Slashdot Mirror


Build Your Own Band-aid Fuel Cell

ptorrone writes "Here's how to make a fuel cell from a band-aid...This has got to be the simplest way to build a fuel cell from scratch. The design is ridiculously simple, whilst being effective - it will allow you to explore the concepts of fuel cells in a ludicrously simple way."

60 of 84 comments (clear)

  1. Simple by Sentri · · Score: 1

    Sounds... Simple

    --
    Can't we all just get along
    1. Re:Simple by matthew.paulsen · · Score: 1

      got methanol?

    2. Re:Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      First get a band-aid. Make sure it has a large sterile pad area.

      Remove the backing from the adhesive and set it aside. Next, buy a fuel cell from the online fuel cell store. Then, carefully attach the fuel cell to the adhesive part of the band-aid.

      Finally, wave your wand while saying "A-la peanut butter sandwiches", and hey presto! it is done!

    3. Re:Simple by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hah! That's what I was thinking when I read that. Build your own nuclear reactor using a band-aid. Strap band-aid to functioning nuclear reactor procured from post-Cold War Russia. Voila, Band-Aid Nuclear Fission Reaction System.

    4. Re:Simple by kalirion · · Score: 1

      Pffft. McGuyver could do it with just the bandaid and a couple toe-nail clippings.

  2. meh by darkrowan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Still requires you to buy specialty parts to complete. Sure, its a nifty idea. But so is trying to make a V8 engine out of soda cans. You'd still have to buy some parts to make it work right. Let me know when you can do it from just the store bought items.

    --
    AccountKiller
    1. Re:meh by MrFlannel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh, Oh!
      I've got one. Take a lemon, a piece of zinc, and a piece of copper...
      well, you know the rest.

      I know, it's not much. But it's hundreds of times more interesting than this article.

      It's like saying "We've used a band aid to hold together this light bulb, battery, and piece of wire. look! we can show you how to make a flashlight out of a band aid!" Quite deceptive indeed.

      --
      Clones are people two.
    2. Re:meh by Davus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      MEA stands for "Membrane Electrode Assembly", this is the bit that "does the works". You can make your own, they are rather difficult to assemble, much simpler is to buy one that is already made from www.fuelcellstore.com
      So basically this article just tells you how to hold the main piece into something (bandaid) that makes it look simple...

      --
      The above is most likely humour. Slashdot foot icon goes here.
    3. Re:meh by Nazo-San · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So basically this article just tells you how to hold the main piece into something (bandaid) that makes it look simple...

      Read my website to find out how to do it using some scotch tape instead! (This was just a joke, I have no such site.)

      Seriously though. There must be something I'm missing here, right? I mean, is there supposed to maybe be some kind of interaction between the methanol and the antibacterials placed on some band-aids or something? Surely no one is dumb enough that they'd come up with this whole article touting the use of a bandaid as being somehow simpler than anything else that holds it all together?

    4. Re:meh by beheaderaswp · · Score: 2, Funny

      They already did this... it was called the Chevy Vega.

      --
      Another consultant who stuck it out.

      "We are the Priests, of the Temples of Syrinx..."
    5. Re:meh by Davus · · Score: 1

      Right on, that's what I'm saying. It's like saying you make your own adhesive, and the key ingredient is pre-bought glue.

      --
      The above is most likely humour. Slashdot foot icon goes here.
    6. Re:meh by Threni · · Score: 1

      > Still requires you to buy specialty parts to complete

      Yep! From the artice:

      ===

      MEA stands for "Membrane Electrode Assembly", this is the bit that "does the works". You can make your own, they are rather difficult to assemble, much simpler is to buy one that is already made from www.fuelcellstore.com

      ===

      Tomorrow - how to make your own car using only a can of paint...and a car.

    7. Re:meh by njh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What disturbs me is that pressing on the cell apparently doubled the voltage. TFA claims that this is due to the electrode making a better contact. But they are measuring the voltage with a digital multimeter, with an input impediance of at least 10M. This means that the fuel cell has an output impedance of the order of 10M too - you'd probably get more power out of a calculator solar panel on a stary night!

      (alternatively, the finger is warming it up or something)

    8. Re:meh by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      You mean www.fuelcellstore.com... Oh Crap I mentioned it. Sorry.
      They probably paid the guy to write an article about interesting hobby fuel cell making, that uses some of their parts. So he figured the most novel idea was to put it on a bandage.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    9. Re:meh by GospelHead821 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The sticking plaster does perform a couple of important roles in this design. It is "breathable," so it lets oxygen in so that it can react with the methanol. The gauze pad is absorbant and will hold a few drops of methanol solution, so you don't need a continuous feed of methanol to the anode.

      Plus, holding together the other componoents is not exactly unimportant! For the cost of obtaining them, sticking plasters are tough and their adhesive is durable.

      --
      Virtue finds and chooses the mean.
      Aristotle, Ethica Nichomachea
    10. Re:meh by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      You mean the "totally fabby" store? The guy lost all credibility when he said that. Then he insisted on calling the metal screen "posh." Twice.

    11. Re:meh by njh · · Score: 1

      The original maker should some experiments!

  3. ...just a bandaid? by Toba82 · · Score: 1

    I see a bit more than a bandaid in the directions.

    --
    I pretend to know more than I really do by mooching off google and wikipedia.
  4. Fly Screen by jpardey · · Score: 1

    High quality indeed... maybe that stuff would keep the mosquitoes out. And the airborn bacterium. So basically, build a fuel cell, and use one part known by laymen? Impressive. Why don't they just put the bandage on the outside of a ballard fuel cell bus?

    --
    I have freaks! I did something right...
  5. well, how long does it last? by the_REAL_sam · · Score: 3, Insightful

    how many watt-hours, at how many volts? and, just as important, is it rechargable?

    anyhow, the bandaids were incidental. the "mea" part was $47.50. it's a heck of an expensive battery, even if IS a WONDER battery.

    --
    "Forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us." -Jesus Christ The Lord's Prayer
    1. Re:well, how long does it last? by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      It's a fuel cell, so theoretically it has infinite Watt-hours aslong as you keep replenishing the methanol.
      Of course, it depends on how fast the materials deteriorate aswell.
      Judging by his pics, he's getting 0.26 Volts, but it depends on different factors such as moisture.

      As for rechargability, it's a fuel cell. All you need to do is add more methanol.

      But the Mea is something you can't really get past. Platinum's expensive stuff, and you won't want to be experimenting around too much with that to coat some electrodes.

    2. Re:well, how long does it last? by julesh · · Score: 1

      Where'd you get $47.50? Looking at the site recommended in TFA, the part (here) costs $69.50.

    3. Re:well, how long does it last? by the_REAL_sam · · Score: 1
      --
      "Forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us." -Jesus Christ The Lord's Prayer
    4. Re:well, how long does it last? by julesh · · Score: 1

      The article suggests you want the DMFC variety. I guess the "Standard" MEA you've linked here would need gaseous hydrogen/oxygen mix to function?

    5. Re:well, how long does it last? by the_REAL_sam · · Score: 1


      Yea, all I searched for was "mea", but not "dmfc." The least expensive dmfc is indeed $69.50.

      http://www.fuelcellstore.com/cgi-bin/fuelweb/view= SearchResults/command=LogSearch?searchfor=dmfc

      --
      "Forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us." -Jesus Christ The Lord's Prayer
  6. In my grandmother times... by Vo0k · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Gypsies used a similar trick to get free lunch, they called it "nail soup". Tell the host that you can cook a "nail soup", a soup based on a nail.
    Ingredients:
    - One big nail
    - Water
    - Groats
    - Bacon
    - Salt, Spices, Herbs
    - (...some more foodstuffs, I don't remember).

    The idea was to cook a basic groats-based soup with nail in it. The nail didn't provide anything to the soup except of curiosity factor that made the host to provide the rest of the ingredients. The gypsy would eat one bowl, the host another, the nail would be saved for another cooking of the soup...

    Here they use band-aid instead of the nail.

    --
    Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    1. Re:In my grandmother times... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Gypsies used a similar trick to get free lunch, they called it "nail soup".

      This story "Nail Broth" was on a Danny Kaye album called "Danny Kaye Tells 6 Stories From Faraway Places" (1960). I listened to it as a kid, but haven't heard it in years.

      And yeah, having read the article, it's kinda like the band aid part is the least important...

  7. SUMMARY: "ludicrously simple potato battery." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    [Article summary:]
                    Incredibly Easy Way to Build A Ludicrously Simple Potato Battery.

    Materials list:
    1. 2 nice big potatoes.
      Any ones will do. Make sure you don't get a sweet potato.
    2. Stainless Steel Fly Screen.
      If you want to get really techie and heavy about stainless steel fly screen, the material that I used was top-notch stuff! The stainless steel was 318 grade - very high quality!! The screen was 72 wires per inch in both directions, with each wire being 0.0037". This wire is available from the folks at the totally fabby www.potatobattery.com
    3. MEA - The Membrane Electrode Assembly
      Rather difficult to assemble yourself. Much simpler is to buy one that is already made from www.potatobattery.com .
    4. Cotton Gloves
      At all times when working with the MEA, you will need to wear cotton gloves. This is because the muck on your hands will greatly inhibit the function of the MEA. Cotton gloves are available in specialty stores, but I love my pair from www.potatobattery.com

                                  [...]
    [Image]
    The completed Band Aid Fuel Cell!

                  Testing the Band Aid Fuel Cell

    To test the fuel cell you will need some 3% Methanol solution. Again you can get this from the Potato Battery store ( www.potatobattery.com ), unless you know a bit about chemistry or are friendly with a college lab technician.

    [...]
    Have fun, and be sure to tell all your friends!!!
  8. What about raves? by n3tcat · · Score: 2, Funny

    I suppose it makes no difference what brand you use, but the marketing implications of this are phenomenal. Imagine having bandaids that don't glow but actually light themselves!

    Add a nifty strobe effect and you'll have the perfect rave accessories anytime you fall off your bike!

  9. Re:Simple technology by beezly · · Score: 1
    This is what the world really needs now.

    You're mistaken...

    What the world needs now is love, sweet love
    It's the only thing that there's just too little of
    What the world needs now is love, sweet love,
    No not just for some but for everyone.
  10. Re:Simple technology by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    can't get much simpler than burning wood...

    of course there is that double environmental issue caused by doing so.

    Look, we have our current situation of burning fossil fuels and such because it is the simple solution. While the idea of wind power and solar power may appear simple the technology to make them viable solutions is anything but. Hell if it were simple we would have had someone marketing it to us day and night.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  11. The simplest way by Silver+Sloth · · Score: 1

    It seemed an awful lot of fuss to me, what's wrong with copper wire, steel wire, and a lemon? Now that's simple.

    --
    init 11 - for when you need that edge.
    1. Re:The simplest way by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      Tell me where you get your copper from that it's cheaper than methanol.

    2. Re:The simplest way by Silver+Sloth · · Score: 1

      out of the waste bin in my workroom

      --
      init 11 - for when you need that edge.
    3. Re:The simplest way by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      It's been a while since I had chemistry, but my idea was that there's a redox reaction between the Zinc and the acid, so you use up your Zinc and end up Zinc-oxide (I was mistaken about the copper). The Lemon is only the electrolyte.

  12. Re:Simple technology by ajs318 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wood isn't a fossil fuel. It's entirely renewable. Growing trees abstract CO2 from the atmosphere and release oxygen ..... spookily enough, exactly the same amounts of CO2 as you're going to produce and O2 as you're going to consume when you burn that wood. You were taught why in your third year chemistry classes. All the energy stored in the chemical bonds in plant matter originally came from the sun. As long as you plant enough trees, accounting for infant mortality, to replace the ones you are using up {which is not rocket science, just simple forestry management}, then you have a closed cycle. {Note that maintenance and harvesting require energy which is not released in burning, but there's no reason for this energy not to be sourced from renewables}. A tree being grown for energy should be harvested as soon as possible after its growth slows down, since beyond this point you are adding fewer kg. of wood, and hence MWh of energy, per day that passes. This is no different to killing a chicken for meat when its egg production slows down. Both come under the general heading of husbandry.

    Where there is private ownership of land coupled with a high population density, there is an automatic incentive to make every square metre of land work for its keep. Poor forestry managers don't last long in that sort of climate; they invariably run out of money and get their business taken over by someone who can do the job properly. Basically what is happening is that the monetary value of the product is closely tracking the non-monetary value. The main failing of Capitalism as it is practised today is that it only takes notice of the monetary value of goods; but when non-monetary value is directly related to monetary value, then capitalism works.

    Non-renewable energy appears cheap, because we're effectively stealing it from succeeding generations. The point will come eventually when it will cost more than renewable energy and that is when the world will have no option but to switch. The damage done by non-renewables is probably reversible, but that won't be anything like an instantaneous process.

    I sometimes wonder if the answer to half the world's problems would not be to peg the world's currencies against the megawatt-hour, rather than the value of someting capricious like silver or gold. The price of crude oil being tied to the US dollar doesn't count: that is just as capricious, and the USA has a nasty tendency to invade countries who mention pricing their oil by the Euro.

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  13. Outlaw this! by Opportunist · · Score: 1, Funny

    Let's see how long it takes 'til someone figures out to power the timer for some bomb with a similar design and we can't get band aids anymore.

    "Sorry bud, you're bleeding and we can't do anything to avoid infections. But doesn't it give you a fuzzy warm feeling that it's all done for national security?"

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  14. Or maybe do it properly by vandan · · Score: 1

    People wanting to look at this seriously should buy the PDF instruction book available from http://www.goodideacreative.com/fuel_cell.html. I got one, and it's good :) Damned good. I'm thinking about getting some other ones ( eg the solar one looks interesting too ).

  15. Re:Okay, it might be neat... by ajs318 · · Score: 1

    5. There are power points on the walls with electricity coming out of them which costs about 7p a kWh in the daytime, or 3p in the dead of night.

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  16. Environmental economy by camperdave · · Score: 1

    The current economic system (especially in North America) is so out of whack with reality it's not even funny. We pay actors and atheletes millions of dollars, and they produce nothing. Yet we pay farmers, who produce every scrap of food on our plate, to whom we owe our very survival, next to nothing. In many cases, not even enough to maintain their own farms. Sometimes I think we need some sort of catastrophe, like running out of oil, to snap us out of our fantasy world and back to reality.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re:Environmental economy by Twixter · · Score: 1
      To make a note on the forestry idea..... to produce the amount of fuel needed to run the entire country you're talking about a logging and burning project that would place carbon into the air and remove from the forest billions of tons of decaying wood which is a vital piece of the forest ecology. Neither of which is really a viable option.

      As far as the economy and why we pay athletes millions of dollars and farms nothing it's because our system works on the premise of scarcity and capital. Those with scarce resources that are desired by many, such as the ability to dunk the basketball from the free-throw line are going to make more than the folks who can drive a tractor. No natural disaster would change that.

      What you're really talking about though is a shift away from a system where the people with capital maintain the privilege. We need scientists and researches to maintain ownership of their ideas, but not exclusivity of their use. (Let their value be negotiated on an open market.) The Open Source Movement is the first real viable example of how much we would benefit economically from this model. Look at the billions in opportunity cost we have saved because of the cooperation on the Apache project. Ask Oracle where they would be without it.

      I've often thought about letting patient futures be a tradable commodity. i.e. "Oh, that's a great idea that guy or company came out with. I'm going to put $200 bucks and buy a share of that idea."

      The value of the shares is the use price someone pays to use the idea, which the scientist receives for payment. It would make markets and manufacturing perfectly competitive, and split out the R&D departments to separate businesses that sell 'ideas.' I think this would work particularly well with the pharmaceutical industry, as the drugs that would help our society the most would have the most fiscal backing, instead of the ones that will have the highest profit margin. Then the drug companies could stop complaining that it is SO expensive to research new drugs while spending more on advertising than on R&D.

      --

      -Todd

      Put down the sig, and step away from the computer.

  17. DIY by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

    This is remarkably like an article I once wrote about how to make a fission generator with stuff lying around the house. It turns out not everyone else has the same stuff lying around the house as me.

  18. Fuel cell by camperdave · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, that may be simple, but it is hardly a fuel cell.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  19. Re:Simple technology by mooingyak · · Score: 1

    ...and blowjobs. Lot's of 'em.

    --
    William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
  20. Ludicrous by WED+Fan · · Score: 1

    Ludicrous, simply ludicrous. Got to love that word, "ludicrous". Everyone, find a situation and use it in your conversation today and report back. Extra points if you used WHILST talking with your employer. Ludicrously yours, Me

    --
    Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong fix.
  21. Re:Band-aids are for wusses by nasch · · Score: 1

    A) Reference?
    B) How come my ducts are sealed with it?

  22. From the Editor? by derubergeek · · Score: 3, Funny

    It would appear that the submitter of the story is Phillip Torrone, the host of the MAKE blog (and apparently a Senior Editor?). I'd like to think that's not really the case: MAKE is really cool and this fuel cell is really lame. The worst part is that now I have that stupid "I am stuck on Band-Aid brand, 'cause Band-Aid's stuck on me" jingle running through my head.

    --
    Trust me. This is an inactive account. Regardless of what the /. bean counters might report.
  23. Re:Band-aids are for wusses by julesh · · Score: 1

    Wikipedia cites the OED, unfortunately you have to pay to see it online.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_tape

  24. Re:Simple technology by rk · · Score: 1

    "I sometimes wonder if the answer to half the world's problems would not be to peg the world's currencies against the megawatt-hour, rather than the value of someting capricious like silver or gold."

    Either way, it would likely be better than pegging the world's currencies to exactly nothing, which is the current system. It's certainly an interesting idea... the problem is savings. How do you store a megawatt-hour? I've read that at night the wholesale price of electricity can drop to zero because there's more being produced than consumed, because it's just too expensive to shut down a generator that's going to be urgently needed in just a few short hours. The retail price of a megawatt hour where I live probably about $100. I can store $100 in about 8 ounces of silver, or a few grams of gold. If you can make a battery that can store a megawatt-hour per pound (and hold its charge!) you'd be really onto something (apart from having laptops that could run for weeks on a single charge).

  25. This MAKE article is really disappointing... by cr0sh · · Score: 1
    I was expecting to see something really cool. I guess I shouldn't have gotten my hopes up - it is MAKE magazine, after all, the wonderful magazine that seems to do anything BUT show you how to make something. Rather, it seems like many articles are of the "first, buy something expensive, then tweak it" variety - which is anything but making something.


    What was I expecting from a "bandaid fuel cell" in an article from a magazine named MAKE?

    Well, perhaps something describing how to build a fuel cell that doesn't require an expensive (and sometimes difficult to obtain) membrane, or catalyst. I was saying to myself "Finally, someone has figured out how to use saranwrap (or something similar) as the membrane for a simple fuel cell".

    I suppose if it was that simple, the companies would already be doing it - or would they? How many other times in our recent history have companies passed on simple and effective technologies for a product simply because you couldn't patent the crap out of them? Could fuel cells be any different? I wonder the same thing about solar technology - is there a way to make a better (or at least cheaper to build) copper oxide solar cell, or an easier to build organic solar cell (you know the ones I am talking about, which use cranberry juice or whatnot). In the case of a fuel cell, the expensive and hard to obtain parts seem to be the catalyst material and membrane (in the case of the bandaid fuel cell, it seems that the membrane you buy is just a combination of both in a pre-made stack). In the case of a homemade solar cell, the difficult piece is the front transparent conductor: It is difficult to make transparent conductive glass (silvering is one method, but it require chemicals that are heavily regulated today thanks to things like the PATRIOT Act - no kidding! - plus the chemicals are difficult to handle and expensive to purchase) - so most homemade solar cells, especially the copper oxide ones, use saltwater as a transparent conductor. I have also given thought to "silkscreening" a very, very thin layer of Artic Silver paste compound onto glass to act as a conductor, but I am not sure that would work, either.

    At any rate, this article did nothing to cause me to get excited and MAKE something. For a toy experiment, it isn't worth it. I would have been much more impressed had they detailed building a solar powered stirling engine from empty cola cans and a fresnel magnifier...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    1. Re:This MAKE article is really disappointing... by adam.dorsey · · Score: 1

      Dunno if the Arctic Silver thing would work. I'm pretty sure that one of their big selling points is a lack of conductance, at least that's what http://www.arcticsilver.com/as5.htm says. Sweet idea though.

      --
      You are still innocent until proven guilty. What's changed is what they do to innocent people. - notnAP, #26891325
    2. Re:This MAKE article is really disappointing... by cr0sh · · Score: 1
      Hmm - you're right. Good thing I didn't go out and buy some of this stuff to try it! Thanks for heads up. What I am needing is some kind of "stuff" that will "stick" to glass, be mostly transparent (ie, 75% or greater), and electrically conductive. So far, the only two realistic options I have seen for this kind of thing is silvering glass, either chemically or via vapor deposition. Now, vapor deposition isn't difficult, but the tools to do it with aren't easily (or cheaply) available.

      Basically, you need one hell of a lab grade vaccuum pump, that can pump down to very, very low pressure levels. Even chained together refrigerator compressors won't get you low enough (I haven't found one method that would allow me to homebrew a vaccuum pump for such use). So, I am left with chemical silvering, and as I have explained, the chemicals are nearly impossible to get, and are expensive as well, difficult to store (before or after mixing - they come in dry form), are poisonous, etc.

      So, I am trying to look at some other method to build the front electrode - silkscreening with some electrically conductive adhesive seems like the best way, so far - I just have to find that adhesive (and hope it doesn't have too high of a resistance).

      My other idea is to reduce the cost for the copper oxide side of things - copper sheeting is pretty expensive, so I have also thought that maybe a high-copper bearing anti-fouling paint, applied to an alluminum base plate might work. Anti-fouling paint is used on boats and ships to prevent corrosion and barnacles from collecting - it tends to be fairly expensive (around $80.00 a gallon), but that gallon covers more area than $80.00 worth of copper sheeting, so if it worked it would be a great thing. My ultimate goal is to be able to homebrew a solar panel cheaper than a silicon based one (even if in area it has to be much bigger to supply the same amount of electricity). So far, based on everything I have seen, silicon is still cheaper. It would be cheaper still if it were easier to get seconds from manufacturers...

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    3. Re:This MAKE article is really disappointing... by adam.dorsey · · Score: 1

      I hit google with clear conducting as search terms and got something on clear conducting laminating films. Maybe that would elp, unless "conductive" in this sense doesn't mean electrically...

      --
      You are still innocent until proven guilty. What's changed is what they do to innocent people. - notnAP, #26891325
  26. Let Us Consider 'Step 2' by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    Lets see; bandaids, wire screen, scalpel, volt meter, sissors, cotton gloves, 3% solution of methonal. Got it. I can go to my local stores, and purchase the stuff, no problem.

    Ok, I'm looking at the "5 Layer DMFC MEA", not so simple, How can I do a "McGiever" on this?

    Now for a logistics question, "What would it take to apply this solution to an average home for One Year?" This would be VERY interesting.

  27. Re:Simple technology by ajs318 · · Score: 1

    One thing you can do is use electricity to pump water up from a reservoir at the bottom of a mountain to a reservoir at the top when demand is slack, and use that to spin a turbine when needed. There's a plant in Wales that does just that. You don't need to store the actual electricity that represents someone's savings in a battery, as long as you can prove that you have the capacity to produce it as fast as they can consume it. In fact, you are storing the energy in a way -- just in the form of gravitational potential energy in several megalitres of water, or chemical potential energy in unburned fuel. As for transporting the electricity to the people, I had this radical idea of running cables under the streets to each building, thereby maintaining a continuous supply with no breaks while swapping batteries. Of course, it might never catch on .....

    Also, instead of being like the traditional banks where you would go in with a banknote and exchange it for a certain amount of silver or gold, I can see people turning up at the local Sojiedade Munizipal de Illuminacion y Traccion with anything that burns, and exchanging it for banknotes!

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  28. Re:Simple technology by karnal · · Score: 1

    I had this in my head instead:

    Cause what the world needs now
    is a new Frank Sinatra
    so I can get you in bed.
    Cause what the world needs now
    is another folk singer
    like I need a hole in my head.

    --
    Karnal
  29. Not much of a solution. by Pejorian · · Score: 1

    This Band-Aid Battery strikes me as a really temporary, stop-gap solution.

    --
    - Murphy's Corollary: - It is impossible to make things foolproof because fools are so ingenious.
  30. Re:Band-aids are for wusses by BeaverCleaver · · Score: 1

    I used to work in the industrial heating industry and we used a buttload of duct tape to seal the heating ducts. Worked a treat. You mean the plastic-y tape, right? Because I thought the fabric-backed stuff was gaffer tape, so called because film crews use so much of the stuff. I know this is completely unrelated to a bandaid fuel cell, but the bandaid fuel cell was shit. I wonder if the guy's books are any better?

  31. Re:The simplicity of Joe Cell and Water Electrolys by Nazo-San · · Score: 1

    I know for a fact that there are over 26 elements preceding the alleged first element "Hydrogen"

    You know this do you? Might I ask how you know this? Hydrogen is the first element because it has one proton in it's nucleus (I say one proton, because that's the only thing for certain thanks to ions,) not because of some kind of political "we like hydrogen better than firstium" style of thing. The way the periodic table works is each element in the table has a certain number of protons in their nucleus and they are ordered by this. Therefore, to be less than hydrogen, you must have zero protons in the nucleus. Therefore, to be less than hydrogen, it must be just an electron or a neutron floating around somewhere, not an actual atom at all and therefore not an "element."

    I don't really understand why you even said this though. No one ever said anything about needing elements before hydrogen for it to work or something.

    Oh, and leave string theory out of this. It's clear you don't even know what it is. It's not a political movement or something, to put it really simply, it has to do with quantum particles and the theory that it may be possible for some to be essentially connected to each other so that one will respond to the other. No murders have occured over this theory and it's quite silly to even think it possible. There's nothing in it to murder for.

    I would suggest that everyone else take this person's statements with a grain of salt. It can't hurt to read up on the Joe Cell if you want, but, simply put, if it were so simple as that, don't you think people would be capitalizing on this? Even if you are scared of "the Illuminati" coming after you, the potential profits are enough to hire a host of bodyguards.