Slashdot Mirror


ISPs Offer Faster Speeds, Why Don't We Get Them?

Ron Williams asks: "I'm infuriated every time I see that companies are raising their speeds when they can't maintain their current speeds. Here's my biggest issue: my grandmother signed up for the 3Mbps DSL plan through Verizon, however a speed test said she was only getting 750Kbps. Why pay for the extra bandwidth when she's not getting it? She downgraded to the 768K plan expecting to still have 750K. Wrong, instead her speed dropped to 300K. So, how about instead of companies constantly claiming to increase their speeds, they get their actual speeds correct. Comcast has done the same thing, I had their 6Mbps plan at one point, I got 2.5Mbps usually and sometimes 3Mbps, so they're all doing the same thing. In closing, with all these speed increases, why is my Internet not getting faster?" What practices and tools do you use to test your bandwidth speed and how have you approached your ISP when the performance repeatedly fell short of your expectations? One thing to note is that you'll never get the top speed advertised for any connection due to transmission overhead; even so, you should be able to get close (within about 10-20%). Also, ISPs oversell their bandwidth, so if you run your speed tests when other customers are using their connection, you will notice the performance hit.

10 of 688 comments (clear)

  1. SLA? by Jordan+Catalano · · Score: 5, Insightful

    SLA? Bullshit. If I buy a car called "Toyota 85MPH Blue Car" it had damned well better not be goverened to 55MPH. "But when you bought the car, the dealer never signed an agreement guaranteeing speed." Bull-shit.

    1. Re:SLA? by kahanamoku · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, thats is EXACTLY what the post is claiming...

      She downgraded to the 768K plan expecting to still have 750K. Wrong, instead her speed dropped to 300K.

      Using your example, the user has thus now bought a car that only does 60MPH and now magically the traffic has slowed to 30MPH

      --
      ----- Concentrate on promoting more than demoting.
    2. Re:SLA? by avdp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      To be fair, you ISP only owns parts of the highway: the on ramp (some might own a bit more than that). I bet you'd find that a bandwidth test against a server in their network would probably report numbers very close to what they're selling you. But there are quite a few bottleneck on the internet, including the bandwidth connection of the website you're trying to reach (including the bandwidth test sites I have seen).

  2. Bit Versus Byte by Wizarth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Something I've heard from my friends a lot is that they don't realise companies sell their connection speeds in BITS per second.

    Myself, I have 512Kb/s down, and as a rule of thumb I divide by 10 to get it in bytes. I get at best 54KB/s downloads, which works out by this rule.

    I know, a byte is 8 bits, but as a rule of thumb, dividing by 10 seems to include overhead.

    I know my 512Kb/s ADSL connection doesn't rate against these 3Mb/s cable connections, but, this is my experience, learn from it what you will.

  3. Re:Shocking! by ScrewMaster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What does gramma need with 3Mbps anyway?!

    Irrelevant. They sold her on 3 Mbps, they aren't delivering it. It's not my business or yours what she wants it for.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  4. Re:No surprise here move along by Flexagon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... you get no SLA...

    My cable connection (Comcast) is the same, and specifically includes a disclaimer that no guarantee is made that I will actually receive the rated throughput.

    In practice, it blazes in the off-hours, sludges out during prime time. And the most noticable effect when it's bad is latency, not throughput.

  5. Gas Mileage by 246o1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Gas mileage is not determined by the companies, it is determined by a set of specific tests under federal law. If you were able to run those tests and find a discrepancy, then you would have a case as far as fraud/mislabeling/etc. goes. Tests are quite easy to run on bandwidth, so it's an entirely different situation.

    --
    Although the moon is smaller than the earth, it is farther away.
  6. Re:No surprise here move along by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My cable connection (Comcast) is the same, and specifically includes a disclaimer that no guarantee is made that I will actually receive the rated throughput.

    Doesn't matter. If they never give you the speed you pay for, it's fraud. Otherwise, why wouldn't they sell you 12M internet?

    --
    "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  7. Re:Welcome to fascism, kid. by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've heard of this phenomenon. I think they call it "lobbying".

    In most parts of the world this is better known as 'corruption'.

  8. Yeah, it is DSL... by thebdj · · Score: 3, Insightful

    this is absurd. Of course your speeds with DSL might suck depending on your location, and the way they determine what speed you get, of course a speed decrease will lower your actual bandwidth. You'll note the speed decrease is actually a bit less with the lower speed, but they are actuall still comparable and probably somewhat attributable to other networking factors.

    Before complaining about your DSL line being slow, I think you really should read up on how DSL (and most likely ADSL to be specific) works. You are hardly ever going to get max bandwidth out of a service line though I honestly cannot complain about the speeds I am getting with Cable. So, remember, before starting a bitch-fest...know what the hell you are talking about...

    --
    "Some days you just can't get rid of a bomb."