Slashdot Mirror


Not Your Daddy's IT Force Anymore

Quill345 writes "The days of high-paying technology-based jobs right out of highschool are over. As writers for ACM report, the skill-sets required for jobs have grown over time. Academia has responded to the evolution with novel programs recruiting women and integrating IT into MBA programs. And as technology finds its way into every aspect of business life, the NSF is creating a grant program to fund service science, a blend of IT into other industries. Researchers at City University of NY are working on an NSF-funded project to infuse technology into Liberal Arts courses taken by students who are in primary tech-producer or tech-consumer majors. What are these crucial modern skills? Knowledge of laws like the DMCA? Interpersonal and group work skills? Experience with different technology platforms? The ability to discriminate between useful and useless information sources?"

34 of 342 comments (clear)

  1. I got a suggestion. by AltGrendel · · Score: 5, Insightful
    How about "Listening to the Engineers, they may actually know what they're talking about."

    That would be a great course to offer "potental" managers.

    --
    The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

    - Douglas Adams

    1. Re:I got a suggestion. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Amen! (And I'm not an engineer.)

      It's easy to see how the U.S. is beginning to decline as a world power, if we see teaching about how to obey laws that bind our hands to be a good thing!

      Some basic knowledge of the laws hobbling the use and development of technology is probably appropirate, as it'd be good for the general public to learn these need to be tossed.

      Think the DMCA does ANYTHING good for the average individual? (As opposed to efforts towards advancing the state of the art.) DMCA may help some big organizations get more money over the short term, but it's short sighted. When people develop new ideas and products in other countries, those countries will overtake countries who simply rely on teaching about legal rstrictions. Who will be more productive? A country that teaches about ideas, or a country that teaches about how to follow corporate sponsored laws?

    2. Re:I got a suggestion. by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unfortunately, as soon as an engineer (and I am one) says something in an email/public forum where they can't get basic subject/verb agreement down, you kinda lose all credibility with "management types". You can get pissed off about it, say it doesn't really matter re: the CONTENT of your message, but it is true.

    3. Re:I got a suggestion. by dugjohnson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Only by listening to the engineers can management know what they are lying about and to learn the actual base factor of cost and time that needs to be discounted. Without using engineering's numbers there is nothing to put on the PowerPoint presentation to back up the wildly insane management projections. No numbers, no graphs.

      --
      My brain is overly lubricated
    4. Re:I got a suggestion. by Retric · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Engineers and techs are hired to perform some technology-related task. They are responsible to complete these tasks."

      False.

      Projects could work this way if they started with extremely clear goals but most Managers are unable to provide sufficient detail. In the real world Engineers are often asked to provide the idea's, estimated completion time, wait for Management to decide what to do and how many resources they have to work with, and then Engineers to start creating a product. However, the goal keeps changing as new ideas show up so Engineers are often asked to adapt something designed to do X and get it to do Y and Z using old time tables created around different projects.

      Most Engineers understand you need to have marketing sell products and it's a good idea to have the public input on what are important features but filtering public desires though a marketing department decreases the accuracy of such requests. AKA instead of we will only buy it if A..N and we want M..Z marketing says they need A..Z.

      IMO. The most efficient method of managing teck projects is to have teck people, working all other departments involved in the project, create a detailed plain of action which is then vetted though upper management to align it with overall strategic planning. Management then oversees this project to keep things going and keep Engineers focused on creating adequate if not perfect solutions to the problems at hand.

      PS: This is not to say need the same Engineers working at each of the projects stages. The problem is management is unable to determine how complex changing "small details" is so they need to be given the choice between different plains of action instead attempting to micro manage said projects.

    5. Re:I got a suggestion. by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Thanks for that objective evaluation. I agree that a skill that an engineer or tech employee should have is project management. However, they are being hired for a tech skill, if the company wants a project manager, they will hire a project manager.

      The hard separation of Project Managment from technical function is often not a very good idea, since a thorough understanding of the technical environment and its impact on the project is often critical to being able to bring most projects to a successful conclusion (especially if schedules are tight).

      At most of the places I've worked, the role of "Project Manager" was played by a senior member of the development staff on most projects -- a dedicated Project Manager was only brought in when complex multi-platform or multi-team coordination was required. That approach seemed to work very well.

      At places I've worked where a decidated Project Manager was used, the misunderstandings/miscommunications with that person often outweighed the benefits his position could have otherwise brought to the project.

      --
      Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
      The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
    6. Re:I got a suggestion. by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Managers are not always good at communicating what this strategy is to their engineers ... please forgive management for not including you in their long term strategic planning and goal setting discussions.

      And here in lies part of the problem with current employee/management relationships, in tech areas. Generally speaking, in order for the tech people to make a system plan, they need to know where the business wants them to go. For example, if the business is expecting to start a business portal, the system plan will probably need to include a large webserver/webfarm with a good database backend, depending on expected traffic. If all the business is intending for a web presence is an advertsing web site, with some basic promotional information/contests, the traffic may not be as much and the webserver could be pared down, and the DB server/farm not quite the monster it would be for a large business portal.
      Communication with all parts of the business are needed. Yes, you probably don't need your tech staff sitting in on planning meetings, but having someone who is familiar with technology, and your current system, in on planning meetings would be a good idea. If nothing else, they can provide a reality check to some of the near and mid term goals, and provide some valuable input on long term goals.
      On the other side of the coin, computer people need to start learning a bit of the business side of things. It's great that you can configure a 1000 user LAN, on an OpenLDAP server, using Domino authenticating against the LDAP database for email and information mangement. But if, when a manager asks you about it, you can't put it in terms they will understand, you are not as useful as you think. That "business-speak" that is often bemoaned is simply a set of accepted terms that is understood by business people. In much the same way as programmers speak to each other in a specific set of terms, business people do the same. And, like the programming terms, it is not meant to obfuscate things, no matter how it sounds to an outsider, it is simply specific terms with defined meanings, which make communications eaiser between those who understand them.
      IT/engineering and management must work together to create a successful business. If the two sides are fighting each other, and are unable to communicate, the business is doomed. This has to come from both sides. Management needs to keep the tech people in the loop, or the tech people will often go the wrong direction. And the tech people need to learn to communicate thier ideas and problems to management in an effective way.

      --
      Necessity is the mother of invention.
      Laziness is the father.
    7. Re:I got a suggestion. by Funakoshi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The moderation of my original post and the moderation of the replies (not slamming the replies...well maybe Bastard's, but not the others) clearly indicate the mentality of the tech sector, which futhers my argument that there is an issue with how engineers view their role. This is a tech site, so I would certainly not expect most to view these things from a management point of view, but moderation on here continues to amaze me. Give me a 1 or a 2, fine I understand that I suppose, but flamebait? Because I choose to view it from a side other than the tech side? And some pathetic excuse of an insult involving a mathematical tool is modded higher? If it was funny that would be fine. If it was intelligent, that would also be fine. However, it was pathetic.

      Perhaps next time I'll try with a management slamming, anti-Microsoft/Google/major corporation rant of some form.

      The reason that there is a divide between managers and techies is because of this arrogance. The corporate strategy trumps your need to have a manager who nutures you at every turn. The fact that you code and create the product is irrelevant, they will find someone else to fill your chair if its deemed necessary.

      The one person who actually reads this post will undoubtedly say that people like me are the reason there is a problem in management. Let me explain this as clearly as possible: business is about money. It is not about making people feel good, making up for your lack of self esteem, or saving the fucking dolphins. If you have a job, do one of two things: 1) be thankful you have the job and work your ass off to get ahead, or 2) shut the hell up and get another job you like more.

      /rant

  2. Personel Skills by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While technical skills are important, the ability to work in groups, follow orders, and eventually lead groups are what will advance a career. Communications skills are a key component as well. Unless you want to stay a programmer / admin forever, and always be at risk for being replaced by a newer / cheaper model as your skills decay (or are perceived to no longer be up with the latest or simply too expensive); people skills are what will advance your career.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    1. Re:Personel Skills by jedidiah · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...so I can advance into middle management?

      No thanks. That way is even more precarious than being a technologist.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:Personel Skills by bladesjester · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The life is over developer-wise at 30 mentality makes no sense to me. It's about that time that you *really* start to actually know what you're doing and stop making so many stupid mistakes.

      I just don't understand why so many places want to start back at square one every 9 years (if that long) and make themselves completely out of people that are fairly new to the game and make the same mistakes as the people who came in before them when they were their age. There really should be a mix of older and younger people on the team if you have much of a choice because there's a heck of a lot to be said about experience (and I don't just mean experience in a language, but rather in the industry as a whole - knowing what works, what doesn't, and how to get around it)

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
  3. Too mature of an indrustry. by jellomizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The days of any hack with computer skills are welcomed to Fortune 500 is long gone, or at best is going away quite quickly.

    Companies don't want people who can get the work done, they want people who can get the work done professionally. Well Documented designed to work with their buisness needs, not change their buisness requirements to fit the computer. There are a lot of Highly skilled and well trained college educated Technical Professionals out there. There is little reason to really hire an out of Highschool Techy guy just because he know how to program the buzz words.

    A college degree at the very least shows a minum level of self control and professionalism. At least the person got up most every day to go to class and pass the exams. Vs. Out of High School who just went to school because they were required by law to go. Or a College drop out who just couldn't fit into an environment. Getting a Degree shows the company you are more then just what you want to do.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Too mature of an indrustry. by Lumpy · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Companies don't want people who can get the work done, they want people who can get the work done professionally. Well Documented designed to work with their buisness needs, not change their buisness requirements to fit the computer.

      you obviousally do not work in a corperation IT/IS department.

      Rule #1 is do it in the right way is not an option. Writing a specification document will only get your ass in a grinder as the specifications will change randomly all the way up until deploy date. After the project is online and running in a beta state you will no longer be allowed to devote any time to it for documentation and the last 10% of clean up and making it work very well as you will be given another project that has starts the whole mess over again.

      Rule #2 is we moved your deadline, here is 5 more programmers that should make your project finished in 1/2 the time. Managers can not understand that more programmers does not equal faster work. Nor can they understand that adding a bunch of people more than 1/2 way through will only slow the project down further as you need to devote time getting them up to speed.

      Corperare projects = half ass it so it works and then start the next project. It has been this way forever and will never change.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Too mature of an indrustry. by cavtroop · · Score: 5, Insightful
      A college degree at the very least shows a minum level of self control and professionalism. At least the person got up most every day to go to class and pass the exams. Vs. Out of High School who just went to school because they were required by law to go. Or a College drop out who just couldn't fit into an environment. Getting a Degree shows the company you are more then just what you want to do.

      I'm in a different boat - I have twelve years of sysadmin/networking/security experience, but I can't get large companies to bite as I don't have a degree. What I DO have is 8 years of military experience out of high school. By your logic, that should count, but according to the larger companies, it doesn't.

      If the military doesn't show 'a minimum of self control and professionalism' and required me to 'get up most every day to go', I don't know what does. :)

    3. Re:Too mature of an indrustry. by radtea · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Companies don't want people who can get the work done, they want people who can get the work done professionally.

      No, they want people who can make managers feel good.

      Doing a good, professional job is well down the list of things that companies want. Far more important are things like: does not make their manager feel stupid, even when the manager makes stupid suggestions; does good work in such a way that their manager can take credit for it; does not point out stupid management decisions to management's face; does not point out how poor policy decisions have created a situation that is now being solved by implementing even worse policy decisions because they waste resources on short-term band-aid solutions rather than invest resources in longer-term corrective action; and so on.

      Young kids don't have the political savvy to realize this, and therefore are only hired in boom times. Besides, managing young kids doesn't give managers anything like the ego-boost that managers get out of older people. There's nothing a semi-competent MBA with adequacy issues loves more than managing people who are smarter, more technically capable and older than their manager.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    4. Re:Too mature of an indrustry. by cyriustek · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Speaking as one who waited until his thirties to actually finish a college degree, I can say that one can be proficient, and fit into a corporate environment if he is either college educated, or high-school educated, and has a mature attitude and work ethic. Having said this, if one has a college degree, and attended business type classes in addition to the technical classes, he has an opportunity to develop better communication skills in the work place. For example, I recall an employee that I had who would merely blast off an e-mail saying, "Request Denied" when he thought it was improper to open a port on a firewall for a new application. If he was educated in comunication skills, he would have known to 1) Thank the person for the request, 2) explain the risk, 3) offer alternatives that provide an improved level of security while allowing the company to move forward with business.

      Having said this, most of the value of my education was in the business area. After twenty years in the IT industry there was little the school could teach me in the technical areas. As such, once I completed the BS degree, I moved on to an MBA. Remember you are working for the business for the sake of improving shareholder wealth. (Ethically of course) Without working towards this goal, you will marginalize yourself in the long run.

  4. Re:Cheaper jobs? by tddoog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My dad makes good money as a plumber and there are plenty who make a lot more than him.

  5. Maybe it's just me being overly critical... by Alicat1194 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    But isn't changing a program to make it 'prettier' and (supposedly) more attractive to girls just giving them the 'dumbed down' version of things?

    Surely it would be better to concentrate more on those students who are genuinely interested in ('boring',normal) IT, whatever their gender?

    --
    You can learn a lot about a person if you just take the time to inject them with sodium pentathol
    1. Re:Maybe it's just me being overly critical... by PrescriptionWarning · · Score: 2, Insightful

      a program being aesthetically pleasing doesn't mean its being tailored for women or being dumbed down. I for one (as a member of the male species who doesn't prefer to wear much besides T-shirts and jeans) really dig applications which can both offer as much power as possible to the user and at the same time not cause them to want to vomit in their mouth a little. Functionality and style can co-exist and are both equally important.

    2. Re:Maybe it's just me being overly critical... by bbernard · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "But isn't changing a program to make it 'prettier' and (supposedly) more attractive to girls just giving them the 'dumbed down' version of things?"

      Is this the result of ages of sexist thinking when it comes to technology, or just a lack of understanding economics?

      If you want more people to buy your cars, you make sure they're interested in buying them. You want more people to come to your class, you make it more interesting for them. You want to rope more students into paying $25,000 or more per year at your university, you have to find a way to lure them in. Who do you target? The largest group of people that you can "easily" modify your product for. In this case, hands down, it's women. Face it guys: they make up nearly half the population, and if they're not interested in IT and other computer related technology that's our loss.

      You don't have to "dumb down" a class to make it more appealing to others. You just have to think about how you present the concepts, work, and training. Why assume that teaching IT has to be "boring?"

      --
      ----- Connection reset by beer
    3. Re:Maybe it's just me being overly critical... by GnomeChompsky · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe I'm not a representative sample of your general chick. But growing up (ie, from the age of 7 onwards) I thought programming was the coolest shit ever. I was that kid who would write never-ending batch files and add them into the autoexec.bat file of the class computer; who would unpassword protect program groups in win3.1. I went to computer camp.

      What was the difference? I guess maybe that I was in a class filled with devious "gifted" kids. We were a sneaky, spiteful lot. Anything that we could "cleverly" ruin, we'd get kudos for from peers. We'd get in trouble, of course -- but it was social capital to have the reputation for being able to do things.

      I think that a lot of the problem is not that computer programming isn't pretty. It's that it's stigmatized as nerdy; and girls internalize that they don't want to be nerdy. They need the opportunity to see what kind of stuff you can do with computers (ie, almost anything you want). They need to realize that it's a viable way to express yourself, and that it is a supremely useful tool.

      Even if they don't go into computing, generalized programming skills are incredibly useful. I myself didn't (I had the choice between electrical engineering and linguistics; I chose the latter) but knowing how to design simple algorithms has helped me automate stupid repetitive tasks that my roommate does by hand. Having a basic understanding of java, perl, lisp etc. so far hasn't gotten me any jobs, but I'm happy to have it. Girls don't generally get interested in computers because there's nothing they get out of it socially (even guys, to a point, have some sort of machismo hacker culture to rely on, which I guess I tapped into at the age of 11.) Figure out how to develop that, and you'll see rates of female enrollment skyrocket.

  6. Barrier to entry by texaport · · Score: 4, Insightful
    What are these crucial modern skills?

    Uhhm, aptitude tests in the first place? You want someone with 20 hours a week experience for three or four years while in high school.

    What you don't want is someone who reads a 1" column in Money Magazine of the top growth fields by 2011 and just throws a dart.

    I've seen where nearly 40% of the incompetent tech staff that I worked around in 2001 jumped right into the field of health sciences.

    They shouldn't have been in IT, and the nursing profession (and patients) deserves better -- these folks never "heard their calling."

  7. Re:Things haven't really changed where it counts by MrSquirrel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm glad that women aren't denied jobs because of their gender, but I don't see why people are trying to force women into IT roles -- women can do what they want and it seems to be there's general disinterest on there part. If people want to change that, the best place isn't here in the work world, it's during the whole experience known as life -- especially childhood. Want women to be more IT savvy??? How about some more non-gendered video games (what girl wants to play "I'm a big strong man with a gun, oh look at me I saved the world"). Let's give Barbie a BlackBerry and a desktop running Linux? If you want to get people to be interested in something, hook 'em while they're young! I wish there were more girls interested in IT -- I can't tell you how many times I've wanted to cuddle after a nice LAN (especially if I've been pwn3d). I believe there are less than 10 female OMIS (operations management and information systems) majors in my class. Lame!

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.
  8. Re:Cheaper jobs? by BlackHawk · · Score: 2, Insightful
    • We've seen that tech is being more and more commoditized. Pretty soon, tech jobs will be no more than plugging in parts. We will become plumbers.

    Some of us, yes. But some of us will be designing the parts, testing the parts, refining the parts. Making the next generation of parts. And supporting people who have to install, service and use the parts.

    And some of us will give up IT altogether, and go raise goats. Or something.

    --

    Believe nothing, not even if I say it, if it violates your sense of reason -- Buddha

  9. Does it follow? by Distinguished+Hero · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As writers for ACM report, the skill-sets required for jobs have grown over time. Academia has responded to the evolution with novel programs recruiting women and integrating IT into MBA programs.
    Is it just me, or is this quite the nonsequitur? I can see integrating IT into MBA programs as a potential solution, but how does recruiting women into IT adress the problem? Clicking on the "recruiting women" link leads to an article titled "CMU uses game maker's characters to interest girls in computer programming" which is one of the most condescending ideas I have ever come across.

    --
    Uttering logically derived and empirically supported truths to the disciples of the orthodox establishment.
  10. Re:This is a positive thing by GoatMonkey2112 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Of course the high school kids have failed way more than they have succeeded. The only reason they were ever hired was that there weren't any more good, well educated techies left during the .com boom.

    Now companies have decided to go overseas instead of high school to get their cheap green techies. And again some of them will succeed and grow and some will fail miserably.

    In the end you will still have your core of educated geeks that go on.

  11. Experience trumps everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    10+ years experience trumps every degree and cert that I have seen, unless the company has some made up rule about degrees and salary. There are just so many things that you can't learn in college and with a cert.

    I've always heard that 80% of why you have and keep your job is people skills. I think that number is close to being true.

    Also, somebody mentioned the people going into nursing and the medical field because US News and World Reports put it as a lucrative field. I think you need to have a passion for that field to really want to help others. I can't imagine a good healthcare provider who's in it just for the money.

  12. Interpersonal and group work skills? by TobascoKid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If "Interpersonal and group work skills" are so important, why aren't they taught? They are not really taught at school - the sports field is not the office environment (sports metaphors not withstanding) and where the environment is closest to the office (ie, classwork) working together can bring allegations of plagarism and cheating. They're not a part of any university classes I've seen either.

    I think IT workers get unfairly lumped as people with "poor interpersonal and group work skills", simply because people with a more introverted dispostion are attracted to it than to other professions. A lot people assume that just because you're quiet, you lack interpersonal skills, completely ignoreing the fact that a lot of extroverts aren't actually that good when it comes to interpersonal skills - all that talking is assumed to be an example of "good interpersonal skills" when it's actually a lot of BS and politics (with a good amount of backstabbing). Most introverts where I know work really well with other people, while a lot of I know extroverts (and especially the ones I know at work) are great at blowing hot air but don't work at all well with other people.

    --
    At some point, somewhere, the entire internet will be found to be illegal.
  13. Re:Things haven't really changed where it counts by ElleyKitten · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I totally agree that girls need to learn technology when they're young if they're ever going to get insto it. A person pushed into IT in their high school or college years can learn the basics, but she's never going to have the passion for it that will really make her successful and happy in that career. I got my first computer when I was 6 years old, and I love technology. Most girls aren't exposed to technology that young (or worse, their brothers are and they aren't - grrr) but it would get a lot more of them into IT later on if they were.

    --
    "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
  14. Re:It really isn't just Tech... by gad_zuki! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Graduate high school, get a couple certs "

    That's pretty lousy advice. Considering you're basing this on your gf's story, maybe the lesson is don't specialize in something you think you don't want to do. Quitting your career because of uninsured people is a silly reason to piss away your experience and education. Who's going to hire someone who willy-nilly has random ethical problems? She comes off like someone who refuses to be part of the environment she chose to work in. What employer wants a flakey person like that? Here's some real advice:

    1. Finish school.
    2. Don't be a martyr.
    3. Become flexible to adapt to different environments.
    4. Have fun and make connections.
    5. Remember a job is a means to an end not an end in itself.

    Also, I disagree that the market is flooded with useless degrees and certifications. Its flooded with people competing with her for that payroll job. The person with payroll experience will win. This is nothing new. Whether or not they have degrees or certs is merely incidental. The entitlement attitude you and your gf have because you just have some degree isn't going to fly. Advising people to stop going to college because of your bad attitude is pretty ignorant and petty.

  15. Re:Things haven't really changed where it counts by EraserMouseMan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yet somehow this difference does not extend to the workplace

    Women are better at school than men are. The problem is that school doesn't work like the corporate world does. People who succeed in running a business learn that mistakes are wonderful learning opportunities. School teaches that mistakes are bad and you are punished for making them. People who are good at business are rewarded for creative thinking. People who are good in school are punished for not doing it the way the teacher said to even if the result is technically correct.

    By-and-large, women are good at details and strictly following step by step instructions. There is no step-by-step instruction book for building a successful business. Schools are run mostly by women. No wonder women do better in school. School is geared for the female brain.

    Guys don't like school because they aren't good at it and generally are wondering to themselves, "why do I need to learn poetry to build a good business." Many guys aren't going to buy some petite school-teacher's argument about why poetry can help them. They're gonna skip college or leave college after the first year and get on whith their own business. Many people of this mentality succeed. The step-by-step people get hired to work for high-school grad business owners.

    People seem to forget that running a business is something you have to create for yourself. Nobody hands you an instant CEO scholarship because you got a 4.0 gpa.

  16. Re:Physics for Poets by cmat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This I have to totally disagree with. While I would never expect anyone to be an expert in even more then a couple of areas, the point of general education is to "round-out" everybody's understanding of the world they live in. Things like geography, math, chemistry, literature, language, history, socialology; these aren't just poopoo topics. These are things that MAY be exciting to someone, and denying the opportunity for someone to discover their love of a field is saddening. In a world where education is moving more towards specialization sooner, I think we really are missing a large chunk of who we are as people by not teaching the "soft" subjects to the technical, and the "hard" subjects to the technically-disinterested.

    As a software developer, I have to say that I also love history. I might never have discovered this had it not been for Mr. Riley. To you sir, I thank you for opening a world I would never have normally been interested in discovering.

    --
    -- Humans, because the hardware IS the software.
  17. Unreasonable expectations. by B5_geek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Things will only get worse for compaines untill they realize that they can't get something for nothing.

    I have been out of work for 6 months, this is an example "Help Wanted" that I recently read:

    Minimum MUST HAVE requirements:
    5 Years Oracle
    5+ Years Windows System Admin
    5 years Help Desk
    5 years Citrix
    7 Years C++, VB, (and a few others)

    Salary Range: $20,000 - $25,000/year (Canadian)

    They are trying to fill 4 jobs with 1 person who would work for $10/hour!

    Computers are my passion, but with many places pulling shit like this I think I'll keep it as my hobby and go look for another career.

    --
    "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." ~Plato (427-347 BC)
  18. Missing the point by MountainLogic · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The real change in the IT profession is that it will go away. In the early days of electrification, if your company used electricity you would have an electrical engineer on staff to design the system, update it and keep it working. Today unless you have a very unusual need, such as an aluminum plant you have no need for an EE on staff. Same for the early days of the phone system. IT as an internal service must mature to that point. In the mainframe days a whole army of systems analysts were kept busy converting paper spreadsheets into one-off programs. Modern spreadsheet programs have killed that need. Not every company needs a custom accounting program. Sure, if you have a very unusual need there would be no market for someone to write it as a commercial product, but is your company really that much different that you have to write a custom spreadsheet program? So why do you need a custom accounting or MRP program? The business world needs canned programs that the MBAs or logistics folks can use just as well as MBAs now drive spreadsheets. What does IT bring to the table other than overhead? What domain expertise do they bring? The most competitive companies will spend the least on IT.

    The whole wave of off-shoring shows the first phase of this maturation process. If you can spec it you can out source it. If you can our source it then someone can generalize it. Once it is generalized then IT as an internal service goes away. In the not so distant future, IT functions will be turned over to the facilities department and the maintenance folks - same as heat, water, electricity, phones, etc.