Slashdot Mirror


Alien Bacteria May Have Landed in India

coastal984 writes "CNN & Popular Science are reporting that a scientist in India believes he may have discovered alien life in water collected from a unusually colored rainstorm. From the article: 'So how to explain them? Louis speculates that the particles could be extraterrestrial bacteria adapted to the harsh conditions of space and that the microbes hitched a ride on a comet or meteorite that later broke apart in the upper atmosphere and mixed with rain clouds above India.'"

116 comments

  1. Great... by 0311 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...now even bacteria are being outsourced to India.

    1. Re:Great... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      And from other planets, no less. You thought the outsourcing situation was bad on Terra...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Great... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Even the Indian guy on Dilbert is has that problem.

    3. Re:Great... by Neurotoxic666 · · Score: 1

      Seriously, those who tagged this story "outsourcing" deserve karma bonuses. I really laughed my balls off when I saw that! ;)

      --
      You are more than the sum of what you consume. Desire is not an occupation.
    4. Re:Great... by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Your balls have been outsourced?

  2. Um by hawkbug · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah, or they could be from some mountain top somewhere or from any other number of sources.

    1. Re:Um by thc69 · · Score: 1
      ...and now is able to reproduce on it's own to create a new super-bat army.
      It brings to mind the line "...a super race of alien butt babies" -- which I can't seem to remember on what tv show or movie I heard it.

      Er, that was quite the malformed sentence. Yee-haw!
      --
      Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
  3. Sorry, this is not news by Aging_Newbie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This story has been surfacing periodically since

    "blood-colored showers that fell sporadically across Louis's home state of Kerala in the summer of 2001"

    but it never seems to reach a conclusion. Precisely why the sample has not been distributed to a variety of scientists continues to amaze me. I would think it would not take too long for a group of scientists to qualify or reject his hypothesis.

    Panspermia is not a bad hypothesis but lack of rigor in evaluating it does little for its credibility.

    1. Re:Sorry, this is not news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      Precisely why the sample has not been distributed to a variety of scientists continues to amaze me.

      If you bothered to RTFA, you'd notice that it has infact been "been distributed to a variety of scientists" for evaluation. Excerpts for your kind perusal:

      In April, Louis, a solid-state physicist at Mahatma Gandhi University, published a paper in the prestigious peer-reviewed journal Astrophysics and Space Science in which he hypothesizes that the samples -- water taken from the mysterious blood-colored showers that fell sporadically across Louis's home state of Kerala in the summer of 2001 -- contain microbes from outer space.

      Last winter, Louis sent some of his samples to astronomer Chandra Wickramasinghe and his colleagues at Cardiff University in Wales, who are now attempting to replicate his experiments; Wickramasinghe expects to publish his initial findings later this year.

      The next significant step, explains University of Sheffield microbiologist Milton Wainwright, who is part of another British team now studying Louis's samples, is to confirm whether the cells truly lack DNA. So far, one preliminary DNA test has come back positive.

    2. Re:Sorry, this is not news by Nutria · · Score: 1
      Precisely why the sample has not been distributed to a variety of scientists continues to amaze me. I would think it would not take too long for a group of scientists to qualify or reject his hypothesis.

      Exactly what I was thinking as I RTFA.
      Why send a sample to an astronomer? Send it to a molecular biologist who can do DNA testing.
      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    3. Re:Sorry, this is not news by im_mac · · Score: 2, Informative

      You say the story has been surfacing periodically before... any examples of that in a peer-reviewed journal? I skimmed the actual article (in Astrophysics and Space Science which is 13 pages long so won't be copied here) and he basically suggests a couple hypothesis that don't work, i.e. dust, pollen, fungal spores etc. The fact that the cells look like biological cells but have no trace of DNA/RNA is the oddity. If it is terrestrial in origin, then it's something never seen before. Or his tests are wrong. Others are working to verify his results.

    4. Re:Sorry, this is not news by LionMage · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's assuming there's any DNA to find. There are many self-replicating molecules in the universe, of which DNA is one kind. If researchers don't find DNA, then the next logical step IMHO is to find evidence of any other self-replicating molecules present inside these "cells."

      Preliminary tests don't seem to indicate the presence of DNA. This shouldn't be the end of the inquiry. Furthermore, repeated testing for the presence of DNA is only so useful; yes, it's good to independently verify results, but after you're satisfied that something isn't there, it's time to find out what is there.

    5. Re:Sorry, this is not news by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      Precisely why the sample has not been distributed to a variety of scientists continues to amaze me.

      Especially if they are truly multiplying, as hinted in the article.

      OTOH, a meteor (possibly containing much Fe) soars across the sky, burning up as it goes (burning another term for a fast oxydation reaction), and suddenly the rain has a red tinge to it.

      Obviously, there must be some form of life involved, it couldn't be just chemistry.

      And they always told me the reddish water pumped from farm wells was just due to iron in the water...

      So that lettuce that got left in the refrigerator too long, that's really alien bacteria/fungus/whatever turning it reddish and slimy.

    6. Re:Sorry, this is not news by Nutria · · Score: 2, Funny

      Preliminary tests don't seem to indicate the presence of DNA. This shouldn't be the end of the inquiry. Furthermore, repeated testing for the presence of DNA is only so useful; yes, it's good to independently verify results, but after you're satisfied that something isn't there, it's time to find out what is there.

      Absolutely. But this is work for an open-minded biologist, not an agenda-driven astronomer.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    7. Re:Sorry, this is not news by shotfeel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even so, you don't send it to an astromomer. Send it to a biologist, a chemist, or, hey, even a biochemist to evaluate. Does this guy go to a lawyer for medical advice (or vice versa)?

      We have yet to determine how he came to the conclusion there is not DNA (he's a solid state physicist). Its really hard to go to any "puddle" of water and not find DNA, even if there aren't any living organisms (just ask anyone who does DNA work how careful they have to be to avoid contaminating samples).

    8. Re:Sorry, this is not news by LionMage · · Score: 1

      I'm totally with you, although I should point out that there are many people who work across disciplines. Carl Sagan did some of the initial research on reproducing the earliest building-blocks of life in conditions that mimicked the conditions of the primordial Earth. Sagan is usually remembered as an astronomer, although he was trained as well in the biological sciences, and is one of the earliest exemplars of the field of astrobiology as a result.

    9. Re:Sorry, this is not news by FrontalLobe · · Score: 1

      So that lettuce that got left in the refrigerator too long, that's really alien bacteria/fungus/whatever turning it reddish and slimy.

      Man... They should send some scientists over to my place... I think I have a whole colony of aliens!

      --
      -FL
    10. Re:Sorry, this is not news by LionMage · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed, although there are astronomers and astrophysicists who also dabble in astrobiology, as I pointed out in a response to a sibling comment to yours. Just because someone specializes in one field doesn't mean they don't have a right to diversify and branch out into other fields. Furthermore, what input would a carbon-chauvanist biologist have about a life form that was not recognizable to biologists as "life as we know it?" A biologist can speak authoritatively about biological processes that are understood, but no biologist has any training in looking for genetic information carried by anything other than DNA.

      (Yes, I know there's work being done with prions, but those are self-replicating protein structures which, to my knowledge, don't carry information we'd think of as "genetic" in nature. Prions don't form cells around themselves, to the best of my knowledge, nor do they seem to "code" for structures other than more of themselves.)

      Astrobiology, being a speculative field of science, has people in it drawn from a much broader spectrum of scientific endeavor, and as such is a bit more immune to prejudice and narrow-minded thinking; astrobiologists routinely speculate about "exotic" biochemistries.

      So... why not give samples to an astronomer? It's not as crazy an idea as you seem to suggest. The tendency in the modern world to overly-compartmentalize and over-specialize can retard the progress of science. Considering that the astronomer in question, Prof. Wickramasinghe, was one of the co-authors of the seminal paper on the theory of panspermia, why not let him participate in the research?

      Many scientists have profitably crossed between disciplines in the past. I don't see why we should take a provincial view in this particular case.

    11. Re:Sorry, this is not news by Grab · · Score: 1

      Even this is behind the times. NewScientist ran an article on this a few months back, including pictures of the "alien" cells. Several readers then wrote in identifying said cells - IIRC it was some variety of bacterium after all (sadly I don't keep my copies of NS so I couldn't tell you exactly what). Mystery over.

      Grab.

    12. Re:Sorry, this is not news by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      "blood-colored showers that fell sporadically across Louis's home state of Kerala in the summer of 2001"

      Note the word "sporadically".
      It seems just a tad peculiar that something extraterrestrial hit Kerala several times, but not anywhere else. Comet fragments were arriving exactly at 24 hour intervals, so as to hit the same spot as the Earth rotated?

    13. Re:Sorry, this is not news by NickFitz · · Score: 1

      This letter (22 April 2006)?

      You need to be a New Scientist subscriber to read the full text, but it begins:

      Now that Milton Wainwright and his colleagues have confirmed that the Indian "red rain" cells contain DNA, it seems most likely that they are algae, and as he suggests in his letter, are not in the least mysterious...

      and goes on to say

      Researchers in Kerala suggest that the red rain could be cells of a red-pigmented green alga, Trentepohlia, but there are other likely candidates. The green algal genus Haematococcus is a member of the motile order Volvocales which forms spores and resting-stage "palmella" structures, both enclosed by thick cell walls, and very similar to the pictures that you published. The cells are strongly red-coloured by the carotenoid pigment astaxanthin, formerly called haematochrome.

      The CNN story is about a paper published in April; it's now June. They also claim that the cells contain no DNA, even though the New Scientist letter states that they do. Looks like a slow news day at the CNN science desk.

      --
      Using HTML in email is like putting sound effects on your phone calls. Just say <strong>no</strong>.
  4. Rainbows... by talkingpaperclip · · Score: 3, Funny

    "...may have discovered alien life in water collected from a unusually colored rainstorm..."

    Last time I checked it was a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow, not alien bacteria.

    1. Re:Rainbows... by Chosen+Reject · · Score: 1
      Last time I checked it was a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow, not alien bacteria.

      Last time I checked I took the pot of gold. The leprechauns must have replaced it with the aliens.

      --
      Stop Global Warming!
      Just say no to irreversible processes!
  5. red rain in russia by prurientknave · · Score: 3, Funny

    there was actually another report of red rain in russia two weeks ago. No mention of alien bacteria though.

    1. Re:red rain in russia by tbone1 · · Score: 2, Funny
      there was actually another report of red rain in russia two weeks ago.

      Hm, was Peter Gabriel anywhere near the area?

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
    2. Re:red rain in russia by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, alien bacteria find you.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    3. Re:red rain in russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in soviet russia, putting words in the correct order and spelling is getting even more popular!

      those who have seen the tv-serial "invaders", are allowed to scared now :D

    4. Re:red rain in russia by NuShrike · · Score: 1

      Did the goddess Aunt Flo pass by?

  6. Popular Science article is rather sparse... by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 3, Informative


    Much more detail about this phenomenon can be found here and here.

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:Popular Science article is rather sparse... by booch · · Score: 1

      Or here and here.

      --
      Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
    2. Re:Popular Science article is rather sparse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent's comment is rather sparse and simplistic, albeit a typical slashdot post linking a few google results looking for the 'informative' mod. A more insightful take on the topic, providing some actual input, can be found here.

      That is all.

  7. The End by bobs666 · · Score: 1
    You know this could be the end of life as we know it. If this is "extraterrestrial bacteria adapted to the harsh conditions of space", in time we could be replaced.

    Or perhaps not.

    1. Re:The End by Jerf · · Score: 1

      Yup, I totally agree that slime that seems to be able to replicate itself could eventually develop into something that could replace us.

      However, history indicates that the time required will be somewhere around 500 million to two billion years, depending on where you draw the line.

      This is not something that keeps me up at night.

    2. Re:The End by craXORjack · · Score: 1, Funny
      in time we could be replaced.

      Maybe Indians who drank the water were taken over by the alien parasites and are now infiltrating the U.S. on H1-B Visas. So when Chandresh, the new employee, brings in food for everyone in your department, whatever you do, don't eat the red chutney.

      --
      Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
    3. Re:The End by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      at the rate we're going, whatever they evolve into won't be replacing us - we'd have been long gone, wiped out via either war or environmental destruction

  8. But certainly by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

    Couldn't come to the US, fearing they might be considered illegal aliens.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:But certainly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, Indians go to Bacteria !

    2. Re:But certainly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny? That's just stupid.

    3. Re:But certainly by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Don't tell me, I know that. I didn't mod that funny, did I?

      It's actually amazing. I post something insightful, it's modded funny. I post something funny, it's modded flamebait. I get pissed and post a flame, it gets modded insightful...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:But certainly by john_uy · · Score: 1

      worse, biological terrorists!

      --
      Live your life each day as if it was your last.
  9. War Of The Worlds in reverse? by objekt · · Score: 4, Funny

    H.G. Wells was wrong! They aren't going to be killed by bacteria--THEY *ARE* BACTERIA!

    --
    -- Boycott Shell
    1. Re:War Of The Worlds in reverse? by Xzzy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Well at least this version won't get morphed into a 3rd rate Tom Cruise action movie.

      So it can't be all bad.

    2. Re:War Of The Worlds in reverse? by tibike77 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Been there, done that... MI2 :P

      --
      By reading this signature you agree to not disagree with the post you just read.
    3. Re:War Of The Worlds in reverse? by maniac/dev/null · · Score: 4, Funny

      Does this mean they can only be stopped by large, terrible war machines?

    4. Re:War Of The Worlds in reverse? by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 2, Funny

      Woohoo! Finally something the President is good for!

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
  10. Continuation of earlier /. stories... by GillBates0 · · Score: 3, Informative
    It should be noted (atleast in the new Slashdot "Related Story" section) that this is a continuation of these two earlier stories published on /. earlier this year.

    It would also be fruitful to mention that that Google turns up these stories with the most obvious of keywords: alien rain India site:slashdot.org.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
  11. Re:WTH Is Going On Here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm just as tinfoil-hat wary as any other slashdot regular

    Pssst... most of us here are normal people. Your type is a vocal minority, laughed at and looked down upon with regularity.

  12. Ahh yes, "popular" science.... by argStyopa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ..more like "hysterically overblown science with little basis for their hyperbole but it sounds pretty cool..." ie the Weekly World News of Science.

    When you consider that JUST in ONE LAKE (Yellowstone Lake) in a heavily-studied US national park: "...One park biodiversity expert believes that 99% of the park's microbes and 75% of its invertebrates remain undiscovered.", I guess I'd assume that these strange little structures are Earth-generated, before I'd start reaching to outer space for explanations of their origin.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:Ahh yes, "popular" science.... by misleb · · Score: 1

      I didn't note any hypebole at all in the article. Sounds like everyone involved has an appropriate amount of skepticism. The one thing that makes it unlikely that this is a case of an as yet undiscovered bacteria is that these red cells don't seem to contain DNA. All life on Earth has DNA as far as we know. If this proves to be life without DNA, that is good evidence that it is not from Earth. Not proof, but certainly evidence.

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    2. Re:Ahh yes, "popular" science.... by Illserve · · Score: 1

      All life on Earth has DNA as far as we know

      Incorrect. Single celled organisms began with RNA, as far as we know, and there are still some surviving lines with this simple architecture. DNA was a major upgrade to RNA. There could be other, pre-RNA versions of information storage that we have yet to find evidence of.

    3. Re:Ahh yes, "popular" science.... by cnettel · · Score: 1
      What "surviving lines" are you talking about? Do you subscribe to the theory of (some) RNA viruses actually being highly modified descendants to that primordial life, or something else?

      Anyway, one form of life that lacks DNA, and is red, is of course just that - mammalian red blood cells. No nucleus and no mitochondria. And they make a pretty red. I guess an Indian Dracula was hit by a lightning strike (or a flying alien garlic) in mid-air.

    4. Re:Ahh yes, "popular" science.... by Dr.+Photo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Frankly, given the fact that outer space is like FIVE TIMES bigger than the Earth, I'd say that Occam's Razor puts the burden of proof squarely on the "It came from Earth" crowd. ;-)

      Five times bigger, folks. That's a lot of space!

  13. Re:WTH Is Going On Here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you read the article, it says even the scientist himself is skeptical of the idea. I think he is just throwing it out as a possibility, and it's being exaggerated by the reporters, as it makes for an interesting headline.

  14. It HAS to be said... by Hikaru79 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new microscopic overlords!

    1. Re:It HAS to be said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. No, it didn't.

  15. Chubby Rain! by sdo1 · · Score: 1

    Sorry. I'm truly sorry. But it had to be said.

    -S

    --
    --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
    1. Re:Chubby Rain! by 93,000 · · Score: 1

      "I got you, sucka!"

  16. So let me get this straight by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1
    It reproduces and it doesn't have DNA?
    OMG! Red goo!!

    Seriously, this could be like the (theoretical) self-replicating clays that supposedly were the precursers to DNA.

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    1. Re:So let me get this straight by Amouth · · Score: 1

      nahh don't get your hopes up.. my bet is it is part of Jenova

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    2. Re:So let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mother, is that you?

  17. In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The rain was always Red.

    1. Re:In Soviet Russia by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

      MOD PARENT DAMN FUNNY

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    2. Re:In Soviet Russia by rts008 · · Score: 1

      One of the best " In Soviet Russia..." /. jokes ever! :)
      Congrat's!

      Yes, Please Mod this one DAMN FUNNY! as suggested.

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  18. Stupid Pet Tricks by shoma-san · · Score: 1

    Where do bacteria go to resolve disputes? The settling chamber. Where do alien bacteria go to resolve disputes? They don't have the right to go to the settling chamber unless they've obtained a legal work visa.

  19. More analysis showing possible signs of DNA by bharath · · Score: 2, Informative

    More analysis showing possible signs of DNA here:

    http://www.astrobiology.cf.ac.uk/redrain.html

  20. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  21. From The Guardian's article: by Red+Samurai · · Score: 1

    "One scientist who posted a message on Louis's website described it as 'bullshit'."

    Ouch.

    From: http://observer.guardian.co.uk/world/story/0,,1723 913,00.html

    1. Re:From The Guardian's article: by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      So how did the bullshit get into indian rain? Did they send bulls into the sky?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  22. Huh? by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    in water collected from a unusually colored rainstorm

    Isn't water basically clear? So aren't rainstorms basically clear as well?

    This sounds more like an article referring to a show on SciFi Channel, than something I should be tuning into National Geographic to watch.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Isn't water basically clear? So aren't rainstorms basically clear as well?

      Uh, yeah. Except that this one was basically red, which is basically unusual.

      Honestly, there are enough self-evidently dopey aspects to this story that you hardly need to grasp at this silly straw.

  23. You forgot "Military Recruiting Tool" Science by spun · · Score: 1

    Pretty much every issue has some kind of "gee-whiz, look at how cool it is to be a soldier and play with these high tech gadgets," article. BTW, it's no Weekly World News, because Popular Science actually takes itself seriously, whereas WWN, I believe, is in on the joke.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  24. Re:WTH Is Going On Here? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You know, we are approaching the date (200)6-6-6, the day of the beast. Probably those are the bacteria of the Apocalypse! :-)

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  25. The amount deposited in the rain was 50 tons by johansalk · · Score: 1

    If extraterrestrial germs indeed, that would be one hell of a stink comet. That would a holly molly rottenest thing ever.

  26. Activate... by idontgno · · Score: 2, Funny
    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  27. This time last year... by jd · · Score: 1
    ...I would have considered that a gross overestimate for dramatic purposes on the part of the park expert. Within the past year, ice worms were discovered in the Cascades in Washington State, 13 new species of scorpion were found in California, and they've now found that 2.5 km cave system in Israel with who knows how many species that are totally new to science.


    99% of the microbes in Yellowstone Park being undiscovered (or, at least, unidentified) sounds a whole lot more reasonable to me today, and I am completely convinced that enough remains unidentified on Earth that alien origins for any organism would be impossible to prove by any process that eliminates the known. There is simply too much unknown.


    The claims of no DNA aren't convincing, either. DNA isn't hard to extract, but not while it is still in a puddle on the ground. Of course, not everything there need be alive - plenty of chemicals cause colours. A few unusual compounds could make for pretty colours but not produce DNA.


    (Also, survivable high-speed atmospheric impacts would require any bacteria to be in a meteorite large enough to reach the surface AND large enough to hold all the bacteria being found AND deep enough inside for the fragment to be blasted off a planet(oid) without killing everything in it. I'd be much more ok with this claim if the find was in a sizable, FRESH crater.)

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:This time last year... by piano-in-a-box · · Score: 0
      Of course, not everything there need be alive - plenty of chemicals cause colours.
      Except for the fact that they are definitely reproducing...
  28. In the wild? by misleb · · Score: 1

    So has anyone checked to see how the "cells" the weren't collected are doing in the wild? Do they multiply there? Turn whole lakes red?

    -matthew

    --
    "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
  29. ALIENS ARE ALREADY HERE by CranberryKing · · Score: 1

    This is just like insect evidence from their planet. More will be coming. The government know about it has entered negotiations.

    Believe it.

    1. Re:ALIENS ARE ALREADY HERE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some have suggested that all these recent stories about alien microbes/bacteria are in fact being deliberately leaked in order to mentally prepare the public for forthcoming REAL announcements concerning extraterrestrials.

      This is, of course, wild and unfounded speculation from all parties... but it's kinda fun to think about. :)

    2. Re:ALIENS ARE ALREADY HERE by red_gnom · · Score: 1

      "Some have suggested that all these recent stories about alien microbes/bacteria are in fact being deliberately leaked in order to mentally prepare the public for forthcoming REAL announcements concerning extraterrestrials".

      There are also leaks from the sources, that the announcement is scheduled for 2006.6.6

  30. Clearly, it's the work of the Plague Horseman [nt] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    None!

  31. They were algae spores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
  32. Rainbow Cheese? by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

    "...may have discovered alien life in water collected from a unusually colored rainstorm..."

    Last time I checked it was a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow, not alien bacteria.


    Are you sure? Could be a pretty good yoghurt or chese. I'm not willing to allow a cheese gap.

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
  33. Presigious? by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The article claims that the study was published in the "presigious" journal, Astrophysics and Space Science. I'm an astronomer and I've never heard of it. And yes, this does matter: a major find like ET life will have journals like Science and Nature tripping over themselves to publish it. Every step down from there is an indiciation that someone didn't think that the research was reasonable. Of course, the fact that this is a solid-state physicist who published this and not, say, a biologist is disturbing, too.

    Also, I'm going to be a bit junior-high here and point out that "Astrophysics and Space Science" has a very unfortunate acronym and must be difficult to cite with its abbreviation.

    1. Re:Presigious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Also, I'm going to be a bit junior-high here and point out that "Astrophysics and Space Science" has a very unfortunate acronym and must be difficult to cite with its abbreviation.

      Really? As an astronomer you have to be aware of the many, many journals out there in different fields that have the word 'Analysis' shortened to 'Anal.' in the shortened name form, right? As a biochemist, I can't begin to count the number of references to an 'Anal.' journal I've seen... :)

    2. Re:Presigious? by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 1

      Actually, I can't think of one in my field that's abbreviated that way. But the word "Analysis" doesn't really appear in any astronomy journals that I've seen. "Annals", yes. "Analysis", no. It's probably a culture thing. Even if it did, my guess is we're go for the shortest possible abbreviation. (Thus, "The Astrophysical Joural" is "ApJ" -- pronounced "ap-jay" -- for example.)

    3. Re:Presigious? by fermion · · Score: 1

      The journal is published by springer. which has journals I have heard of, at least in the physical and material science area. You may have a point, however, that a physicist, and a journal reviewed by physicsist, may not be best judge of biological issues.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    4. Re:Presigious? by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 1

      Knowing who the publisher is doesn't equate to having heard of the journal. It's the journal's proported prestige (I didn't use that word to describe it, the original article did) that I question, not that it's a legitimate publication.

  34. LINK TO JOURNAL by rewinn · · Score: 1

    The online journal appears to be here.

    Whether it is pretigious or not, I leave to people who know more than I.

    1. Re:LINK TO JOURNAL by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 1

      Thanks!

  35. it is called iron bacteria by zogger · · Score: 2, Informative

    The red tint can easily come from bacteria called iron bacteria. I am familiar with water wells and the necessity sometimes for disinfecting and filtering the water before use from those microbes.(having the old lady go medieval on you from her losing a set of all-whites in the wash is a good motivator for research and corrective actions with said infected well :p ) Here is a URL for your perusal on this subject

    http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/eh/wells/ironba cteria.html

    1. Re:it is called iron bacteria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      except the iron bacteria 1) have DNA and these (apparantly) do not, and 2) iron bacteria have a totally different structure (iron bacteria are elongated, almost like a cigar or wand, while these other cells (?) are oval).

    2. Re:it is called iron bacteria by zogger · · Score: 1

      I was only commenting on the red tinted water from wells, I have no idea whatsoever on the Indian sky/rain falling bacteria or whatever it is.

        That it fell off and on for a couple of months I *think* would eliminate a rogue meteor and transpermia action*, which would leave wind patterns normal for that time of year picking up dust upwind someplace with a tint to it and/or something like red tide algae from over water, or, less likely but still possible, some sort of extensive black ops missions with atmospheric spraying of some exotic man made substance. We would need a lot better analysis of the substance in question to begin to proceed here. I am not really believing the no DNA claims yet. If it fell off and on for two months there should be a lot more samples someplace.

      *I don't know if we were going through any particular concentrated meteor swarm at the time, something like the Perseids, etc, but not noticed before. I find that unlikely though. the initial report from the local residents describe a large boom in the sky that preceeded the first red-stuff drop, that part is the screwiest to me, because then for two months the red rain fell, but no additional sky booms. Anything deposited like that from a meteor would have spread all over, not remained in one small area.

      So-I big fat "I dunno".

  36. Summon the Mythbusters! by electric_yak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Other theories have implicated fungal spores, red dust swept up from the Arabian peninsula, even a fine mist of blood cells produced by a meteor striking a high-flying flock of bats."

    Now wait just a goddamn minute.

    A flock of bats!? I think it's time to have F5 Industries figure out exactly how many bats, of what type, struck by a meteor of what size and velocity, are needed to create a fine red mist across a chunk of land that size.

  37. Repost by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This is the third time I've seen this article in several months..really, can't moderators be bothered to do a quick archive search to see if a story has already been posted?

    --
    'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
    1. Re:Repost by SEE · · Score: 2, Funny

      This isn't just the third time the story's run this year. It's also the second time Zonk ran the story in the Science section this year.

  38. Good PDF of the subject by reezle · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://arxiv.org/ftp/astro-ph/papers/0312/0312639. pdf

    He goes into quite a bit of detail about the test they ran on these bugs. Pretty interesting stuff.

  39. OT: Thank you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm glad you liked it.

    --davidwr

  40. Cryptologists by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

    Do cryptologists get to look at the gene sequences of these bacteria?

  41. What... is your quest? by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    I think it's time to have F5 Industries figure out exactly how many bats, of what type, struck by a meteor of what size and velocity, are needed to create a fine red mist across a chunk of land that size.

    Huh? I.. I don't know that. AAAAAaaaahh!!! [thrown off bridge]

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  42. Oh, Zonk. No. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    Not only is it pseudo-science garbage, but it's a pseudo-science garbage double-dupe (or pseudo-science "tripe," for short). After the homeopathy / carpet fuzz / schizophrenia article, I've just about lost all repsect for him. Could someone please take away his rights to post articles in the Science section?

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  43. Yet Another Weird Story From India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    India has always had crazy stories like this: wild man-beasts, man-eating babies, etc. Hell, alien bacteria will feel right at home with the Indian swamp monster.

  44. scientists have already investigated by entendre+entendre · · Score: 1
    And here's what the scientists has to say:
    On microscopic examination, the substance was seen to consist of tiny circular particles that resembled spores. The sample was therefore transferred to the microbiology laboratory of the Tropical Botanic Garden and Research Institute (TBGRI). The spores were found to grow well in algal culture medium. The alga was identified as a specie belonging to the genus Trentepohlia. The region in Changanacherry from where the red rain was reported was found to be densely vegetated with plenty of lichen on trees, rocks and lampposts. Samples of lichen collected from there also were cultured in the microbiology laboratory of TBGRI. The study showed that the lichen collected from the site gave rise to algae similar to the ones cultured from the spores obtained from the rain water samples. The spores in the rainwater, therefore, most probably are of local origin.

    Read the whole thing if you're interested.

  45. Life by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 1
    Well, it's unfortunately not that easy, easy even here on Earth. We're still working out the boundaries of what life is, with discoveries like the mimivirus, nanobes, viroids, and the fact that the Archaea appear to be fantastically abundant in the oceans, yet remain virtually undetectable there. Life is a slippery beast, even when dealing with plain old carbon-based DNA critters. Unless you know what you're looking for, or are looking for something big and colourful and obvious like Euglena in pond water, it can be very difficult to find anything at all.

    Still, the fact that the samples haven't been shared out widely speaks ill of this researcher. After all, didn't this stuff rain from the sky? It can't be in particularly short supply.

  46. Chemist by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I'd say the chemist/biochemist might be the best bet. Really, what is the hallmark of life, other than that it causes unusual chemical reactions to take place? You don't typically see CO_2 turning into sugar when bombarded by sunlight, unless there's a cyanobacteria or something around to do the job. Sugar tends to be fairly stable in O_2 without monsters to catalyze its breakdown. So if you seal up a wee little ecosystem, and catch it changing in some way that is inconsistent with simpler, non-living chemical reactions, that's a good clue that you might have a sample worth probing further.

    Actually, now that I think about it, wouldn't a chemosynthetic creature (or what would be called a chemosynthetic creature were it part of our tree of life) be hard to detect, since they typically just expedite reactions that take place anyway? Like metal oxidation?

  47. Re:WTH Is Going On Here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What! Reporters exaggerating the facts for a headline?! I'm shocked! .... No, wait, I'm really not.

  48. This story is a TRIPLICATE by Pestilence · · Score: 0

    It's been run THREE times on Slashdot now since January 7th that I could find in a quick search.

    You'd think that a story like this would stick in the memories of the dorks running this site...

  49. Hmm ... by LizardKing · · Score: 1

    Alien bacteria in India? Maybe that's why I get the chronic shits everytime I go there.

  50. Wrong link by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    The journal goes by its acronym; it's right here.