Slashdot Mirror


Wii Tops E3 Game Critics Awards

Gamespot reports on the announced winners of the E3 Critics Awards. From the article: "Nintendo, which was nominated a show-high 13 times, took home the show's biggest prize for its Wii console. The system, in the running for the only two categories it could qualify for, was handed the coveted Best of Show award, as well as Best Hardware award. But the Japanese game-maker wasn't done there. The publisher grabbed three more awards for some of its games, including Best Handheld Game (The Legend of Zelda: Phantom Hourglass for the DS), Best Sports Game (Wii Sports), and Best Racing Game (Excite Truck for the Wii)."

5 of 77 comments (clear)

  1. Go Big N by ExKoopaTroopa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    do you mean people actually prefer playability and fun over pure performance and graphics, and here's me thinking that Sony and Microsoft listened to players opinion's

    --
    Don't Tell Me What I Can't Do!
    1. Re:Go Big N by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      do you mean people actually prefer playability and fun over pure performance and graphics

      One might be able to conclude that the specific people who comprise the voting panel for the E3 Game Critic Awards might, but I would hesitate to draw any conclusions broader than that.

  2. Re:PS3 is all but final at this point by Wind_Walker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's far far too late in the development cycle for Sony to make major changes to the PS3. They may be able to bring the cost down another $50 without the beancounters screaming too loud, but that's it. They can't redesign the controller, they can't get rid of Blu-Ray, and they definitely can't be seen as copying Nintendo too hard.

  3. Re:Some people... by jizziknight · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think we need to redefine what a "hardcore gamer" is. I think I've said this before, but the widely accepted definition, is IMHO, wrong. A hardcore gamer is NOT someone who plays FPS's and war simulations. A hardcore gamer IS someone who either excells at nearly any type/genre of game and/or plays games for hours on end. You don't necessarily have to play intense, fast paced games to be a hardcore gamer. Also, if you've never played any console older than the original playstation, you are not hardcore. You've not endured enough slow framerates and flashing-induced headaches (Gunstar Heroes on the Genesis, anyone?) to be considered hardcore. Sorry. As an aside, and perhaps a suggestion for your friend.... I got my ex hooked on Phantasy Star Online. You can play cooperatively, the graphics are ok, and it's still a shooting/fighting type of game. She liked it because even though I was still a bazillion times better at it than her, I wasn't killing her specifically, and it wasn't too fast paced. She had time to stop and think. And if she got in a pinch, I was always there to back her up.

    --
    Everything I say is a lie. Except that... and that... and that, and that, and that, and that... and that.
  4. Re:More stuff that doesn't yet exist... by Minced · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually, to be elible for any of the awards the product/game HAS to be in playable form (apart from the Best Cinematics category). Since Nintendo had 27 Wii games on the floor including Wii Sports and ExciteTruck I don't see where you say they "only exist in product brochures and in marketer's minds..." Oh, and DNF doesn't have a playable form let alone a video form that reflects ANYTHING of what the current game might even be.