tuned on x86, and Kenge/Iguana development is much more fine tuned on ARM; no need to start holy wars here
That said, nice work benno, chuck, and gernot (and whomever else I'm forgetting)
Error 407 - No creative sig found